that Black talent development is lacking in science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields in the U.S. and that these numbers are reflected inundergraduate and graduate admissions as well as the workforce. In this paper, we focus on theexperience of Black students in academia because it is particularly rife with gross inequities inparticipation and prone to racial stereotypes about ability and competence [1]. To understand thecontext of this study we must first understand the history of engineering in institutions of highereducation in America.BackgroundThe Morrill Act of 1862 established engineering as a major at institutions currently known asPWIs. From the very conception of the engineering collegiate culture in 1862
college and university classrooms. School closures, masking andsocial distancing requirements, contact tracing, and quarantines have changed how educatorsinteract with students and have placed a new emphasis on remote learning and virtual instruction.The pandemic has also had a great impact on teacher professional development programming,which was also forced to shift to virtual delivery. The research data on the impacts of COVIDpandemic induced changes is limited, particularly in the areas of energy technology and teacherpreparation. A recent pandemic study of academic programs in engineering and teachereducation profiled an interdisciplinary project engaging university and middle school students inwind energy technology [1]. Student reflection
an option foreveryone;● Empowered engineering and engineering technology student organizations to makeengineering education more inclusive; and● Actionable organizational policies and effective practices implemented in Colleges ofEngineering and Engineering Technology that disrupt the status quo regarding who gets toparticipate in engineering and engineering technology education as a student and as a facultymember.Figure 1 summarizes the activities and preliminary outcomes of the work of the volunteers whoare making the Year of Impact on Racial Equity happen.Figure 1. Overview of Year of Impact on Racial EquityIn addition to the activities that are happening within each of the three pillars described above,the Commission on Diversity, Equity
practices.Madeline Roth © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Impact of Gender Identity on Early-Career Engineer's Perception of ExpertiseIntroductionThis full paper seeks to share insight on the relationship between early-career engineers’perceptions of personal expertise and their gender identity. This research is an effort to expandupon a previous study regarding engineers with 6+ year of experience and how their respectiveidentities influenced their perceptions of personal expertise [1]. This experienced participantpopulation was chosen based on the known links between expertise and experience
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Probation and Suspension in Engineering by Major and Matriculation ModelAbstractThis full paper will explore rates of academic suspension in engineering disciplines and willbuild off past descriptive ex post facto analysis. Academic suspension rates at 4-year institutionsrange from 2% to 10% [1], [2]. We investigated the percentage of students on probation whoeventually become suspended within an engineering major. To explore engineering trends acrossinstitutions, over time, and contextualized by major, we utilized the Multiple-InstitutionDatabase for Investigating Engineering
insight into which high-impactcompetencies engineering faculty, staff, and administrators can focus on when creatingenvironments conducive to student thriving and interacting directly with students when teaching,supporting, advising, and mentoring.IntroductionAlthough products of engineering reach nearly every facet of society, little is known regardingthe most important factors that contribute to thriving for undergraduate engineering students whowill supply the engineering workforce. In this paper, we build upon prior work [1] that definesengineering thriving as a process in which students develop internal competencies and managechanging external factors within the broader engineering education system and culture. A modelof engineering thriving
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com How to Use the STEM-OP Levels to Support the Engineering Designed-Based Lesson Plan Template in The Framework for P-12 Engineering Learning (Resource Exchange)This instructional resource is designed to help K-12 engineering educators create activities for the EngineeringDesigned-Based Lesson Plan template found in the Framework for P-12 Engineering Learning [1]. The resource ismeant to help take topics found in resources such as textbooks, curricula, and standards and create activities thatalign with the lesson plan template. This tool is not meant to be used in a linear fashion, but each section
disciplinaryteachers in Antioquia, Colombia. The learning goals for this program are: (1) Recognize the importanceof integrating computation in different areas, (2) Explain how the CT can be integrated into differentareas, and (3) Design a learning environment where CT is integrated within a disciplinary context. Weintroduced a set of lesson plans of Physics, Natural Science, and Social Sciences for the participatingteachers to explore. The lesson plans contained a set of activities using the UMC progression to supportstudent learning. For example, the Physics lesson plan had the structure presented is Table I. The teachersstart by exploring sample lesson plans, and explain them to each other (i.e., use). They should thenintroduce a change into the lesson
project competitions [1-7], which rangein level of scope and complexity. Balsa wood bridge competitions, for example, have beenaround for decades and are the “go to” engineering outreach activity, particularly for civilengineering programs, used to introduce students to engineering. They are fairly simple to runand can easily reach over 100 students. However, balsa wood bridge competitions are now facedwith the ever-growing popularity of other competitions related to robotics and rockets, and mostrecently drones. Competing with more flashy activities can make it difficult to attractparticipants, and even volunteers, especially if competition dates overlap. The traditional balsawood bridge competition simply requires students to build a bridge and
early college credits are earned or transferred to these universities,they often fall outside the student’s plan of study, or count as elective credits, doing little to reducetheir workload while in college [1]. This paper, however, highlights a novel case of a dual creditmodel, referred to as the facilitator model, for first-year design courses. The case presentedoutlines procedures for developing and implementing such a model within engineering andtechnology programs. While this may not be the same process at each university, hopefully thisprovides some guidance to help navigate such a task. The facilitator model is a relatively newmodel for dual credit that was recently piloted with a cohort of high school juniors and seniors [2].For this
evaluation. Ourco-authors, who conducted the external evaluation, have submitted a corresponding parallel paperthat details the approach taken for the evaluation (Zappe et al, 2022). This paper focuses on: 1) therationale for conducting and allocating resources for the external evaluation, 2) the approach OurCenter took to focus the evaluation, 3) finding and working with external evaluators, (4) theprimary findings from the external evaluation, 5) lessons learned, and (6) moving forward.Rationale for Conducting and Allocating Resources for the EvaluationThere were several reasons for commissioning external evaluations of Our Center and our work.One reason was to model research-based practice. Our Center promotes a backwards design(Wiggins &
)IntroductionPrior to the global pandemic that led to unprecedented, widespread changes in instructionalstrategies, students’ participation in online laboratory learning was often their prerogative, withseeming advantages and disadvantages. Though past research about online learning, in general,may shed light on instruction with online labs—e.g., [1], [2]—the experiential emphasis oflaboratory learning presents unique challenges in an online environment that must be addressed.Online labs have gained interest in education over the last decades. Starting with rather simple,remotely accessible equipment [3] we can see new examples such as augmented and virtualreality technology making progress for teaching and learning [4]. Efforts from diverse
includesteps of choosing equations, monitoring, and evaluating problem solutions, and the combinationof these steps into more complex problem-solving strategies. These are metacognitive processesbecause they require the solver to think about anticipated, ongoing, and final problem-solvingsteps. Although research has identified characteristic differences between novice and expertproblem solvers, less is known about the more detailed ways in which students develop theirproblem-solving methods through experience. In this research project, we asked 1) Whichproblem-solving strategies do students report using, 2) Is strategy use correlated with level ofmetacognitive reflection and problem-solving confidence, 3) Is strategy use correlated withobjective
Powered by www.slayte.com How Do Engineering Education Graduate Students Perceive and Negotiate Disciplinary Expectations in Academic Writing?Introduction and BackgroundAcademic writing is an important aspect of graduate education. To succeed in their programs,graduate students must learn to communicate their research in a way that resonates with otherscholars in their field [1]. In other words, they must write in a way that aligns with theexpectations of their field. In engineering education, graduate students come from varieddisciplines, and many are new to the field. They may find that the expectations around academicwriting in engineering education differ from prior experiences in other disciplines.Transitioning from a technical
engineering policy[1]; Second, countermeasures and suggestions foremerging engineering policy system optimization, the scholars based on the results ofthe study puts forward the specific optimization suggestions for emerging engineeringpolicy[2][3]. There is still a lack of quantitative analysis of the text of the emergingengineering policy, and comparative analysis on the emerging engineering policy hasnot yet formed a unified research framework. On the one hand, quantitative analysis ofpolicies is difficult to some extent. Both text mining and quantitative statistics mainlyused in quantitative analysis require a large amount of text data, and the specificanalysis of differences in the content of emerging engineering policies is ignored. Onthe other
experience.Field Engineering and Readiness Lab OverviewIn 1994 the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the United States Air ForceAcademy initiated an innovative concept in higher education: The Field Engineering andReadiness Laboratory, more commonly referred to as FERL. FERL is a direct result of thevision and dedicated effort of Retired Brigadier General David O. Swint to improve the learningof students in this unique course. FERL is where engineering practice and education areuniquely combined in a hands-on construction environment. In addition to improving thelearning, FERL was intended to increase interest in and motivation to study civil andenvironmental engineering. Vander Shaaaf and Welch [1], and Buchholtz and Vander Schaaf [2
Paper ID #37313A review of research on STEM preservice teacher education(Work in Progress)Yingqian Zhang 1. Bachelor's degree in Biosystem Engineering, Zhejiang University 2. Master's degree in Educational Management, University of Malaya 3. PhD candidate in Educational Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityJiabin Zhu (Associate Professor) Associate Professor, School of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Dr. Jiabin Zhu's primary research interests relate to the development of engineering students, professional skills, the assessment of teaching and learning in engineering, the cognitive
global communities and work to devise solutions to the givencommunity’s technical challenges. However, if these projects are created without a social justiceframework, or undertaken without appropriate student training, they can often reify the inequitiesthey seek to resolve. When students are motivated by a “design-for-charity” mindset, they maydevise effective short-term solutions to a specific technical challenge, but fail to adequatelyimplement a successful long-term resolution [1]. These projects can often have a paternalisticquality, in which engineering students, outsiders to the community, decide upon the best courseof action for community members without taking into consideration the community members’needs, goals, or desires [2
for undergraduates onmedical imaging signals and systems, and students’ engagement with the developing technologyand perceptions of the course will be evaluated in addition to the course learning outcomes.Following the completion of the pilot we will expand to a multi-institutional evaluation.Ultrasound Educational Hardware DevelopmentOur team is developing a low-cost, high-precision, table-top ultrasound system optimized foreducation and student-led research. A CAD rendering of the first iteration of the system is shownin Figure 1. This is a modified version of ultrasound tank systems designed for limb imaging aspart of our research groups (Zhang et al 2015; Ranger et al. 2019). The system will consist of alow-cost ultrasound transducer
the preliminary survey data. The focus groups will be facilitated by SMEsubject matter experts to refine the topics in each knowledge block. The focus groupsessions will be recorded for further analysis. This will provide an updated version of theFour Pillars of Manufacturing Knowledge anticipated for publication and dissemination. 2Background InformationThe Four Pillars of Manufacturing Knowledge [1], (see Figure 1) was first published in2011. Mott et. al. [2] credits the process of developing the Four Pillars to the Society ofManufacturing Engineers (SME) through its Center for Education. Robert L. Mott isProfessor Emeritus of engineering technology
ultrasonic sensor and the code to initializethe exit gate ultrasonic sensor:Code 1.0 (Entrance HC-SR04 Code)Code 1.1 (Exit HC-SR04 Code) A standard servo is a device that controls position at a range from 0 to 180 degrees. Servos haveintegrated gears and a shaft that can be controlled with precision. The position of a servo andhow long it holds that position is controlled by sending a PWM (pulse-width modulation). Thewidth of the square wave depends on the length of time the PWM stays high. Varying widthsproduce varying positions in the servo.[1] For this project Parallax Standard Servos were used.Two sets were used for the entrance gate to position barriers which would block the entrance if aface mask was not detected and allow access if a face
to examine howentrepreneurship programs can foster an inclusive environment through understanding theperceptions of racially minoritized engineering faculty (i.e., persons who identify as AfricanAmerican/Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Native American/Alaskan Native, and NativeHawaiian/Pacific Islander) of an entrepreneurship program. Seven racially minoritizedengineering faculty of an entrepreneurship training program participated in 60-minute semi-structured interviews to understand their sense of belonging in the program and their experiencesrelated to respect and inclusion in the program. Two themes emerged from the data: 1) reducingstructural barriers and rectifying harsh climate conditions can improve participants’ overall senseof belonging
media analyses have limitations and ethical considerations, and this work is not meant tosupersede other forms of evaluation. Rather, our study explores the use of social media as apotential complementary source of data for practitioners. Our work has implications foreducators and institutions looking to develop low-impact ways to evaluate educationalprogramming in times of crisis and beyond. We hope that by presenting this work to otherresearchers and practitioners in engineering education, we will engage in mutually beneficialconversations around the pros and cons of using social media data and its potential applications.1 Introduction & BackgroundThe ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has had a huge impact on students' lives on a variety
Work2.1 AndromedaAndromeda is an interactive visual analytics tool that was originally designed to enable dataanalysts of all skill levels to explore multidimensional data [1]. Andromeda is available publiclyas a web application [2]. The application creates a scatterplotlike 2D visualization ofmultidimensional data using Weighted Multidimensional Scaling (WMDS) [3]. WMDS is adimensionality reduction algorithm that, given highdimensional data and variable weights asinput, can output a corresponding lowdimensional dataset that follows a “near == similar”metaphor. The variable weights represent how WMDS prioritizes the variable’s value whenoutputting the lowdimensional dataset. This means that two points in the projected scatterplotthat are
suggested.BackgroundAccording to a 2019 survey on exploring the workplace for LGBT+ physical scientists conductedby the Institute of Physics, Royal Astronomical Society and Royal Society of Chemistry, 28% ofLGBT+ respondents reported that they had considered leaving their job due to the discriminationthey faced in their workplace [1]. The same report also revealed that nearly half of the respondentshighlighted a lack of awareness of LGBT+ issues in the workplace. Unfortunately, LGBTQ+marginalization is also found in academia. Research shows that LGBTQ+ students in engineeringare more disadvantaged and face greater marginalization than their non-LGBTQ+ peers [2-4].Cech and Waidzunas [2] found that LGB students in engineering navigate a chilly climate wherehomosexuality
Using Logisim-Evolution and Basys 3Teachers in undergraduate programs often find it challenging to engage with students so thatmaterials and knowledge related to the subject matter are communicated in an efficient andmeaningful way. To address the effectiveness of knowledge transfer and to make the DigitalElectronics (DE) classroom experience more productive, several pedagogical approaches such asactive learning with a hands-on approach, scaffolding, project-based learning, authentic and real-world learning, simulation within the classroom environment, and teamwork have been found tobe effective [1]-[4]. Additionally, recent advances in technological tools have createdopportunities for a flexible curriculum that serves the
the author’s experience developing and teaching an undergraduateintroductory nuclear engineering course at the University of Florida that is suitable for studentsnot majoring in nuclear engineering. Table 1 shows the variety of institutions offeringintroductory nuclear engineering courses using data gathered from their public websites. Thecourses range from 1 to 3 credit hours and while some have mathematics and/or physicsprerequisites, others do not. The lack of standardization suggests that the design of the courses(number of credits, prerequisites, etc.) is unique to each institution’s needs. Table 1: Introductory Nuclear Engineering Courses Offered by Various U.S. Universities. Institution Course Title
methodology to generalize connectivity to sensing devices, thedevelopment of software capable of interfacing with the connected sensors, thedevelopment of software capable of translating data into meaningful information, and thedevelopment of software to send/receive data over LoRa to a cloud-based infrastructuremonitoring service. We aim to streamline the instrumentation of this device to enable anyscientific group to easily set up an instrumentation infrastructure to collect data over largegeographical footprints.Key words: IOT, LoRa, Sensors, Monitoring.Neither the entire paper nor any part of its content has been published or has beenaccepted for publication elsewhere. It has not been submitted to any other journal.1. IntroductionThe emergence of
compounded. The impact of living in poverty has far-reachingimplications. Certainly, the chronic stressors associated with poverty affect emotional andcognitive development, which leads students from poverty to experience higher levels ofdepression and anxiety; students raised in poverty also tend to be more impulsive and impatient[1]. In addition, students may not have been taught the implicit rules of etiquette and socialgraces [2], leading their interactions with peers and faculty to operate outside the academic andsocial norms. These abnormal, and generally perceived as negative interactions may produce alack of acceptance from these groups, which can harm academic performance [1]. Because low-income transfer students are also typically first
people worldwide playing video games [1]. Asignificant percentage of those 3 billion people were high school and college-aged [1]. Videogames are becoming a normal sight around the world. In the past decade, the world has seen theintroduction of budget-friendly SBCs (Single Board Computers), microcontrollers, 3d printers, andmassive contributions from the open-source community. [1, 2, 3, 4] This has made the design andimplementation of a DIY handheld video game console more affordable and realizable.The main component of the project consists of an SBC, an operating system to run on the SBC, aHID (Human Interface Device), a power system, a 3d printed case, a display, and speakers. TheSBC used in this project is a Raspberry Pi 4B, however almost