survey form.14 Through a descriptive reflective essay.15 Conducted during Fall 2000, is based on author’s four years of experiences in teaching design studios focused on using digital media. Page 7.180.416 Hanna and Barber [2001: p 258] describe how these processes were at work in Alvar Aalto’s design methodology and that for him major ideas emergedafter restraining the rational. They also concede that the choice of ‘which’ mode of thinking to suppress depends on the architect himself and his designapproach (functional/aesthetic). Proceedings of the 2002 American
semester of 2001 (Figure 2c).Figure 2d represents the average time allocation reflected by seventeen WebCT facilitatorsinterviewed at the University of Pretoria. Traditional contact time is reduced and flexibility oftime and location is increased when a WebCT learning environment is introduced. Theskewness of this figure towards non-contact time may be attributed to the fact thatpostgraduate courses (which consists normally of fewer contact hours) take precedence whenWebCT is introduced. Whether contact teaching is considered or whether non-contactteaching is considered, WebCT influences flexibility in terms of communication.3.2 Flexibility in communicationsCollis20 solely refers to communication with the facilitator (“instructor”), when she
knowledge to elicit performance (Gagne’s Event #6). This is done by applying problem-solving tasks and group projects that require students to apply their abilities in a hands-on manner. The discussion questions and case studies in the course encourage collaboration, experimentation, and creativity and encourage students to solve real-world problems in simulated environments. • The course instructor has a clear plan to offer constructive feedback (Gagne’s Event #7) during discussions and project milestones and after students have submitted assignments. This emphasizes the importance of self-assessment and encourages reflective thinking in students about the concepts they have learned during
change.Impact of the Work on the SELs: It was my first time doing any ADEI work, and I have learned from this experience that it is a very hard thing to navigate. I have learned that I am very passionate about efforts like this, especially ones that I am involved in such as my department, so I have learned that professionally this is something that I want to continue with doing in relation to my career. -KAThe faculty members of the ECO group asked each of the SELs to reflect upon their experiencewith the culture related work. The purpose of the reflection was to better understand theexperience of the students leading the work to help determine what supports they might needgoing forward and the overall impact of the work
provided table file). Operating conditions that do not meet the system requirements should be highlighted red. • Evaluating Solutions Against Requirements – for each solution, evaluate the solution against the requirements. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the solution. If the solution does not meet one or more of the requirements, discuss approaches to correcting the issue (which should be reflected in the subsequent solution). At minimum, you must have three iterations. There is always a way to improve your design. • Making Trade-offs – Discuss any trade-offs made throughout the design iteration process. Discuss any other changes that were made throughout the design iteration process and
. Research Team Dr. Walter Lee Malini Josiam Artre Turner Crystal Pee Taylor Johnson Dr. Janice Hall Associate Professor PhD Student PhD Student PhD Student PhD Student Postdoc This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1943811. "Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation
integrationbefore and after the modeling. This would help them to feel their ideas were appreciated andprovide an opportunity to reflect on the modeling activities. Through our guided discussion,participants could exchange ideas with one another on what the integration of math andengineering brought to the subjects that study of each separately could not provide.As an extension of this discussion, we also wanted participants to talk about examples ofintegration outside of the workshop experience. This would help reinforce what they experiencedduring the modeling, and allow them to talk about integration outside of their own subject areas.Participants would have the freedom to discuss lessons without fear of judgment by others. Itwould also help them come
accessed using studentcell phones (Text messages and Twitter) or personal laptop computers (www.pollev.com), as apotential method to improve student engagement by open-ended, reflective, multiple-choice, andcontent specific questions in a more efficient manner as perceived by students in a large-lectureclassroom.The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of implementing polling software(PollEverywhere) on student engagement in an introductory computer science large lectureclassroom (n = 291). The ease of use of this technology can help with the adoption of this activelearning strategy. Research needs to be done to measure the impact of this software. During thefall semester of 2013, a pilot study was completed in an introductory
, authority,and social rules). The third level, postconventional level, builds ethical reasoning on universalnorms and values (e.g., justice, human rights) that are concerned with and good for everyone inthe world. Individuals operating at postconventional phases hold a critical and reflective stanceon moral values and “authoritative” principles. Moral values and principles are notunquestionably accepted but subject to critique and reflection. Those who reason at this levelhave the highest level of moral development compared to people at the two earlier levels.As early as the late 1970s, Kohlberg’s theory was applied by engineering ethicists in assessingthe moral development of professional engineers. Most typically, Richard McCuen suggested
responses were challenging to grade effectively and consistently, even with awell-defined grading algorithm. It became clear that even if this intervention were effective, itwould be unlikely to be broadly implemented due to these challenges. The interventionresulted in only small trends in improved test performance. These observations led us toreconsider and redefine our writing prompt.After considerable re-assessment, discussion and continued research, we streamlined the writingassignment. In the latest iteration of the prompt, implemented during the Fall 2013 semester, weasked students to reflect on any confusion they had about how to solve the selected homeworkproblem and then revise this reflection after receiving instructor input
participants’perceptions of the climate in their departments, unconscious bias, gender and race biases, andmentoring students with family responsibilities. The workshop also features several presentationsby experts in the field.EvaluationIn order to evaluate the effectiveness of TESP we gather data related to student skills, attitudes,products, and ideas. The TESP evaluation approach is three-pronged: self-assessment, reflection,and skills assessment (Fig. 3). Every activity includes a student self-assessment of skills andattitudes using a 5 point Likert scale. After each activity, students write a 1-2 paragraph Self Assessment • Perceived Skill Gain
Page 23.938.3maintain their basic values, need to find special arrangements that may even contradict the law ofthe land (for example in regards to internet access and freedom of speech 8,9).This paper draws from the author’s observations of the entire academic community in Dubai.The observations reflect both a systemic perspective regarding campus formation, faculty hiringand campus consolidation, as well as an operational perspective regarding attracting, maintainingand graduating top quality students, and the peculiarities resulting from the highly diverseenvironment that emerge in the classroom.Discussion The challenges presented here are roughly divided into startup challenges, which typically are temporary in nature and
the institution, when the individual’s intellectual developmentis congruent with the environment of the college 8.Social integration could be understood as the degree of congruency between the student’s socialbehavior and the social system of the university. Academic, or structural, integration is theacademic performance and achievement of the student. Normative integration, according to Page 23.1211.3Tinto, reflects the student’s appraisal of the academic system of the university and is evident aspart of the student’s intellectual development. The goal of college graduation and thecommitment to the institution are, in Tinto’s model, direct
isprovided for poor performance (illness, language difficulties, lack of background, etc.).EPS and Experiential learningThe educational process in the EPS program is best described as experiential learning.Experiential learning is most easily described as the process of acquiring information through thestudy of a subject without the necessity for direct textbook exposure. In the early 1970s,educational researchers David Kolb and Ron Fry developed the Experiential Learning Model(ELM)4 which is composed of four elements: concrete experience observation of and reflection on that experience formation of abstract concepts based upon the reflection testing the new concepts (repeat)These four elements are the quintessence
timeline that reflects theresearcher’s tenure at the university. At this level, faculty members can tailor meaningful projectsfor researchers over a set period. The last and broadest level of participation is short-termengagement through undergraduate and graduate courses. For short-term engagement, studentsparticipate in community-based class projects for one semester or can take elective courses thatoffer community-based research. With short-term engagement, students apply concepts ofcommunity-based research. This participatory approach serves as an opportunity for students toconduct research and advance into mid-term engagement opportunities (Figure 1). These levels ofengagement provide a more diverse audience that is engaged in community-based
different passives, sensors, andperipherals to the MKR Motor Carrier, including resistors, potentiometers, FSRs, motors, servos,encoders, accelerometers, Hall-effect sensors, ultrasonic sensors, infrared reflectance sensors,and photoresistors.Software DesignThe Arduino MKR was programmed to establish a wireless access point and await commandsover UDP from an external device (e.g., a student running MATLAB on a laptop or classroomdesktop). The MKR remains waiting, responding to commands as they are received.When a command is received to read from a peripheral device or a GPIO pin, for example, theArduino responds with the value. Several data streams have been established to facilitate datatransfer when several different data values are needed, which
exams are well written [2]. Even in the context of standardized testing ithas been found that student GRE scores compared to student written responses had a highcorrelation between the results [3]. Multiple-choice tests can be valid assessment instruments ifwritten correctly, which has led to many concept inventories being created in STEM, like theMechanics Diagnostic Test, Force Concept Inventory, Statics Concept Inventory, DynamicsConcept Inventory, and many others [2, 4, 5].Often MCT are used as pre-/post-tests to try to identify changes in learning. The quantitative resultsof these multiple-choice tests provide easy comparison data when looked at from a pre-/post-testanalysis, but the scores do not always adequately reflect a learning
using active andcollaborative learning pedagogical approaches. For the course project, the first-year studentswere required to design a 65,000 ft2 community park on a brownfield site in Charleston, SC, witha $5,000,00 budget for site cleanup and redevelopment. A few assessments were implemented,including weekly summary reports, poster creation, presentations, peer evaluation on teamwork,reflection assignment, and a survey. This paper discusses the redesign of the course through thebackward design approach, the implementation of project-based learning, and the assessment ofactivities. Additionally, it provides insights into its implementations in other institutions.BackgroundEML has emerged as a relevant educational approach fostering an
learn. For example, according to the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate, a well-structured program should be purposeful (i.e., programmatic requirements and elements should be aligned with specific goals). It should also be created by a process of iterative individual and collective reflection, transparent (i.e., collectively understood by the faculty and graduate students), and accessible (i.e., elements can be evaluated in terms of their contribution in achieving the purposes of the program) (Golde et al., 2006).● A cascading mentorship model works well, in which members of research groups receive mentorship from more senior members and provide it to more junior members (Feldon et al., 2019).● Institutional
to enhance Hispanic/Latino transfer student success. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Investigating Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning for Students in a Fundamental Engineering CourseAbstractMotivation and self-regulated learning (SRL) are two interconnected constructs that are criticalfor student learning, especially for those in challenging fundamental engineering courses such asThermodynamics. Each of these elements are integral to the learning process and typicallyimpact one another, as fostering motivation can lead to improved self-regulatory skills. SRL isdescribed as a cyclical process where students plan, set goals, monitor learning, and reflect tofurther plan
inquiries and discussions have brought to light several issues with thereliability and validity of SETs as the primary measure of teaching quality. There is mountingevidence that end-of-semester evaluations are biased and represent an imperfect measure of aninstructor's performance. They may not accurately reflect the true quality of teaching, or at thevery least, they are unfair [6], [7], [8].Transitioning from traditional paper-based surveys to electronic ones in higher education, whilecost-effective, presented certain drawbacks, particularly in terms of significantly reducedresponse rates, which led to skepticism about the validity and reliability of SETs [9], [10].The limitations of SETs have led to continuous calls for a more comprehensive and
comparable amount of time forindividual reflection, would have resulted in far less than this 100-hour threshold. Thus, theProject Management team in consultation with the IHE college administration determined that awiser investment of their limited resources would be to strengthen the skills of the engineeringfaculty who were directly involved in the project, and having that enhancement transfer to othermembers of the college through peer-to-peer interaction.Over the course of the project, changes in pedagogical skills of the engineering faculty wereobserved2, 3, 6, 7: 1. Use of pre-test evaluations to monitor student skills prior to instruction. 2. Improved use of data collection and evaluation of student learning. 3. Changes in educator
populated by male students. Among the faculty members present was the First-Year Engineering Programs Coordinator, who posed questions about the program and soughtsuggestions on how OWISE and other faculty members could enhance and support their first-year experience.The students expressed positive reflections on their first year but highlighted certain aspects ofthe course that felt intimidating. Many shared their experiences of entering classespredominantly composed of male students, feeling overwhelmed and uncertain about where tosit—a notable departure from their high school environments. Additionally, they conveyedfeelings of under-confidence and intimidation, particularly when dealing with fabricationequipment used in the courses. There was a
curriculum needs to support students' development of representational fluencybetter.Appropriately integrating sociotechnical design problems into the curriculum can supportstudents' development of engineering skills, practices, and conceptual understanding whilealso learning design [14], [15]. Sociotechnical problems are design problems that includesocial and technical constraints [16], [17]. Addressing sociotechnical problems reflects theprofessional workplace in which engineers typically address and solve engineering problemsthat merge social and technical constraints [8], [16], [18]. By exploring the students'representational practices and skills, we can design appropriate scaffolds that support them indeveloping expertise. This research aims to
necessitate covering aspects from adiverse range of topics, including fundamentals of digital design, computer architecture, parallelprogramming, and systems thinking. Although such concepts naturally intersect within thediscipline of computer engineering, structural considerations within our master’s programs anddisparate prior knowledge within our cohort entail students inherently experience the subject asinterdisciplinary in nature. This presents numerous challenges in subject design but offers anopportunity for developing interdisciplinary competencies and an appreciation for otherdisciplinary ways of thinking. Based on instructor observations while teaching, we reflect on thesuccesses and shortcomings in the subject’s design that impact
method of Promax withKaiser Normalization. We did not use the questionnaire items if they had a coefficient lowerSpring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova Universitythan 0.5. The pattern matrix of the seven extracted latent variables and the correspondingquestionnaire items are given in Table 3. The meanings of the extracted latent variables are asfollows: ● Motivation (MOT): The motivation latent variable measures overall student motivation to complete the activity. ● Interaction (ACT): The interaction latent variable is a measure of the extent to which students interacted with one another during the activity. Note that the students in the IW group were also allowed to interact. ● Reflection
mirroring, horizontal mirroring, mirroring on the diagonal tiltedleft, and mirroring on the diagonal tilted right as the hardest. Participants received extensivetraining on the task 4 weeks prior to the experimental session. The experimental session finishedwith an anatomical scan of the brain using fMRI. The data showed a negative brain activation–intelligence relationship in frontal brain regions in the high fluid intelligence group, in contraryto the average fluid intelligence IQ group. The study concluded that better behavioralperformance in the geometric analogies task would reflect a lower demand for executivemonitoring in the high fluid intelligence IQ individuals. The study also concluded that flexiblymodulating the extent of regional
theelastic wave propagation resulting from a strain pulse directed along the incident bar toward thespecimen. The pulse is developed when the incident bar is impacted by a projectile (striker bar),the wavelength and amplitude of the pulse being directly proportional to the length, mass andvelocity of the projectile. The pulse is partially transmitted and reflected at the incidentbar/specimen interface and the transmitted portion passes through the specimen and into thetransmitter (output) bar. An analysis of the incident, reflected and transmitted elastic waves 6occurring in the bars allows for the determination of the stresses and strains occurring in the
the applications, and of 20 KHz frequency and uses it to find a way around thethen assembled to build the physical robots swarm. The obstacle, detect the uneven surfaces, any shape and size ofsoftware scans for replaced or extra added sensors itself object in known as well as in unknown environment. Thiswhich makes robot swarms more dynamic. is known as Echolocation. This sensor sends outs ultrasonic waves which are then detected after they are III. SENSOR FUSION reflected or bounced back from object and/or obstacle. The
Conference Copyright © 2015, American Society for Engineering Education 287had little knowledge regarding water quality and the potential contaminants that could be presentin tasteless and odorless waters.Student reflections. The engineering students reflected upon their experiences surveying the CalPoly community, and after analyzing the collected data. Sample statements as written in theengineering reports are shown below.“Questions were mostly answered among agree, neutral, or disagree, showing that Cal Polystudents were not fully confident in their answers.”“The combination of our interviews and survey data showed that