interdisciplinary research with the goal of improving engineering programs at the undergraduate level. Her research interests include cognitive theories, memory, problem solving, theories of the mind, and the role of identity and motivation in education.Mariaf´e Taev´ı Panizo, James Madison University Mariaf´e Panizo is a first year graduate student in JMU’s Graduate Psychology Doctoral program. She has been working on engineering education research projects for two and a half years, focusing on non- cognitive factors that impact engineering student academic success.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is a Founding Faculty and Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison
Hurricane Katrina. Previously, he served as an unre- stricted line officer in the U.S. Navy onboard a guided missile destroyer and the second Aegis cruiser.Prof. Dante Dionne, Korean Air Dante Dionne is an Organizational Leadership PhD candidate and a Senior Innovation Technology Man- ager at Korean Air. The past 20+ years of his career has centered on management and professional services consulting. Where, he has specialized in leading multi-national project teams in the design and implementation of digital marketing, mobility and innovative technology solutions. Dante holds an MA in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the Chicago School of Professional Psychology and a BS in Business Management with a minor in
Tech.Dr. Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Renee Clark has 23 years of experience as an engineer and analyst. She currently serves as the Direc- tor of Assessment for the University of Pittsburgh’s Swanson School of Engineering and its Engineering Education Research Center (EERC), where her research focuses on assessment and evaluation of engi- neering education research projects and initiatives. She has most recently worked for Walgreens as a Sr. Data Analyst and General Motors/Delphi Automotive as a Sr. Applications Programmer and Manufactur- ing Quality Engineer. She received her PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her MS in Mechanical Engineering from Case Western while
and Dweck compiled research conductedon resilience, mindset, and people’s understanding of malleability of intelligence16. Yeager andDweck conclusions included the role parents and educations can take towards positivelyinfluencing a student’s resilience. Parents and educators should reinforce the malleability ofmindset through the guidance provided in discussions.The third theory guiding the research project is Self-Efficacy. Coined by Albert Bandura, Self-Efficacy is a term which has been defined as a person’s belief that he/she can act purposefullytoward achievement of the goal3. Through achievement of goals, people served as agents of theirown future. Professional development is an effective approach for enhancing a professional’sself
and math-driven nature of engineering students.Intuitive learners prefer to investigate possibilities and relationships. These learners are morecomfortable with abstractions and mathematical formulations. Intuitive learners can use the casestudies to investigate “what if” scenarios in their projects. The sequential preference by thestudents would suggest use of cases that present facts where students can use well-establishedmethods such as laboratory procedures to solve a problem that could enhance learning. This isconsistent with the model we chose to use for the cases combined with the laboratory exercises. The majority of the students represented visual learners (95%). The mean score for verballearners was 6.8 and the mean for
a number of times that it was reassuring to know that others were dealing with similar issues. A couple times she mentioned that she was struggling with a graduate student she was working with and how to create incentive to have that student contribute to her project. Walter was having a similar struggle in terms of assigning a graduate student tasks to complete. It was reassuring to her that she wasn’t alone in this struggle. She also got ideas about how to fix it, which aligns with one of our other areas of support. Cheryl talked about, nearly every week, how it was comforting to know that she wasn't
) Underdevelopedhousing projects 2) Homeless and out-of-work individuals, and 3) Working class individualswith no higher education training.” In these living conditions, it’s presumed that kids from tribalreservations are incompetent or incapable of leaving home to pursue a higher education based ontheir poor socioeconomic status. The constant exposure of this attitude set forth by society haslong lasting, and in some cases severe, effects on the mental stability of young Native students.As a result, some students begin to believe that their chances of succeeding in the future are veryslim, so they often flunk out of high school and dismiss the idea of attending college altogether.This is a very damaging self-fulfilling prophecy that is very real to these
. Install LabVIEW™ from the disk that came with your MyDAQ. Hopefully, you did this before coming to lab today since it takes close to 30 minutes to install. 2. While the install is running or you are just getting ready, go to the National Instruments website (http://www.ni.com/academic/students/learn-labview/) You will want to watch the following videos: a. LabVIEW™ environment Video. b. While Loop Video. c. Recommended: Programming Tools d. Optional: For Loops e. Optional: Case Structures 3. Build your first VI. Open “NI LabVIEW” and then “Create Project” and then a “new VI”. This will open up the “Block Diagram” and “Front Panel” windows. Write a
and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Dr. Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University Casey J. Ankeny, PhD is lecturer in the School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering at Ari- zona State University. Casey received her bachelor’s degree in Biomedical
Paper ID #15288How to Develop Alaska Native STEM Students in Middle School and HighSchoolDr. Michele Yatchmeneff, University of Alaska Anchorage Michele Yatchmeneff is Unangax (Aleut) who grew up living a traditional subsistence lifestyle in rural villages along Alaska’s Aleutian chain. She earned a BS in Civil Engineering in 2005 and an MS in Engineering Management in 2009 at University of Alaska Anchorage. After earning her BS she began working in Alaska’s construction and engineering industry, specializing in water and sewer projects in remote villages across the state. She also worked as the Deputy Director of the
States.Dr. Tanya A. Faltens, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tanya Faltens is the Educational Content Creation Manager for the Network for Computational Nanotech- nology (NCN) which created the open access nanoHUB.org cyber-platform. Her technical background is in Materials Science and Engineering (Ph.D. UCLA 2002), and she has several years’ experience in hands-on informal science education, including working at the Lawrence Hall of Science at UC Berkeley. While at Cal Poly Pomona, she taught the first year engineering course, mentored student capstone re- search projects, and introduced nanoHUB simulation tools into the undergraduate curriculum in materials science and engineering and electrical engineering courses
, as the seminal article [18] has been cited over1000 times [19]. OVITO has also begun to be used as an educational tool. For example, theUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign uses OVITO in their computational materialsscience curriculum [16]. In the activity reported here, OVITO is utilized to help studentsvisualize crystal structures and manipulate unit cells, producing images such as those shown inFigure 1, of the FCC unit cell sliced on the (110) plane.A BFigure 1. Projection view of the (110) plane in an FCC crystal structure, created and displayedusing OVITO. Atoms are scaled to be space-filling, and the unit cell outline can be displayed orhidden. Figure 1A shows a view of the (110) plane
street performer) 6. Relating to negative and positive feedback (e.g., balancing a horizontal stick) 7. Quantitative measurement of degrees of stability and instability (e.g., jumping a rope; driving in a narrow street) 8. Open challenge (e.g., engaging audience to come up with their own conclusion on demonstration)The video and this paper end with a challenge to the viewer to make sure he/she actuallyexperience and further inquire about the concept of stability.We should notice here that this paper reports on larger scale on-going project that aims atexplaining basic control system concepts in a similar manner.IntroductionWhy are concepts in a Control Systems course so difficult for students to comprehend? A greatinsight that
Paper ID #19659Are Better Teaching Methods the Answer to Improved Math Proficiency orAre We Simply Barking Up the Wrong Tree?Mr. Guo Zheng Yew, Texas Tech University Guo Zheng Yew is doctoral candidate in civil engineering at Texas Tech University with a focus on finite element analysis and glass mechanics. Prior to his graduate work in the United States, he obtained his Bachelor’s degree from Malaysia and has participated in research projects involving offshore structures in Malaysia. As a graduate part-time instructor at Texas Tech University, he teaches an introductory course in engineering to freshmen undergraduate
the matter is theEarth’s capacity to sustain a burgeoning global population which makes increasing demands onlimited resources [5]. Projections of resource exhaustion continually change based onimprovements in technology and consumer behavior. In 2017, global resource consumptionovershot the sustainable rate of use of a year’s worth of the Earth’s resources by early August.This day, observed as Earth Overshoot Day, occurs earlier each year [6]. At the present rate, thehuman population will consume two years’ worth of the Earth’s resources that can be sustainablyreplenished each year by 2034. Thus, ensuring a healthy environment in the future requiresembracing environmental sustainability. We define environmental sustainability as the ability
. The expectation based on multipleother works was that institutions with an honor code would have the best handle on academicintegrity issues [2],[3]. The results were that Benedictine College and East Carolina University’sresults were most like previous studies of colleges that have honor codes in place, while TheCatholic University of America (the institution without a formal honor code) was most similar toprevious studies of colleges without honor codes in place [4]. A 1994 study by Grahamconcluded there were no statistically significant differences between religious institutions orcommunity college students’ attitude toward cheating and perceived amount of cheating [5]. Oneaim of this ongoing project is to capture a sufficient cross
, theteacher transitions to think about how to design for those characteristics. As part of the researchstudy, teachers were provided kits for soft robotic fabrication, which can be arranged in a varietyof configurations with different motion [19, 20]. However, based on the materials available,some of the design ideas may not be feasible. Subsequently, the teacher leads a discussion aboutmaterials and processes, balancing between creativity and feasibility. Following a demonstrationof how to safely work with silicone rubber and the mold kits, students work in pairs on thedesign project. They are encouraged to learn through two main channels: 1) via research on theinternet (sites such as www.softroboticstoolkit.com) and 2) via hands-on prototyping
Paper ID #21856Investigating Student Perceptions of an Engineering Department’s Climate:The Role of Peer RelationsDr. Susannah C. Davis, Oregon State University Susannah C. Davis is a postdoctoral research associate in the School of Chemical, Biological and Envi- ronmental Engineering at Oregon State University. She received her Ph.D. and M.Ed. from the University of Washington, and her B.A. from Smith College. She is currently working on the NSF-funded REvolu- tionizing engineering and computer science Departments (RED) project at OSU. Her research focuses on organizational learning and change, particularly in higher
Paper ID #27138Adding the Extra 5 Percent: Undergraduate TA’s Creating Value in the Class-roomMrs. Alicia Baumann, Arizona State University Ali Baumann received her master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Wyoming before working as senior systems engineer at General Dynamics C4 Systems. She is now part of the freshman engineering education team in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State Uni- versity. Currently, she focuses on enhancing the curriculum for the freshman engineering program to incorporate industry standards into hands-on design projects. She is an instructor for the
(2007) to an engineering problem frame of reference and the physical posed to them (the Midwest location codes, with kappa values of .748 Floods problem). and .746 respectively.”Kong, Douglas, In the “qualitative study of “The kappa values were found to be 100%Rodgers, Diefes- student team projects,” the for the definition category, 93% for theDux, & research team used constant evaluation category, and 84% for theMadhavan (2017) comparative analysis to comparison category.” analyze student work products, specifically their
preparation – e.g., capstone projects in the senior year – and because students oftentransfer out of science and engineering majors because of difficulties with solving problems,considerable effort has been directed towards helping students become proficient problemsolvers. To assure that problem-solving skills are mastered, problem solving has become a coreelement in engineering curricula. In U.S. engineering education, ABET (Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology) criteria for accrediting instructional programs treat problemsolving as one of the critical learning outcomes to be achieved throughout curricula and isdirectly addressed in ABET Outcome 3.1 an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complexengineering problems by applying
class (and are co-authors on this paper). Similarly, a strong librarian-facultyrelationship with the faculty member teaching the senior level class has allowed introduction ofthe advanced videos in the design class. The videos also have an active learning component, asstudents are asked to complete activities after viewing them (either taking a quiz or completing areflection exercise).We believe that insights from the interviews could inform other librarians’ information literacyinstruction, as well. We will continue refining the video modules in our project through collectingstudent feedback.References:[1] L. L. Hardesty, Faculty and the Library: The Undergraduate Experience. Norwood, NJ:Ablex 1991.[2] A. Cannon, "Faculty survey on
assignment for which they can get formative feedbackfrom you that they can use directly to improve their work on that module’s summativeassessment or project at the end. Examples of this include rough drafts submitted prior to a finalversion, smaller sets of problems prior to an exam, giving feedback on homework which mirrorsupcoming higher stakes assignments, online quizzes which can be taken multiple times untilstudents master the material, or a smaller, low stakes version of the larger, higher stakesassignment at the end of that unit. Your feedback needs to be meaningful, frequent, timely, andinclude specific suggestions for improvement [21] where ever possible. Structuring theseformative feedback opportunities into each module or unit of your
University of Applied Sciences in Groningen, where he taught both in Dutch and in English. During this time his primary teaching and course develop- ment responsibilities were wide-ranging, but included running the Unit Operations laboratory, introducing Aspen Plus software to the curriculum, and developing a course for a new M.S. program on Renewable Energy (EUREC). In conjunction with his teaching appointment, he supervised dozens of internships (a part of the curriculum at the Hanze), and a number of undergraduate research projects with the Energy Knowledge Center (EKC) as well as a master’s thesis. In 2016, Dr. Barankin returned to the US to teach at the Colorado School of Mines. His primary teaching and course
and served as a journal reviewer in engineering education, STEM education, and educational psychology, as well as a co-PI, an external evaluator or advisory board member on several NSF-funded projects (CA- REER, iCorps, REU, RIEF, etc.).Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, The Ohio State University Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is Professor and Chair in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. Prior to this appointment, she was a Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, the Inaugural Director of the College of Engineering’s Leadership Minor, and the Director of the International Institute of Engineering Education Assessment (i2e2a). In 2013, she became founder and
development project in responseto a sponsor customer’s needs. The Academy requires foundational core courses for all studentsprovide a broad and thorough general undergraduate education in basic sciences, engineering,humanities, and social sciences [6].The SE Program is governed by a board comprised of the heads of the seven cooperatingacademic departments and an SE academician holding the title of Director of SystemsEngineering. The Director of SE also chairs a working level committee of teaching facultyrepresentatives from each SE-cooperative department. Program modifications, includingassessment changes, typically begin in the SE Committee as proposals that are ultimatelypresented with recommendations to the SE Board for dispositioning. Assessment
the Polar and Pathcoordinate systems in Figure 5 have been alluded to repeatedly as part of answering studentquestions, especially the fishing reel and swivel stool in that figure. This reinforcement seems tohave made the cartoons more meaningful.Future WorkSeveral ideas have been suggested on how to use these cartoons or measure their effectiveness.Some of the most interesting involve getting the students involved in their creation andencouraging them to be creative. A student “suggestion box” discussion board on the LMSmight be useful, so students can submit cartoon ideas or request the instructor draw particularconcepts. Having the students draw their own cartoons as part of a project or for extra credit isan interesting proposal. Even
3.4. The two students selected from this group areMary (African American female) and Geoffrey (Caucasian male). Mary earned D or “no pass”in her STEM courses, while Geoffrey passed or earned an A or B in the same courses.Mary: In her written assignments in the study skills course, Mary expressed an internal locus ofcontrol for her learning, yet she did not exercise self-regulation. Thus, though she did notalways follow through with her goals, she was aware that any shortcomings were her owndoing. For example, Mary made lists of the coursework and did projects on the importance ofmotivation and time management but struggled with following through. Lack of motivation,distractions, and ineffective prioritization of her responsibilities were
underrepresented or marginalized groups. This study is part of a broader initiative at our college to examine accessibility of engineering degrees and how our engineering programs can better support students from underrepresented populations. Introduction Seattle University is in the midst of a multi‐year project to develop programs and policies to better support students from underrepresented populations in engineering and computer science. Previous work examined data on undergraduate students who were enrolled in the four engineering majors in the College of Science and Engineering (CSE) for any part of their time at Seattle University. Barriers to students’ successfully completing degrees in these programs were analyzed, including examining the