existing knowledge of FLCs by (a) investigating the FLC experience from thefaculty participants’ perspectives and offering both quantitative and qualitative base-levelunderstandings of engineering faculty’s participation and perceptions of NFLC; (b) situatingunderstandings of FLCs in the larger theoretical framework of newcomer socialization and careerlearning/development, on which to build theoretical models to design better faculty learningexperiences; and (c) highlighting the salient role proactive behaviors/mentality in facultylearning and socialization to improve FLCs in ways that promote proactivity and inclusivity. The study also responds to the call of Community Engagement in Engineering EducationDivision in a few important ways
Paper ID #16265Noticing, Assessing, and Responding to Students’ Engineering: Exploring aResponsive Teaching Approach to Engineering DesignKristen Bethke Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Assistant Professor at Tufts University, where she is also a Faculty Fellow at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach.Jessica Watkins, Tufts UniversityDr. Aaron W. Johnson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Aaron W. Johnson is a postdoctoral research associate at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. He received his
learning curriculum: From an activity theory perspective. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(1). 5. Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Punie, Y. (2009). Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member states: Fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching. JRC Technical Note, 52374. 6. Bowden, J. A., & Green, P. (2005). Doing developmental phenomenography. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT Press. 7. Marton, F., & Booth, S. A. (1997). Learning and awareness. Psychology Press. 8. Zoltowski, C. B., Oakes, W. C., & Cardella, M. E. (2012). Students' Ways of Experiencing Human‐Centered Design. Journal of Engineering Education,101(1), 28-59. 9. Mann, L
schoolgroups (n=57) completed surveys before and afterthe event. We developed nine questions to assessstudent understanding of common concepts inbiomechanics (Fig. 1), student interest (A, B, Fig.2), and applicability to related professions (C, Fig.2). Teachers from each group administeredsurveys via online software (Qualtrics, Provo,Utah) one to three days ahead of attending theevent and two to three weeks after the event.Data AnalysisStudents were allowed to select one response per Figure 2. Interest and inspiration questionsquestion even if multiple answers were correct. answered by students before and after theEducational effect was evaluated using differences event.between pre and post responses to questions 1-6. Inspirational effect was assessed
exceeded [7]. There are 5 parts to rubric.Appendix I, Parts A and B are the rubrics required for evaluating the conceptual design contentand design process of the first semester, or Capstone I, written reports and are entitled theConceptual Design Review (CTDR) Content/Process. Part A of the CTDR is an industry-basedapproach to design review [8]. Part A was adapted directly from an industry design reviewprocedure. Part B is a process based TDR and was developed from collaboration betweencapstone academics [9] using extensive reviews of academic and industry literature and reports.Parts A and B represent a combined content and process approach to the TDR for capstonegrading. The details within the rubric provide students a guide to expectations for
, N. W., Jones, S. A., Bernstein, H. M., & Gudgel, J. (2009). The business value of building information modeling: Getting building information modeling to the bottom line, McGraw-Hill, New York. 12. Sabongi, F. J. (2009). “The integration of BIM in the undergraduate curriculum: An analysis of undergraduate courses.” Proc., Annual Conf. of the Associated Schools of Construction, Windsor, CO, 1–6. 13. Becerik-Gerber, B., Gerber, D. J., & Ku, K. (2011). “The pace of technological innovation in architectural, engineering, and construction education: Integrating recent trends into the curricula.” J. Inform. Technol. Constr., 16(1), 411–431. 14. Clevenger, C., Ozbek, M., Glick, S., & Porter, D. (2010
Number Contact StressTruck # Content Volume Weight Weight Tire Type 3 Weight (empty) of Tires Patch (lbs/ in2) (ft ) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs/tire) (lbs/ ft3) (lbs) (in²)1 Cylinder Water6. a. Which truck trailer and its content will cause the maximum damage to the pavement? b. Which truck trailer and its content will cause the least damage to the pavement?Key geometric concepts were reviewed. This focused on equations and strategies to calculateareas of cross section and volumes
Reading and graded Practice Problem assignments. b. Instructor-Created Modules, consisting of Introduction videos with learning objectives, Lessons in both PowerPoint™ and video form, and Example problem videos contained in the learning management system. 2. Classroom Activities a. Lessons, consisting of PowerPoint™ presentations with live annotation b. In-Class Problem Solving with polling, consisting of examples solved by students and/or the instructor with audience response 3. Support Resources a. Problem Solving Help, consisting of tutoring three afternoons per week by skilled undergraduate Learning Assistants in a computer lab setting b
team waspaying special attention to the length of the pipe runs to minimize heat losses. The new base frameshape also allowed us an area to build a cabinet type enclosure for the tank and an elevatedmounting surface above the cabinet. Casters were installed beneath the base frame to facilitatetransportability. (a) (b) Figure 2: (a) T-shaped base frame and cabinet and (b) Greenhouse mountFigure 2(a) also depicts the design of the greenhouse integrated with the solar collectors’ circuit.Ventilation holes were cut into the floor of the house holding the flower pot. The legs of the housewere extended so that it could sit above the storage tank. The hot water tubes enter the
Using a Flipped Classroom Model ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA. 10.18260/p.24811[5] Swift, T. M. and B. Jean Wilkins (2014). A Partial Flip, A Whole Transformation: Redesigning Sophomore Circuits. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Indianapolis, IN, ASEE.[6] Clemens, B. M., C. Nivargi, et al. (2013). "Adventures with a Flipped Classroom and a Materials Science and Engineering MOOC : “Fools Go Where Angels Fear to Tread”." Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 1583.[7] Marks, J., K. J. Ketchman, et al. (2014). Understanding the Benefits of the Flipped Classroom in the Context of Sustainable Engineering. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Indianapolis, IN, ASEE.[8] Mason, G. S., T. R
1768-PA-3/A Ethernet Module 1768-ENBT/A Sercos Interface 1768-M04se/A Compact Logix L43 1768-L43/A Isolated Relay out 8pt. 1769-OW81/B/3 Sink/Source Input 16pt. 1769-IQ16/A/2 End cap 1769-ECR PowerFlex 4 cat no 22A-B2P3N104 Servo Drive Line Interface Module 2094-AL50S Ultra 3000 servo drive 2098-DSD030-SE Ultra 3000 servo drive 2098-DSD030-SE Line Filter
Network Professional, Microsoft Certificated Professional, EMC Information Storage and Management, IPv6 Forum Certified Engineer (Gold), IPv6 Forum Certified Trainer (Gold), and Cisco Certified Academy Instructor. Dr. Pickard received his Ph.D. in Technology Management at Indiana State University. He also holds an MBA from Wayland Baptist Uni- versity and a B.S. in Professional Aeronautics from Embry-Riddle University. Research interests include: IPv6,wireless sensor networks, industrial networks, and industry-academia partnerships.Dr. Jimmy Bill Linn, East Carolina University Jimmy B. Linn, Ph.D. Teaching Professor Technology Systems College of Technology & Computer Sci- ence linnj@ecu.edu
. 2 For the communication and documentation of ideas, CAD software (Creo Parametric) wasused to create and visualize all aspects of the proposed design. The final design of the machinecalled for four main sub-assemblies (CAD renderings shown in Figure 1): a) base, b) bed, c)bridge, and d) carriage. The base sits flat on the table, containing the ball screw and linear railsfor the y-axis motion. The bed is attached to the base, and contains a flat surface for parts to beprinted or a work piece to be secured. Figure 1. CAD rendering of the four main sub-assemblies: a) base, b) bed, c) bridge, and d) carriage. The bridge is attached to the y-axis
possible.The experiments for the basic IoT training module are further discussed;(a) LED Switching over InternetThe goal of this experiment is to introduce students to the basic concept of IoT using LED.Although neither a sensor nor an actuator is needed for this experiment, students are expected toidentify that the IoT function required is control. For this experiment, students will be required toset up the system and independently use RF and Bluetooth as connectivity types. The studentsthen use the mobile/ web app to test their system. They will be required to record the actual stateof the LED when controlled from the app.(b) A/C Bulb Switching over InternetControlling an A/C bulb is a step ahead of controlling an LED. With this, the learner
) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Implementation and Usage of an Online Environment in a Chemical Engineering CurriculumAbstractWe have developed an online system to serve as a hub for student activities in our chemicalengineering
, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.25034 4. Diong, B. M. (2013, June), Work-in-Progress: Videos and Video Podcasts - What Engineering Educators Ought to Know Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/22783 5. Fraley, M. A., & Hamlin, A. J., & Kemppainen, A., & Hein, G. L. (2015, June), Using Pre-lesson Materials and Quizzes to Improve Student Readiness and Performance Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.25013 6. Leicht, R., Zappe, S. E., Messner, J. & Litzinger, T. (2012). Employing the classroom flip to move “lecture” out of the classroom. Journal of Applications and Practices in
and curriculum development. He is a Fellow of the ASME.Dr. Bonnie H. Ferri, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Bonnie Ferri is a Professor and the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Affairs in the School of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering at Georgia Tech. She performs research in the area of active learning, embedded computing, and hands-on education. She received the IEEE Education Society Harriet B. Rigas Award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Blended Learning in a Rigid-Body Dynamics Course Using On- Line Lectures and Hands-On ExperimentsAbstractRigid body dynamics is a foundational course that forms the basis for much of the ME
for non-NFS in fall 2013.The more generous distribution of letter grades in non-NSF sections might have helped withGPAs and motivated students to persist in engineering. Students may also choose to enroll in thenon-NFS sections to get an easier A or B. These factors may complicate the data analysis.Interpretation of the ResultsStudents who pass the NFS version of EPS are more likely to persist in engineering then studentswho pass the non-NFS version of EPS and this difference is statistically significant. This seems toimply that passing the NFS version of the course is a better indicator of success in engineering.Why are students who pass the NFS version of EPS more likely to persist in engineering thanstudents who pass the non-NFS version
a faculty member at Poly since you first joined.influenced faculty members’ willingness to Begin with what drew you to join the Poly faculty.!take risks?! a. How do you see your role as a faculty member? Has this changed over time?!! b. How has the leadership (dean, director) influenced you as a faculty member?! c. What are major shifts that have happened during your time at Poly? Could you elaborate on how those changes have influenced your teaching, research or service?! 2. How have you/might you approach risk-taking
question shown in Fig. 1 was usedIn answering this lead-in question, pick the one answer that you think is most correct and complete;and provide a brief justification of your choice.The static mechanism, when used inside a Java class, is used for the following reason: (a) The “static” keyword is used for only one purpose: to flag the main() function of the Java program so that the system will know that is where the execution should begin. The “static” mechanism is not used for anything else in Java (unlike in C++ which uses it for other purposes). (b) In some sense, “static” is essentially equivalent to declaring something to be “public” so that a variable or method of the class that is flagged as static can be used anywhere
organizational change in response to postsecondary education improvementinterventions? We identify the need for a multi-theoretical research model that allows us to morerigorously describe the potential for organizational change at the start of an educational changeintervention in higher education and to document change over time. To accomplish the first purpose, weset the stage by describing characteristics of educational change interventions targeting formalpostsecondary education organizations. Next, we detail findings from a targeted literature reviewconcerning: (a) the nature of formal postsecondary education organizations upon which we grounded ourontological perspective of these organizations, and (b) literature on organizational change that
• Natural boundariesIntroduce EarlyPrior ArtpatentedSolutions Figure 1: (a) Picket Fence, A. Dabb (1867) US Pat. 63482, (b) Wire Fence, L.B. Smith (1867) US Pat. 66182, and (c) Fence, W.D. Hunt (1867) US Pat. 67,117 [9]Stage 3 - Studio Exercise to Design and Mockup Creative-Novel Fencing AlternativesThis exercise allows the students, through simulated practice, to appreciate the creativeambiguity of not knowing the extent to which what prior art exists. The studio exercise waslimited to simple pipe cleaners and scissors. Pipe cleaners provide a good amount of dexteritybecause of their flexible nature; while limiting the number of items needed to conduct a simpledesign
Paper ID #15793Correlation of a Cantilever Beam Using Beam Theory, Finite Element Method,and TestsDr. Luis E Monterrubio, Robert Morris University Luis Monterrubio joined the Robert Morris University Engineering Department as an Assistant Professor in the Fall of 2013. He earned his B.Eng. from the Universidad Nacional Aut´onoma de M´exico, his M.A.Sc. from the University of Victoria, Canada, and his Ph.D. from the University of Waikato, New Zealand. All degrees are in Mechanical Engineering and both M.A.Sc. and Ph.D. studies are related with vibrations. After his Ph.D. he worked at the University of California, San Diego as
Sourcing Research at Arizona State University (ASU). He has worked with private, public, federal, and international organizations, procuring over 700 projects and services (worth over $1.5 Billion). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Design and Implementation of a Practice Based Course in Contracting and Project Management Kristen C. Hurtado, Jake B. Smithwick, Kenneth T. Sullivan, and John Savicky Arizona State University School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built EnvironmentAddressing the needs of engineering curriculum to provide evidence-based practice andopportunities for students to gain skills that
Paper ID #14778Planning and Assessment of a Workshop on Undergraduate Education in Bio-metric SystemsDr. Ravi P. Ramachandran, Rowan University Ravi P. Ramachandran received the B. Eng degree (with great distinction) from Concordia University in 1984, the M. Eng degree from McGill University in 1986 and the Ph.D. degree from McGill University in 1990. From October 1990 to December 1992, he worked at the Speech Research Department at AT&T Bell Laboratories. From January 1993 to August 1997, he was a Research Assistant Professor at Rutgers University. He was also a Senior Speech Scientist at T-Netix from July 1996 to
) demonstrates that the time spent on six of thetasks (software spin-up through investigate assessment instrument) comprised ~75% of the totaleffort. Furthermore, the instructor performed all but one of these tasks during the developmentphase, while a teaching assistant performed the other (in-class delivery) during the pilot phase. Incontrast, graph b) illustrates in-class delivery was not significant from a cost perspective. Thisfinding reveals that, while the teaching assistant’s time for in-class delivery was significant, theassociated cost was not.Combined Capital and Personnel CostWe conclude our results with Figure 5, which is a projection of combined capital and personnelcosts per the number of students in a semester. This graph assumes one-time
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED433048.pdf13 Shapiro, N.S. & Levine, J.H. (1999). Creating learning communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.14 Boyer, E.L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.15 Gardner, J. (1986). The freshman year experience. College and University , 61 (4), 261-274.16 Hunter, M. A., & Linder, C. W. (2005). First-year seminars. In M. L. Upcraft, J. N. Gardner, B. O. Barefoot, & Associates, Challenging and supporting the first-year student: A handbook for improving the first year of college (pp. 275–291). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.17 Murphy, R.O. (1989). Freshman year enhancement in American higher education. Journal of
) highly cross-coupled (non-linear) spring pendulum, and b) rotary inverted pendulum.Presented in Figure 5 are Simulink and SimMechanics models which are used to solve thecoupled nonlinear equations of motion for the spring pendulum system. With these models,students can develop a deeper understanding of the system by modifying input parameters andseeing their effect on the dynamic behavior of the system at all times.Figure 5. Model and simulated time response for spring pendulum system, Simulink (top), and SimMechanics(bottom).3.3 Modeling, Analysis, and Control of Dynamics Systems – Year 3The base of this course is a standard course in most Mechanical Engineering curricula. Theunique aspects are the integration throughout the course and the
. A tradestudy is done on the designs to make decisions such as whether or not to use tank-like tracks inplace of wheels or a bucket ladder and hopper instead of one large scope. Based on the results ofthe trade studies, the students arrive at one general design.This general design must be completed by October 15th and presented to their advisors in apreliminary design review (PDR). At the PDR the students present the designs they consideredand how they arrived at their final design. In addition, they present a rough timeline for thecompletion of the robot. This timeline must include verifiable milestones. Often students willgenerate milestones such as “check on supplier for widget A” or “work on subsystem B”. Suchvague milestones are hard to
Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, December 2013. 2. F. T. Anbari. Earned Value Project Management Method and Extensions. Project Management Journal, 34(4):12–23, 2003. 3. S. Augustine. Managing agile projects. Prentice Hall PTR, 2005. 4. K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. Van Bennekum, W. Cockburn, Alistair Cunningham, M. Fowler, J. Grenning, J. Highsmith, A. Hunt, and R. Jeffries. Agile Manifesto, 2001. 5. B. Bruegge, M. Reiss, and J. Schiller. Agile principles in academic education: A case study. ITNG 2009 - 6th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, pages 1684–1686, 2009. 6. T. Chow and D.-B. Cao. A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 81:961