relatability between the scholarand their surrounding environment. Two intersecting themes that emerged from Yadav et al.’s (2020) study are the value offamily orientation and intersectionality, unlike Crenshaw’s (1989) well-known definition ofintersectionality, which examines how U.S. structures frame identities as isolated and mutuallyexclusive resulting in the theoretical erasure of multiple minoritized identities (Crenshaw, 1989,p. 139; Carbado et al., 2013; Harris & Patton, 2019). Yadav et al. (2020) detailedintersectionality from an identity-centered lens with a focus on the use of intersectionality as ananalytic tool that focuses on multiple identities versus engaging with the complexities ofidentities (Luft & Ward, 2009; May 2016
(shown in Section 3), there aremany key words in each SO for which ABET provides no specific definition; therefore, theseterms can be interpreted in a variety of ways.In 2017, the Engineering Area Delegation of ABET approved a revision of EAC Criterion 3(Student Outcomes), Criterion 4 (Continuous Improvement), and Criterion 5 (Curriculum). Therevision of each criterion began in 2009 and resulted in a transition of 11 ABET EAC SOs (i.e.,SOs a – k) to 7 SOs (i.e., SOs 1 – 7) [3]. The implementation of the revised ABET EAC SOs(henceforth referred to as only “SOs a – k” or “SOs 1 – 7”) began during the 2019 – 2020 ABETevaluation cycle. Most major concepts found within SOs a – k were captured in the transition toSOs 1 – 7; however, several terms were
panel included faculty, professional staff, alumni, and industry representatives. Thiswas a major improvement for the project as the engagement of each team now incorporated manyinstitutional partners beyond this single class, department, or school. The faculty at the Departmentsupported the event. It took place at the facilities for the Center for International Studies, an openspace for public attendance, with the promotion on their information channels, reaching the wholeuniversity and beyond.Results and DiscussionWe have developed three annual editions of this project (2019, 2020, and 2021). Table 2 presentssome demographics of the corresponding courses. One hundred sixty-two students haveparticipated in this initiative, with 32 projects. A
capstone projects. He has presented Mastery- Based Learning workshops at ASEE for several colleges and universities.Jean Carlos Batista Abreu (Assistant Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: From Problem to Project: An Entrepreneurial Model for a Three- Semester Multidisciplinary Capstone SequenceAbstractThis paper explores the evolution of a novel three-semester multidisciplinary capstone project atElizabethtown College where students work on teams of four or five team members to pitch anddevelop an entrepreneurial design of their choice. In the first semester, the spring of their
Antonio 73% UT Arlington 72% Texas A&M Kingsville 68% Texas A&M Commerce 66% UT Tyler 64% Texas A&M Corpus Christy 58% Texas Southern University 54%At UTRGV, statical measures indicate that retention rates of first year (full-time) students in theCECS have been at an average of 60% between the Fall of 2015 and Fall 2019 (Table 2). However,it is observed that in the wake of COVID-19, retention rates of
Paper ID #37601Work-In-Progress: Incorporating Open-Ended ModelingProblems into Undergraduate Introductory DynamicsCoursesRachel Vitali (Assistant Professor) Dr. Rachel Vitali is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Iowa. Prior to her appointment, she was a NASA-funded TRISH postdoctoral fellow in the Industrial & Operations Engineering Department at the University of Michigan, where she also received her B.S.E. in 2015, M.S.E in 2017, and Ph.D. in 2019 from the Mechanical Engineering Department. As director of the Human Instrumentation and Robotics (HIR) lab, she
role of technology in the shift towards openinnovation: the case of Procter & Gamble,” R&D Management, vol. 36, no. 3, pp.333–346,2006. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x[4] S. Satish, “Case Study of Tesla: Supply Chain Challenges and Enablers,” pp.1–21, 2019.[Online]. Available:https://www.academia.edu/42288805/Case_Study_of_Tesla_Supply_Chain_Challenges_and_Enablers[5] National Academy of Engineering, “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in theNew Century,” 2004[6] National Academy of Engineering, “Grand challenges for engineering,” 2008.[7] L. Gutierrez-Bucheli, G. Kidman and A. Reid, “Sustainability in engineering education: Areview of learning outcomes,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol
integration ofsubjects/disciplines around relevant issues/topics—with a more recent trend of seeking transdisciplinarylearning experiences for students (Sheets, 2016; American Association for the Advancement of Science,2019). Transdisciplinary learning can be viewed as the holistic way of working equally across disciplinesto transcend their own disciplinary boundaries to form new conceptual understandings as well as developnew ways in which to address complex topics or challenges (Ertas, Maxwell, Rainey, & Tanik, 2003;Park & Son, 2010). This transdisciplinary approach can be important as humanity’s problems are nottypically discipline specific and require the convergence of competencies to lead to innovative thinkingacross fields of study
Mobile County Public School System, the University of South Alabama, and area business and industry. Change the Equation, a non-partisan, CEO-led commission focused on mobilizing business communities to improve the quality of STEM learning in America, recognized the EYE Modules as one of Change the Equation’s STEM Works Programs. Dr. Pruet has served on a number of educa- tion boards and committees including vice chair of the Board of Directors of the Alabama Mathematics, Science, Technology, and Engineering Coalition (AMSTEC) and the Executive Board of the American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE) K-12 & PreCollege Division. Dr. Pruet received her under- graduate degree in mathematics from Birmingham-Southern
a textbook while supporting the required learning goals. Additionally, the projectcaptured a range of student feedback. Using this as a basis, additional modifications were madeover the course of a few years. In the summer of 2019, the faculty advisor for the project alongwith other colleagues enrolled in a Faculty Institute for Online Teaching, FIOT.[7] A primaryfunction of the mini-course was to engage with instructional designers and layout a coursebeginning with the outcome objectives and working backwards to accomplish theseobjectives.[8] In the fall 2019 the course developers encouraged the mechanical engineeringdepartment to propose the course to the institute. It subsequently received course approval bythe university faculty. At the
and Embedded Systems and Applications, 2013.[23] W. Durfee, P. Li, and D. Waletzko, “Take-home lab kits for system dynamics and controls courses,” in Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference, 2004, pp. 1319–1322 vol.2.[24] J. A. Rossiter, S. A. Pope, B. L. Jones, and J. D. Hedengren, “Evaluation and demonstration of take home laboratory kit,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 56– 61, 2019.[25] L. M. Jiji, F. Delale, and B. Liaw, “Home Experiments in Mechanical Engineering,” in 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1996, p. 1.237.1-1.237.6.[26] C. J. Panebianco, J. C. Iatridis, and J. R. Weiser, “Teaching Principles of Biomaterials to Undergraduate Students During the COVID-19
Cybersecurity Education," in Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM, 2019, pp. 731--737.[6] A. Castro, . G. Alexander and . P. Rocca-Serra, "The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes--the nutrigenomics use case," BMC bioinformatics, vol. 7, p. 267, 2006.[7] D. Hay, I. Kinchin and S. Lygo-Baker, "Making learning visible: the role of concept mapping in higher education," Studies in higher education, vol. 33, pp. 295--311, 2008.[8] D. P. Wallace, Knowledge management: historical and cross-disciplinary themes, Libraries unlimited, 2007.[9] S. Papert, Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas, Basic Books, Inc., 1980
://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533548.pdf[2] U.S. Census Bureau (2011). 2010 Census Shows Black Population has Highest Concentration in the South. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/2010_census/cb11-cn185.html[3] U.S. Census Bureau (2013). Disparities in STEM Employment by Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2013/acs/acs-24.html[4] Yoder, B. L. (2017). Engineering by the Numbers. ASEE. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/documents/papers-and-publications/publications/college- profiles/2017-Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics.pdf[5] Harris, A. (2019, April 19). The Disciplines Where No Black People Earn Ph.D.s. The Atlantic
classroom learning environments. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 6(3), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(80)90027-9Ratelle, C. F., & Duchesne, S. (2014). Trajectories of psychological need satisfaction from early to late adolescence as a predictor of adjustment in school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.09.003Rivoli, G. J., & Ralston, P. A. S. (2009). Elementary and Middle School Engineering Outreach: Building a STEM Pipeline. Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Southeast Section Conference. ASEE.Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.Society of Women Engineers. (2019
. P., Chambers, C. E., Ghazvini, A., & Kusakabe, L. M. (2019). Benchmarking SUCCESS: How do non-cognitive and affective factors vary among college students?, In Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Pacific Southwest (PSW) 2019 Conference, Los Angeles, CA.[18] Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087.[19] Dweck, C.S. (2016). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, Random House, New York, NY.
Paper ID #30032 She is currently a Member-at-Large for the Pre-college Division of ASEE. Dr. Carrico’s consulting com- pany specializes in research, research evaluations, and industry consulting. Dr. Carrico received her B.S. in chemical engineering from Virginia Tech, Masters of Engineering from North Carolina State Univer- sity, MBA from King University, and PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Dr. Carrico is a certified project management professional (PMP) and licensed professional engineer (P.E.).Ms. Holly Larson Lesko Holly Larson Lesko is the Program Director for the VT PEERS (Partnering with Educators and Engineer- ing in Rural Schools) program at Virginia Tech. This NSF funded program is housed
involved in the program during the 2018-2019 school year. We found thatthe use of a regionally-centered, in-person event catalyzed participation in the region more thanany previously attempted recruitment efforts, including offers of financial support and meetingswith school leaders. Surveys were administered to a subset of participating teachers and students in the region,allowing for insights into how participants experienced the program in this setting. Outcomesassessed in the student survey include math interest, science interest, self-efficacy forschoolwork, and creative problem solving. Outcomes assessed in the teacher survey includeperceived impact of the program on students, motivation for participating in the program, andself
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Continued Effort in TI ARM M4 Microcontroller Curricula Development and Assessment between Three Different Institutions and ProgramsIntroduction This article addresses curriculum design activities that are based on the initiatives fromNSF funded projects that focused on cyber-enabled collaborative learning in the academiccommunity. The curriculum development initiatives addressed the disappearance of the popular68XXX and 80XXX microcontroller and microprocessor families. These aging microcontrollersand microprocessors have become an instructional issue and concern in the engineeringeducation community. Everyone agrees that technological change in microcontroller
engineering degree. Rockhampton: Central Queensland University, 1997. [5] National Academy of Engineering (NAE). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005. [6] J.E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering education - Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer?,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 3, pp. 2-16, Jan. 2003. [7] S . Palmquist, “Active Project Based Learning In Structural Analysis: Field Inspection Of A Steel Truss Bridge,” ASEE PEER Document Repository, 10-Mar-2015. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/2036. [Accessed: 01-Feb-2019]. [8] D. Q
the foundation stones of an arch, the new courses are called “Springers”because they serve as the foundations of the transformed curriculum. Through a project-basedlearning approach, Springer courses mimic the senior capstone experience by immersing studentsin a semester-long practical application of civil engineering , exposing them to concepts andtools in a way that challenges students to develop new knowledge that they will build on and useduring their junior and senior years. In the 2019 spring semester, a pilot of the first Springercourse introduced students to three civil engineering sub-disciplines: construction management,water resources, and transportation. The remaining sub-disciplines are covered in a follow-onSpringer 2 pilot. The
Frontiers of Engineering Education Symposium and the Purdue University 2018 recipient of School of Engineering Education Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching and the 2018 College of Engineering Exceptional Early Career Teaching Award.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University at West Lafayette Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators
year over year changes in Creating & Making willhelp to confirm further analysis of this initial finding.Expansion of survey depth was identified as an area of improvement in this study. With thestatements generated and evaluated by a sole researcher it is imperative to expand the dataset togradate the distribution of what constitutes liberal arts, active learning and engineering elements.To refine this distribution a further survey will be conducted at the annual ASEE conference inorder to survey a more sophisticated population of engineering education researchers.References [1] D.A. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York: Basic Books, 2013. [2] D. Epstein, Range: Why
Obispo Dr. Cruz-Lozano received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Texas Tech University in 2017. In 2012 he received his Master’s degree in Interactive Design and Manufacturing from CINVESTAV-IPN (Mexico) & ENSAM Bordeaux-Talence (France).He received his Bachelor’s degree in Industrial and Sys- tems Engineering from Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Campus Estado de M´exico in 2007. Since September 2019 he has been a Postdoctoral Teaching Fellow in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Cal Poly - San Luis Obispo teaching Design for Strength & Stiffness courses. His previous scholar activities include been a Full-Time Instructor of Dynamics and Finite Element Analysis, as well as a Graduate Re- search
, mentoring from several college studentswith engineering experience, presentations from university admissions officers on how toimprove their chances in applying to a university.References[1] M. Governement, "Global warming solutions act background," [Online]. Available: https://www.mass.gov/service-details/global-warming-solutions-act-background.. [Accessed 20 December 2019].[2] A. M. Huberman and M. B. Miles, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.), Sage Publications, Inc., 1994.[3] K. Schulte Grahame, C. Zahopoulous and D. Schilder, "Can Real-Life Projects in Freshmen Engineering Classes Result in Improved Interest and Performance in the Clean Energy Careers?," in ASEE Northeast Section Conference Proceedings
, “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives,” in Handbook: The Cognitive Domain, David McKay, New York, 1956.[8] M. Lande, “Roles for Take-Home Exams from the Perspective of Engineering Students and Instructors,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023. Available: https://peer.asee.org/44163.[9] J. Tao, and Z. Li, “A Case Study on Computerized Take-Home Testing: Benefits and Pitfalls,” International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 8(1):33–43, 2012. Available: https://sicet.org/main/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ijttl-12-01-3_Tao.pdf.[10] L. Bengtsson, “Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review,” Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4. MDPI AG, p. 267, Nov. 06, 2019. doi: 10.3390
Report [Data file],2019.[21] J. Mackiewicz, “The effects of tutor expertise in engineering writing: A linguistic analysisof writing tutors’ comments,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 47, no. 4,pp. 316-328, 2004.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1364079 (Accessed Feb. 23, 2023)[22] S. Dinitz and S. Harrington, “The role of disciplinary expertise in shaping writing tutorials,”The Writing Center Journal, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 73-98, 2014.https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1769 (Accessed Feb. 23, 2023)[23] A. J. Hanson, P. Lindahl, S. D. Strasser, A. Takemura, D. R. Englund, and J. Goldstein,“Technical communication instruction for graduate students: The communication lab vs. acourse,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and
related to the engineering competency model, which may includeinclusion in the Open Skills Network [54]. We are continuing our efforts to promote the use ofthe Pro-ABC materials to industry partners for early-career professional development, to create a“pull” from industry for more professional formation within engineering programs as regionalindustries set clearer professional expectations in their hiring practices.References[1] G. Kremer, “Student perceptions of culture - from a survey of students in ME 4800 / EnE 3810colloquium, December 2019,” Dec. 2019. [Online]. Available:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mcMteeaQFlwOjr15Kp5YNCuyXDW48IW_VRyCMsuQXn0/edit?usp=sharing. [Accessed: Jul. 15, 2022].[2] G. Boyle, Barking to the Choir: The Power
Structure of Engineering Education,” In: Christensen, S., Didier, C., Jamison, A., Meganck, M., Mitcham, C., Newberry, B. (eds) International Perspectives on Engineering Education. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 20, Springer, Cham, 2015.[25] E.A. Cech, & H.M Sherick, “Depoliticization as a mechanism of gender inequality among engineering faculty,” In the Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[26] E.O. McGee, Black, brown, bruised: How racialized STEM education stifles innovation, Harvard Education Press, 2021.[27] M. Hernández-de-Menéndez, A. Vallejo Guevara, J.C. Tudón Martínez, D. Hernández Alcántara, & R. Morales-Menendez, “Active learning in engineering education
in Engineering (Evaluation),” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Oct. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-longitudinal-evaluation-of-an-ap-type-dual-enrollment-introduction- to-engineering-course-examining-teacher-effect-on-student-self-efficacy-and-interest-in- engineering-evaluation[16] L. Coleman-Tempel and M. Ecker-Lyster, “Linked Coding: A Qualitative Investigation of the Impact of a College Transition Program,” Journal of College Orientation, Transition, and Retention, vol. 26, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.24926/jcotr.v26i2.2373.[17] S. P. Ackermann, “THE BENEFITS OF SUMMER BRIDGE PROGRAMS FOR UNDERREPRESENTED AND
design team can work toward a shared goal with theirstakeholders or end-users. The focus on stakeholder needs also helps the team to clarify the rootproblem and ensure that they are working toward the correct solution, as opposed to merely anobvious or easy solution. In other words, the HCD process does not try to just solve any problem,but rather a specific, need-based problem faced by the users or stakeholders [16].Since 2019, a newly established design center at a large, public Midwestern university has beenusing the HCD framework shown in Figure 1 to develop programs and design activities that canhelp students learn about HCD processes and practices and develop its mindsets [15]. This workstarted through collaborations with engineering