to Associate Professor in 2013 and Full Professor in 2019 . Dr. Chrysochoou’s general research area is environmental geochemistry, with a focus on site remediation, characterization and reuse of industrial waste and construction materials. Dr. Chrysochoou’s serves as the Principal Investigator of the project ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Revolutionizing Engineering Department program, this 5-year project aims at transforming educational practices and cultivate the potential of neurodivergent individuals to contribute to engineering breakthroughs American c
sections complete. The outlined formathas the benefit of ease for addition of content as it is finalized. That said, it is anticipated that thecurriculum and kit will be finalized well before the ASEE 2022 conference, and as such, theinterested reader is encouraged to visit the website for the latest status of the BLIMP program.Notably, during the website development, the art skills of an undergraduate member of the teamhave been used to make it visually captivating as well as science-informed as shown in Figure 4.The present illustrations are still conceptual and will be finalized by the website’s officialpublishing date.Figure 4: Screen capture of work-in-progress program website.Next StepsThe initial project timeline called for kit development
in the trajectory of idea conception to development, they found that their idea has already been reported in the literature. Limitations of the material properties databases (difficulty finding quantitative data for certain materials) (4) what they found most useful was In-classroom and workshop discussion Review process with undergraduate teaching assistants Rubric for final report development and evaluationThe results of the quantitative self-reflection data from Spring 2019 Spring through Fall 2020 arereported in Figure 5. 854 out of the 896 students (95.4%) submitted the self-reflection reportsover the 4-semester period and the ratings were
the fairness of engineering assessments. In total, she has been on the leadership of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the Educational Research Methods Division of ASEE.Jorge Dorribo Camba (Associate Professor)C. Robert Kenley C. Robert Kenley is a Professor of Engineering Practice in Purdue’s School of Industrial Engineering, where has been
‘anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility.’ Starting in the 2019-20accreditation cycle, this student outcome was replaced with SO4: ‘an ability torecognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and makeinformed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global,economic, environmental, and societal contexts.’ On the computer science side, ABETstudent outcome 4 requires that students ‘recognize professional responsibilities andmake informed judgments in computing practice based on legal and ethicalprinciples.’ While both thus mention ethics, there is less explicitly stated about justice,equity, diversity and inclusion. Engineering student outcome 4, as stated above,implicitly covers
. Figure 10: Average pre- and post-test scores for hands-on (N = 213) and virtual (N = 136) implementations from Fall 2019 to Fall 2020. * = p < 0.05 in paired samples t-test comparingpre- and posttest scores; ^^, ^^^ = small and medium Hedge’s g effect size for pre- and post-test comparison Results indicate that both implementation methods promoted statistically significantimprovements in performance on the post-activity conceptual assessment and that there was nostatistical difference between average score increases from pre-test to post-test for the hands-onand virtual methods.Conclusion This project has continued for four years with our development of low-cost hands-onlearning modules
of Machines. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1982.[7] D. H. Myszka, Machines and Mechanisms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.[8] S. Dordević and R. Bulatović, "On the optimum synthesis of a four-bar linkage using differential evolution and method of variable controlled deviations," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 44, pp. 235-246, 2009.[9] C. E. Wilson and J. P. Sadler, Kinematics and Dynamics of Machinery. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.[10] E. Constans, K. Dyer, and S. Sangelkar, "A New Method for Teaching The Fourbar Linkage and its Application to Other Linkages," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[11] E. Constans, T. R. Chandrupatla, and H
forthcoming decade,” Design Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 123–153, 2005.[5] B. Trilling and C. Fadel, “National Academy Of Engineering.(2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century,” 21st century skills: learning for life in our times.[6] S. Olson, Educating engineers: Preparing 21st century leaders in the context of new modes of learning: Summary of a forum. National Academies Press, 2013.[7] P. Petrone, “Why creativity is the most important skill in the world,” LinkedIn, The Learning Blog, 2019.[8] A. Abraham, The neuroscience of creativity. Cambridge University Press, 2018.[9] M. T. Ahad et al., “Behavioral Pattern Analysis between Bilingual and Monolingual Listeners’ Natural Speech Perception on
employed for STEM courses. It can further be concluded that the same course structurecan be employed for STEM related courses as the structure has been applied to multiple differentcourses at different universities with different student populations and class sizes. Furtherimprovement and innovation led to the inclusion of TikTok videos for the experimentsperformed in the labs. This also proved to be a successful inclusion and innovation in terms ofstudent learning and motivation.References[1] Arshad, M., Romatoski, R., “Effective Learning Strategies: Design of Course Structure forEngineering Courses Aimed for Hybrid Classes”, ASEE 2021 Annual Conference & Exposition,Virtual Conference, July 2021, ASEE2021-32436.[2] Wiebe, E.N., Branoff, T.J
10 0 Perfectly Closely Somehow Slighly No Figure 6. Students’ responses to Q4HANDS-ON APPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE CLASSROOM DEMONSTRATIONSAs mentioned earlier, the table was developed for multiple interactive hands-on applications instatics. The authors were a little rushed because they just finished the development process, andthe assessment of student learning could have been more thoughtful and detailed. But theauthors were excited to share this table with the ASEE community in Minneapolis as part of thebest in 5 minutes demonstration sessions
within the first-year general engineering undergraduate program. He also is interested in study abroad, expanding service learning opportunities for students, and serves as the faculty advisor for the Engineers in Action student design team.Catherine Twyman Catherine Twyman has been an Instructor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech since 2019, teaching ENGE 1215 and 1216. Ms. Twyman also taught the first-year engineering classes at New River Community College from 2016-2019. Prior to this, she completed a M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering in 2015 and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2011 at Virginia Tech.Benjamin Daniel Chambers (Associate Professor of Practice) Dr. Ben Chambers is an
, FL, USA, 2018, vol. 2.[11] K. F. Hulme, E. Estes, M. Schiferle, and R. Lim, "Game-based Learning to Enhance Post-secondary Engineering Training Effectiveness," in The Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (I/ITSEC)(Training subcommittee| 1), Orlando, FL, 2019.[12] K. F. Hulme, M. Schiferle, R. S. A. Lim, A. Estes, and M. Schmid, "Incorporation of modeling, simulation, and game-based learning in engineering dynamics education towards improving vehicle design and driver safety," Safety, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 30, 2021.[13] B. Coller, D. J. Shernoff, and A. Strati, "Measuring engagement as students learn dynamic systems and control with a video game," Advances in Engineering
Massachusetts and Virginia and maintains an active consulting practice.David M. Feinauer (Associate Professor Electrical and ComputerEngineering) Dr. Feinauer is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Military Institute. His scholarly work spans a number of areas related to engineering education, including P-12 engineering outreach, the first-year engineering experience, and incorporating innovation and entrepreneurship practice in the engineering classroom. Additionally, he has research experience in the areas of automation and control theory, system identification, and energy resilience fundamentals. His work has been published through the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and
, doi: 10.1145/3375462.3375472.[2] R. Matz et al., “Analyzing the efficacy of ecoach in supporting gateway course success through tailored support,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 216–225, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3448139.3448160.[3] D. Turnbull, R. Chugh, and J. Luck, “Learning Management Systems: An Overview,” in Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies, A. Tatnall, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_248-1.[4] V. Shurygin, N. Saenko, A. Zekiy, E. Klochko, and M. Kulapov, “Learning Management Systems in Academic and Corporate Distance Education,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 121–139, 2021, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v16i11.20701.[5] T. Naz
. B. Campbell, W. F. Denetclaw, S. Gutierrez, S. Hurado, G. H. John, J. Matsui, R. McGee, C. M. Okpodu, T. J. Robinson, M. F. Summers, M. Werner-Washburne, and M. Zavala, “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in stem,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 3, p. es5, 2017. [4] M. I. Shuster, J. Curtiss, T. F. Wright, C. Champion, M. Sharifi, and J. Bosland, “Implementing and evaluating a course-based undergraduate research experience (cure) at a hispanic-serving institution,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019. [5] D. M. Arnold, C. J. Mortensen, A. C. Thoron, E. K. Miller-Cushon, and J. K. Miot, “Contrasting science learning gains and attitudes of
, and directed many interdisciplinary projects related to design. Dr. Pidaparti’s research interests are in the broad areas of multi-disciplinary design, computational mechanics, nanotechnology, and related topics. Dr. Pidaparti has published over 250 technical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings. Dr. Pidaparti received a Research Initiation Award from the National Science Foundation and the Young Investigator Award from the Whitaker Foundation. He is a member of Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Gamma Tau, and Who’s Who societies. He is a member of professional societies including AIAA (Associate Fellow), AAAS (Fellow), ASME (Fellow), RAeS (Fellow), and ASEE (member). Dr. Pidaparti will move to University of
, gender disparities persist across many engineeringdisciplines and are particularly high in mechanical engineering and electrical engineering, with less than20% of undergraduate degrees being awarded to women (ASEE By the Numbers 2021). K12 roboticsprograms have shown potential in increasing a student’s likelihood of enrolling in a mechanical orelectrical majors. By broadening the applications of robotics to human-centered designs and highlightingsoft and biomaterials used in building robots, the field of soft robotics may be a platform to engage adiversity of students in K12 robotics and later, engineering majors. This paper presents a pilot studyaimed at answering the research question: Can a soft robotics curriculum impact high school
,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021.[11] R. G. Abd Ellah, “Water resources in Egypt and their challenges, Lake Nasser case study,” Egypt. J. Aquat. Res., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ejar.2020.03.001.[12] P. E. Spector, Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction. SAGE, 1992.[13] R. Johnson and L. Christensen, Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches, 5th ed. Washington D.C.: Sage Publisher, 2014.[14] J. F. Hair, W. Black, and B. Babin, Multivariate data analysis, 8th ed. Cengage Learning, 2019.[15] I. Osunbunmi, “A Mixed-Methods Study of College Experiences and Learning and Study Strategies of High-Achieving Engineering Students,” Grad
board in quarterly meetings over two years. The board included national experts inengineering education, STEM education, project evaluation, and the field of engineering. Theengineers represent both individuals from rural communities and historically underrepresentedpopulations (female and African American). Together, the group prepared the integrated content,assessments, and reflections, which led to the design of a 3.5-day NEIR-ED PD workshop.Following the design phase, the PIs identified rural high schools to participate in the workshopthat covers the following: (details and examples will be provided at the ASEE conference)• Knowledge of engineering core ideas;• Practices and pedagogical knowledge and skills to teach engineering design in a
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32351.[11] K. Hadley and W. Oyetunji, “Extending the theoretical framework of numeracy to engineers,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 376–399, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20453.[12] R. J. Mislevy, “Evidence and inference in educational assessment,” Psychometrika, vol. 59, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Dec. 1994, doi: 10.1007/BF02294388.[13] M. M. Riconscente, R. J. Mislevy, and S. Corrigan, “Evidence-centered design,” in Handbook of test development, 2nd ed, New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2016, pp. 40–63.[14] Association of American Colleges and Universities, “Quantitative Literacy VALUE Rubric
Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Lynch is a member of AFS, AIST, SME, IISE, and ASEE. Dr. Lynch’s primary research interests are in metal casting, manufacturing systems, engineering economy and engineering ed- ucation. Dr. Lynch has been recognized by Alpha Pi Mu, IISE, and the Pennsylvania State University for his scholarship, teaching, and advising. He was awarded the Penn State Behrend School of Engi- neering Distinguished Awards for Excellence in Advising (2018), Teaching (2019), and Research (2020). Dr. Lynch was also awarded the Penn State Behrend College Awards for Excellence in Advising (2018), Teaching (2019), and Outreach (2021). He received the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers En- gineering
Paper ID #37497Engagement in Practice: Community service buildsexcitement in designDavid R Mikesell (Professor & Chair) David Mikesell is professor and chair of mechanical engineering at Ohio Northern University. He joined the faculty after graduate work in automotive engineering at Ohio State, six years designing automated assembly machines and metal- cutting tools, and service as an officer in the U.S. Navy. His research interests are in land vehicle dynamics, autonomous vehicles, manufacturing, and robotics. Since 2015 he has served in leadership of the ASEE Mechanical Engineering Division including
www.slayte.com The Community College Pathway: A Study of Women in STEMPurpose of the StudyMany women begin their postsecondary education at a community college (CC), so encouragingand supporting them on the transfer pathway is critical for addressing the lack of gender diversityin STEM – particularly in engineering and technology. The National Academy of Engineering(NAE) has highlighted the importance of community colleges in broadening participation inengineering because of the diversity they represent [1] [2]. In fall 2019, approximately 41% ofHispanic undergraduates, 38% of American Indian/Alaskan Native undergraduates, and 31% ofBlack undergraduates were enrolled in two-year colleges in the U.S. [3] Approximately 34% ofwomen undergraduate
Education Research (J-PEER), vol. 9, no. 2, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1244.[2] A. Godwin, G. Sonnert, and P. M. Sadler, “Disciplinary Differences in Out-of-School High School Science Experiences and Influence on Students’ Engineering Choices,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), vol. 6, no. 2, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1131.[3] F. Lewis, J. Edmonds, and L. Fogg-Rogers, “Engineering science education: the impact of a paired peer approach on subject knowledge confidence and self-efficacy levels of student teachers,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 793–822, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1887544.[4] M. Riojas, S. Lysecky, and J. Rozenblit
thoughtful engineers.References[1] N. Alaraje, L. A. Meadows, L. K. Fiss, S. L. Amato-Henderson, G. C. Hembroff, A.Sergeyev, K. H. Raffaelli and J. L. Irwin, “Board 3: Engineering Technology Scholars-IMProving Retention and Student Success (ETS-IMPRESS): First Year Progress Report,” Paperpresented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 2019.https://peer.asee.org/32317[2] R. Kegan, In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press,1994.[3] M. B. Baxter Magolda, “Three elements of self-authorship,” Journal of College StudentDevelopment, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 269-284, 2008.[4] L. A. Meadows, M. Raber and L. K. Fiss, “Innovation and Inclusion—Applying designthinking and lean startup in the honors
management expertise,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 51–60, Oct. 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(97)00017-1.[6] S. Gillard, “Soft Skills and Technical Expertise of Effective Project Managers,” Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, vol 6, pp. 723-729, 2009. doi: 10.28945/1092[7] E. Miskioglu and K. Martin, “Is it Rocket Science or Brain Science? Developing an Instrument to Measure ‘Engineering Intuition,’” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33027.[8] J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications Limited, 2021.[9 J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Quality in Interpretive
Engineering courses at a large, public US university, also indicatedfavorable reception of such curricular refinements from both staff and students. To obtain theseresults, the authors adopted a case-studies approach, using data collected through feedbacksurveys from students and faculty members, while also analyzing students’ academicperformance in these modules.A more recent research study by Shoaib, Cardella, Madamanchi, and Umulis (2019) examinedthe challenges and aspects of computational thinking (CT) competencies such as data analysis,algorithm design, simulation, testing and debugging within an analytical problem-solvingclassroom activity of a sophomore-level thermodynamics course for biomedical engineeringstudents at a major public, US
. Canetto., “Academic Self‐Efficacy and Performance of Underrepresented STEM Majors: Gender, Ethnic, and Social Class Patterns,” in Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, vol. 13, pp. 347-369, Dec. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12033. [Accessed Dec. 16, 2020].[7] C. Vallas & S. Donohue., “Identifying Factors Affecting Persistence Rates Among Undergraduate Engineering Students From Underrepresented Populations at the University of Virginia,” in American Society for Engineering Education-ASEE. June 2007. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/2925. [Accessed Dec. 15, 2020].[8] S. Gershenfeld, D. Ward Hood, & M. Zhan., “The Role of First-Semester GPA in Predicting
Virginia University. Dr. Elshehabi taught numerous Petroleum Engineering and Engineering Science courses. He received several teaching and learning awards. He published several technical papers and posters in the areas of Petroleum Engineering and Engineering Education. He is an active member and fellow of numerous Petroleum Engineering and Education societies, including SPE, AADE, IADC, ASEE, NETI, AAC&U, LAMP, and NSPE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Visual Teaching Philosophy Empowering Inclusive Learning and Managing Expectations Tawfik Elshehabi, PhD, PE
up regular group meetings with students to answer questions, check working progress and identify students’ difficulties and provide solutions. 4) Cell phones are the main communication devices for students in distance learning environment. While there are many emerging smartphone applications with the function of group chat, text message is currently still the most popular method adopted by the students for teamwork communications in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.References[1] A. Bao, “Online learning with a bonus”, ASEE Prism, May 2020, p.p. 41.http://www.asee-prism.org/advances-from-aee-sum-4/[2] A. Bao, “Enhancing learning effectiveness by implementing screencasts into civilengineering