kept in mind however that these data should be used in conjunction with the subjectivejudgments of the design faculty members for final evaluations.BIBLIOGRAPHY[1] Pahl, G. and Beitz, W., Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Edited by Ken Wallace, Springer-Verlag, The Design Council, 1988.[2] Dekker, D., and Gibson, J. D., “Learning Design in a College Setting”, International Conference on Engineering Design, Tampere, Finland, August, 1997.[3] Walvoord, B., “Helping Students Write Well: A Guide for Teachers in All Disciplines”, The Modern Language Association of America, New York, 1986.[4] Process Education Teaching Institute Handbook, Pacific Crest, Corvalis, 1999.[5] Gibson, J.D. and Brackin, M.P., “Techniques for the Implementation
Session 1330 Understanding the Importance of Intermediate Representations in Engineering Problem-Solving Durward K. Sobek, II Montana State UniversityAbstractThis paper describes an emerging theory on the role that representations play in engineeringproblem solving. Modern cognitive psychology has shown that not only do problem solvers usedifferent representations to store information and ideas, the representation itself influences theproblem-solvers’ solution approach. I extend this notion to the engineering domain, and illustrateit with an example from
others.The critical need for reform-minded courses involving faculty, not only from Education but fromScience and Engineering as well, is seen in light of a recent initiative begun jointly by the stateof Louisiana’s Board of Regents and Board of Elementary and Secondary Education. In May2000, endorsing a report by a Blue Ribbon Commission on Teacher Quality(http://blackboard.lcet.state.la.us/courses/ScienceConsortium/; user name: Blueribbon; password:blueribbon), the two boards instituted new guidelines for teacher preparation. Noting that“teacher preparation is the responsibility of the entire college/university, not just the educationprogram unit, these guidelines shall consider issues which pertain to the college/university atlarge”. As in many
Session ______ Measuring Cognitive Growth in Engineering Undergraduates: A Longitudinal Study John Wise, Sang Ha Lee, Thomas A. Litzinger, Rose M. Marra, Betsy Palmer The Pennsylvania State University / University of Missouri / The University of IowaAbstractThis paper builds on previously reported findings1,2 by describing the completion of a four-yearlongitudinal investigation into the cognitive development of engineering undergraduates asmeasured using the Perry Scheme of Intellectual Development.3 Fifty-four
laboratory experience, so this is still relatively rare.The lab portion of the course meets once a week for at least two hours, and has been designed withtwo key objectives in mind. First, since most students enter the program without a clearunderstanding of how the two disciplines compare, the lab introduces students to the fundamentalconcepts that distinguish the areas of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Second, in order topique the students’ curiosity, the labs are designed to be interesting and fun. Since the students inour programs do not take any ECE courses until their sophomore year, this is an importantobjective. Unfortunately, the math and science classes required during the freshman yeardiscourage many students. By meeting these two
upcoming accreditation requirements however,these efforts are now viewed in terms of long-term benefits to the department. Department aswell as School assessment has been carefully critiqued to make certain day-to-day activities arein cadence with department, school, and institutional goals. Resting sole responsibility ofimprovement and assessment development is no longer effective although is was at one time.Over time and with encouragement, individual faculty members are accepting organizedassessment and improvement into their culture.As engineering technology programs develop assessment systems and continuous improvementplans they should keep in mind both institutional and specialized accreditation requirements. Itis likely a program meeting
abroadprograms described above. It must be kept in mind, though, that in the aggregate less that2% of engineering students in the United States currently partake of such programs.European CompetitionAs noted earlier, some of the economic competitors of the United States in the globalmarketplace are currently more effective in preparing their engineering graduates forinternational practice. In the EU, the European Commission’s SOCRATES programprovides mechanisms for the cross-border study of a large number of students, includingengineering students. In describing such programs, Mulhall (13) notes that theSOCRATES program includes groups of universities which have agreed to cooperate in aprogram of educational development in a particular area such as
Session 3202 Teaching Multimedia Development to Engineering Students through Web-based Modules Tze-Leong Yew and Kurt Gramoll Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering University of OklahomaAbstractMultimedia training modules are powerful educational tools that provide students with engagingexperiences in the classroom. This paper presents an approach to implement web-based modulesfor teaching engineering students multimedia development at the University of Oklahoma. Inparticular, the strategy used to teach the courseware is discussed
ThermoNet:: A Web-Based Learning Resource for Engineering Thermodynamics Derek Baker, Ofodike Ezekoye, and Philip Schmidt Department of Mechanical Engineering and Colleen Jones and Min Liu Department of Curriculum and Instruction University of Texas at AustinAbstractThermoNet is a comprehensive web site being developed under NSF sponsorship to provideinternet-based learning resources for students in engineering thermodynamics. The site includesa series of tutorials covering the topics typical of introductory engineering thermo
Session 2653 Enhancing Engineering Student Success: Working With Students to Change Their Attitudes Raymond B Landis, Edward N. Prather California State University, Los Angeles/University of CincinnatiINTRODUCTIONThe need to bring about greater success on the part of engineering students is not the topic of thispaper. The fact that we do is assumed to be self-evident. We only have to consider the anecdotalstatements of engineering professors that “students aren’t what they used to be,” or measure ourgraduates against the outcomes established by the new ABET Engineering Criteria
International Collaboration in Engineering and Technology Education: A Case Study Sohail Anwar Penn State Altoona ABSTRACTThis paper describes an engineering and technology education collaboration between the InstitutUniversitaire de Technologie (IUT) housed in the Bethune campus of the Universite′d’Artois inFrance and the Altoona College of The Pennsylvania State University (Penn State Altoona). Thiscollaboration embraces faculty exchanges, short-term student industrial placements,teleconferencing, and curriculum development.The Universite′d’Artois houses programs in engineering
Session 3266 Integrating Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing at Sophomore Level Massoud Tavakoli, Gary Hammond, Jawaharlal Mariappan, Henry Kowalski GMI Engineering & Management InstituteABSTRACTThis paper describes the innovations implemented in a traditional sophomore-level introductorydesign course at GMI over the last three years. The evolution of the ideas, the philosophy behindthe innovations and the effects of the changes are discussed. Particular attention is paid to theintegration of engineering design
Session 3547 The Role of Civil Engineering Technology in the Global Picture Dr. Leslie Lahndt-Hearney, P.E. Department of Engineering Technology University of North TexasAbstractThis paper discusses pertinent issues related to the field of civil engineering technology, and alsoattempts to answer some often asked questions regarding the purpose of civil engineeringtechnology programs. The future of civil engineering technology relies on a clear definition ofits mission and goals, and that these fit in well with adjacent fields of study. This paper presentsa
Paper ID #42589Evaluating Project Management Skill Development in Engineering and AgriculturalCurriculaPaul Davidson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Davidson is an Associate Professor of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. He has been a faculty member since 2014, and is in a 50/50 teaching/research position. His teaching and research interests are related to project management and also soil and water resources engineering.Travis Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Travis Johnson is an instructor and academic advisor in the department of
. Deslauriers, L. McCarty, K. Callaghan, E. Theobald, S. Freeman, K. Cooper, and S. Brownell, “Active learning: “Hands-on” meets “minds-on”,” Science, vol. 374, issue 6563, Sep. 2021. [Online] Available: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abj9957. [Accessed Jan. 16 2024].[4] S. Hartikainen, H. Rintala, L. Pylväs, and P. Nokelainen, “The Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Higher Education”, Education Sciences, vol. 9, issue 4, Nov. 2019. [Online] Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276. [Accessed Jan. 16 2024].[5] E. Theobald, M. Hill, E. Tran, S. Agrawal, E. Arroyo, S. Behling, N. Chambwe, D. Laboy Cintrón, J. Cooper, G. Dunster, J. Grummer, K
. M. Lord, L. A. Gelles, D. A. Chen and G. D. Hoople, "Mind the Gap: Exploring the Exploring the Perceived Gap Between Social and Technical Aspects of Engineering for Undergraduate Students," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021.[8] W. Faulkner, "Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering," Social Studies of Science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759-792, 2000.
quality of a leader, one might question if the person has the self-awareness neededto be effective. However, leaders often do not begin as great leaders often receiving performancefeedback that prompts them to engage in conscious self-reflection and self-evaluation of theirinfluence on those around them [12], [13]. Self-evaluation and self-regulation make up twodimensions of self-awareness that have been evaluated under the OSA theory, but there are otheraspects or contributors of self-awareness have been examined such as emotional intelligence[14], self-insight [15], motivation [5], [16], self-reflection [13], [17], [18], and mindfulness [19]. In this paper, the researchers queried graduate student engineering mentors to assess theirself
above) “Evidence sells” is a mantra we encourage engineering job hunting students to embrace.Resumes and interview responses should include every relevant evidence-fact that will convincean employer that a job candidate is competent, motivated and successfully results-oriented.Therefore, students are encouraged to quantify their contributions as co-op students. It has proven very beneficial to students and the co-op program for co-ops to, whenpossible, establish a dollar or percentage value to co-op/internship results. This becomes “trackrecord” evidence of quantifiable success. It verifies the value of the student and the co-opprogram to future employers. With “evidence sells” in mind, following is actual feedback from
AC 2011-135: DEVELOPMENT OF BEST PRACTICES FOR NEW ENGI-NEERING AND MATH EDUCATORSRobert M. Brooks, Temple University Dr. Robert M. Brooks is an associate professor in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Temple University. He is a registered professional engineer in PA and a fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers. His research interests are Civil Engineering Materials, Transportation Engineering, and Engineering Education.Jyothsna K S, Department of English, St.Joseph’s College, Bangalore Secured a gold Medal for the highest aggregate marks in the Post Graduate English Literature Course at St.Joseph’s College (Autonomous). Working for the Department of English, St.Joseph’s College for
AC 2011-2484: EMPLOYING ENGINEERING DESIGN TOOLS FOR DE-SIGNING/REDESIGNING OF COURSESZeshan Hyder, Virginia Tech & UET Lahore Zeshan Hyder is a PhD student in Mining & Minerals Engineering Department, Virginia Polytechnic In- stitute & State University, Virginia. He has completed his Masters Degree from University of Engineering & Technology Lahore, Pakistan and is currently working in Virginia Center for Coal & Energy Research (VCCER) under supervision of Prof Dr. Michael Karmis for research in Underground Coal Gasification.zulfiqar Ali, Department of Mining & Mineral Engineering,Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State universityVA, USA.Janis P. Terpenny, Virginia Tech Janis Terpenny is a
reflective mind love of learning and the promise of continuing learning throughout their lives"Technology and Socio-Economic Change" (TSEC) is a junior-level seminar moderated byCSM engineering and science faculty designed to critically analyze the impact of science andtechnology on American values and institutions. The role of technology in American society isstudied and the implications of technology transfer from developed to developing nations aredebated. As an outcome of the TSEC seminar, students learn to relate technological growth tosocio-economic, cultural, and religious aspects of society and probe into the moral and socialconsequences of technological innovations. Seminar sessions consist primarily of full groupdiscussions, small
laboratory for undergraduates. Journal ofEngineering Education, 97(2), 213-222.National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in thenew century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.National Academy of Engineering. (200). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineeringeducation to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National ResearchCouncil. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC:National Academy Press. Page 15.51.10National Research Council Board for Engineering Education. (1995). Engineering education:Designing an adaptive system. Washington DC
AC 2010-770: ASSESSING ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ ABILITY TO USE THEMATHEMATICS THEY HAVE LEARNEDMaria Terrell, Cornell University Math Dept.Robert Terrell, Cornell UniversityLisa Schneider, Cornell University Page 15.201.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Assessing Engineering Students’ Ability to Use the Mathematics They Have LearnedAbstractA Mathematics Applications Inventory (MAI) is being developed by engineering andmathematics faculty at Cornell University to assess students’ ability to apply the mathematicsthey learn in freshman calculus to engineering-related problems. This paper reports on threeaspects of this work
global communities and adding new Funding Streams serving Students. ISTE 35 year old, professional society nation wide collaboration of Engineers is strategically positioned to expand Dissemination and utilization of findings and in Creating International frame of mind. Much of the learning in a study broad experience arises from random personal contacts with individuals in informal cultural settings rather than solely in structured exercises supervised by a highly qualified instructor. Teamwork, Communication, Creativity and Design, Entrepreneurial thinking are usually self-directed and agile when learnt through Informal Education. Professional Society have the potential to interface with the
, founder of the School of Mathematics andNavigation Sciences, polymath Michail Lomonosov, inventor of radio AlexanderPopov, aerodynamics founder Nikolay Zhukovskiy, leading Soviet rocket engineerSergey Korolyov, pioneering Soviet aircraft designers Andrey Tupolev and NikolayKamov, inventor of steam machine Ivan Polzunov, naval architect Alexey Kryilov,first author of Russian jet aircraft project Nikolay Kibalchich, aeronautics pioneerYury Kondratyuk (Alexander Shargei), architects Nikolay Nikitin and VladimirShukhov and many others.Russian engineering school has always provided rank-and-file engineers.These great minds have succeeded in the development of aircraftengineering, exploration and development of mineral deposits and mineral resources
processing, pharmaceuticals, andprosthetics. Its specialties such as bionics6 and bioprinting7 are gaining momentum thanks toinnovative neuro-prosthetics, bionic eye or ear development, and tissue and organ engineeringrespectively. On the other hand, another subset, biomaterials is searching for organic substitutesfor engineering materials. Biofuel8 development and bacteria-based energy generation9 areoccupying minds of the many. While DNA computing10 and bioinformatics11 are redefining theinformatics field, biometrics12 is growing deeper in our daily lives. Most importantly we arestarting experience a scientific revolution in our world through bionanotechnology13.For the U.S. to keep its competitiveness in the cutting edge technology arena, its
notinstitutionalized in the curriculum at this point.Almost no instruction in listening skills occurs. In fact, listening may be the weakest componentof the communication curriculum in Electrical Engineering. Students do receive someinstruction on listening in EN-241 Speech. Strategies for mentally organizing and retaininginformation are discussed, and ethical issues in listening (such as keeping an open mind) areaddressed. However, this is the only instruction on listening skills that students receive. Onepromising development in the listening category, however, is the new requirement in SeniorDesign for the team leader of each group to write a memo reflecting on his or her leadershipstyle. This assignment may provide a place where self-assessment of
Engineering Education Vol. 84, No. 4, pgs. 375 –381.9. Meyers, C. and Jones, T.B. (1993) Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom, Jossey-BassPublishers, San Francisco.10. Kolodner, J. (1993) Case-Based Reasoning Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. San Mateo, CA.11. Leake, David B. (1996) Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions AAAI Press/MITPress, Cambridge. MA.12. Shapiro, B.P. (1984) An Introduction to Cases, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA. 9-584-097.13. Bruner, Robert F. (2003) Socrates’ Muse: Reflections on Effective Case Discussion Leadership McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.14. Evan, William M. and Manion, Mark (2002) Minding the Machines: Preventing Technological DisastersPrentice Hall PTR, Upper
expertise of a manufacturing engineer, such as systems integration,microcomputer technology and computer-controlled machinery.For this reason, it is a more effective educational strategy to develop a concentration instead ofjust adding a course or two into an existing curriculum. Manufacturing automation represents awide spectrum of technologies that can be applied to an even wider range of areas. Therefore, itis difficult to teach automation as a single discipline. What becomes necessary is teaching anapproach to automation and solving automation problems.3Automation Degree ConcentrationWith this in mind, the automation concentration for the mechanical engineering technologyprogram at Arizona State University (ASU) consists of six multi
above materials context in mind, the UK Centre for Materials Educationrecently organised a one-day national “Materials for Engineers” Workshop, inresponse to requests from the communit y. The aim of the Workshop was to bringtogether Materials faculty from across the UK, to identify areas where the UK Centrefor Materials Education could provide national support, and to identify and discusskey issues relating to the teaching of materials within a broad engineering context.These key issues were examined in the light of recent educational developments andeducational research. Discussions at the Workshop were based around the followingthree main themes: § Designing a common 1 st year course of materials for engineering students § Motivating