Century [5], they confirmed thatNSBE, along with other ethnic student organizations for African American students, providedmuch-needed cultural enclaves on PWI campuses.Both research teams then came together to compare findings. Shannon joined the project afterthe grounded theory data analysis was already underway. As a result, she was able to view thefindings of both investigations from a new perspective with more clarity than the authors whohad been engaged with data analysis for a long time. She leveraged this perspective to helpsynthesize the findings of both studies, pinpointing and articulating commonalities and distinctdifferences in the results. Shannon produced the majority of the writing of the text based ondiscussions between the two
, &Lee (2006) found that nearly all workplace problems are complex and ill-structured. Studentsoften only encounter complex ill-defined problems at the end of their four year engineeringprogram and enter the workforce without these critical skills requiring more on the job training.3How can we prepare students to solve these ill-defined complex problems that they willencounter as working engineers? The Vanderbilt-Northwestern-Texas-Harvard/MIT (VaNTH)Engineering Research Center attempted to answer this question in a Biomedical Engineeringcontext. The VaNTH project designed a biotransport engineering curriculum to help studentsdevelop innovation and efficiency.4,5,6 Innovation was operationalized as the adaptive ability toperform well in
had completed theirundergraduate degrees. Of these former mentors, 25 served as Head Mentors as of spring 2015.These Head Mentors oversee the program at each school, develop design projects, organize anddirect the other mentors, suggest and implement new initiatives in the program, and carry outresearch on the outcomes and effectiveness of the program. The Head Mentors volunteer aparticularly large amount of time over their commitment of at least 3 semesters. An adaptationof Clary and Snyder’s Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) provides a quantitative indication ofmotivations indicating that volunteer Head Mentors are overwhelmingly motivated by the Valuesfunction, related to altruistic and humanitarian concern for others. Qualitative
of support practices they utilize,(b) how such practices influence their achievement, persistence and transfer status to four yearcolleges and universities, and (c) how in turn their propensity for innovation and creativeproblem solving affects such choices and persistence. This paper presents on the first and secondyear of a three-stage research project funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Thevalue of the study’s findings depends largely on an exploratory research design, which analyzesthe pedagogical practices—practices designed to foster successful transfer from communitycollege to four-year colleges and universities and how students’ innovative capability influencessuch transfer capacity. The goals of this research are: (1
Paper ID #17187Cross-Validation of a Global Citizenship Scale: Constructs for EvaluatingUndergraduate Engineering PerspectivesRachel Roberts, University of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences Rachel completed her Bachelor’s degrees at the University of Wyoming in International Studies and Span- ish, spending a semester in Guatemala interviewing business owners and local residents in Antigua as part of a project to understand conflicts over the growing ecotourism industry. She also completed a Masters with the School of Environmental and Forest Sciences at the University of Washington, collaborating on
curriculum development, including ITEEA’s secondary education programEducation byDesign: STL # 9: Students will develop an understanding of engineering design. STL # 10: Students will develop an understanding of the role of troubleshooting, research and development, invention and innovation, and experimentation in problem solving. STL # 11: Students will develop the abilities to apply the design process. 13Engineering design is a process that “demands critical thinking, the application of technicalknowledge, [and] creativity” ITEEA and Technology for All Americans Project, 13.One of the stated goals of STEM education is to develop 21st Century Skills 14. To ouradvantage, design represents a powerful context for supporting the
ofimportant program learning outcomes, while over 67% identify internships and community-based projects as useful in “evaluating the graduates’ potential for success” [2, p. 18], and half ofthe employers target them as the place where institutions should devote the most resources forassessment [2]. Experiential learning environments provide places where “knowledge is created throughthe transformation of experience” [14, p. 41], while enhancing their learning experience [13]. Itis an authentic assessment environment that more closely simulates later types of learningsituations, and is “one of the truest forms of active learning” [16, p. 80] where students candemonstrate their knowledge and skills, and receive valuable feedback from the
standardized performance on the tests. Students alsoEnabled active John Sciences, of the TEAL project on tests, multiple reported an appreciation for thelearning affect 2009 students' cognitive and choice and learning experience and that theirundergraduate affective outcomes. Students' open ended understanding was significantlystudents' conceptual understanding items impacted by the innovative approachunderstanding of
Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher is a post doctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She is currently participating in a project that supports the use of evidence-based instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses through developing communities of practice. Her research interests focus on understanding how organizational change occurs in higher education with respect to teaching and learning in STEM courses.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a
in the eastern United States. Allfirst-year engineering students at the study site take a common course sequence preparing themto enter their chosen engineering discipline at the end of the freshman year, with studentsintending to major in electrical and computer engineering or computer science taking a second-semester course with an emphasis on computing and circuits. This course was the setting for thisstudy, with data collection occurring in the 2012-2013 academic year. Course content includedan introduction to ECE concepts including programming and analysis in MATLAB, and basiccircuits and sensors culminating in a half-semester team-based engineering design project andreport. In the first half of the semester, students engaged in a
class period to review and discuss the results. The detailed facilitation plan forimplementing the EPSA in a course is shown in Appendix E, table E-1.At Norwich University all assessment of the student discussions was conducted in real-time, Page 26.1689.4during the discussions. Instead of using electronic voice recorders as is typically done by theresearchers on the NSF sponsored project, all data was collected as the discussions took place, with the assessors simply writing tally marks and notes directly on the relevant portion of theEPSA Rubric.The students in each class were divided into teams. Some members of the team were assignedthe role of
solving for students to persistin engineering majors.3 Accordingly, this engineering education seeks to examine a sample ofnon-traditional college students enrolled in science and engineering programs in four urbancommunity colleges to determine (a) the types and frequency of support practices they utilize,(b) how such practices influence their achievement, persistence and transfer status to four yearcolleges and universities, and (c) how in turn their propensity for innovation and creativeproblem solving affects such choices and persistence. This paper presents on the first year of athree-stage research project funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). The value of thestudy’s findings depends largely on an exploratory research design
then it came time to start to talk about the project. In the morning, all of the questions were directed towards my [male] peers. (Female professional)Female students often provided specific examples in which women were either directly orindirectly discouraged from pursuing engineering: I did International Science Fairs, or I did a science fair, and I competed at the International Science Fair twice when I was in high school. One time, one of the judges was like, “I can't believe this—” He was talking in a group of other people, and he was like, “I can't believe that girl did that work.” I was, “Uh.” (Female student) I was in India two years ago, and we went to this woman’s college and on the way back
cognitivelyinclined—a concept is a single thing that is non-negotiable and has a specified approach. In theworkplace, concepts may function differently as posed beyond these ideals. Concepts may besituated, distributed, and pragmatic, and may be negotiated according to the project at hand.This study initiates a series of studies proposing the malleability of concepts in the workplace Page 26.391.2that is not actively addressed in academia and engineering instruction. Studies regarding thevalidity of the utilization of resources in academia with concerns to preparedness for theworkplace is very sparse. This study attempts to provide insight into this gap in
, and law students. Barbara uses applied psychology and art in her storytelling methods, to help students and leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a projects - from the early, inspirational stages to reality. Founder of the Design Entrepreneuring Studio, she is the author of,”Working Connection: The Relational Art of Leadership;” ”Entrepreneurial Leadership: A Balancing Act in Engineering and Science;” and ”Designing for Social Participation in the Virtual Universe.” With her students in ME 378, she co-authored, ”The Power of First Moments in Entrepreneurial Storytelling.” Barbara makes productive partnerships with industry and creates collaborative teams with members from the areas of engineering, design
country’s ability to develop competitive quantitiesof engineers, equipped to tackle the complex challenges of the future, has come under question.These challenges are wicked and unknown and will force engineers to use collaborate and usetechnical skills to solve social problems. With this in mind, the National Academies ofEngineering launched the Engineer of 2020 project and charged its Committee on EngineeringEducation to develop a vision for engineering in 2020 and beyond. The Engineer of 2020 will becharacterized by 10 attributes. The descriptions of these skills are vague; many institutions andorganizations have characterized these attributes and created internal metrics by and throughwhich they will develop these attributes in their
years on the faculty at the US Military Academy at West Point teaching civil engineering. He is a Fellow of ASCE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Imperative Issues and Elusive Solutions in Academic Integrity: A Case StudyAbstractThis research investigates the issue of academic integrity, specifically plagiarism, as it relates toand affects graduate engineering students. The scope of this project included a comprehensivereview of relevant literature and case study analysis in a large enrollment, multi-instructor, 1-credit course entitled Career Management for Engineers. This is a required course for graduateengineering students who desire to participate
; Botelho, G. (2015, February 11). Costa Concordia captain convicted in deadly shipwreck. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/11/world/costa-concordia-trial/29. Squires, N. (2012, September 13). Costa Concordia crew “were not drilled in evacuation procedures.” The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/9541189/Costa-Concordia- crew-were-not-drilled-in-evacuation-procedures.html30. Nadeau, B. L. (2013, September 16). Costa Concordia underwater: What's inside of wrecked cruise ship? CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/15/world/costa-concordia-underwater/31. Schuler, M. (2015, February17). The four phases of the Costa Concordia dismantling project. Retrieved from http
incentivized the development of modules, lessons, or class projects that have a clearhumanities-based learning objective and have the potential to reach many students. The moduledescribed here was funded for development through an internal grant, and this paper presents asummary of the module’s content, the rationale for its approach, reflections on some of the keyassumptions of the rationale, and recommendations for others wanting to implement a similarly-styled ethics assignment.Most Engineering Economy instructors would probably agree that these courses are well-suitedfor reaching large numbers of students due to their cross-disciplinary nature and are also well-suited to discussing professional ethics because of their connection to the world of
develop a notional machine in order to write programs (Khalife, 2006).Learning to program may be particularly difficult thing for many people. While humansnaturally learn language, “instructing a computer is an ‘unnatural’ activity and not at all likeinstructing a person” (Du Boulay, O’Shea, & Monk, 1999, p. 239). Often novices are capable ofreplicating examples, but struggle to fix problems or create new projects. Even if theyunderstand syntax rules and can type code, they do not seem to learn from trial and error. Papertet al. blame the inability of students, who otherwise are successful in procedural coding tasks, tolearn from experimentation is “not surprising from Piagetian work” (Papert & others, 1978, p.70), though do not explain
practices’ for student professional development and training. In addition, she is developing methodologies around hidden curriculum, academic emotions and physiology, and en- gineering makerspaces.Dr. Marialuisa Di Stefano, Utah State University Marialuisa Di Stefano is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Utah State University, advancing research projects on bilingual education in New England and in Puerto Rico. She is an education researcher and advocates for historically marginalized groups in elementary education. Her research interest lies in bridging perspectives between transnational civic education, bilingual education, and STEM education, and how such intersections may lead to a more equitable education system
Picture This work is part of a larger project which spans multiple subjects and seeks to broadenunderstanding of STEM topics. This approach is meant to help both teachers and students,allowing for more innovative teaching and enhanced comprehension-based learning. The projectrecognizes that students learn in diverse ways, and attempts to appeal to those who learn bestthrough visual, intuitive, and engaging methods. It draws upon real-life experiences, as well asvarious STEM/STEAM examples and activities, and targets both an understanding andappreciation of basic concepts in STEM, including Physics/Mechanics, Calculus, Statics, ControlSystems, Digital Signal Processing (DSP), Probability, Estimation, and Computer Algorithms.The material can
, all competencies that comprise thisconceptual framework of engineering thriving were derived from existing narratives inengineering. Overall, this paper addresses the growing need for a clear definition of engineeringthriving relevant to undergraduate engineering students.While few would challenge the pursuit of thriving as a pertinent educational goal, discussions ofthriving remain largely missing in the engineering education literature. This paper was inspiredby a research project that examines the impact of non-cognitive factors on engineering studentsuccess (NSF #1626287). As part of this project, we developed a survey to measure several non-cognitive factors using existing validated instruments reported in the literature. Most non
sharedthat he did not implement this user-centric design thinking in his design project: That wasn’t in my design project. I was aware we were designing for a person, but I didn’t think it needed to be that finely ingrained into the design process. I guess, yeah, that’s one way that … what was it, difference, how people thought differently about engineering. I’ve taken that obviously like you can’t afford not to take that and adopt it to your own type of engineering because that amount of information is way too valuable.This quote is another example of how Nathan described how there are various ways of thinkingin engineering that are complementary to one another. While he acknowledged differences, in
Paper ID #21574Understanding Engineering and Technology Student Perceptions: Barriersto Study Abroad ParticipationDr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). His research and teaching interests include leadership, global agility, globalization, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many
auditoriums.Transformation The transformation of the course was a collaborative effort between the course instructor andan instructional designer from the university’s Office of Teaching, Learning & Technology, and wassupported by the university’s Large Lecture Transformation project. The transformation took sevenmonths and included course planning, design, and development phases. During the planning phase,students’ needs were reviewed, and instructional strategies to better meet them were identified. Itwas concluded that giving students more practice would be the most direct approach to improvingtheir problem solving, and whenever possible, immediate feedback about students’ answers andspecific guidance should be provided.FALL 2017
., & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering education and the development ofexpertise.” Journal of Engineering Education 100(1), 123–150. Mina, M. and Gerdes, R. (2006). The pedantic 21st century freshman engineering student. European Journal ofEngineering Education 31(5), 509–16. Norman, D.A. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things, New York, NY: Currency-Doubleday. Ortiz-Medina, L., Fernandez-Ahumada, E., Lara-Velez, P., Garrido-Varo, A., Perez-Marin, D., & Guerrero-Ginel, J.E. (2014).Assessing an Entrepreneurship Education Project in Engineering Studies by Means of Participatory Techniques. Advancesin Engineering Education 4(2), 1–30. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K. (2013). Engineering design: a systematic
educational initia- tives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President, Dr. Lenox led several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engineering profession – with the overall objective of properly preparing individuals for their futures as civil engineers. An example is his staff leadership of ASCE’s initiative to ”Raise the Bar” for entry into professional engineering practice. Dr. Lenox’s awards include ASCE’s ExCEEd Leadership Award, ASEE’s George K. Wadlin Award, ASCE’s William H. Wisely American Civil Engineer Award, and the CE News’ ”2010 Power List – 15 People Advancing the Civil Engineering Profession.” He is