Higher Education (ASHE).Prof. Harriet Hartman, Rowan University Professor of Sociology, Chair of Sociology and Anthropology Department Rowan University. Co-p.i. of RED NSF RevED project at Rowan University. Editor-in-chief, Contemporary Jewry. She studies gender and diversity among undergraduate engineering students, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the experiences of undergraduate and graduate students, faculty and staff in higher education.Dr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Interim Dean and of the Henry M. Rowan College of Engineering and Professor and Founding Chair of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University (USA). Prior to 2016 she was a faculty member in
: https://www.asee.org/retention-project/keeping-students-in- engineering-a-research-guide-to-improving-retention. [Accessed: 09-Feb-2021].[5] D. E. Chubin, G. S. May, and E. L. Babco, “Diversifying the engineering workforce,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 73–86, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00830.x.[6] N. W. Klingbeil and A. Bourne, “A national model for engineering mathematics education: Longitudinal impact at wright state university,” in 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2013.[7] PCAST President’s Council on Advisors on Science and Technology, “Engage to Excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and
-College- Students-Need-Now/248882[2] B. Bayne. “Adjusted Syllabus.” https://docs.google.com/document/d/1- 6d_W8rdzE9mW2DvPi-dPvRxo4sekKlz3VqEpnu4Dwg/edit (retrieved March 30, 2020).[3] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005.[4] L. L. Wu et al., “Rapidly Converting a Project-Based Engineering Experience for Remote Learning: Successes and Limitations of Using Experimental Kits and a Multiplayer Online Game,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 8, no. 4, 2020.[5] S. L. Leung, B. A. Hargrove, E. R. Marsh, A. R. Gregg, and K. A. Thole, “Prompting by COVID-19 to Rethink the
concept that helps explicate how social justice might be enacted within the academy and draws on Black women theorists in order to frame the project. The lead author, a white woman, receives the reviews, only to find that the reviewer has disparaged the writing style and the methodology, demanding graphs and charts and analysis! The tone of the review is troubling, particularly for a social justice track: as their qualitative study (along with decades of research) shows, the preference for a particular style of writing, for charts and quantitative analysis, often reveals and upholds patriarchal, Western and white supremacist values. Key to social justice, the lead author thinks, is an
learning and knowledge assessment systems. Currently, he is involved as a knowledge engineer in various private and publicly funded projects. Dr. Iseli holds a PhD and an MS in electrical engineering from UCLA and from ETH Z¨urich, Switzerland.Ms. Tianying Feng, University of California, Los AngelesDr. Gregory Chung, University of California, Los AngelesZiyue RuanMr. Joe Shochet, codeSpark Joe Shochet has been developing award-winning interactive experiences for 25 years. In 2014 he co- founded codeSpark, an edtech startup to teach kids the ABCs of computer science. His career started at Disney Imagineering building virtual reality attractions for the theme parks and designing ride concepts. Joe was a lead designer and
when describing their near future steps, rather focusing their actions on thedevelopment of technical skills, for example: "...gain technical skills through an internship orpersonal project"; "these [technical] skills will help me in my career or internship..." As shownin Figure 2, the ratio of mentions of social dimensions to technical dimensions in the engineeringstatement was the inverse of those mentions in the near future steps portion of the action plan.Because students were not explicitly prompted to make these connections, and the sample weanalyzed was small, these early findings suggest the need for further examination and betteralignment between conceptual understanding and action.Figure 2. Mentions of social and technical in two
studentsclaimed not to have realized that different types of audiences often existed for a technicaldocument. As one student wrote, “I simply thought that because the writing is scientific, it isintended for a learned audience when in reality, scientific writing can be intended for differentaudiences,” such as users of an instruction manual or for decision makers of a project. Thesefindings supported our decision to keep those details in the film series. With regard to the question on what students most liked about the films, the top commentconcerned the high number of examples and the quality of those examples. The second portion ofthe comment was not surprising given that the examples had been vetted by so manyprofessional engineers. Also
underrepresentedbackgrounds that I worked with over two years as they engaged in engineering work through anout-of-school community engineering program. Designed by a team containing the author, theprogram engages youth in defining a community engineering problem of interest, researchingthat problem, and developing a solution. I led the programming multiple times over three yearswithin an afterschool and summer context. 75% of sessions were video-recorded, resulting in atleast ten hours of clearly visible video per youth. I interviewed youth via focus groups at the endof each project and collected all youth-produced artifacts. To conclude data collection, Iconducted reflective, stimulated-recall interviews with each youth. Per qualitative best practices,I member
insight into student behavior [Conner19], modifyingEclipse to integrate with Git [Yan19], or integrating with the Web-CAT auto-grader [Kazerouni17]. TheRunestone project logs Python development activity, allowing for research such as [Yeckeh19].In recent years, cloud-based program auto-grader usage has grown tremendously. Hundreds ofuniversities have switched from manual to auto-grading, reaching hundreds of thousands of students[Gordon21]. Auto-graders can create a log of every submission students make for auto-grading,including date, time, the submitted program, and more. In fact, some such auto-graders provide adevelopment environment too, so potentially can log all compiles/runs also, as depicted in Figure 1.Figure 1: Modern auto-graders may
Paper ID #34075Comparison of Conceptual Knowledge of Shear Stress in Beams BetweenCivil Engineering Undergraduates and PractitionersDominga Sanchez, Oregon State University Dominga Sanchez is a graduate student in the Civil and Construction Engineering Department at Oregon State University. During her undergraduate studies at University of California San Diego, she worked in research projects related to earthquake engineering and engineering education. She is currently conduct- ing engineering education research while pursuing a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering. Her research interests include, engineering curriculum
prior experience as engineering students best equipped them to handle the change in modality.This study relates to a larger project that is currently underway to explore the interactionsbetween cognitive load experienced in engineering courses during the pandemic and self-directed learning readiness. Our work will provide important insights for using online educationto provide continuity of engineering instruction during future crises, whether biological,environmental, or other. While the COVID-19 pandemic is the first disruption of its kind in theUnited States during the 21st Century, extreme weather events like flooding, tornados, andblizzards are now regular disruptors across the US. Understanding students’ experiences andcoping with this
workshops on topics such as globalization,localization, visual design, color theory, cultural dimensions, intercultural rhetoric, informationarchitecture, interface and interaction design, and a modified approach to content analysis. Themodule culminates in the Cross-Cultural UI Report.The module and report described here are part of a required 5-credit junior level communication,design, and engineering core course offered in the Department of Human Centered Design &Engineering in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. The course usesparticipatory learning and project-based learning approaches in all assignments. The coursecounts towards the university’s required writing credits. The course leans on many of the
the entire semester not only for classwork, homework, and group projects in CAD, FEA, materials, and other courses, but it is also used for in-class practical exams and quizzes that must be completed on an individual basis. Therefore, multiple solutions had to be created depending on the specific type of work being assigned and assessed in a given course. Specific items addressed included: • Documentation – the Office of Disability Services will convert all course documents to a format the student can use. All documentation shall comply with the course syllabus
-year engineering course and no correlation in the mid-level aerospace course. Correlation coefficients (ρ) are displayed on each plot. Individual data points represent data from a single student with stars representing those identified as high magnitude outliers for concept map score.of concept map submissions for the next iteration of this project, the assignment prompt has beenmodified to clarify the expectations for concept map creation. The prompt now requires studentsto start with the course title as the central topic and to create the concept map electronicallyrather than hand-written. We anticipate that these two changes will allow for easier scoring of theNC, HH, and NCL and make the determination of these components by raters less
, Towson University Jennifer L. Kouo, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Special Education at Towson University in Maryland. Dr. Kouo received her PhD in Special Education with an emphasis in severe disabilities and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from the University of Maryland at College Park. She is passionate about both instructional and assistive technology, as well as Universal Design for Learning (UDL), and utilizing inclusive practices to support all students. Dr. Kouo is currently engaged in multiple research projects that involve multidisciplinary collaborations in the field of engineering, medicine, and education, as well as research on teacher preparation and the conducting of evidence-based
Paper ID #32704Engineering Students Coping With COVID-19: Yoga, Meditation, and Men-talHealthDr. Kacey Beddoes, San Jose State University Kacey Beddoes is a Project Director in the College of Engineering Dean’s Office at San Jose State University. She holds a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech, along with graduate certificates in Women’s and Gender Studies, and Engineering Education. Dr. Beddoes serves as Associate Editor for the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education and Managing Edi- tor for Engineering Studies. She is also the past Chair of the Working Group on Gender and Diversity
interests currently focus on the effects of icing on the aero- dynamics of swept-wing aircraft. In engineering education, he is also interested in project-based learning and spatial visualization. He teaches courses at the University of Illinois where he serves as the Director of Undergraduate Programs for the Department of Aerospace Engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Evaluating an Intelligent Sketching Feedback Tool for Scalable Spatial Visualization Skill TrainingAbstractSpatial visualization skills are essential and fundamental to studying STEM subjects. Theincreasing need for STEM education poses scalability
, STEM education, and ABET accreditation.Dr. Steve U. Efe, Morgan State University Dr. Steve Efe is an Assistant Professor and the Assistant Director of the Center for Advanced Transporta- tion and Infrastructure Engineering Research. He obtained his Doctor of Engineering in Civil Engineering with a major in Structural Engineering and minor in Construction from Morgan State University. He has more than 15 years of outstanding experience in practicing, teaching, and research in civil and transporta- tion engineering. He is experienced in project management, inspection and construction supervision, adaptive materials and construction techniques, high performance material testing and simulations, mate- rial modeling and
instructors and students from the engineeringFaculty of the university. The survey was part of a larger research project that received the approvalof the research ethics board of the university. We included four groups of variables for analysis in light of the conceptual framework for thisstudy and used the general Input-Environment-Outcome framework to assess learning experience andoutcomes in postsecondary education [32, 33]. The focus of interest for the study was self-directedlearning. We included five measures—motivation for learning, time management, self-regulation,persistence, and help-seeking—to serve as the self-directed learning (SDL) indicators as theyrepresent the key characteristics of self-directed learners [10]. Questions from a
exclusively from thechosen textbook. A more experienced instructor might make notes based on a composite ofknowledge in the field, but will still be constrained to coordinate notes with the outline of thetextbook. The textbook becomes the primary organizational vehicle for the course. However,some students will not read much of the textbook, relying instead on taking notes during class. 2The instructor uses the textbook-oriented notes for the classroom lectures, usually writing thenotes on a whiteboard or presenting them via computerized projection while speaking. Studentscopy the notes, either by hand or by using a computer. The instructor’s notes
demonstrate a basic understanding of the engineeringdesign process and show basic competency in the KSAs measured by the STSS.KSA # KSA Category Number of Items 1 Identify and define system boundaries and external interfaces 1 2 Identify major stakeholders and understand that stakeholders must 1 be involved early in the project lifecycle 3 Identify possible technical performance measures [specifications] 2 for determining the system’s success 4 Understand the different types of architecture 2 5 Understand the need to explore alternative and innovative ways
- efficacy? The case of project-based learning in Korea,” vol. 85, pp. 45–57, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.005.[15] J. K. Liker, The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.[16] J.-H. Thun, M. Drüke, and A. Grübner, “Empowering Kanban through TPS-principles – an empirical analysis of the Toyota Production System,” vol. 48, no. 23, pp. 7089–7106, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/00207540903436695.[17] M. G. (Mark) Yang, P. Hong, and S. B. Modi, “Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms,” vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 251–261, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.017.[18] R. Shah and P
the videos are recorded, another faculty member wrote: “Extensive effortis required to create modules for these courses. I eliminated exams and increased the number ofassignments and quizzes. I have required students to do virtual demos with graders to presenttheir projects.” Another faculty member wrote: “The whole course structure has been changed.Particularly, a live discussion session is included to actively facilitate students' learning.”As for the help received by faculty who taught in the Online modality, some faculty members hadalready taken the Online Certification Course at our university or at other places. Specifically,several faculty members wrote that they “underwent a training course.” Another faculty memberreceived help “From
hardest projects. I’ll hide my emotions and ignore mycreativity. I’ll only rely on my logic and I won’t fail,” She whispered back, a bit defeated butdetermined. And she did, she got her BS in engineering. But she didn’t stop. Already exhausted,she then completed her MS and PhD at a top-tier school completely outside the shield and faithbubble she’d grown up under. “But I hate the color pink,” she tells everyone, pulling the ribbonfrom her hair. Each of her interests and each of her degrees a new ribbon, some pulling her upcloser to her lofty goals. Others pulling her down and holding her back. All the while, she’strying to weave them together into a comprehensible story of who she is.She weaves.By now, she was actively pushing at the shield
educationliterature. In fact, modern expectancy-value theories argue that individuals' choice, persistenceand performance can be explained by their beliefs about how well they will do on the activityand the extent to which they value the activity [9, 10]. For example, a student chooses to engagewith different course materials because they believe it will increase their performance or overallunderstanding. Likewise, interest in a topic and empowerment to make choices in their learningengagement can determine whether or not a student performs well in a course. To betterunderstand the expected value of different course materials, the project leveraged a popular,validated survey methodology known as the MUSIC Inventory. The MUSIC Inventory measuresthe five
Testing lab at Missouri S&T, teaches mechanics of materials and develops digital educational resources for the engineering students. He had the opportunity of leading several scientific and industrial research projects and mentoring graduate and undergraduate students. Over the span of his career, Dr. Libre authored and co-authored 3 chapter books, 17 peer-reviewed journal articles and over 60 conference papers. He has advised and co-advised 8 gradu- ate students and mentored over 30 undergraduate students. He has collaborated with scholars from several countries, including Iran, China, Slovenia, Canada, and the US. He also served as a reviewer for 6 journals and a committee member of 5 conferences. He is the
towards laboratoryexperiments in either face-to-face or online environments also showed no significant difference[27, 28]. With this new knowledge, students can also pursue hobbies and projects relevant to thefield of electronics using their equipment.Lessons LearnedWith the potential of future disease outbreaks and the increase in online education, the need foronline learning is necessary to provide a laboratory experience remotely with physicalequipment. Furthermore, online learning can provide an opportunity for students unable to attenda physical university location. While challenging, hands-on laboratory learning can occur at adistance. The success of distant, hands-on learning requires the use of many resources,supplemental instructions
Staffed by graduate students, free for adults in central Ohio.Suicide Prevention Hotlines Phone: (614) 292-2345 Website: psychology.osu.edu/pscColumbus Hotline: (614) 221-5445 Email: psc@psy.ohio-state.eduNational Hotline: (800) 273-8255LGBT (Trevor Project) Phone: (866) 488-7386 Text: "START" to678-678 Crisis TEXT LineCounseling and Consultation Services This free line will not show up on your phone bill, so this is
leadershippositions, stemming in large part from the mindset and traits imparted where data, facts, andlogic represent the only cornerstones for success.Awareness of the necessary traits and ways to develop emotional intelligence and servantleadership to facilitate success in leader or manager positions can be imparted to studentsthrough interactive courses and workshops. Problem-based learning is paramount in leadershiptraining to demonstrate that ‘correct’ or even good answers are sometimes not possible, butdecisions must be made to move the project and team forward. By considering and discussingrealistic leadership or management scenarios that require decisions or responses where ambiguityreigns due to the sociotechnical problems encountered, early-career
] OECD. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (4th Edition), The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018:85-102.[22] Boris Zlotin, Alla Zusman, Len Kaplan, “TRIZ Beyond Technology: The Theory and Practice of Applying TRIZ to Non-Technical Areas”, Jan 2001. [Online]. Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c7d7/653f22df8c3e448b261e2a45a54c2b137cb6. pdf. [Accessed April. 15, 2019].[23] Yang Liexun. Review of Research on R&D Project Assessment [J]. Journal of Management Engineering in China, 2002, 16 (2): 60-65.[24] Yao Wei, Han Xu. A Theory driven Comparison and Enlightenment of TRIZ