image processing, computer vision, engineering education, and academic ethics. He has extensive experience as a computer hardware engineer at Hewlett-Packard. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27793Dr. Jie Yang, Northern Arizona University Dr. Yang is an assistant professor of practice in the School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems at Northern Arizona University. She serves a coordinating role in the NAU/CQUPT 3+1 Program. Her research interests are in wireless communications, signal processing, and engineering education. c American
Purdue University and is currently a 2nd year mechanical engineering graduate student at the Georgia Institute of Technology in the field of robotics and controls. As a member of the Intelligent Machine Dynamics Laboratory, under the direction of Dr. Wayne J. Book, his current research focuses on the improvement of control algorithms for flexible robotic manipulators. Brian's interest in engineering education has translated into a STEP Fellowship where he teaches College Prep. Physics, Conceptual Physics, and Engineering Drawing and Design weekly at Marietta High School in Marietta, GA, where he also mentors the Marietta High School Engineering Club.Dirk Schaefer, Georgia Institute of
, Canada in Educational Psychology (Learning Sciences stream), and Psychology, respectively. Her research interests include using multimodal data to examine self-regulated learning across contexts and populations. She is the current Associate Editor for the International Journal of Learning and Instruction and the International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education and serves on the Editorial Board for the International Journal of Metacognition and Learning. She is Co-PI on the NSF-supported HSI Implementation and Evaluation Project: Enhancing Student Success in Engineering Curriculum through Active e-Learning and High Impact Teaching Practices (ESSEnCe). Sierra Outerbridge, M.Ed., is a graduate research
concerns compared to their non-engineering peers [32]. Furthermore, a study conducted by Lilley andLarnell (2023) on historically minoritized graduate students in STEM, including engineering, identified the impactof continuous microaggressions and social isolation on their mental health. This research highlighted the need forevidence-based support systems specifically designed for students from historically marginalized communities tomitigate the effects of intimidating academic environments [33]. Another study, focusing on the Indian context,highlighted the role of interpersonal stressors, including changes in social activities and disagreements with peers,as significant contributors to students’ stress. The study also pointed to financial
-relianceand critical thinking skills of the participants. The authors also believe that this enhancement ofknowledge and skills will be a necessary component for all future bridge camps developed byND EPSCoR. ND EPSCoR is planning to conduct four bridge camps during the summer of 2020and will continue to refine the camp and track participants throughout their academic careers. Insubsequent research, in an effort to determine the overall impact of these camps, ND EPSCoRwill compare the college matriculation rates of the bridge camp participants to the collegematriculation rates of all AI high school graduates in ND.AcknowledgmentsThe development and implementation of the ND EPSCoR NATURE bridge camp was madepossible through funding provided by NSF
Paper ID #10364An Assessment Tool for Using Videos and Rich Media in Construction Man-agement Curriculum - A Case StudyMrs. Kristen Caroline Hurtado, Arizona State University Kristen is a current PhD candidate in Construction Management at Arizona State University in the School of Sustainable Engineering in the Built Environment. She is also pursuing a Graduate Certificate in In- structional Design and Performance Improvement in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College. Kristen has experience teaching applied statics and estimating at the undergraduate level. She also instructs profes- sionals in her work and research in value
public and conduct themselves honorably, responsibly, ethically, and lawfully so as to enhance the honor, reputation, and usefulness of the profession...” In this paper, rather than discuss the teaching of engineering ethics, the author will explore the significance of the “hold paramount” principle for engineering educators, the engineering curriculum, and its potential impact on public policy and the student body. How we teach engineering may in fact dominate the ethical and societal lessons we wish to teach. Questions explored include: How can one effectively and practically teach fundamental engineering concepts in a way that will equip our graduates to
make it very difficult for new educators to quicklydesign a portfolio curriculum and accurately employ it in their classrooms.This paper describes our efforts in collecting, summarizing, and comparing the design ofportfolio assignments in order to provide a review of the practice of using student portfolios inengineering education. To achieve this goal, we will review eleven research papers to illustratethe broad range of portfolio use relevant to engineering education. The review of these paperswill help engineering educators to understand the diversity of portfolio use in engineeringeducation.In the paper, we will first review the current literature on defining and classifying studentportfolios. Using this review as a basis, we introduce and
laundry list of issuesdeemed important in the practice of the profession from safety to environmental impactto the societal and global contexts of engineering design decisions. Still, no mention ofpeace is ever made. With these experiences and observations, I began my search for a differentparadigm for engineering education, one that put peace as an explicit goal, one that didnot assume or presume that the reader would somehow identify it as part of the code ofconduct. My search has identified one such model that will serve as the focus of the Page 9.84.2 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education
colleges [1]. Women and members of ethnic/racial minoritygroups continue to be underrepresented in computing and engineering fields at both two- andfour-year institutions [1], [2]. Community colleges are a vital part of the solution to broadeningparticipation in STEM fields; however, more evidence is needed about the impact of innovative,sustainable models for serving greater numbers of transfer students in high demand disciplines,such as technology, across pathways from community college to university. Knowledge about theimpact of best practices for transfer advising and other supportive interventions is especiallycritical [3]. The Post-Transfer Pathways (PTP) program at a mid-sized public research university(UNIV) was designed to increase the
the educator had requested 17 hours of topics outside of the defined core, theproblem would have returned an infeasible solution since there would not be enough hours tomeet the core requirements. In this situation, the educator would be asked to revise their inputs.This interaction with the user is complete when no more revisions are needed to the syllabus.The user would then have access to a database of information to aid in implementing thesyllabus.3. Extension of Model Use to other Engineering CoursesWhile it is believed that the model will have its greatest impact on the design and presentation ofEngineering Economy courses, the model can also serve as a useful resource for educatorsdesiring to incorporate engineering economy topics in
color in the field of cybersecurity.Dr. Sharon Zelmanowitz P.E., U.S. Coast Guard Academy Dr. Zelmanowitz is Dean of Engineering at the United States Coast Guard Academy and Professor of Civil Engineering. As an institutional change agent, she has catalyzed the formation of a USCGA di- versity initiative inspired by the ASEE Engineering Deans Diversity Initiative and has brought faculty and stakeholders together to employ best practices to meet the the Coast Guard’s urgent need for more engineers prepared for 21st century technical challenges. Her teaching, research, and capstone projects span a wide array of environmental issues including storm sewer and sanitary sewer redesign, shipboard wastewater treatment
Minstrell citation)NRC (1995). Engineering Education: Designing an Adaptive System. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.NRC (1999). How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.NSF (1995). Restructuring Engineering Education: A Focus on Change. Washington, D.C., Division of Undergraduate Education, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation.NSPE (1992). Engineering education issues: Report on surveys of opinions by engineering deans and employers of engineering graduates on the first professional degree (3059). Alexandria, VA: NSPE.Summers, E. (1984). "A Review and Applications of Citation Analysis Methodology to Reading Research Journal Literature
student transition support [8], [9].This paper examines the various impediments that contribute towards first-year student attritionfrom the engineering major. Further, it provides a case study of a summer bridge program calledthe Successful Transition and Enhanced Preparation for Undergraduates Program (STEPUP)created specifically to address the above challenges. The paper will propose STEPUP as ageneralized program model and best practice to be utilized by colleges and universities to promotethe success of first-year engineering students in general, and USP, in particular. 3 Figure 3. Framework for admission and retention of USP at public universities.Overview of the STEPUP ProgramHistoryIn
Creating a "Global Algorithm" for Engineering EducationAbstractFor five generations American engineering education has rested upon a practical model ofdrawing a broad range of students with certain mathematical skills and wide technologicalinterests into a large-mouthed pedagogic funnel, gradually compressing their training into ever-narrower frames of specific, skill-sets and acumens. The result has been to standardize the end-products emerging from the apex of the educational funnel. Examinations and re-toolings ofengineering education have usually merely redirected the funnel with recommendations of newmethods and protocols for fine-tuning the relevance of contemporary technology to theclassroom and laboratory. One canon remains constant
hubs that serve as locations for one-time training workshops for geographically close “spoke” participants, specifically the Southeastand Central Hubs. Due to weather, the workshops were consolidated. At the workshop,participants heard presentations on the motivation behind this project, DLM design, instructionalphilosophy, and best implementation practices, and also had a chance to use all four modules inconjunction with suggested classroom worksheets.The effectiveness of the LC-DLMs has been previously tested; however, there was a lack ofrobust measures for assessing student understanding in prior implementations of LC-DLMs. Toaddress this, we used Bloom’s taxonomy to categorize learning outcomes, measure learninggains, and better analyze
course deliverables. Deliverablesinclude: final working product (hardware, source code, and binaries), research paper (completedindividually), time logs (completed individually), system requirements specification, systemdesign specification, project plan, design review presentation, socio-economic impact statement,ethical impact study, test document, traceability matrix, test logs, user manual, and finalpresentation.Literature Survey: Competition-based Capstone ProjectsCompetition-based capstones are not uncommon as was found from a literature survey. In aconference paper by Paulik and Krishnan4, they discuss the use of competitions for capstonedesign courses at the University of Detroit, Mercy’s department of Electrical and ComputerEngineering
women graduates of our undergraduate programs. We also createda diversity page on the department website with an inclusive statement and a series of videosfeaturing women graduates of our undergraduate programs. As an affiliate of BRAID in 2020,we are also learning best practices from peer institutions with a historical record of improvingthe representation of women within their programs.Results from Culture ChangeOur department is seeing a sustained growth from our efforts in both the number and percentageof undergraduate degrees awarded to women. The percentage of all undergraduate degreesawarded has grown from 9.8% in academic year 2012-13 to 16.1% in academic year 2019-20,increasing monotonically except for 2016 (Figure 1). This translates
responsible for accrediting collegeand university programs in applied science, computing, engineering, and technology, has alsorecognized the need to broaden engineers’ skills by the requirement of programs to demonstrategraduate proficiency in 6 core professional skills,1 including communication and ethics.A majority of engineering undergraduate programs satisfy the engineering ABET criteria toproduce technically competent and professionally aware engineers through a capstone seniordesign experience, which utilizes problem-based learning or experiential learning pedagogies.8,15, 32 Capstone design literature is replete with resources that address best practices in teachingdesign courses and methods to scaffold the technical expertise required
engineering staff, at one of the nation’s premier universities to strengthen educationalprograms at community colleges and other institutions in an emerging technology ofstrategic economic importance. The NMT Partnership is a proven success. Associatedegree program graduates are receiving as many as seven offers for employment each,and salaries as high as $52,000! The recent designation of the NMT Partnership as aNSF Center for Manufacturing Education in Nanofabrication will support continuedexpansion and improvement of this model program, and greater dissemination ofinformation about its effectiveness to other educational institutions and regions of thecountry
international standards and best practices. On September 2011 the UANLpublished a new General Regulation for Evaluations (Reglamento General de Evaluaciones),which considers the development of competencies through the different courses of each programand requires the use of modern methods and practices, indicating that the evaluation for eachcourse cannot be specified using only a single method or score and has to be both formative andsummative through a series of specific and properly designed activities and their evidences. Tocomply with this regulation and at the same time satisfying ABET criterion 1 (relative to studentsand that specifies that “student progress must be monitored to foster success in attaining studentoutcomes..”) a new informatics
members and veterans enrolled in undergraduate and graduate education,” 2016. Stats in Brief. NCES 2016-435. National Center for Education Statistics.[14] A. Bandura. “Self-efficacy”. In V. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, New York: Academic Press. 1994. vol. 4. pp. 71-81.[15] W. Davidson, H. Beck, M. Milligan, M. “The college persistence questionnaire: Development and validation of an instrument that predicts student attrition.” Journal of College Student Development, 2009. vol. 50. pp. 373-390.[16] V. Tinto, V. “Research and practice of student retention: What next?” Journal of College Student Retention, 2008. vol. 8. no. 1. 8
Copyright ©2003, American Society for Engineering EducationEngineering and Chemistry with a Director who is a member of the faculty in the Departmentof Chemical Engineering. The primary areas of involvement include (but not limited to):• Freshman Engineering Design modules adopted by faculty for use in secondary level student programs.• Engineering faculty providing professional development programs for secondary grade level teachers.• Pre-College programs designed specifically for engineering disciplines.• Engineering graduate students assigned as GA’s for professional development of teachers and providing lessons for school children (Science Outreach Program).• Competitions in engineering and science subjects hosted by NJIT, with the
. Thisdata suggests that topics students spent more hands-on time with resulted in better performance.IntroductionAccording to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, the average person has 10 jobs by the age of 40[1]. This can be seen in Engineering and also reflected in what Engineering graduates are doingfive and ten years post degree[2], [3] . Further, nearly 25% of the Best Performing CEOs startedwith a B.S. in Engineering [4]. Industry continues to ask for more well-rounded competencies ofnew Engineers. The T-shaped engineer combines a depth of engineering technical knowledgewith broad knowledge across domains such as business, communications, entrepreneurship, andethics [2], [5]. Fostering 21st century skills ensures Engineers are equipped to
Katherine Goodman is assistant professor at the University of Colorado Denver, and curriculum lead at Inworks, an interdisciplinary innovation lab. Her research focuses on transformative experiences in engineering education. She is currently division chair of the Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: A Layered Mentorship Program for Engineering Student Success and RetentionAbstractThis Work in Progress paper of an Evidence-based Practice examines the impact of a LayeredMentorship Program (LMP) on the retention of first-year
information security uses, policies, models – Sec 1, Sec 2 • Specific communications systems and policies – Net, Sec 2 • Planning and designing for security – Sec1, OS, Net, Sec 2 • Specific vulnerabilities; technical and policy solutions – Sec 1, OS, Net, Sec 2In June, 2007, our department participated in a workshop for information securitycurriculum development hosted by the University of Minnesota and sponsored by theNational Science Foundation. During that workshop we compared curricula acrossexisting and proposed programs at the 2-year, 4-year, and graduate level. The onlyconsensus standard identified for information security curricula were the IACEPrequirements. Participants noted that the demand was so high for graduates
and approaches are used inteaching sustainability in different engineering disciplines, e.g., creating an interdisciplinaryseminar as a summer research program5, or integrating sustainability into all engineering coursesincrementally6, 7, etc. In general, it is agreed that integrating sustainability into existing coursesmight be a better way8, 9. However, predefined course content requires additional preparations onthe instructor’s side and supplementary resources may be a challenge as well.Capstone design as a showcase for students’ development before their graduation has beenchosen18-24 to engage students in sustainable engineering design experience, especially in civiland environmental engineering areas. Burian18 proposed to use a specific
can be designed with built-in flexibility. Forexample, elective slots within the structured framework allow students to explore interdisciplinarycourses while still ensuring timely graduation. This balance ensures that students have bothautonomy and guidance.At the same time, economic realities must be considered. Many full-time students work during theday to support their education, which has been cited as a reason for increasing course flexibility.However, research shows that extensive work commitments significantly contribute to studentattrition, with 42% of dropouts citing financial stress as a primary factor [3].A more balanced approach is needed—one that preserves the benefits of structured learning whileaccommodating students with
Paper ID #7933A Female-Only Camp for STEM DisciplinesDr. Muhittin Yilmaz, Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) Dr. Muhittin Yilmaz received a B.S. in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Gazi University at Ankara, Turkey, and the M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Pennsylvania State University at University Park. He has been an assistant professor with the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) since 2007. His research interests include robust and control system optimization, model identification and validation, robotics
evaluates programmatic inter- ventions designed to recruit, retain and advance diverse faculty at UMBC. Dr. Reed also routinely dis- seminates best practices learned from UMBC’s diversity initiatives at national and international venues. Dr. Reed is on the advisory board for the Mid-Atlantic Higher Education Recruitment Consortium.Dr. Renetta G. Tull, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Renetta Garrison Tull is Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Student Professional Development & Post- doctoral Affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC: An Honors University in Mary- land), where she is the Co-PI and Founding Director for the National Science Foundation’s PROMISE: Maryland’s Alliance for