flipping an entire course. We will also share lessons learned as weworked through flipping a sequence of courses. Attendees are encouraged to bring coursedocuments and ideas to the workshop, as working time will be encouraged and feedback will beprovided by facilitators. The workshop will consist of the following parts:Part 1: Motivation for Flipped Classrooms (5 Minutes)The first part of the workshop will consist of a brief overview of literature regarding the benefitsof flipped classrooms. We will also share our own motivations related to moving to this approachin our program.Part 2: Designing Flipped Classroom Modules (20-25 Minutes)In the second part of the workshop, we will share an overall structure we have used whendesigning flipped
taskspecifications, and more importantly, they are not bound by a commonly encountered right or wrongphilosophy.The teams also learned important lessons about the transition from conception to implementation andsatisfied one of the most important outcomes of the course, which is learning to work effectively in teams.At the end of the course, each team was assessed on the quality of design and team efficacy. Studentsdeveloped their professional socialization skills while preparing technical reports, PowerPointpresentations, and poster presentations. On the last day of the program, students also got to experiencepresenting their group projects in the form of team presentations. 1. IntroductionEngineering design is defined as the communication of a set of
assessment of immersing first-year ArchitecturalEngineering students into a beginning architecture design studio that is instructed by bothArchitecture faculty members and an Architectural Engineering faculty member.IntroductionThe utilization of interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and cross-disciplinary approaches inengineering curriculum is not a unique concept and has been widely used and accepted withinundergraduate engineering curriculums for decades. In 1997, the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) adopted Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000), whichfurther emphasized that accredited engineering programs need to consider the ability to functionon multidisciplinary teams within their curriculums [1]. Since this time, there
inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meetobjectives” as a required student outcome supporting the program educational objectives [5].Engineering educators who endeavor to teach inclusive teamwork skills to enable their studentsto work productively and inclusively, however, often discover what organizational theorists havepreviously observed and documented: that teaching people to work productively in diverse teamenvironments is a challenge [1].Historically, many diversity-related educational interventions in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) environments attempt to prepare the marginalized personto cope with the unwelcoming cultures in which they are situated [2]. With NSF support, aresearch team used a
adaptation of national models for “gold/red shirt” programsand a first-year research program for mid-tier incoming students, guided by significant featuresof our local context. Here we describe the motivation and structure for this hybrid model first-year plus support program and an informal assessment of our first year.Background and Local ContextSince first learning of Jackie Sullivan's plan to launch a program she called Goldshirt atUniversity of Colorado-Boulder, an engineering education team at OU started trying to figure outhow we could do something similar for our institution [1]. Our local context resulted in acapacity-limited, economic, and political environment that prohibited a similar launch at ourstate institution. The Goldshirt program
recently published an article by an undergraduate student in which they argue thatstudents are using ChatGPT prolifically but primarily to generate ideas (e.g., “Give me someoptions for very specific thesis statements”) and not to blindly author complete assignmentsubmissions [1]. The same outlet published articles in which questions around how to assesslearning following ChatGPT’s release and widespread adoption were discussed [2] and concernswith ChatGPT as a “plagiarism machine” were raised [3]. We also see publications bygovernment agencies calling for the need to develop policies and conduct research on the rapidlyexpanding availability of Artificial Intelligence that is impacting teaching and learning [4].While there is no shortage of media
courses. The course structure is employed at the Chemistrydepartment at University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV). The present study is anautoethnography of the implementation of the course structure and its effectiveness assessment.This study highlights the implementation of the course structure considering student motivationand learning since student motivation is an important research area for modern instructionaldesign. Lab course motivation is incorporated by asking the students to make TikTok videos oflabs and submitting them on Blackboard.1. IntroductionApart from the traditional face-to-face mode of instruction, online and hybrid courses haveexisted for many years. Due to COVID-19, academic institutions were forced to transform
explores new ways to supportfreshmen engineering students and understand the changing needs of current students in thehopes of increasing retention rates and fostering student academic and professional success.However, many factors play into the academic success of individual students. Numerous studieshave identified factors that influence whether a student will persist in engineering includingclassroom climate, academic success (i.e., grades and conceptual knowledge), self-confidence/self-efficacy, academic preparedness, career interests and race and gender [1]. Timemanagement and study skills are key areas with which most new freshmen engineering studentsstruggle. Effective time management strategies increase academic performance [2], as well
College of Engineering had no comprehensive data regarding studentsuccess, as defined by graduation, for first-time full-time freshmen students with declaredengineering majors. The college thought, anecdotally, the success of declared engineeringfreshmen students was about 50 percent, which was similar to what was being reported by otherengineering programs around the country. [1] Within the college, small and limited analyses hadpreviously been performed to use in areas such as recruiting and grant proposals; however, an in-depth study had not been performed.To address the lack of data, an Engineering Data Analytics team was formed to study the successof first-time, full-time engineering freshmen. The team consisted of the lead
Boulder. 14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference: University of Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee Jul 30 Full Paper: Where’s the Math? A Case for Reconsidering Math in K-12 EngineeringIntroduction“[We wanted them to] experience the fun side of engineering, and we weren’t selling what all ofengineering actually requires.” – administrator about his high school’s STEM curriculum [1]It is indeed important for students to have “fun” in engineering, particularly those in lowergrades who have yet to cross engineering off their potential career pathway list. Yetmisrepresenting the significance of mathematics in K-12 engineering may give students a falsesense of what engineering
University - Dominion Energy collaboration was initiated in 2019 by a need in DominionEnergy’s workforce development and a summer research faculty position offered to the ECEdepartment at George Mason University by Dominion Energy. The faculty internship programwas not new; however, the George Mason University faculty identified three loose connectionsin UIC, including (1) the two-way learning between faculty and industry professionals, (2) theinsufficient real-world experience in the program curriculum, and (3) the gap between teachingand research. The loose connections are shown in the dotted lines of Figure 1. Figure 1 The University-Industry CollaborationThe George Mason University faculty worked with the special study
-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference: University of Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee Jul 30 Full Paper: Fostering Success in Introductory Calculus through Peer-Led Team Learning (PLTL)IntroductionAs the analytical foundation of engineering, Calculus 1 is a key building block of the first-yearengineering curriculum. It is also, unfortunately, a stumbling block for many students for avariety of reasons: weak preparation in high school math courses; lack of self-confidence; anddifficulty building a new peer study/support group in the new college environment, among others[1,2]. D or F grades in calculus can be a significant barrier to progression in an
computing capabilities to trainmodels to intelligently understand and respond to complex situations. Nearly all engineeringdisciplines have begun utilizing ML to effectively solve challenging problems. With newlearning technologies and a plethora of easy to use ML model libraries in Python, students nowhave the opportunity to gain hands-on experience with this emerging subject. Educators shouldembrace ML and its ability to transform problem solving and teach students how to use machinelearning as a tool.Current ML curriculum efforts are heavily focused on computer/data science or mathematicsdisciplines, with little emphasis on teaching ML applications to students in traditionalengineering disciplines, especially at the undergraduate level [1]. This
educationoften focuses primarily on technical knowledge and skills, neglecting the broader aspects ofstudent development and engagement. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition ofthe need to enhance engineering student success by creating a more holistic and supportivelearning environment [1], [4],[13].This paper presents a case for enhancing engineering student engagement and success through amulti-faceted effort at an Engineering College. Recognizing the importance of the first year as acritical transition period for students, the College has undertaken a comprehensive approach tosupport and empower first-year engineering students [2], [7], [11].To ensure that first-year students are well-prepared and connected to their engineering
New York City, with the intent of helping students with less of a technical backgroundor fewer STEM-related hobbies feel a greater sense of belonging in the engineering classroom.OutcomesThemes that students chose in the first iteration of this assessment were fittingly varied. Table 1summarizes the distribution of themes chosen, where like themes were grouped together by theauthor to highlight which were the most common. Specific individual themes varied acrossTolkien novels, Pokémon, the North Pole, student’s country of origin, bottled water brands, andeven the setting of a fantasy short story that a student had written themselves in high school.Table 1. Summary of the most common map themes chosen by students.State Fantasy Literature Movie
: Broadening Students’ Self-Knowledge and Self-Development in an Introductory Engineering Design CourseObjectives:1. To offer engineering students practical ideas and resources to improve their self-awareness, self- development, and overall academic achievement, introduce college students to various engineering opportunities available, and inspire them to explore and engage in these opportunities.2. To prepare students as future engineers ready to work in an increasingly diverse and inclusive society by introducing them to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) and Engineering Ethics Modules.Implementation: The concept of broadening students' self-knowledge and self-development is
value they calculated.There are many processes and heuristics that have been developed to support problem solving.As instructors, we have focused on teaching our students PROCESS, which was developed byGrigg and Benson [1], [2]. This approach breaks problem solving into seven steps:(i) Problem Statement, (ii) Represent the Problem, (iii) Organize Information, (iv) Calculations,(v) Evaluate your Solution, (vi) Solution Communication, and (vii) Self-Evaluation.When demonstrating problem solving as instructors, we document our work in the PROCESSformat like we expect our students to document their work. This includes problems recorded foruse in the learning management system, problems solved during synchronous class time, andposted solutions to
Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee Jul 30GIFTS: Metacognition reflection notecard - A 5-minute daily class activity to driveself-efficacy, classroom engagement, and communityIn the last five minutes of my first-year engineering class sessions, I hand out notecards and askeach student to write their responses to three simple but powerful questions:Question 1: What's the most important concept you learned today that you want to remember?Question 2: Is anything unclear to you after today's class? Are there any outstanding questionsstill on your mind?Question 3: What is one song you'd like to be added to our class playlist? Include your name ifyou want credit for your song choice.I review student responses at the
engineering students [1]. Most students in the coursehave declared an engineering major (12 different majors) but there are some students who areadmitted to engineering without a major—they need to declare their major before the end of theirfirst semester. Highlighting the different engineering disciplines in this class is particularlyimportant for the students who haven’t yet declared an engineering major. Typically, engineeringdepartment overviews are provided to the students in the form of weekly lectures from guestspeakers from each engineering department. While the weekly overviews provided informationon the expertise of that discipline, there was a need for students to have the opportunity to reflecton the interconnectedness of engineering
implementation tools theywill need in the following years. MATLAB is included due to its use in several upper-level labcourses across disciplines. The FYE curriculum focuses on introductory programming skills andMATLAB syntax. However, the learning activities, developing geometry calculators and gameslike Tic-Tac-Toe, do not directly apply to their future use cases in lab settings. Gamedevelopment differs significantly from the algorithm development and logic skills required tocreate scripts to assist with a complex, research focused experiments. In response to thatdisconnect, we developed hardware-enabled data collection MATLAB modules to integrate asituational learning experience[1]. These modules enable students to collect data individually andwork
semester or term allows instructors to provide formative feedback, through surveyquestions that prompt students to share their perceptions about what helped their learningprocess during and between class sessions, what could be improved, and what they actuallylearned.An argument exists that in-class surveys provide better formative student feedback abouteffective teaching and learning than a survey about one or two previous classes, becauseparticipants are in the middle of the learning activity that the instructor is attempting to assessrather than reflecting on it after the class before they respond [1] [2].On the other hand, post-class exit surveys provide opportunities for reflection, which isbeneficial for student well-being; offers relief
laboratories in providing students with hands-onexperiences that complement theoretical learning has been explored in [1]. These first-yearengineering labs can effectively acquaint students with the captivating and demanding field ofengineering, while also preparing them for further studies and careers in the discipline.As part of the first-year engineering curriculum, a Mechanical Engineering Laboratory coursewas developed and offered in the Fall of 2022. This course aims to cultivate fundamentaltechnical skills and exposure through a series of practical laboratory sessions. It is a 2-creditcourse consisting of a 1-hour lecture and a 2-hour lab session each week. The course introducesstudents to various concepts including laboratory safety
engineering education research culture, and applications of operations research in an education context. 14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference: University of Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee Jul 30Workshop 1 – Making Patterns, Breaking Patterns – Ethnographic systems mapping and analysis ofengineering education groupsSystems thinking is an essential skill for engineers in an increasingly complex world. Engineers must beable to see beyond applied science and mathematics to the social, political, economic, ethical,environmental, and even interpersonal forces acting on any problem in order to arrive at optimalsolutions. As we endeavor to “expand student success” by helping
teaming. 14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference: University of Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee Jul 30 Work-in-Progress: Opening the First-Year Design ProjectIntroductionDesign is a fundamental part of the typical engineering curriculum. As emphasized by theNational Academy of Engineers and ABET [1] – [3], the development of design skills is crucialfor engineering graduates. Design experiences are often components of introductory andcapstone engineering coursework [4]. These experiences are often in the context of coursesspecifically focused on design or upper-level engineering topics [5]. For introductoryengineering courses focused on design, the lack of
disciplines. This study aims to determine if adding additional freehand sketching toan introduction to design class is beneficial. A controlled trial was conducted with 85 students ina Control Section that were assigned just 6 freehand sketching assignments on paper. In contrast,an Intervention Section, consisting of 73 students, were assigned 146 sketching assignmentsusing software that automatically graded the sketches. Both sections covered CAD, hands-ontool use, and an open-ended design project. Pre- and post-course assessments of spatialvisualization ability were conducted using the PSVT:R standardized test. The results indicatedthat the average PSVT:R score increased by 1% in the Control Section, while it rose by 10% inthe Intervention Section
the load• Learning Management System tools• Project development in team taught courses• Support for new team members• Now it’s your turn - team teaching breakout session• Share what you’ve learnedIntroductionTodd Hamrick Introduction● Definition: Team teaching means that multiple instructors teach the entirety of the course while coordinating schedules and materials. (AKA parallel teaching)● Who we are and what we do ○ West Virginia University, Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources ○ Fundamentals of Engineering Program ○ Common first year program for 9 departments ○ Primary teaching functions are Engineering Problem Solving 1 and 2 ■ 1st semester is professional skills and
ASCE Concrete Canoe team leader. It is highly recommended that the team attendASCE concrete canoe meetings if there are any or have regular meetings with the ASCE ConcreteCanoe team leader. The deliverables from the team will be the miniature concrete canoe that isless than 2 feet and longer than 1 foot and must float when tested in the water for more than 30seconds. The canoe floatation must be demonstrated in real-time in class or recorded. The teammust turn in a brief report consisting of the mix-design table, mold design, calculation of thevolume of the canoe, buoyancy, pictures of the process, any difficulties encountered, andhighlights of the communication with the technical advisors. Grading on Aesthetics,Innovativeness (using