the NCEES FE Reference Handbook[2]. This is a 258-page publicationcontaining equations and data needed during the exam. The FE exam is an 8-hour exam. It is broken up into two sessions: a 4-hour morningsession and a 4-hour afternoon session. The morning session contains 120 general engineeringquestions in the areas of: Mathematics, Engineering Probability and Statistics, Chemistry,Computers, Ethics and Business Practices, Engineering Economics, Engineering Mechanics(Statics and Dynamics), Strength of Materials, Material Properties, Fluid Mechanics, Electricityand Magnetism, and Thermodynamics. Each question is multiple choice and, on average, shouldbe solved in 2 minutes. The afternoon session contains 60 questions and the examinee
is to provide insight into how moneyflows through a company, the value of tracking cost data and the importance of managingoverhead costs in increasing profitability. This subject area also includes a section on how toread, interpret and use a project cost report.The accounting section provides an opportunity to address present-day legal and ethical issues.This is especially important in the aftermath of Enron, WorldCom, and Tyco8. This discussion iscapped with a short overview of Sarbanes-Oxley compliance (SOX) and the legal requirementsto accurately estimate and report cost.Cost EstimationThe three types of cost estimation techniques are introduced (i.e., parametric, analogous andengineering estimation). The differing levels of effort
participants. ABETguides many such studies in the States, most notably through its infamous Criteria A-K (ABET 2007).Of these criteria, roughly half (an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility; and ability to communicate effectively; the broad educationnecessary to understand the context of engineering solutions; a recognition of the need of life-longlearning; and a knowledge of contemporary issues) are more challenging to implement, and seemeaningful outcomes, in traditional engineering programs. D80 programs are infused withexperiences that enrich students with these skills, abilities, and attitudes while building on the “easy
to earn accreditation by the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology. Engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain… an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability [1]The Kate Gleason College of Engineering (KGCOE) at the Rochester Institute of Technology(RIT) has about 700 students enrolled in its five engineering programs. In recent years thecollege has seen significant innovation in the areas of sustainability and sustainableengineering. Some of these innovations have been motivated by faculty involved in this
Program (IPRO) at Illinois Institute of Technology is aproject-based experiential learning experience with the primary learning objectives of [1]strengthening multidisciplinary teamwork skills, [2] improving communication skills, [3]learning project management, and [4] recognizing ethical behavior. In the last four yearswe have developed a multipart assessment system for the purposes of measuring ourachievement of these and other IPRO learning objectives. In this paper we will discusshow we measure learning objectives attainment at the project team level and theinconsistencies in those measures that prompted us to better define our learningobjectives, and align our assessment measurement instruments with these newdefinitions. We conducted rank
participants to acclimate to their research projects before the programstart.Throughout this work, participants were able to gain or further develop skills in some of thefollowing areas: Ethical Hacking, Data Science, Intrusion Detection Systems, Linux, MachineLearning, Networking, and Python, as well as interact with a designated smart device and testingenvironment. In the first summer, participants were assigned a smart glucose meter and taskedwith 1) exploiting the potential threats associated with installing smart devices onto unsecurednetwork configurations via address resolution protocol (ARP) poisoning, and 2) exploring socialengineering tactics through cloning the device user application. Additionally, in the followingsummer, participants
constructing their web portals, explicitattention is paid by both the students and the instructor to the variety of permission types that arerequired in the completion of the project. Examples of these permission types includepermission given on the web site from which the media was obtained, permission successfullygranted via correspondence, open source license agreements, use of non-copyrighted materials,and use of materials personally owned (or optimally, created) by the student. The overall effectis to create a strong awareness in the students that electronic intellectual property is generallyowned by someone, and to give students confidence that they can still ethically succeed in thisenvironment.One final aspect of the introductory module is a
. Additionally, they participate in a discussion series with readings relevant to the field,often on contentious topics (embryonic stem cell research, the role of design in biomedicalresearch, biomedical ethics, etc.). In other classes in the third year of study in our curriculum,students focus on concise, clear technical writing, as well as oral presentations. Other requiredcourses within our Engineering School emphasize the global, societal, and ethical impact ofengineering endeavors.The sections that follow describe the methods we have implemented in our BiomedicalEngineering Capstone Course sequence to address the need for additional professional skillsdevelopment in our undergraduates. The overarching aims of these methods are not necessarilyunique
. Page 13.967.3DSP CurriculumBSEE Undergraduate Curriculum in DSPAt our university, as in most universities, we offer a four-year BS program in ElectricalEngineering. In this program, we require that students take basic sciences and mathematics in thefirst year. In the second year, they take a few engineering courses but still continue to get astrong science and mathematics foundation. In the third year, they complete the set of coreelectrical engineering courses. In the final year, they take mostly elective courses. During thefour year program, the students also have to complete university-required core curriculumcourses in areas like English, ethics, political science, religious studies, etc. We also offerflexible Junior Spring term for
to a full year. This will allow additional topics such as engineering ethics, leadershipand career development to be added to the content portion of the course. It will also allowstudents greater time for both the design and the construction process. Both elements arecurrently compressed in the 20 week schedule. It is anticipated that at 10 weeks the students willhave a preliminary design review with the critical design review occurring mid-way through thesecond quarter.LogisticsFaculty OrganizationFor each offering of Senior Design Project, one faculty member is assigned the courseorganization task. They are responsible for finding the projects, organizing the students intoteams, giving the weekly lecture and organizing the participating
time with students.This paper looks at how to effectively run online office hours using applications such as AOLInstant Messenger. The focus will be given to implementation and sustainability of onlineoffice hours. The instructor must demonstrate the viability of their online office hours such thathis/her students believe in its effectiveness and will want to continue using the application. Inaddition, the approach to running online office hours changes slightly due to the nature of theenvironment. From cheating to ethical concerns, these topics will be discussed to help theinstructor feel comfortable and have confidence running online office hours. A previous studyshowed a significant increase in student contact time with the implementation
. Page 13.1020.5Constructivism and Engineering EducationA second viewpoint that can foster meaningful responses to the ongoing challenges raised earlieris a willingness to consider professional engineering as a value-driven and value-laden activity:a local manifestation of accepted personal, professional, and cultural ideals. In this sense, valuesshould not be confused with morals or ethics in relation to standards of right and wrong. Theterm ‘values’ is invoked here as the underlying logic or normation expressed in the engineeringdesign choices made between ‘all things considered’. Viewing engineering as a value-drivenactivity opens up a place for subjectivity in what is traditionally thought to be an objectiveendeavour.Framed in this way
a rigorous design ethic, one that seeks to impart order on an as-yetunbuilt project, it would nurture a future generation of leading thinkers in structural design.Clearly such a design ethic, or set of values, requires high levels of cognition on Bloom’staxonomy.Jones (1981)23 has analyzed Scruton’s quote regarding the attachment of value to a series of“ends”. Jones has argued that architecture students must be educated in the appreciation of avast array of accomplished “ends”, as well as in “the imaginative construction of ends yet to be”.Jones goes on to argue that the undergraduate study of architecture must “establish a balancebetween the appreciation of the socio-cultural process of expressing ‘ends in view’ and thetechniques of
Libraries(ACRL) a division of the American Libraries Association, IL is not only closely tied to course-integrated instruction but extends beyond the coordination between the reference librarian andindividual faculty member to students demonstrating competencies in formulating researchquestions and their ability to use information as well as an understanding of ethical and legalissues surrounding information. Achieving this lofty goal requires a culture of collaboration(faculty-librarian-administration) and focuses on active student learning. The need for suchblended students becomes more critical because of demand from industry for broadly qualifiedgraduates/engineers and this can be achieved through collaboration to create an atmospherewhere
ability to conduct, analyze and interpretconstraints such as economic, environmental, experiments, and apply experimental results tosocial, political, ethical, health and safety, improve processesmanufacturability, and sustainability d. an ability to apply creativity in the design of(d) ability to function on multidisciplinary systems, components, or processes appropriate toteams program educational objectives(e) ability to identify, formulate, and solve e. an ability to function effectively on teamsengineering problems f. an ability to identify, analyze and solve(f) understanding of professional and ethical technical problemsresponsibility
, Mayagüez. His research interests include nonlinear structural mechanics, biomechanics, engineering education, and engineering ethics (with particular interest in appropriate technologies to serve impoverished and developing communities). He is an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), and Association for Practical and Professional Ethics (APPE). He holds BS degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University, and a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University. He was previously a faculty member in the Department of Civil Engineering & Mechanics at the University of
. Understand professional, ethical, and social responsibilities (4)On the first class of the semester, students are divided into teams. The teams are chosen througha lottery system whereby each student is given a number. Random numbers are drawn to formthe teams. This random number selection process creates teams of individuals that may or maynot have normally come together. As in real life, teams are formed through chance rather thanby ongoing friendships. The random teams are then assigned to meet to decide how they willproceed, divide out work, and schedule work meetings as the various aspect of the projectunfold.The course work for the semester is divided into four parts: bidding the project, scheduling theproject, establishing temporary support
-university collaborative research study assessing the ethical outcomes associated with the curricular and extra-curricular experiences of engineering undergraduates on a national scale, she leads projects to evaluate the effects of different kinds of instructional consultations on teaching, to assess the impact of an interactive theater sketch on student teamwork skills, and to determine the effects of an applied honors math course. Dr. Finelli is Chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of American Society of Engineering Education, is a member of the International Planning/Advisory Committee for the 2009 Research in Engineering Education Symposium, and is
,4 the life cycleapproach has wider potential to help students attain two of the ABET “a through k” outcomes:“(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability” (emphasis added); and “(h) the broad education necessaryto understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context.”To date, most of the engineering education literature’s treatment of life cycle has been limited todiscussion of innovative exercises and courses. 2,4,5 In particular, there has been littleexamination of how much engineering students consider life
miningengineers. After experience in industry, career paths are possible for positions as executives,managers and entrepreneurs. Page 14.474.2The Mining Engineering Technology program publishes the following program educationalobjectives as broad statements describing expected accomplishments of its graduates during thefirst few years after graduation.1. Graduates produce and utilize mining documents.2. Graduates function effectively on teams and communicate effectively with speaking, unity, and graphical skills.3. Graduates respect ethical and social issues as well as a commitment to quality.4. Graduates manage mining activities in
defined equivalent of a master’s degree in engineering as30 credits beyond the BS degree of “acceptable” upper level undergraduate or graduate levelcoursework in “technical or professional practice” topic areas from “approved providers”.“Acceptable” coursework is defined as being equivalent in intellectual rigor and learningassessment to engineering coursework provided by ABET EAC accredited programs.“Technical or professional practice” topic areas are defined as engineering, math and science inthe technical realm, and professional practice topics such as business, communications, contractlaw, management, ethics, public policy, and quality control. Coursework could be allengineering, or could be part engineering and the rest math, science and
, and early warnings.2) ME Faculty will mentor students in areas and activities such as professional opportunities for students (internships, professional societies, co-ops, undergraduate student research and industry projects, design competitions, professional meetings, etc.),answer questions about career choices, encourage good habits (study habits, ethical behavior, healthy life, stress management techniques, search for any required professional help, etc), motivation (rewards of hard work, celebrate success, learn from failure, etc.), building a relationship (personal accountability, showing that we care, etc.), financial aid/scholarships, and selection of technical electives appropriate to student interest and career goals3
common non-technical skillsemerged as critical to most industries. These are skills that the industry representatives deemedhighly valuable and required in the incumbent skill set of employees. Academic outcomes thatwill be used as benchmarks to measure these specific skills will be developed and the presence ofthese skills in BCC’s curriculum will likewise be evaluated and updated.The identified non-technical skills include: written communication, oral communication,presentation skills, teamwork skills, conflict resolution skills, ethics, professionalism in terms ofattendance and employee responsibilities, problem solving skills and approaches, appreciation ofthe manufacturing process and procedure, customer support, appreciation of diversity
educators were encouraged to provide more training inprofessional ethics, leadership, knowledge of global technology issues, and understanding of theworld’s cultures in order to facilitate working in a global arena and engagement in civicactivities.4Partly in response to this “quiet crisis,” but also to realize the greater potential of our students,the Brigham Young University Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technologyadministration proposed a strategy to pursue a set of initiatives that would help prepare anddevelop students as leaders. This strategy described in a paper delivered at an earlier ASEEmeeting involves “five key areas of focus: 1) Technical Excellence with a systems emphasis, 2)Leadership, 3) Character Development (including
,campus publications, athletics, community service, etc).9 Its five major goals for students arethat they learn to access, understand, and evaluate information, use it ethically, and create newmaterial (papers, presentations, or other products) based on that information. While theuniversity program started in the spring of 2008, progress toward its goals was already underwayseveral years before within the eight-semester engineering design course sequence.The engineering science design curriculumThe Engineering Science program at Trinity University requires a minimum of 129 hoursconsisting of a 51-semester-hour engineering core, 33 hours in math and science, 33 hours in thecommon curriculum, and 12 hours of elective, leading to a Bachelor of
focus on community building, communication,problem solving, leadership, and fun. The same cohort of students attended weekly seminarsfocused on preparing students to apply to and succeed in graduate school. Seminar topicsincluded: How to Impress a Graduate Admissions Committee (panel discussion), How to Write aPersonal Statement, Dinner & Dialogue with a Graduate Student, Keys to Success in GraduateSchool, Professional Ethics, Effective Scientific Presentations, and How to write a ScientificPaper. Following each one hour seminar there was a group dinner to give students from thedifferent programs an opportunity to meet and discuss the workshop topic in depth. Participantsfrom the same set of programs also attended GRE preparation courses
system—were used by engineering programs to plancurricular changes and make improvements. The end of the cycle in 2007, however, only meantthe beginning of a new cycle of accreditation, and for many of us at Rose-Hulman, we saw thisas an opportunity to review the institute student learning outcomes and revise them to reflect newchallenges our graduates must meet as they move into the engineering workforce and to graduateschool. Some of the institute outcomes, like communication, teams, and ethics, remainedimportant outcomes to continue to assess, both for the purpose of our institutional focus and forprogram accreditation requirements. In addition, we saw new challenges for our students,reflected in important publications like Rising Above the
10% intended to begin their academic careers at the local juniorcollege. Since the Engineering 11 students were pre-selected from students with highschool GPAs above 3.0, the predominance of more renowned institutions in the list ofUniversities to which the students intended to apply testifies to the students’ motivationfor attending university and strong self-concepts. The college-going ethic appeared to bewell established in the population. While there is no formal tracking mechanism of students once they complete thecourse, 33 students who completed Engineering 11 were contacted by e-mail after thecourse. Nine responded. All but one of those who responded were still interested inengineering. Six of the respondents have been
Page 14.970.5Whilst this appears to be an increased load for students, it formally recognises additionallearning that students were, to a large extent, already undertaking previously in preparation for,and reflection after completion, of their work placements.Professional Practice Program StructureThe structure of the Diploma of Professional Practice program element of the dual awardprogram is as shown in Table 2 below. Table 2 Professional Practice Element of the Co-operative Education Engineering Program Course Units Comments of CreditProfessional Practice 6 Covers resume writing, interview skills, ethics
potentially hazardous wastes. Too many engineers whoeventually become supervisors have no knowledge regarding the proper disposal of hazardous wastes. Ateaching materials laboratory is an excellent place for students to put into practice some of the principles theymay have discussed in their engineering ethics class. Disregard for the environment is a very seriousproblem in our nation and should not be ignored.. The need for students to learn about the care and maintenance of laboratory equipment, especially handtools and laboratory supplies. Have you ever tried to fix your car only to discover that the person who lastborrowed your tools did not return them? Even a basic work-ethic principle like always returning tools totheir proper place of storage