during the internship, write a finalreport on their capstone project, and deliver a final poster presentation of their capstone project.Rubrics are provided for the students so they understand the expectations for each deliverable.Upon completion of the program, students will be able to 1. Demonstrate broad technical skills 2. Think critically & solve problems 3. Discuss current research 4. Discuss the history, theory, & ethics of stem cell investigation 5. Present and communicate effectively 6. Network with professionals in the fieldInternship MatchingThe centerpiece of this program is the 9-month internship that our students embark on. As such,we worked to develop a formal procedure to facilitate the pairing process to
doing this, including the Ecodesign Strategy Wheel5 and LifeCycle Assessment.6The second category of instructional goals was to use the exercise to develop students’entrepreneurial skills and increase their awareness of the importance of these skills. Fivebehaviors were specifically targeted which support the KEEN Student Outcomes:7 Apply critical and creative thinking to ambiguous problems Construct and effectively communicate a customer-appropriate value proposition Effectively collaborate in a team setting Persist through and learn from failure Discern and pursue ethical practicesThe full set of KEEN Student Outcomes may be found in the appendix.The topic of sustainability provides excellent opportunities to
economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainabilityD. An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teamsE. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problemsF. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibilityG. An ability to communicate effectivelyH. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal contextI. A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learningJ. A knowledge of contemporary issues, andK. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.With the addition of these Rep-Rap machines to
Policy, 7(4):427-446.17. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992). Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA, 268 (17): 2420–2425.18. Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M.C., Muir, G.J.A., Haynes, R.B., and Richardson, W.S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312:71-2.19. Upshur, R.E.G., VanDenKerkhof, E.G., and Goel, V. (2001). Meaning and measurement: an inclusive model of evidence in health care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(2):91-96.20. Rogers, W.A. (2004). Evidence based medicine and justice: a framework for looking at the impact of EBM upon vulnerable or disadvantaged groups. Journal of Medical Ethics; 30:141-145.21
improvements. water emissions. Tragedy of the Students play out Harden’s Tragedy of the One of our collaborations has developed a Commons Commons using gold fish. Students series of ethics games; one of which is a more discuss ethics of sustainability. Note, this complex version of the simple gold fish is a common exercise available in many module. versions. Page 26.8.4Summary of Critical CollaborationsThe collaborations that enabled a successful first two years of this program aresummarized in Figure 1. Drs. Parrish and Bilec
Outcomes.Cadets possess: a. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. an ability to communicate effectively h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
week. Each of the Page 26.65.24 lecture sections, with approximately 150-200 students each, was subdivided into laboratorysections run by a Teaching Assistant (TA) with a maximum of 19 students per lab section. Thelectures were a mix of topics ranging from how to get around campus, student clubs andactivities, time management, general engineering design concepts, engineering ethics,engineering economics, and talks from industry and faculty. Laboratory work consisted ofseveral team-based design projects generally using low cost elements such as Popsicle sticks orsoup cans and tried to teach general engineering design principles. Two full-time
this design project. 0.00 4.76 4.76 66.67 23.81My ability to formulate creative solutions to open-ended problems was enhanced 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.43 28.57by working on the project.The design project encouraged me to be innovative. 0.00 0.00 9.52 42.86 47.62The design project inspired me to deliver a quality design for the community. 0.00 0.00 4.76 61.90 33.33Working with a team on the design project enhanced my leadership skills. 0.00 0.00 19.05 61.90 19.05I became more aware of ethical issues encountered around the world while 0.00 4.76 9.52
Work Experience California Baptist University July 2011-Present: Civil Engineering Department Chair July 2010-June 2011: Civil Engineering Interim Department Chair August 2009-Present Assistant Pro- fessor of Civil Engineering Topics taught: Chemistry, Statistics, Statics, Mathematics, Environmental Engineering, Leadership Cohort, Internship Prep, FE Review, Fluid Mechanics, Water Resources Engi- neering, and Hydrology. University of California, Los Angeles Mar.2008-June2008 Teaching Fellow Engineering Ethics Sept.2007- Mar.2008 Teaching Associate: Engineering Ethics (2 quarters) July 2004-June 2007 Teaching Assistant: Introduction to Water Resources Engineering (2 quarters) Hydrologic Analysis and Design (2
collaboration within a team setting.The Java programming session would be brought into the class right after the App Inventor session.Java was used as a general programming language to reinforce the proficiency of programming andproblem solving skills among students. It also played as a transitional programming language forstudent to continue their study in Computer Science.In addition to programming and problem solving skills, the designed modules also include consid-erable contents on teamwork, social responsibility and ethics. Followings are brief descriptions ofdesigned App Inventor modules:Module 1 is based on the ”Hello Purr” project from Wolber’s book 11 with a few extensions. Itworks as a quick start for students to explore the life cycle of
academic carieer in 2006 as a professor at Tottori University. His current research area is flow and combustion analysis in reciprocating engine, innovations in education and engineering ethics education.. He is also serving as the head of Innovation Center for Engineering Education in joint appointment. Katsuyuki Ohsawa has published over 70 papers including over 40 papers in peer reviewed journals. He received best paper awards from Society of Automotive Engineers in Japan and Japan Gas Turbine Society. He also works as a member of supporting committee in JICA for Pan-Africa University. Prof Ohsawa received Ph D Nagoya University in 1992 and started academic carieer in 2006 as a professor at Tottori University
; catalytic reaction engineering for biomass conversion Chemical Eng.Catalysis & catalytic reaction engineering for reducing SO2 emissionsIntegration of photovoltaic thermal systems in residential buildings for energysaving Civil Eng.Application of seawater-source heat pump in hot climate3.2 Research trainingIt includes a formal training on the scientific method, the development of the research questionand research plan, the research methodology, the importance of social and economic aspects ofthe research, and the professional ethics in research. The training is scheduled to be
extensiveexperience in focus group facilitation. All aspects of this study received ethics approval throughthe institution’s delegated ethics review process. Two focus groups, of four first-year studentseach, were conducted, each lasting approximately one hour. Students were asked theirimpression of each RLO and encouraged to discuss their opinions of each activity including pros,cons and areas for improvement. Each session was audio recorded.The inclusion criterion was enrollment in MSE101, the introductory materials science andengineering course being taught in the Winter 2014 semester at the University of Toronto.Students were not required to have used the RLO. Students were asked to participate on avoluntary basis only.In addition to the audio recording
’: a) ability to use given information and to research for available resources; b) critical thinking and decision-making skills; c) team work and communication skills; d) understanding of environmental engineering and management principles; e) knowledge about engineering professionalism/ethics; f) understanding of engineering design and practice; g) ability to use the computer tools such as Excel and stormwater design tools The SWPPP exercise was: 1. Effective in achieving one or more goals described above (identify and list items
level, three credit, semester long course that introducesengineering students to the foundations of management and organizational theory. Figure 2provides an overview of the course organization. As illustrated in the figure, the course buildson a foundation of management theory. This supports a more complete investigation of the work Page 26.1557.3of managers and theories of motivation and leadership. The topic of ethics is woven throughoutthese materials. Figure 2 - The Relationship Between Core Course TopicsThe course employs a highly inductive teaching approach focused on active learning withalmost all class sessions utilizing
Wright State engineering programs. Moreover, it wasshown that EGR 101 had the greatest effect on the group termed ‘Support Seekers’, composed ofstudents with below median ACT math scores but above median high school GPA’s. The latterindicates greater work ethic and ability to persevere in engineering, while the former mayarguably indicate below median ‘ability’. Thus, the mitigation of ACT math score associatedwith the F04-F06 cohorts was due to the fact that the low ACT math students who enrolled inEGR 101 were predominantly ‘support seekers’, who had the work ethic and perseverancerequired to progress through the remedial math sequence before enrolling in EGR 101. On thecontrary, low ACT math students from the incoming cohorts of Fall 2007
attributed to the development of value systems andvery high ethical standards, teaching others to generate knowledge, and the use of creativity anddiverse backgrounds to bring “unique perspective[s]” to research problems. One engineerdescribed the need for diversity in engineering in order to innovate: “The advances come whenyou’re sort of looking at—you’re applying something new to a different area and you’re bringingin people who haven’t looked at it before.” Others refer to the importance of collaborations andcollaborative work in generating advances in technology, especially between different fields (ex.mechanical engineering and psychology to advance mental health technologies), collaborationsbetween university research facilities and industry
forces on various devices3 Equilibrium Lab: Longboard -Trucks Apply equilibrium conditions to planar systems4 Free Body Diagrams Working with Physical Samples Draw FBDs based on (Small Group Problem Solving) physical systems5 Trusses Hyatt Ethics Case (Small Group Problem Solving)6 Trusses Lab: Bridge Design In a team, design, analyze, build and test a truss
topics: Use the case to illustrate why a particular failure method is important; examples include the I-35W bridge collapse on road-users in the twin cities metropolitan region [24]. Class discussions: Link technical issues to ethical and professional considerations; example includes the Hyatt Regency Walkway collapse [11]. Group and individual projects: Have students research the cases in depth and report back on them. The most successful case studies are those that inspire students to go out, do their own research, and learn more about their chosen profession [5].Research ApproachThe methodology selected for this study included case studies. Case studies can be used to gaininsight on in-depth
-faculty and student-student engagement. Every effort was made to ensure thatthe speaker diversity reflected that of the REU students, so that students could envisionthemselves taking the speakers’ paths. Further student-faculty interaction was provided throughweekly faculty research seminars. Each week, one faculty member presented brief vignettes oftheir research interests to the group, enabling students to learn of other imaging related researchbeyond their own projects.In addition to the program-related activities, students participated in several University-wideenrichment events. These activities included a weekly brown-bag seminar series on topics suchas Ethics, GRE preparation, Getting into Graduate School, and Abstract Writing
be around developing a mock project proposal thatwould follow the guidelines of the real directed MS project proposal as were described in thegraduate program handbook in terms of sections, length, citation (IEEE), and format. At the endof the semester, each student would present his/her proposal to the fellow graduate students whowould act as the members of the examining committee. The author would compile theirfeedback, as well as his own observation, and share it with the presenter. A sample of proposalevaluation form is shown in Appendix A.The course contents and activities were designed to help students develop their proposal. Thesemester was divided into three sections, called units: 1) Introduction to research, ethics, humansubject
University. His upcoming dissertation will focus on how student’s connections of social responsibility and engineer- ing change throughout college as well as how engineering service is valued in employment and supported in the workplace.Dr. Nathan E Canney PE, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stan- ford University with an
tounderstand their leadership capabilities, rather than a series of training interventions such ascourses or lectures.2,3Leadership competencies such as teamwork, problem solving, ethics, and communications4 arevital for the accomplishment of any construction project.5 According to the ASCE Vision 2025,civil engineers will have to command the multidisciplinary and leadership facets of their work inorder to implement complex projects that include various stakeholders.6 Similarly, it is stated inthe ASCE BOK (2008) that 21st-century engineers must possess leadership competencies inaddition to technical competencies as the industry moves forward.7 Other reasons, including risingcomplexity and the rapidly changing nature of construction projects, have
, production processes, concurrent engineering design, and detailed system description. Further it is essential to include a variety of realistic constraints, such as economic factors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics and social impact.”1Senior design is an apprentice-like involvement and the highlight of the undergraduate engineeringexperience. Most projects are sponsored by local industries or motivated by the needs of thedepartment or a faculty member. Since 2003, UST has tried to offer at least one of its senior designprojects to consider the needs of material-resource poor people at the base of the economicpyramid. These projects often bring to life the ‘realistic constraints, such as economic factors,safety, reliability
the weakness oftraditional lecture-based learning modules which may quickly become out of date for rapidlychanging areas like NSNT without diligent attention from well-informed instructors. By its nature,PBL-structured case studies promote learning at the cutting edge of a discipline and thus are well-suited to the emerging NSNT field.A central premise in using the case study technique is that the process of learning is just asimportant as the content [12]. In general, students work cooperatively during case studies to answerchallenging questions or to evaluate complex ethical issues. For PBL-structured case studies,students are expected to investigate and learn necessary content in order to understand the contextof a case. This requires
unless its intention is public responsibility, thedevelopment of which is a major goal of liberal education. “Society itself requires some othercontribution from each individual, besides the particular duties of his profession. And, if nosuch liberal intercourse be established, it is the common failing of human nature, to beengrossed with petty views and interests to underrate the importance of all in which we arenot concerned, and to carry our partial notions, into cases where they are inapplicable to act,in short, as so many unconnected units, displacing and repelling one another.”7Since there is a need for ethics to be built into the design then users should be in a position tocomment on the design for which they will also need to be
policy." Ethics & Behavior 11.3, 233247, 2001. [3] Hutton, Patricia A. "Understanding student cheating and what educators can do about it." College Teaching 54.1, 171176, 2006. [4] zyBooks. https://zybooks.zyante.com/. March 2016. [5] Carnegie Research I Universities. http://www.washington.edu/tools/universities94.html, March 2016. [6] David Weerts, State Governments and Research Universities: A Framework for a Renewed Partnership. New York: Routledge, p. 26, 2002. [7] Gregory A. Krohn and Catherine M. O'Connor, "Student Effort and Performance over the Semester" The Journal of Economic Education Vol. 36, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 328, 2005. [8] Judy Shearda, Selby Markhama & Martin Dicka, "Investigating
certifications and degrees.The methodology employed to assess the potential list of resources was to make an exhaustivelist (as possible, since higher education is constantly changing) of graduate and post-baccalaureate institutions that provide certification in regulatory science fields. First, thecategories of cost, availability, and curriculum needed streamlining for comparison purposes.Then, best practices needed to be identified, for both domestic and international programs.Common themes of coursework in the life sciences, biotechnology, and policy/ethics wereidentified. Often, programs would require or prefer a bachelors in health science, life sciences, orengineering with common requirements of the advanced degree mandating courses in
. 3 Faculty-led Study Abroad in an engineering course International Engineering Internship Semester-long Engineering Exchange Program Overseas Service Learning (e.g. Engineers Without Borders)Leadership Electives 6 International Business Law Construction Engineering and Management Analysis and Mitigation of Conflicts, Claims and Disputes Civil Engineering Comprehensive Social and Ethical Issues in Computing Managing Software Projects Introduction to Engineering and Public Policy Engineering Entrepreneurship Seminar International Business International Economic Development International Economics
Program was originally founded through the Center for EnergyEfficient Electronics Science, and has since branched to multiple disciplines includedbiotechnology and robotics. TTE REU was designed as an intervention for students so thatthey would have an opportunity to build their confidence and knowledge in science andengineering with the goal that this intervention would lead to more students transferring to abachelor program. As discussed by S. Artis4, TTE REU brings students from communitycolleges around the state of California to the University of California, Berkeley to complete a9 week summer research internship. The first week of the internship has the students goingthrough a “laboratory bootcamp” where the students learn lab safety, ethics