Review Board (IRB) conducts ethical reviews on all researchproposals involving human research participants, including the use of their personal data.Once the list of relevant stakeholders was finalised and IRB approval was granted, the secondphase began. To gather input from the stakeholders, survey forms and several focus groupdiscussions were originally planned. Unfortunately, Covid-19 pandemic struck and restrictedour approach to mainly online surveys. As such, survey forms were prepared and sent torespondents using “Verint” online survey system that allowed each respondent to receive aunique survey link via email. The response generated from each link was stored on thesystem safely.Despite the challenges presented by the pandemic, relatively
ofSTEM education. Moreover, it explores various dimensions of AM education, includinginnovative laboratories equipped with advanced 3D printers, remote laboratories to enable accessfrom distant locations, curriculum development encompassing on-ground, online, and hybridprograms. Furthermore, this study examines AM software tools and simulations, industrycertifications, and hardware and equipment used in educational settings. The paper also delvesinto educational pathways, collaborations between academia and industry, workforce demands,and the ethical and societal aspects of AM education, focusing on sustainability and equity.Overall, this study offers insights into the diverse and evolving landscape of AM education,emphasizing adaptability
interpretation of information, and are regarded as intricate andcomplex. Starkey and colleagues5 use the term information fluency to refer to skills, attitudes,knowledge, and a range of ways of experiencing information use. In the Engineering Scienceprogram at Trinity University, for example, engineering students “learn to access, understand,and evaluate information, use it ethically, and create new material (papers, presentations, or otherproducts) based on that information” with an emphasis on critical and creative thinking.3 Thedevelopment of information fluency involves incremental growth in proficiency.5 It requiresmore than a single visit with the school librarian or a couple of written research assignments.Within a demanding and supportive
see connection among multiple disciplines. • I am good at applying knowledge from different areas to solve current problems. • I am comfortable thinking about ideas and beliefs different from my own. • I have a good understanding of career choices and options in my discipline or field of study. • I understand ethics that apply to my discipline. • I can effectively apply the scientific method and develop a procedure to address a research problem. • I am good at analyzing and interpreting data generated from analytical procedures. • I am good at asking questions that help clarify the problem. • I have a good idea of the type of depth of information that should be included in an excellent
, we hope to provide other educators in both science andengineering with useful tools to assist them in developing and/or enhancing the use of writingwithin their own classrooms.IntroductionABET accreditation requirements emphasize the importance of “soft” skills in planning andachieving excellence in engineering education. In addition to “hard” knowledge, engineersneed to experience and understand “communication, teamwork, and the ability to recognizeand resolve ethical dilemmas.”[1] These skills are powerful when combined with awarenessskills involving “understanding the impact of global and social factors, knowledge ofcontemporary issues, and the ability to do lifelong learning.”[1] What is the most effectiveway of incorporating this into
current technology. • Students as a CAD master drawings are professional quality. Table 6. Capstone Project Assessment Results - ABET Outcomes h and i. OUTCOMES – h, i Professionalism–An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, a commitment to on-going professional competence and possession of basic professional and organizational success skills. Level 1 Exhibits professionally appropriate behavior patterns, appreciates engineering as a learned profession and possesses daily success skills. Level 2 Accepts responsibility for their education, understands the major professional and
to read for theirparticular textbook. With the exception of software engineering and ethics, all course topicswere covered in each of the four textbooks in significant detail; therefore, students had enoughreading material to study from regardless of the programming language class to which they wereassigned. WEEK TOPIC(S) 1 Introduction to Computers, Elementary Programming Concepts 2 Conditional Programming 3 Programming with Loops 4 Subroutines, Scope of Variables 5 Data Types, Programming with Files 6
that the instructor could choose the activities that he or she preferred. Module developerswere asked to provide advice on how to alter the activities to prevent plagiarism and to include ascoring rubric where appropriate. Service learning and team activities were encouraged, and aninfrastructure assessment assignment was required as one of the out-of-class activities.The specific instructions given to module developers are included in Appendix A.Six modules were developed for the course. The first module covered fundamental topics andoverarching concepts for the course: Introduction to the ASCE “Report Card for America’s In-frastructure,” engineering ethics, licensure, sustainability, public financing, planning, and team-work. The remaining
individual projects. These were changed toteam projects in 1992 and, at the recommendation of an ABET visiting team, to two-semesterteam projects in 1997/98 school year. During the period from 2001 to 2006, three separatecourse tracks were offered – EE Design (including CE students) I and II, ME Design I and II(including BME students), and MJE Design I and II. All senior engineering students beganmeeting together once a week for most of the spring semester in 2003 in a seminar format todiscuss issues of engineering ethics, standards, and professionalism.It became apparent that students were not uniformly prepared for senior design, so in response amajor curriculum enhancement was implemented in 2006-2007 to build upon the existingproject-emphasis
geography, the profile of engineering graduate attributes appear to follow the samepattern, i.e., engineering graduates should be knowledgeable in science and technologyfundamentals and be problem solvers, but should also possess a number of professional skills(i.e., “soft skills”) important for the profession such as effective communication andunderstanding the world where engineering is practiced (business constraints,flexibility/adaptability, societal and ethical issues, global sensitivity, etc). Numerous student-focused events on a variety of curriculum, policy, and pedagogical issues conducted by one ofthe authors have yielded similar conclusions.Some authors and reports have comprehensively outlined the elusive set of “soft skills” that
Engineering"Similarities Between Writing a Thesis/Dissertation and Writing Major Research Proposals andReports" (10 minutes) Speaker: Professor of Electrical Engineering"The Ethical Dimensions of Writing and Talking About Research" (10 minutes) Speaker: Coordinator of the Engineering Ethics Program"Incubating Ideas" Discussion and exercise led by PCC staff (15 minutes)"Coherence in Writing" (15 minutes) Discussion and exercise led by PCC staff"Managing and Surviving the Dissertation Process" (30 minutes) Discipline-specific, peer-led discussionTwo engineering faculty members participated in the workshop. A professor of electricalengineering discussed the similarities between writing the dissertation and writing
, formulation, and solution of engineering problems and design through the use of appropriate analytical, computational and experimental tools; 4. to instill in students professional and ethical responsibility, and an understanding of the impact of engineering solutions on society; and, 5. to motivate students to engage in life-long learning and knowledge of contemporary issues.The mission statement and these objectives have been published in the “UndergraduateBulletin” of the college and in the college web site8. These objectives were first drafted by thefaculty in 1998 and revised in December 2000 based on preliminary evaluations as well asfeedback from most of our constituents (i.e., students, faculty, administration, and
Comfortable Creative a Tension n c e Degree of DiversityThe Managing Creativity ClassThe class features one or more lectures in each of the elements of the creative system. Inaddition, there are lectures on ethics and personal creativity. The lectures are presented in powerpoint format and are posted for download from the Internet on the University of Oklahoma“Coursenet” system. In the Introduction to Engineering classes students are required by Collegepolicy to have laptop computers. Students can follow the lectures on their computers, and sometake notes on the power point slides. In other classes, laptops are required
the United States. John has published on engineering-communication ped- agogy for many years, including papers on engineering ethics and communication; active-learning ped- agogies; and the intersection of engineering and theatre. He has also held multiple leadership roles at the section and national levels, including President of the Southeastern Section and the national Zone II Chair, and he presently serves as the ASEE Campus Representative for the University of Georgia. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Bioengineering Professional Persona: A New Communication-Intensive Course for a New Program in a New- ish College of
content and learn about applications of AI ● Coordinating mentoring and support activities to build engagement ● Conducting a computing identity study, which is where our research team comes in ● And finally, conducting an evaluation on partnerships Project Context 12-credit Interdisciplinary AI HSCC Certificate Machine Learning AI Thinking Applied AI in Business AI & Ethics Foundations • AI and digital competency • Applied AI
anexample, one of the first assignments in our first engineering class - EGR 111 (Introduction toEngineering Thinking and Practice) - was a personal statement of what each student hoped to dowith an engineering degree and where they envisioned they would be after graduation. This wasnot an easy assignment but one that we would give back to students on graduation day (nearly 4years later). Similar visioning assignments like an Independent Development Plan (IDP) wouldbe part of the curriculum too and would continue to be improved by the founding faculty team(e.g. Melissa Kenny, Kyle Luthy, Kyana Young, Courtney DiVittorio). Ethical Leadershipassignments and Career Readiness assignments in capstone design, etc. Figure 3: Some of the
experience the benefits that will last alifetime. (3)III. The Mentor as a FriendSome academics believe and advice strongly in maintaining a business-like relationshipbetween mentors and mentees. They claim that: a professor should not have any casualrelationships with students, and such relationships “conflict with our fundamentalobligations as faculty members,(4) and the ethics of the relationship require that thefaculty member remains “dispassionate,” avoiding any appearance of partiality. Thefaculty member should “not seek to be their psychiatrist, friend, or lover.” (5) While someof us may agree about the psychiatrist and lover part, many of us do not agree thatfriendship between students and faculty members has ill effects and should not
education can also be a tool forengineering design to develop better products by inspiring critical thinking. Considering justiceideas prompts engineers to develop socially-focused principles in the context of their engineeringtraining, which leads to more creative solutions to implementing projects to better servecommunities [16]. There have been many initiatives to encourage students to engage with socialjustice, ethics, and empathy focused material [17] [18] [19]. At the Colorado School of Mines, aprogram focusing on teaching engineering students’ empathy through user emersion has seenstudents developing more thoughtful solutions that work better for a diverse public. Theempathy focus expands students’ ability to think creatively and their
constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability; • An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; • An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.The current professional skills include: • An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams; • An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; • An ability to communicate effectively; • The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context; • A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life
: Construction Terminology and Accreditation, Ethical Dilemmas, Resume and Career Plan, Engineering and Tech Expo (visit and summary paper), Professional & Trade Organizations, and Guest Speakers.MethodologyThe basic methodology for the development and delivery of the revised CM&E 111 is presentedbelow. The author attended the ACCE2 Mid-Year Meeting held in Phoenix (February 2012) to discuss first-year construction management courses with construction management program directors at the Baccalaureate Program Chairs Meeting. Approximately forty- five (45) ACCE accredited schools were represented at this meeting. The program chairs approved a request for a survey to collect first-year construction management course
five weeks of RAMP, we added one-hour meetings twice a week committed toworkshops focusing on DEIB. The nine workshops that students participated in were based onvarious themes such as team building, intersectional identities, going beyond one’s comfort zone,culture wheels, power and privilege, microaggressions, identifying strengths and challenges,ethics, and exploring music and art reflective of the cultural heritage of the participants. Weemployed a variety of pedagogical strategies during the workshops including but not limited todiscussions, role plays, and games. Table 3 shows the structure of each of the nine workshops. Table 3: DEIB weekly session content and activitiesSession Session structure and activities
for this focus, including to better prepare students for engineering practice, which isinherently sociotechnical [2]; to increase the sense of belonging of historically excluded students,who are more likely to be interested in the social aspects [3]; and to create better societaloutcomes that consider justice [4,5,6]. Attempts to disrupt the social/technical dualism and theapolitical nature of traditional engineering education have included revising stand-alone ethicscourses and adding sociotechnical components to traditional engineering courses, such as designcourses [7-10]. However, revising stand-alone ethics courses implicitly upholds the disconnectbetween the “technical” and “social,” and adding one or two modules to a traditional
ethics, learning styles, and methodological credibility in engineering education. Whileengineering education may be interdisciplinary in name, I argue it that it remains a multidisciplinary field withtransdisciplinary ambitions. I punctuate this analysis with implications for engineering education researchersinterested in using disciplinary fissures as a catalyst for meaningful, interdisciplinary collaboration andunderstanding.BackgroundIn October 2012, I was interviewed for a job as a staff researcher at a Canadian engineeringschool. The interview was both playful and disorienting. After more than a decade of training ineducational leadership, culminating in a tenure track position at a Canadian faculty of education,I had become deeply, and
lack the structured guidanceand technical proficiency necessary for success. While they are often required to write, theirpreparation may be insufficient, hindering their competence and readiness for workforcedevelopment. This pilot study introduces a 9-week intensive course designed to address this gapby providing comprehensive instruction across a range of essential topics. These include goalsetting, topic selection, the research life cycle, ethics and misconduct, AI usage (such asChatGPT), and various writing skills such as illustration, data analysis, citation, and references.A key feature of the course is the opportunity for students to write a state-of-the-art reviewpaper, guiding them through the entire process—from drafting to peer
[5]. The ethical responsibility of engineers goes beyond the technical aspects of their work; they must consider the social and justice implications of the systems they create. For example, engineers can help reduce inequalities by designing accessible technologies that serve diverse populations or by developing infrastructure that meets the needs of underrepresented and underserved communities [5], [6]. This approach requires engineers to carefully evaluate how their work affects different social groups and to strive for solutions that promote inclusivity, equity, and justice. Engineers have a responsibility to ensure that their projects do not reinforce existing inequalities but instead work towards creating a fairer and more equitable
notion that science is a creative process that advances further knowledge4. Their knowledge of ethical conduct in their field5. Their ability to interpret results in research and draw conclusionsThe Summer Bridge to the Beach is a program that closely resembles the National Institutes ofHealth “Bridges to the Baccalaureate” program, which CSULB has had since the 1990s7. TheNIH program targets community college students who are currently students from two partnerinstitutions, Cerritos College and Long Beach City College, and who are majoring in eitherchemistry, biochemistry, or biological sciences. A major mission of the program is to prepare thestudents to transfer and earn a bachelor’s degree from a 4-year institution and ultimatelyincrease
, outcomes in the United States(U.S.), and the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board, or CEAB, graduate attributes inCanada), and constitute an integral part of the outcomes-based engineering education (Froyd,Wankat, & Smith, 2012; Woolston, 2008). For example, the updated ABET outcomes used since20191 include the following seven competencies: problem solving, engineering design,communication, teamwork, ethical and professional responsibilities, experimentation andinvestigation, and life-long learning. The interest in engineering competencies may be ultimately driven by the need to producequalified engineers. In 2005, the report “Educating the Engineer of 2020” published by the U.S.National Academy of Engineering presented a report for
study at Binghamton University examined how to incorporate compassion into an engineeringethics course[5]. This was integrated with a required practicum in a biomedical engineeringprogram, for which service-learning projects are required for human and/or animals in order toimprove their quality of life. A service-learning paradigm that progressed through three stages waspresent, which are initial charity, emerging compassion, and developing social justice. Studentswere asked to reflect upon their projects to see how student awareness of ethics and compassionwas realized after completion of the projects.Two researchers at Wichita State University (WSU) assessed service learning from reflectionsafter completion of projects, inspired by two
courses in Sustainability, Humanitiesand Social Sciences, Ethics, as well as soft skills such as writing, communication and teamwork.7,8,9 Strategies for pedagogical reforms included cornerstone and capstone courses, projectand problem-based learning, active participatory learning opportunities, instructionallaboratories, learning a second language, and foreign country internships.10,11,12,13Nevertheless, most engineering education programs continue to emphasize the technical aspects,while the social and environmental aspects remain externalized.14 Barbara Olds15 notes that “theeducation of science and engineering students has for too long been merely “technical”, oftenneglecting human complexity in order to achieve quantifiable correctness
-based courses the students acquire the ability to design, build, program and testinteractive embedded devices and implement human-machine interactions. Nevertheless, one ofthe most important goals of the program is that they learn to do research, find their ownsolutions, develop team management skills, presentation and documentation skills, they get thesense of critical design processes getting confidence and motivation to persevere until theobjective is reached.During the lectures of these courses the students learn different topics as history of computerengineering, the electronics development cycle, professional ethics, common development toolsused in industry, interview, resume/CV writing, and presentation preparation, management,testing