.Simpson, et al. 9 believe that interdisciplinary experience is more representative of what studentswill find in the real world and advocate interdisciplinary capstone projects. Schaffer, et al. 10have concluded – based on their study of 256 students from 60 teams - that Cross disciplinaryTeam Learning (CDTL) increases self-efficacy across all respondents. Apelian11 believes thatone of the important skills for the 21stcentury engineer is the ability to work with anybodyanywhere. He concludes that we need to educate engineers such that they understand the societalcontext of their work and have an understanding of the human dimension around the globe,coupled with innovation and creativity. Michaelsen, et al.12 have claimed that innovation
students easy, perhaps even commonplace, making faculty rethink globalcooperation in higher education [19, 20].The unique nature of capstone engineering courses resulted in additional challenges towardeffective delivery during the pandemic, with one faculty member commenting “lack of in-persondiscussions, team collaboration and time spent in the lab all have negative impacts on the project”[21]. Many adaptations were made during the pandemic to allow students to effectively work onchemical engineering capstone projects as part of a team, such as focusing on design tasks usingsimulation tools (e.g. ASPEN) and managing group meetings through video conferencing software(e.g. Google Meet) [22]. It is possible that knowledge of these practices
engineering, construction of engineering identities, and faculty development.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communica- tion in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, and design education. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is Co-PI on several NSF grants to explore identity and interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering design.Ms. Andrea M. Motto, Virginia Tech Andrea Motto is a Ph.D. student in social
weeks)10 IDEO vs stage-gate Batill19 Capstone course (several weeks)11 Innovative thinking Raviv20 Several exercises and projects (hours to weeks)1. Candy Airplane ExerciseThe authors behind the Candy Airplane Exercise discuss the conflict between traditional studentviews on engineering as very mathematical and rigorous with the proposed view of engineeringas a creative field of study. They argue that the amount of creativity necessary to solve industrialproblems is highly underestimated21. Referencing Higly and Marianno22 the
were cited a weakness in our Capstone Project that we are not integrating socialaspect, economic impact, environmental consideration, and ethical considerations. Although thedesign was robust in most of the Capstone Projects but these four aspects were lacking. Afterconsulting the ABET reviewer who agreed in advance that if these four issues were addressed bythe industrial personnel, the weakness may be taken care of. It is because of this reason that welaunched a course 16.400 Engineering Topics which is being offered under my supervision bythe industrial giants of our region, where all these 4 aspects are being addressed along with theState-of-The-Art-Designs in their industries. The students write a two page summary and it isgraded by me
the students are before even they graduate and they become productive rightfrom the first day on their job.In 1996 we were cited a weakness in our Capstone Project that we are not integrating socialaspect, economic impact, environmental consideration, and ethical considerations. Although thedesign was robust in most of the Capstone Projects but these four aspects were lacking. Afterconsulting the ABET reviewer who agreed in advance that if these four issues were addressed bythe industrial personnel, the weakness may be taken care of. It is because of this reason that welaunched a course 16.400 Engineering Topics which is being offered under my supervision bythe industrial giants of our region, where all these 4 aspects are being addressed
, students who select the PRM options are tasked with projectsthat allow them to apply concepts learned in the Learning Factory environment that focuses onhigh volume manufacturing. In addition to facilities and technologies, students will also haveaccess to a staff of students and professors who assist with product realization tasks. Studentsare assigned one project per semester until their senior year of study. The curriculum is roundedoff with a capstone project that encompasses the final year of study. ―This capstone courseprovides students with the opportunity to practice the design of products, processes andenterprise from conceptualization to actualization5‖.Learning factories issues:The Learning Factory concept has been a work in progress
necessary.Design faculty across a range of educational institutions still feel that the leaders of engineeringschools (deans, department heads, tenured faculty) are unable or unwilling to recognize theintellectual complexities and resources needed to support good design education.Fortunately, more and more educators are becoming aware of the issues of design, and steps arebeing taken world wide, to address the concerns of industry at large. One approach has been toform “symbiotic” partnership between industry and academia through senior capstone projects.The capstone course has evolved over the years from “made up” projects devised by faculty toindustry-sponsored projects where companies provide “real” problems, along with expertise andfinancial support
necessary.Design faculty across a range of educational institutions still feel that the leaders of engineeringcolleges (deans, department heads, tenured faculty) are unable or unwilling to recognize theintellectual complexities and resources needed to support good design education[1].Fortunately, more and more educators are becoming aware of the issues of design, and steps arebeing taken world wide, to address the concerns of industry at large. One approach has been toform “symbiotic” partnership between industry and academia through senior capstone projects.The capstone course has evolved over the years from “made up” projects devised by faculty toindustry-sponsored projects where companies provide “real” problems, along with expertise andfinancial
, Computer Graphics, Materials Science and laboratory courses. Since 2015 she has been actively involved in the University of Miami College of Engineering’s ”Redefining Engineering Education” strategic plan on educational innovation. As part of this plan, Dr. Basalo worked with 2 other faculty members to organize inaugural Senior Design Expo in May 2017, an exposition where over 200 senior students showcased their Capstone projects to the University of Miami community, alumni and industry leaders. Starting in 2016 and through her work with the University of Miami’s Engaged Faculty Fellowship program, Dr. Basalo incorporated an academic service component into the final project for a sophomore-level Measurements Lab
the power and speed limits ofthe system are specified, leaving everything else open-ended. Students are expected to start withan application in mind that uses a similar subsystem, and justify all the subsequent assumed data,including the safety factors. This produced several alternative designs, which can be used by theinstructor for future classes. Each design report can serve as a case study that includes the mathand CAE tools that the students used for the project. Conventionally, many capstone designclasses use this approach. However, to a smaller scale, this idea serves the same purpose as acapstone course. Several other alternative inputs may be specified rather than input power and
number of engineering/design projects that canbe integrated into the structure of classroom activities,4 such as, Rube Goldberg Contraptions,Leonardo da Vinci: The Engineer, Lego Robots, Battle Bots, etc. Specifically, within theconstruction management discipline, few examples of first-year classroom applications areprovided in the literature. These hands-on application within construction education areprimarily focused on the senior capstone experience.10,12,13The basic purpose of this project is two-fold: first, to document current first-year constructionmanagement courses, and second, to develop and deliver a hands-on first-year “constructionmanagement experience” within the framework of CM&E 111
such as, Rube Goldberg Contraptions,Leonardo da Vinci: The Engineer, Lego Robots, Battle Bots, etc. Specifically, within theconstruction management discipline, few examples of first-year classroom applications areprovided in the literature. These hands-on application within construction education areprimarily focused on the senior capstone experience.10,12,13The basic purpose of this project is two-fold: first, to document current first-year constructionmanagement courses, and second, to develop and deliver a hands-on first-year “constructionmanagement experience” within the framework of CM&E 111.Overall Objectives for Course RevisionThe basic objectives for the revised CM&E 111 course are presented below. To expand the body of
,” Int. J. Constr. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–42, 2018, doi: 10.14424/ijcscm801018-19-42.[33] N. McWhirter and T. Shealy, “Bridging engineering and psychology: Using an envision gold certified project to teach decision making for sustainability,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2017-June, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2--27978.[34] L. Brunell, “A real-world approach to introducing sustainability in civil engineering capstone design,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019.[35] C. Boyle et al., “Delivering sustainable infrastructure that supports the urban built environment,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 4836–4840, 2010, doi: 10.1021/es903749d.[36] G. Weerasinghe, K
academic calendar requires intense exams during some of this period while the US universities spread exams throughout the semester and break for a month of vacation. Also, ASU students continued with the same course format for the spring as a capstone course, while Leeds students were required to switch to an individualized course in design rather than one that emphasized teaming. In addition, the Leeds students were provided with an office setting including a computer workstation where they could gather everyday to discuss the project while ASU students, most of whom commuted to campus, had disparate class schedules and no meeting place provided so their meetings were less frequent, but by necessity more structured
societal contexts [7]. Theemphasis is on enhancing students' ability to confront social and ethical dilemmas in theirprofessional lives, acknowledging the crucial role that ethical decision-making plays inengineering practice.One approach is to integrate ethics and societal impact (ESI) issues directly into senior capstonedesign courses. This integration can be achieved through various methods, including dedicatedlectures, discussions, and project work that emphasize ethical decision-making in engineeringpractice. According to a 2016 national survey [8], 40% of engineering faculty include ethics andsocietal impacts (ESI) in capstone design courses. ESI topics such as professional practiceissues, safety, engineering decisions in uncertainty, and
pedagogy in introductory engineering [3], design skilldevelopment in courses between introductory cornerstone and final capstone [4], and even uniteclinical and engineering students [5]. Some universities are exploring the best ways toencourage faculty to incorporate makerspaces in their curricula. This may take as simple a formas pop-up “inreach/outreach” demonstrations that expose faculty and staff to makerspaceequipment [6]. For those seeking a higher intensity experience, B-Fab, a fabrication workshoporganized by Bucknell University, trains faculty to use equipment often found in a makerspacewhile exposing them to related pedagogical theory and example makerspace STEM projects [7].Carnasciali and coauthors surveyed faculty given three
2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Impact and Delivery of an Engineering Service Learning Course in a Remote Environment Jeffrey Wolchok, Hanna Jensen, and Timothy J. Muldoon Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, ARExtended AbstractIntroduction:Undergraduate engineering curricula typically culminate with a “Capstone Senior Design”course, which integrates much of the engineering topics learned to date in a yearlong experiencewhich addresses a field-specific engineering question. The Department of BiomedicalEngineering at the University of Arkansas has recently adopted the Clinical Observations andNeeds
how to structure a debateDay 3 – The students participated in a live AI demonstration. Hey learnedabout ”hallucinations” and the importance of have clear inputs. They also hada discuss about how AI and other technologies have bene utilized in unethicalways.Day 4 – The students worked with a professional videographer and producer 5to learn about storytelling and using technology to share an effective storyDay 5 – The students presented their capstone projects to a panel of industryand academic leaders 5 Camp Instructors
year MET students from each of thefocus areas are required to complete a team-based senior design project. Studentsprogress through a two semester sequence starting with Product Design and Developmentpresenting integrated methodologies that examine marketing, manufacturing, and cross-functional teams including concurrent engineering and projects utilizing CAD systems,and ending with a Senior Project course including evaluation and design optimizationmethods for efficient and cost-effective designs requiring an oral/written report andcomprehensive exam. In the capstone sequence the student teams first generate thedesign, optimize the design and document the design. Then, during the last semester theteams plan for production, manufacture and
workshop was the first oriented workshopconducted in the satellite location. This was done to introduce students to potential collaborationswith art students. Additionally, metal working and a clay forming workshops were held asadditional multidisciplinary outreach efforts.Since the beginning of the cross-departmental alliance, the AIS has been successful in advancinghigh-resolution prototyping abilities among two high-profile student organization projects andtwo engineering capstone projects. Prior to the alliance, the such projects were dependent on off-campus resources to complete their projects. Specifically, the Design, Build, Fly, and SteelBridge student organization projects were able to benefit from access to the newly available
traditionalservice courses in each of the disciplines. Although mechanics and thermal/fluid courses for theEE’s and circuits/machinery courses for the ME’s are important and necessary, they are notsufficient to give the students the skills to deal with these new systems.Western Kentucky University has implemented a course, EE 285: Introduction to IndustrialAutomation, in an attempt to build a bridge between the EE and ME programs. The goal is givethe students a common language in this area so that multidisciplinary capstone and professionalprojects are more easily accomplished. The results of two years of offering the course, includingstudent feedback and course assessment are included. Examples of projects tackled by thestudents, lessons learned by the
industry connections also provide a pool of adjunct faculty that has, historically, beenengaged in teaching engineering at ASU, particularly at the capstone design level. Thesepractitioners have the potential to provide a valuable connection for students in the areas ofdesign and problem solving.Another theme that arose from our study was instructional innovation, initially stimulated byinvolvement in the Foundation Coalition in the early 1990’s. An education faculty membernoted that the Foundation Coalition was very influential in the area of engineering design and“thinking about what that capstone design project should be. . .and they spent a long timeworking on it very, very hard.” One outcome of the Foundation Coalition and two other
the four comparison sections did not complete theintervention.Figure 1. Activities and timeline for critical-narrative interventionProject-Group Discussion AssignmentBoth the study and comparison groups were required to complete the project-group discussionassignment near the end of the semester. Because the primary objective of this research effort isto gain insights on the impact of critical narratives on students’ abilities to identify the broaderimpacts of engineering work and transfer these abilities to their own senior/capstone designprojects, researchers designed the group-discussion exercise to be focused on each groups’senior/capstone design project.The project-group discussion (PGD) was organized in an identical manner to the
full list in Table 1). While the rubric was designed to allowfor assessment of a variety of project types, it has only been applied to civil engineering studentdesign projects.5The rubric includes two four-point rating scales to aid evaluators in judging capstone reportsbased on the 16 sustainable design criteria. The earned points scale [0-3] captures the extent towhich students consider each sustainable design criterion in their capstone projects. Evaluatorsassign a score of 0 to projects that show no evidence of incorporating the design criterion, whilea score of 3 is assigned if the project shows evidence of extensive criterion application. Thepotential points scale [0-3] describes the extent to which each sustainable design criterion
with two practice rounds followed by an eight weekcompetitive series. Using this simulation, the students learn the interaction of all corporatefunctions and the trade-offs necessary for a company to gain market share and make profits. Astockholders meeting presentation by the team is conducted at the end of the 8 simulated years ofcompetition. The CAPSTONE business simulation is used in hundreds of business curriculumsalso being used in undergraduate engineering education at University of Colorado-Boulder,Arizona Western College, and Milwaukee School of Engineering.2. Effective Business PresentationsEffective business presentations are learned in a project based exercise taught by the members ofthe class. Sections of the book The Articulate
can’t bedeveloped in class, has been shown in [2]. Given the necessity for teamwork across multipledisciplines, robotics provides an excellent platform for senior design/capstone projects, campusorganizations, and design competition teams.While many positive results have been reported in the literature, there remain several challengesin effectively managing a robotics competition and related activities such that a students’learning outcome can be maximized. First, many robotics competitions are demanding in termsof resources. The lack of ample funding experienced by this particular team during the past yearhas created an improvisational stigma among members working on creating parts of the sub,which requires much more time and effort to be put
service and not enough engineering. This is, in itself, an ethical issue. Ifwe are offering courses that get engineering credit without doing realengineering, we are being deceitful to our students. This is an issue that manyengineering programs have faced as some faculty are resistant to this new wayof doing things.Several papers were presented at the 2007 EPICS national conference thatattempt to alleviate these concerns about the real engineering content ofengineering service learning courses. Hefzy from the University of Toledo 2 andZoltowski from Purdue 3 made presentations about how to do service learningbased capstone design courses. Budny and Lund 4 from the University ofPittsburgh have written about how to use engineering service projects
Systems Engineering. His teaching and research is in the area of manufacturing operations and includes capstone design. Before coming to Georgia Tech, he worked as an engineer in the semiconductor industry for a dozen years and served as Partner and CEO for a small company that developed software for factory scheduling.Garlie Forehand, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Forehand was Director of Research Program Planning and Development at Education Testing Service until February 2000. Dr. Forehand teaches and consults in the areas of research design and workplace communication. His research emphasizes curriculum innovation and evaluation. As a consultant to Georgia Tech, he has assisted
CompE.Student teams have become very successful at completing the increasingly imaginativeprojects they choose.Results from the five years over which the course has been developed show increases inteaming skills; increased cooperation among students of different departments leading tomore multidisciplinary capstone design projects; increased multidisciplinary participationin student competitions such as IEEE Robotics, American Solar Challenge, and FormulaSAE; increased levels of enjoyment as students succeed in real engineering projects(especially obvious as students cheer on their team’s robot in the end of semestercompetition). Page 8.844.1IntroductionSDSM&