dynamics,5,6,7,8 the work done by a force F on a body moving from position A1 along a path Cto position A2 is usually denoted by U1→ 2 and is defined by a line integral ∫A A2 U1→ 2 = F • dr (1) 1where • denotes a dot product, and dr is the differential displacement of the body moving alongthe path C during the action of F on the body.The work U1→ 2 done by a moment M (or a couple of moment M) on a body during its finite ro-tation, parallel to M, from angular position θ1 to angular position θ2 is given
week semester), anexam is given. Students can use their Competency Assignment while taking the exam. Anadditional twist, however, is that the managers take the exam together in another room, andalthough each manager submits his/her own exam, the managers can discuss the exam questionsand answers with one another. Further, each manager must also grade the CompetencyAssignments from his/her teams (two assignments). The course instructor grades theCompetency Assignment submitted by the managers and the exams submitted by all. Studentshave different teammates for each assignment and everyone gets to be a manager once.Outcomes from this are:1. Students are required to meet and interact with more of their classmates.2. Students learn how to deal
presentation by the faculty and up to threeRGSFOP OIT students in Fall 2001 and Winter 2002.Applicant Criteria -1) Recommendation by student’s spring Math, Science, or Physics teacher.2) Endorsement by student’s following fall/winter Math, Science, or Physics teacher. - The results of the experiment was to be shared with the Technology Space Camp students and their fall/winter classmates.3) 500 word essay on the subject of: “How Conducting Experiments in a Low-Gravity Environment Can Help in the Development of New Technologies used on Earth.”Publicity Strategy -The strategy to promote OIT’s Technology Space Camp was two-fold. First, an advertisementwas placed in three newspapers, the
, so any classroom computer activities must allowsufficient time for them to come up to speed.III. Criteria for Classroom Laptop UseHaving acknowledged that the students should somehow use the laptops in class, the next step isto determine exactly what criteria should be used to develop these classroom laptop exercises. Inreflecting on this, I have identified five characteristics as being important in this student use:1. There must be a “Value-Added” aspect to the assignment. In other words, the laptop use in class should not be simply busy work. Further, the “value-added” aspect must be clearly evident to the students.2. The student must be actively involved in using the laptop. The laptop should not be used to merely view a Powerpoint
engineeringundergraduate curriculum, you will be able to….”Objective 1: Instrumentation Apply appropriate sensors, instrumentation, and/or software tools to make measurements of physical quantities.Objective 2: Models Identify the strengths and limitations of theoretical models as predictors of real world behaviors. This may include evaluating whether a theory adequately describes a physical event and establishing or validating a relationship between measured data and underlying physical principles.Objective 3: Experiment Devise an experimental approach, specify appropriate equipment and procedures, implement these procedures, and interpret the resulting data to characterize an engineering material, component
PowerPoint software and its potential usefulness in improving the teaching/learning of Engineering Graphics must be discretionary introduced to the students. Tosafeguard against overwhelming the students, only the features of PowerPoint that serve apurpose should be used, and in small increments as need be -- starting from simpleEngineering Graphics concepts and procedures, and building up to the compound.Four Selected Typical Engineering Graphics Case studiesThis paper presents four selected typical Engineering Graphics case studies. These are: 1) Multiview Orthographic Projection - The Loop Principle. 2) Drawing an Ellipse - The Four Point Approximate Method. 3) Drawing an Ellipse - The Revolution Method. 4) Line
; Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationIn the summer following this tumultuous year, one of us was accepted as a TAC of ABETprogram evaluator and underwent the requisite training session. As part of that training, thepreliminary TC2K accreditation criteria [1] and their implementation plans were presented. Thiswas our first real exposure to TC2K. It did not appear at that time to be a near-term challenge aswe expected to be reviewed using the existing TAC of ABET format.Two months later at the beginning of the academic year, our department chair informed us thatwe had been invited to volunteer in the 2001 pilot visit project. Our other EngineeringTechnology programs were in good shape and
5 (an e-Learning software platform fromBlackboard, Inc.) to manage all distance education courses, including those delivered over theInternet. Each of the three factors–content, pedagogy, and management–is discussed below interms of developing or adapting an electronics laboratory course for the Internet. 1. EET Laboratory Course ContentIn the EET program at Northwestern State University, lectures and laboratories courses arepresented in separate, but co-requisite courses. Because DC circuits lecture and lab are the firstelectronics courses that a student encounters in the EET degree, they often serve concurrently asan introduction to electronics, to the technical laboratory, and to university-level pedagogy. Inthe lecture course
taken place at community colleges.The demographics of international students continue to change (The Chronicle of HigherEducation8) and their academic level and origin between 1990 and 2000 (ACE 9) are shown intables 1 and 2 respectively. Table 1 International Students’ Demographics Country or 1-year Country or 1-year Territory Students change Territory Students change China 54,466 +6.8% Trinidad & Tobago 2,762 +18.9% Japan 46,872 +1.0 Romania 2,716
Session 3560 A Work in Progress – Updating and Maintaining an Effective Assessment Program under ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 J. Shawn Addington, Robert A. Johnson, and David L. Livingston Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Virginia Military InstituteThis paper serves as a follow-up to previously published works1,2 regarding the assessmentprogram developed and utilized by the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at theVirginia Military Institute. In particular, the paper will: 1) outline the departmental assessmentstrategy, including the
1, below.The elements around the ellipse in Figure 1 correspond to phases in a product lifecycle, but thedouble-headed arrows indicate that they can’t just proceed in a step-by-step process. They mustcontinually interact and each element affects, and is affected by, the others. A brief descriptionof each element is included with the detailed course description, which follows.Balancing ActsA key to the management of creative enterprises is to maintain balance. Too many popularmanagement books imply that a simple application of a single principal can result in goodmanagement. But it’s clear that a key management job is to constantly balance the competingdemands and constraints on a creative enterprise. Some dimensions of this balance can
paper describes a recently awarded project comprising the design andimplementation of a Sustainability Engineering (SE) Minor at UPRM. We propose a posterpresentation to discuss our SE Minor plan and collect data about people’s perceptions ofsustainability in engineering.1. IntroductionAddressing "Sustainability" is an overarching challenge for the 21st century, requiring engineersto play a critical role. In the US, undergraduate degree programs that directly attend tosustainability are of two types: (1) interdisciplinary programs that do not grant engineering degreesand (2) environmental engineering programs that are vital but do not entirely address the holisticnotion of sustainability. However, based on our reading of "Strengthening
. IntroductionStudents coming from low socioeconomic status (SES) families commonly face more challengesin achieving success than peers coming from higher SES groups [1]. Studies at both local andnational levels indicate that such challenges translate into detrimental factors affecting importantsuccess indicators such as retention, persistence, graduation rates, and limited post-graduationopportunities [2][3][4].The Program for Engineering Access, Retention, and LIATS Success (PEARLS) assessed theeffectiveness of an institutional intervention model seeking to increase the retention and successindicators of low-income, academically talented students (LIATS) in engineering programs.For the last four years, PEARLS has been implementing interventions to boost
Paper ID #44754Demystifying Cybersecurity Experiential Learning for OperationalTechnologies (OT) and Industrial Control Systems (ICS)Dr. Eman Hammad, Texas A&M UniversityConnor McLaren, Texas A&M UniversityJustin Leiden, Texas A&M University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Session XXXXDemystifying Cybersecurity Experiential Learning for Operational Technologies (OT) and Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Eman Hammad
authors hope thispilot project will serve as a framework for future collaborative engineering projects between SUand IAJES partners, expanding global educational opportunities for students and faculty.IntroductionThe professional world has become more globalized, increasing the need for students to bepolitically and culturally competent, adaptable, and able to solve problems creatively [1] [2].Global experiences have been shown to significantly improve workplace skills, includingincreased cultural awareness, improved understanding of global perspectives, and ability to workon diverse teams [3, 4]. Despite these benefits, STEM majors continue to be underrepresented inglobal programs [3]. Students face multiple barriers, including potential impacts
Education, 2024 1 Session XXXX Towards Models for Cybersecurity Summer Research Institutes for Undergraduate Engagement and Education Eman Hammad Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Texas A&M University Yuehua Wang Computer Science Texas A&M University – Commerce James K. Nelson
trainingsessions for writing center consultants. The quantitative assessment investigated (1) students’confidence in their writing skills from self-efficacy surveys gathered pre- and post- the modifiedassignment and (2) draft and revised writing samples from the intervention class and a control.For the quantitative analysis, we used paired t-tests to compare the pre- and post-self-efficacysurveys, and MANCOVA to compare the draft and final writing sample scores. The qualitativeassessment drew from students’ views on the intervention and course from reflection essays,analyzed for themes. Results for the intervention showed significantly improved self-efficacyscores in assignment content, as well as in higher and lower order writing skills. Assessedwriting
substantial interest due to its potential to improve combustion processes. Thishas led to scientific investigations focused on the enhancement of reactive processes through thecoupling of plasma discharges and combustion chemistry [1, 2]. Results from these studiesstrongly suggest that flames may be enhanced by injecting additional energy to raise the systemtemperature or by the production of highly reactive species. Pioneering studies, such as those byAdamovich et al., [3], Bozhenkov et al., [4], and Ju et al., [5], have demonstrated a notablereduction in ignition temperatures, whereas the work of Starikovskaia [6] and Starikovskii [7]showcased substantial reductions in ignition delay times, both of which are pivotal factors inoptimizing combustion
). Interestingly, the idea of using a promptor activity to activate and promote the transfer of prior knowledge into a new context wasdiscussed as a potential tool for remedying these problems but has not yet been explored(Loverude et al. 2002; Meltzer 2004) - lending credence to the usefulness of investigating RQ2as defined here.2.1 Theoretical Framework Figure 1: Sense-Making Framework of Knowledge Transfer (Nokes and Belenky 2011)In order to better understand, visualize and analyze the knowledge transfer process, I chose toground this study in a theoretical framework of knowledge transfer as defined by Nokes &Belenky (2011) and displayed in Figure 1. This framework mirrors my own understanding of theknowledge transfer process and, importantly to
creativity flourish, especially in engineeringprograms. ICPs allow for cultivating critical thinking, creativity, and networking across alldisciplines [1]. Participation enables students to foster innovative ideas and apply them to real-world scenarios [1]. Students can develop leadership qualities by navigating a technical andinnovative ecosystem, like an ICP, that provides practice opportunities [2]. The success of ICPsrelies on the effective implementation of best practices by their organizers and coordinators. Anorganizer must keep the best interests of their participants in mind when planning, running, andexecuting these competitions and programs [3]. Organizers play a pivotal role in shaping theeducational landscape for ICP participants by
noted in currentjob postings, a college education needs to address the skills gap and realize transferable skillsthat can be applied in a wide array of future careers and situations are as important as field-specific knowledge.” With having experienced employers’ demands for leadership competency, early careerengineers are better suited to inform engineering educations on effective means for developingthese essential skills. ReferencesAhn, B., Cox, M., London, J., Cekic, O., & Zhu, J. (2014). Creating an instrument to measure leadership, change, and synthesis in engineering undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 115–136.Armin, A., Upadhyay, H., Simsekler, M
to the theme, whichwas usually a song from the soundtrack. Then, students were given an opportunity to guess thetheme in a Name-That-Tune manner before the instructor appeared from behind a screen wearinga hat related to the theme. Then, various activities related to the theme were presented, includinga video clip, information about an engineering invention, and an example problem, all of whichdirectly related to the theme.This program was implemented in two sections of a statics course in Fall 2023 and evaluatedusing a student feedback survey. This survey assessed the perceived fun of the various elementsof the project as well as traditional course activities using a Likert scale ranging from 1 = not atall fun to 5 = extremely fun. The
Incubator,and shares some of the lessons learned.IntroductionThe complexity of the ethical, social, and technical challenges associated with developmenttrustworthy AI underscores the paramount importance of fostering diverse scholarship andinterdisciplinary collaboration. It is through the melding of varied perspectives, expertise, andmethodologies that we can create and manage AI systems that meet the diverse requirements fora system to be considered trustworthy [1]. These systems must embody ethical integrity andsocial responsibility, ensuring they adhere to the highest standards of fairness and accountability.Interdisciplinary collaboration, therefore, becomes not just beneficial but essential in the trainingof graduate students, enabling a
interventions for further improving the experiences of future participants and ensuring that ICPs add value to students across majors.IntroductionI n order to gain more hands-on experience, many students participate in co-curricular activities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) or business fields, which we refer to as innovation competitions and programs (ICPs). According to Schuster et al. [1], hackathons, design challenges, pitch competitions, and other similar programs offer students a chance to work on design, construction, and testing under tight deadlines and in multidisciplinary teams. This gives them a more authentic real-world experience beyond their regular coursework
-Credential on Professional EthicsIntroduction and Literature ReviewEngineering practice is not without risk for the public and one’s customers. As Sottile (2023, p.1) recently argued, “the safety and security of the public rely on the professionalism ofengineers.” The issue of effective engineering ethics education is important enough that theengineering accreditor ABET prescribes it as a student program outcome (ABET, 2021). Thiswork looks-in on a novel curricular development approach for creating a micro-credential inprofessional ethics at The Pennsylvania State University (Penn State), a large, public, research-intensive institution location in the northeast United States. The novelty of this approach rests onthe curricular development team
– Figure 6: Student in-session activity sheets collecting information onshowcases the use of community partners to economic, political, environmental and social – energy usage in their homes by age groupimprove research design and increase community Figure 1: DOE Justice40 map of Highland Dwellings showing social factors are the least understood due toparticipation by lowering trust and demographics, inequality categories and energy inequality the complexity in conducting in
, offering personalized tutoring and feedback, and facilitating the process of reflectingideas in writing (Thi Thuy, 2023).There were some barriers to using ChatGPT were identified, and several solutions weresuggested for the improvement of using ChatGPT in learning processes. There were someconcerning issues for students while using ChatGPT and they were listed as 1. The inability toassess the quality and reliability of sources, 2. The inability to cite sources accurately, and 3. Theinability to replace words and use idioms accurately. To address these concerns, some potentialsolutions can be implemented; for example, verifying ChatGPT’s responses with reliablesources; using ChatGPT as a reference source or a consultant tool; providing guidelines
-Chair of the Arts and Design Department at Raritan Valley Community College in New Jersey. He teaches Visual Design 1, Visual Design 2, Digital Artmaking, Portfolio Development, and Typography within the Graphic and Interactive Design Program. He is an award-winning artist and professional graphic designer specializing in visual identity and branding. McManus has earned numerous grants, awards, and residency fellowships while working between the contemporary art and design worlds. He received his BFA from the Hartford Art School, where he completed a double major and spent his junior year studying at the Glasgow School of Art in Scotland; and an MFA from Cranbrook Academy of Art.Dr. Peter Raymond Stupak, Main Engine
interactions among professionals working in teams such thatjudgment “emerges” as the interaction of internal (belonging to the subject alone) and participatory (theresult of interactive communication practices) judgment processes play out.Implications for EducatorsThe prior section describes what critical thinking and engineering judgment are. When considering howto strengthen engineering judgment and critical thinking through assignments intended to reinforceengineering judgment capacities, the gaps identified by Claris and Riley (2012, p.110) imply foursuggestions for improving the ways critical thinking is adopted in engineering pedagogy: 1. Engineering education should provide opportunities for students to “analyze the co-construction of
, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM) and engineering students for future success by enhancing their abilityto think creatively, identify opportunities, and develop innovative solutions. This educationequips students with essential skills to address challenges they may encounter in their careers(Mwasalwiba, 2012)[1]. Research has shown that entrepreneurship education influencesstudents' motivations to engage in entrepreneurial activities (Wu & Mao, 2020)[2]. Byfostering innovation and creativity, entrepreneurship education enhances students' problem-solving skills and encourages leadership qualities (Ganefri et al., 2017)[3]. One studyconducted in the United Arab Emirates emphasized the importance of integratingentrepreneurial practices