lifelong learning (2.7) · Knowledge of contemporary issues (2.2)In addition to feedback on the course obtained during and at the end of the course, there is amechanism in place to obtain feedback at the end of a student’s educational experience. On exitsurveys given to graduating engineering seniors, the junior design course is frequently cited inresponse to both the item, “List two engineering courses you feel were most useful for yourengineering education,” and the item, “Describe one or two of your best experiences in theDepartment.” While the course is challenging and time consuming, students tend to view it as aseminal experience in their overall educational process.IX. DiscussionThere are several heuristically deduced benefits that the
, andadministrators see the benefits of PD in creating an engaging learning environment. TheSPDRweb model assists other researchers in math, science and education by providing a modelfor team teaching at the University level and in creating a true K-16 learning environment, wherestudents, teachers, and communities for school-aged, undergraduate and graduate studies areinvolved in curriculum improvement as a team. KEEP has the ability to impact any individual orprogram working to improve STEM curriculum development and learning success.AcknowledgementsThe work presented here was supported by the University of Kentucky College of Education,College of Engineering Alumni Donations, and the Office of the Executive Vice President forResearch.Bibliography1 Clark
listed – Engineering Knowledge,Problem Analysis, Investigation, Design, and Engineering Tools – the more ‘traditional’ engineeringskills – even if this emphasis was not intended by CEAB. In fact, research in the field indicates thatteamwork and communication skills – competencies found in the ‘middle’ of the list – are topcompetencies for engineering practice. Additionally, the need to investigate potential clusters ofcompetencies has been emphasized in this research, identified as a gap in both engineering educationand research.Considering the research, and motivated to inform engineering education curricular design andimprovement at the University of Manitoba, an exploratory case study was designed in part toinvestigate how the CEAB graduate
of instruction for fall semester classes [13], others took amore nuanced approach and gave each instructor the autonomy to select the instructional modethat best balanced the stringent safety protocols with the learning objectives of the course. Thislatter approach was the route taken by Illinois State University, a mid-size public university inNormal, Illinois. As a result, the university offered courses with a mix of course instructionalmodalities during the Fall 2020 semester. Each course was designated by the instructor as eithera face-to-face, online-synchronous, online-asynchronous, or hybrid course. Face-to-face coursesmet primarily in-person, with modifications such as social distancing and classroom capacitylimitations in place
support inthese three areas in a professional development program may contribute to improving STEMcurriculum design. Despite the rise in interest in integrated STEM education, there is little research on thequality of STEM curricular materials and professional development opportunities for teachers tosuccessfully integrate STEM. This study provides evidence for the impact of a professionaldevelopment program that aims to provide opportunities for teachers to explore STEMintegration and develop their own STEM units. Thus, the study findings have implications for thedesign of new STEM education professional development programs for teachers. First, teachersneed opportunities to learn new knowledge and skills to implement integrated
Paper ID #8969The PhD Advising Relationship: Needs of Returning and Direct-PathwayStudentsMs. Erika Mosyjowski, University of MichiganDr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Research Scientist and Adjunct Assistant Professor in the College of Engi- neering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research focuses on idea gen- eration, design strategies, design ethnography, creativity instruction, and engineering practitioners who return to graduate school. She teaches
engineering school at a large R1 universityencompassing nine PhD programs.Rubric Design and ImplementationFirst Rubric IterationThe Holistic PhD Admissions Rubric was designed using best practices in holistic graduateadmissions gathered from relevant literature [30-34]. The first iteration of this rubric contained13 criteria, each with a 1-4 scoring system with qualifiers for each score rating (Figure 1).Criteria were listed in order of best predictor of graduate success (letters of evaluation, evidenceof motivation, and prior research experience) to poorest (GPA and GRE), as reflected in bestpractices. Here, letters of evaluations are letters of recommendations, and each recommenderalso assigns a rating score for each applicant. Qualifiers for each
- ington. When he finds the time, he enjoys cooking, photography, bicycle repair, and cycling (instead of owning a car).Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri is in the Design Group of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford. Besides teaching undergraduate and graduate courses on structural analysis and design, she serves an administrative role as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education. Her research focuses on the study of educational and career pathways of people interested in technical work (and how to make K-20 education more supportive of these pathways). Page 23.621.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 From Freshman Engineering Students to Practicing
. Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel James Bluman is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. He has served the United States Army for the last 20 years as an officer and Army Aviator. He is a graduate of West Point (B.S. in Mechanical Engineering), Penn State (M.S. in Aerospace Engineering), and the Univ. of Alabama in Huntsville (Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering). His research interests are in the flight dynamics of VTOL aircraft and UAVs and innovative teaching methods.Dr. Gregory Martin Freisinger, United States Military Academy Greg Freisinger is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military
serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. Donna M Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Donna Riley is Kamyar Haghighi Head of the School of Engineering Education and Professor of Engi- neering Education at Purdue University
and focuses on systems integration. And IS fulfills an organizationalneed, but mostly from the management side.Of the five computing disciplines, computer engineering is the least closely related to IT. SE issmall in size nationwide and BYU doesn’t even have an SE program. For these reasons, this studyfocused on CS, IS, and IT.1.1 Research questions • How strong is the correlation between AC−CE and AE−RO, and major GPA among CS, IS, and IT students? • How strong is the correlation between AC−CE and AE−RO, and student satisfaction among CS, IS, and IT students? • Is there a correlation between major GPA and student satisfaction? • What is the best multiple regression model to fit these correlations?1.2
Evaluation from Virginia Tech. Her research and scholarship are focused on exploring the implementation of mixed methods, qualitative, and arts-informed research designs in studies examining issues of social justice and educational equity. Currently, she is on a research team examining the impacts of an out-of-school STEM summer program for racially underrepresented youth.Dr. Homero Gregorio Murzi, Virginia Tech Homero Murzi is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at Vir- ginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive ped- agogical
potential applications in theUS.This paper opens with a review of the best known undergraduate KSA frameworks in the US,providing both a context and a history of how these KSA frameworks came to be and how theyhave evolved over time. As these frameworks are familiar to most faculty in the US not leastbecause of ABET accreditation, they provide a common reference point for thinking aboutcomparable KSA frameworks for graduate programs, especially Ph.D. programs. This isfollowed by a survey of reports over the past decade calling for reform of the doctorate in theUS, Canada, UK, Europe, and Australia with a focus on being more explicit about developingbroader graduate attributes. We explore in some detail the Researcher Development Framework(RDF), or
semester. The course requires students to work in small design teams oftwo to solve a significant engineering problem at the undergraduate level. The group size is kept smallto make each student effectively contribute to the project and gain experience in different aspects ofengineering projects. A typical group initially proposes two to three projects by describing the initialthinking in one or two paragraphs along with drawing sketches and their sources cited. Students arefree to select project partners among the project's class. Groups also have the freedom to proposeprojects as long as they are related to their learned knowledge from the curriculum. However, theyneed to be appropriately challenging for the senior level graduating class. Their
to minimize the effects ofgrader judgment [14]. Previous scholars have noted that rubrics are more likely to produceerrors when they are redundant, have limited options for partial credit, have uneven intervalsbetween achievement levels, and exhibit inconsistencies in focus or form [15]. Rubrics mustalso avoid being excessively detailed or excessively general and should be bias-free, well-aligned with performance tasks, and written at an appropriate level for their users [16], [17]. Training. While improved rubric design can reduce grader error, training may be themost important factor to strengthen the reliability of grading [18]. Inexperienced graders requireguided practice to be able to consistently apply a rubric and having
experiences fromthe summer Academy and the lesson plans developed therein, so as to help inform and attractother teachers to such opportunities. The plans are to post on-line the lesson plans developed by Page 26.1605.2participants in the Academy. This would make them available for worldwide access and helpbroaden the program’s reach and impacts.Review of relevant literature Research has identified five core features of best-practices for teacher professionaldevelopment Academies. These include: (a) content focus, (b) active learning, (c) coherence, (d)duration, and (e) collective participation. Content focus is defined by pedagogy and
- sity. She obtained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Pri- mary research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and
help students in developing skills and facilitate practice with ill-structured problem solving.Additionally, we believe the findings suggest that a consistent instructional reference based onEPT may provide a foundation for developing pedagogical tools to assist faculty in developingand facilitating ill-structured problem solving and overcoming curricular integration challenges.1.0 IntroductionThe origins of this research lie in engaging students in a co-curricular project program, engineeringintramurals, at an R1 institution. The program brings together engineering students, fromsophomore through senior year, often from multiple departments, to solve problems sourced fromindustry and community groups, open design communities, technical
frequent interactions with the members of that community of practice. Thismentor’s situated learning experience was more complete, as he was able to observe and learnfrom the experts of that community.Because mentoring the undergraduate students in a research project was beneficial to theparticipating mentors in terms of their learning and development, faculty who advise graduatestudents can consider encouraging them to pursue these types of activities. Though not alldepartments will have a similar course in place, faculty can consider providing opportunitieswithin their own research projects for graduate students to mentor undergraduate students.Although graduate students are generally well prepared to conduct research, they are not as
VemulapalliDr. Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University Jennifer Cole is the Assistant Chair in Chemical and Biological Engineering in the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University and the Associate Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Designing and implementing a workshop on the intersection between social justice and engineeringPOSITIONALITY STATEMENTWe acknowledge that the authors are all in varying positions of privilege. The university atwhich we are implementing this initiative is a primarily white, private institution in the UnitedStates. We are also
analysis of the survey responses indicate the peer grading method successfullyreinforces and improves understanding of engineering design concepts. Proposals for revisionand improvement of the peer grading method based on the survey results are also discussed andremain as future work.1. IntroductionAccording to Torrance et al., the practice and study of assessment in education has experiencedthree major transitions – ‘assessment of learning’ to ‘assessment for learning’ to ‘assessment aslearning’ where assessment dominates learning experiences [1]. Considering the potential ofassessment to significantly contribute to student learning, a peer grading method is integratedinto a graduate-level engineering product design course. Peer grading is a well
Biology from the University of Michigan and Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her combined experience in STEM research and education, program development, and student advising are key to her dedication and success in creating opportunities for graduate students to achieve their education and career goals. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Better together: Co-design and co-teaching as professional developmentIntroductionCo-teaching is well documented as a unique opportunity to deepen one’s appreciation forteaching, share instructional knowledge, and expose students to multiple perspectives in theclassroom [1]–[5
Paper ID #34067The Politics of Citation Practices in Engineering Education: A CitationAnalysis of IntersectionalityDr. Kristen Moore, University at Buffalo Kristen R. Moore is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo. Her research focuses primarily on technical communication and issues of equity, inclusion, and social justice. She is the author of Technical Communication After the Social Justice Turn: Building Coalitions for Action (2019), in addition to a range of articles. She has received a number of awards for her research, including the Joenk Award for the best article
concern and necessitated a need to modifyrequirements to accommodate construction challenges. CAD models, online simulations,additional analysis, and build plans were common replacements for the physical prototypes. Inaddition to the construction constraints, Jaeger-Helton found that her online capstone studentsfound it challenging to collaborate for meetings and classwork, as well as connecting in general[23].Texas A&M’s Mechanical Engineering Senior Capstone Design Program and COVID-19GuidelinesIn mechanical engineering senior capstone design programs, instructors aim to bridge the gapbetween classroom and industry to help students develop the knowledge and skills needed tobecome practicing engineers. In this research study’s program, the
, their workersare forced to adopt complex understanding and problem solving skills in technical areas.However, research pertaining to worker preparedness indicates that colleges and universities arenot adequately preparing graduates for this new work environment (Wieman, 2008)24.Manufacturing has become a field where global view and technical savvy are desirous qualitiesfor all persons involved. Since the 1980’s, manufacturing has undergone significant changes inoperational costs and product quality. The lean mangers of the 20th century are now retiring andthere are not enough new lean experts to lead US manufacturing into the next 20 years (Linford,2007)13.BackgroundResearch surrounding instructional design models has found that effective
Paper ID #44183Development and Impact of Research Efficacy in a Undergraduate Teaching-AssistantCertification ClassDr. Jamie R Gurganus, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Jamie Gurganus is a faculty member in the Engineering and Computing Education Program. She is the Associate Director STEMed Research in the College of Engineering and Information Technology (COEIT). She also serves as the Director for the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL) in the graduate school. Her research is focused on solving problems relating to educating and developing engineers, teachers (future faculty
, Japan and Singapore, has at least indirectly contributed to the stabilization of theexpectation about the global competencies (perhaps more so for graduate students in engineeringthan for undergraduates), despite the apparent difficulties1,2,3,6 in quantifying what thesecompetencies might entail. At KUSTAR, like elsewhere in the UAE and in the broader MENAand Persian Gulf region, the startup package is not a common practice, and different universitieshave adopted different models of supporting their research faculty, but, even when some supportexists, it is approximately an order of magnitude below the North American investment in juniorfaculty. Due to the lack of systematic investment, we sought a different mode of laboratorybuildup, planning
they change formatand/or searching protocol. This relearning has also been made more complex as databasesproliferate and merge.Effective researching methodologies are not intuitive and the researching skills that highschool students bring with them as incoming freshmen (or that community college studentsbring with them as transfer students) cannot prepare them for the complexity of today’sinformation retrieval. Students should not rely on chance to locate their supporting literature,and practicing engineers cannot afford to overlook any relevant documents germane to theirresearch and design. Engineers must be able to systematically review their literature in acomprehensive and efficient fashion.BackgroundGuides to the Literature have been
Society for Engineering Education, 202212 Table of Contents Mentoring Program Design Motivation for the Study Purpose of Research Literature Review Methodology Pilot Mentoring Program Mentoring Program During COVID19 Summary of Best Practices 3In this presentation we’ll cover the mentoring program design, the pilot mentoring program, the discoveries we found during the COVID 19 pandemic, and a summary of the best practices for mentoring programs
Maslow, tocutting-edge concepts and best practices from other nations, which will lay the groundwork forturning theory into practice.4.1 Management Styles and Subordinate Responses Impacting Working ConditionsDouglas McGregor 2 has defined two management theories (beliefs).Belief X is an authoritative management style. The Belief X Assumptions are: • The average human being has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if he can. • Because of their dislike for work, most people must be controlled and threatened before they will work hard • The average human prefers to be directed, dislikes responsibility, is unambiguous, and desires security above everything.These assumptions are a basic belief system that lie behind