. • Develop and apply engineering solutions, while being cognizant of local geography, aspirations and cultures. • Create engineering solutions beyond current or dominant technologies; improve, innovate and invent (technologies) to achieve sustainability. • Actively engage communities and stakeholders in development of engineering solutions.Educational Approach The traditional and probably most common method of introducing aspects of greenengineering has been through a senior and graduate level elective course on environmentalengineering, with an emphasis on process treatment. Courses were developed that focus onmethods to minimize or prevent waste streams from existing chemical plants in the 1990’s. Theeducational
for Work Avoid in either comparison.It is interesting to observe significant decreases in Expectancy between both 2013 and 2016 andbetween 2014 and 2016, with a medium effect size for the decrease between 2014 and 2016.Student perceptions about their abilities to complete tasks in their engineering courses appear todecrease after their first year, possibly due to the challenges of upper level courses with whichthey are confronted.Table 2: Summary of mean (standard deviation) values for all factors for each year and thematched pairs t-test or Signed-Rank test results for comparisons, including the test statistic t(n-1)or S, respectively, the sample size n, the p-value, and the effect size d for significant results.Factor scores are on a scale
engineering studentparticipation but the association with success outcomes for non-Black student members is also afuture area of interest. Additional insights into quantitative relationships can be gained by graded categorizationof NSBE membership that accounts for factors such as number of years of involvement, whenthey first joined the organization (e.g. freshman vs later years), level of involvement, and otherstudent success outcomes (e.g. GPA). Exploring how and why particular associations exist canalso be supported by more rigorous qualitative explorations of NSBE members decisions topersist or leave engineering and/or the organization and what unique role NSBE played in thesedecisions.References[1] D. E. Chubin, G. S. May, and E. Babco
I can do it can do itI can make a good scientific hypothesis. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cannot Pretty sure For sure I do it I can do it can do itI can get myself to do my science school work. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cannot Pretty sure For sure I do it I can do it can do it ReferencesAndrew, S. (1998). Self-efficacy as a predictor of academic performance in science. Journal of advanced
(2)where I is the improvement factor, and the subscripts s and u stand for shaded and unshadedCOP, respectively. Figure 1. Thermocouples wrapped on the refrigerant pipes across the condenser. Note the temperature of the pipe leaving the condenser was used; the one entering the condenser was measured for reference purposes only Figure 2. Canopy used to shade the condenser For the simulated part of the study, data for a 3-TR unit were simulated from Carrier website[10] and the results were compared to the experimental
explore. For this paper, researchers present findings from theanalysis of the final cohort(s) of the original pilot program with an emphasis on characteristics ofinterest, as well as an exploration of the factors involved in place-attachment for alumni.IntroductionThe Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem (BCE2) in South Bend, Indiana is a community-university, cross-institutional partnership [1] developed with a multiplicity of outcome aims – toattract and retain underrepresented groups in engineering and science; to improve the quality oflow-income neighborhoods; and to build STEM literacy across the regional workforce. Corepartners in the BCE2 pilot have involved a diversity of higher education institutions (Ivy Techcommunity college, Indiana
advances in virtualreality (VR) tools – including inexpensive hardware and open source software, there is anopportunity to incorporate the use of virtual environments into this traditional course and bridgethe disconnect between classroom material and realistic flight dynamics and controls. This paperoutlines the development of a virtual reality environment to aid in teaching the design andevaluation of flight controllers using classical control techniques. This environment is beingdesigned to provide a collaborative space where user(s) can manipulate the locations of poles andzeros of a controller for a dynamic system (such as an aircraft) and visualize its response. Such anenvironment will enable the user(s) to visualize how controller design
, K. Reitmeyer, E. Tseytlin, and R. S. Crowley,“Metacognitive scaffolds improve self-judgments of accuracy in a medical intelligent tutoringsystem,” Instructional Science, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 159–181, Mar. 2014.[6] H. M. Ghadirli and M. Rastgarpour, “A web-based adaptive and intelligent tutor by expert systems,”Advances in Computing and Information Technology, pp. 87–95, 2013.[7] J. A. González-Calero, D. Arnau, L. Puig, and M. Arevalillo-Herráez, “Intensive scaffolding in anintelligent tutoring system for the learning of algebraic word problem solving: Intensive scaffolding in anITS for the learning of AWPS,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1189–1200,Nov. 2015.[8] M. A. Ruiz-Primo and E. M. Furtak, “Exploring
acollaborative project. Providing higher education students with options in assessment willencourage the students to engage with curriculum. It enhances students’ capability to be self–directed, outcome based, collaborative and being analytical in solving problems.References1. Chandrasekaran, S., Stojcevski, A., Littlefair, G., Joordens, M. Learning through Projects in Engineering Education in Eurpean Journal of Engineering Education Conferences (SEFI 2012), Thessaloniki, Greece, 2012.2. Chandrasekaran, S., Stojcevski, A., Littlefair, G., Joordens, M. Best assessment practices of final year engineering projects in Australia. University of Technical Education, Ho Chi Minh City, 2013.3. Chandrasekaran, S., Al Ameri, R. Students Perspectives on
AreaNetwork (LAN). The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Motivation, systems modeling Page 26.44.3and design are discussed in Section 2. Results of numerical analysis are presented in Section 3.Discussion of results and contribution(s) of the research are presented in Section 4. Section 5concludes the paper.2 Systems modeling and designThis Section discusses motivation for the research in Section 2.1 and systems modeling anddesign in Section 2.2.2.1 Motivation for the researchThe research is motivated by the need to provide improved learning environment for engineeringstudents, whereby professors/instructors can access the laboratory to
) 0 -0.02 -0.02 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 t (s) t (s) Single-Sided Amplitude Spectrum of y(t) Single-Sided Amplitude Spectrum of y(t
College Student Personnel at the University of Louisville. Her research interests include understanding the role of achievement motivation in the development of academic underachievement, particularly among gifted students.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the University of Louisville. Dr. Ralston teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective use of technology in engineering education, the incorpo- ration of critical thinking in
instructional video to orientstudents for the DLM implementation.References1. Pellegrino, J. W. In Understanding how students learn and inferring what they know:Implications for the design of curriculum, instruction and assessment, NSF K-12 Mathematicsand science curriculum and implementation centers conference proceedings, 2002; NationalScience Foundation and American Geological Institute Washington, DC: 2002; pp 76-92.2. Johnson, D. W.; Johnson, R. T.; Smith, K. A., Cooperative learning returns to collegewhat evidence is there that it works? Change: the magazine of higher learning (1998), pp 26-35.3. Sauer, S. G.; Arce, P. E. In Development, Implementation, and Assessment of HighPerformance Learning Environments, AIChE, Salt Lake City, UT
Engineering Education. 2015;49: 19-26.2. Coronella, C. Project-based learning in a first-year chemical engineering course: evaporativecooling. ASEE Annual Conference. Chicago, 2006.3. Barritt, A., Drwiega, J., Carter, R., Mazyck, D., Chauhan, A. A freshman design experience:multidisciplinary design of a potable water treatment plant. Chemical Engineering Education.2005;39: 296-300.4. Duke, S. R., Davis, V. A. Fuel cell car design project for freshman engineering courses.Chemical Engineering Education. 2014;48: 157-164.5. Hollar, K. A., Savelski, M. J., Farrell, S. Guilt-free chocolate: introducing freshmen tochemical engineering. ASEE Annual Conference. Montreal, 2002.6. Farrell, S., Hesketh, R. P., Slater, C. S. A laboratory project to design and
andtechnical human capital (S&T human capital) [15] as a model to study research collaboration [1],[16], [17]. S&T human capital is defined as the sum of individual’s knowledge, skills, resources,and her professional linkages and networks [15]. With such a model, the concept of collaborationmay go beyond the state of individual partnership and include the entire research team or eventhe research field. However, even these approaches are not often concerned with the quality ofcollaboration and relationships between individuals.Indeed the nature of collaboration cannot be explored unless we go beyond the quantitativemeasures of collaboration to examine the process in addition to outcome. Kraut, et al. [18]emphasize the importance of
among construction industrystudents to a) evaluate their experience of natural disasters, b) examine the source of knowledgeof resilience on natural disasters, c) measure knowledge of post-disaster evacuation, and d)evaluate disaster preparation from university education. The study found that the population of thestudent body existed that had not experienced a natural disaster and were unaware of its impactseither on a personal or familial basis. Further, the majority of the responding students felt that theirmajor(s) and universities did not prepare them in terms of handling natural disasters and extremeweather events. Finally, a correlation was found between the location students live and a desire forknowledge about extreme weather events at
teachershaving meaningful engineering experiences with their development of epistemic empathy thatadds to the conversation about productive learning experiences in K-12 teacher preparation inengineering.AcknowledgementsWe thank the research team members and participants who made this study possible. Thismaterial is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1720334. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.REFERENCES[1] L. S. Nadelson, J. Pfiester, and J. Callahan, “Who Is Doing the Engineering, the Student or the Teacher? The Development and Use of a Rubric to
. Page 12.675.11 10References[1] Felder, R. M. & Silverman, L. K., (1988), “How Students Learn: Adapting Teaching Styles to Learning Styles”, Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, p. 489.[2] Felder, R. M., (1993), “Reaching the Second-Tier Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education”, Journal of College Science, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 286-290.[3] Wang, S.-L., (1996), “Mechanism Simulation with Working Model”, Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.[4] Slater, K. & Gramoll, K., (1995), “Vibration Visualization using Longitudinal Vibration Simulator (LVS)”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual
majors. We have developed a web-basedenvironment that presents pairs of problems and then asks questions about thoseproblems one at a time (see Figure 1 for sample questions related to work-energy). Page 12.1013.4Problem 1 (Giancoli 6-19) Problem 2 (Giancoli 6-23)A 0.088kg arrow is fired from a bow whose string A 0.25kg softball is pitched at 26m/s. By the time itexerts an average force of 110N over a distance of reaches the plate a distance 15m away it has slowed0.78m. to 23m/s.Neglecting air resistance, what is the speed of the Neglecting gravity, what is the
mathematical descriptions and functions in order to inform a design decision.Table 2Coding Mathematical Modeling Purpose Mathematical Usage Coding Description Student Example Description Quantifying “So, the park is about 50 feet wide.” Function The action of using mathematics. “Since the park is 50 feet wide No evidence that it informs and 100 feet long, that means I design decisions directly. have 5,000 ft2 .” Preceded by a mathematical description(s). Explanation Result of a
, No. 3, 2012, pp. 1- 26.[2] Committee on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education, Standards for K-12 engineering education?: National Academy Press, 2010.[3] Katehi, L., Pearson, G., and Feder, M. A., Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects: National Academy Press, 2009.[4] Engineering is Elementary, "Engineering for children?!", n.d.[5] Iverson, E., Kalyandurg, C., and de Lapeyrouse, S., "Why K-12 engineering?": ASEE EngineeringK12 Center, n.d.[6] de Romero, N. Y., Slater, P., and DeCristofano, C., "Design challenges are "ELL-elementary"", Science and Children Vol. 43, No. 4, 2006, pp. 34-37.[7] National Research Council, A framework for K-12 science
0837749 andEngineering Education Program under Grant 1129460. Any opinions, findings andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Gray, G.L., et al. The dynamics concept inventory assessment test: A progress report and some results. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2005.[2] Jordan, W., H. Cardenas, and C.B. O'Neal. Using a Materials Concept Inventory to Assess an Introductory Materials Class: Potential and Problems. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Proceedings. 2005.[3] Krause, S. and A. Tasooji. Diagnosing
Engineering Education”Results and DiscussionThe laboratory/CFD project outlined above is conducted by students in teams of two. Anumber of different variations on this assignment are possible. For example, students maybe asked to collect and simulate data for one insert geometry and to focus on acomparison of the experimental and CFD results, as well as on the performance ofdifferent numerical schemes. Alternatively, the emphasis could be on comparing(experimentally and computationally) the performance of the two inserts. In all cases,experimental and computational pressure and velocity data is collected and analyzed.Table 1 lists sample velocity data collected for the original venturi insert at an inletvelocity of 28.45 ft/s. A pitot-static probe
by the military and NASA. FMEA standards have been established since the1960’s such as Mil-Std 1629A and SAE J1739 3, 4. There are also other standards for FMEA suchas IEC 60812 and SAE ARP5580. There are two SAE standards: J1739 is for automotive, andARP5580 is the aerospace recommended practice.The SAE J1739 standard identifies the intended use of FMEA as a “before-the-event” way toreduce the probability of needing corrective action for failure modes after the process or productis implemented 4. The FMEA is a continuous improvement tool that is useful three majorapplications: new designs or processes, changing existing designs or processes, and usingexisting designs or processes in new environments or applications 4. In the J1739 standard
Promotion of Final Year Capstone Projects Aaron S Blicblau School of Engineering and Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, AustraliaIntroductionIn many engineering courses around the world one of the key aspects required of the studentsis that they complete an independent project in their final year of studies. Project work is nowconsidered to be an important part of an engineer’s training4-6. Students enrolled in their finalyear of mechanical engineering at Swinburne University of Technology are required toundertake and complete a final year project (major capstone project). Students may select aproject from a list
a number of projects in areas of solid waste re-use, renewable energy systems, and waterquality for 8th-grade students.9 Arkansas Tech has hosted a two-week workshop for K-12teachers with a focus on comparing various energy sources and provided in-class demonstrationsfeaturing water turbines, fuel cells, and photovoltaics.10 Finally, the Villanova Department ofMechanical Engineering has hosted approximately 60-80 girl scouts on the annual Girl ScoutDay, where the middle school-aged girls learn sustainability concepts through activities such asconcentrated solar energy and photovoltaics.11One aspect of energy literacy that has not yet been explored on the K-12 level lies in green datacenters. Data centers consumed 1.5% of U. S. energy in
., & Kuh, C. V. (Eds.) (2009), Doctoral education and the faculty of the future.Cornell University Press.Erickson, S. K. (2012), Women Ph. D. students in engineering and a nuanced terrain: Avoidingand revealing gender. The Review of Higher Education, 35(3), 355-374.Ferreira, M. M. (2009). Trends in women's representation in science and engineering. Journal ofWomen and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15(3).Fox, M. F. (2000),Organizational environments and doctoral degrees awarded to women inscience and engineering departments. Women's Studies Quarterly,28(1/2), 47-61.Gardner, S. K. (2009), Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty inseven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education,32(3), 383-406.Goldsmith
). The latter resource provided disaggregated information regardingparental education, occupation, GRE and College GPA of doctoral engineering students and acomparison with science and math students. Zavala (2003) pointed out the diversity of the Hispanics/Latinos, for example “PuertoRicans are about 10 percent of all Latinos but make up 29 percent of the Latino Ph.D.’s” (p.189). Furthermore, based on a Pew Hispanic Center report, Friedrich and Cabrera (2012) andCrisp and Nora (2006) state that “Cuban students are the only Hispanic group who areperforming on par with white students, while Mexicans, the largest Latino group in the nation,tend to have lower achievement than other Hispanics” (p. 8). In consequence, thismisrepresentation is a
help us to better understand all of the factors surroundingstudents’ perceptions of themselves and decisions about going into engineering, which can in Page 24.826.6turn help inform us about better ways to assist these students.References 1. National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2. Matyas, M. L. & Malcolm, S. (1991). Investing in human potential: Science and engineering at the crossroads. Washington, DC: AAAS. 3. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. N. (1992). Curriculum differentiation
Session 2238An integrated usage of circuit simulation and spreadsheet for anenhancement of circuit design and semiconductor device instruction Raymond S. Winton, Member ASEE Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mississippi State UniversityAbstractThe circuit simulation construct is a network of nodes interconnected by component devicesthat are responsive to the voltage and current stimuli applied as sources and signals. Thecomponent devices may be simple linear form or they may be non-linear devices, in whichcase they are usually of semiconductor origin. Each different type device owns a set ofspecific parameters that