underrepresentation of minoritizedwomen, including African American or Black, Hispanic or Latina/Latinx, and Native Americanor American Indian women. Therefore, the computing education research community (CER)have explored pedagogies to improve computing students' learning outcomes based on existinglearning theories. Few studies have reviewed pedagogies in the context of social constructivism.Social constructivism is a learning theory defined as the collaborative co-construction ofknowledge. Social constructivist pedagogies have enhanced learning outcomes for minoritizedwomen in other STEM fields, but their effects have not been studied extensively in CER. Wereference intersectionality theory to guide our search around gender/race/ethnicity, critique
engineeringtechnology students’ written communication skills at these participating campuses, it haspotential use for other institutions to positively impact their students’ written communication.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 2013467, 2013496, and 2013541.IntroductionCommunicating content knowledge effectively in oral and written formats is important forengineering and engineering technology students. Additionally, it is essential for the ABET-accredited programs from which they graduate to ensure that students hone and demonstratethese skills [1]. Anecdotal observations by engineering and engineering technology instructorsand prior research have shown that this is not the outcome observed by
the problem. An analysis of two semesters of exams demonstrated that eighty-six percent of the students exhibited some form of model-based reasoning 16. • Alumna surveys: In a recent survey which yielded a 60% return of graduates from the program, many alluded to the value of this class in terms of their current positions. Many also commented on the need to talk across disciplinary boundaries and that they felt well prepared to do this. One alumna quipped, “I am not afraid of anything anymore.”The course assessment rubric for the course can be found at the end of this paper.Conclusion Classroom activities that challenge old norms and redefine what it means to be a 21st centuryengineer 17 should aspire to
vocations collaboration the authors along with aprofessor in mechanical engineering, led a student project last semester to assess the sentimenttowards ethics education among undergraduate engineering students and faculty at the Universityof Notre Dame. This student group was in our socially engaged computing projects class. Theyconducted interviews with key faculty members that were engaged in a variety of ethics andengineering endeavors.Outcomes from the faculty interviews:A group of undergraduate students interviewed a number of faculty in engineering andphilosophy.From the faculty interviews, some key concerns identified, which echoed what we had learnedfrom computing faculty interviews as well : • Time/limited resources for courses
analysis uncovers whether team memberscorrectly perceive the relationships among their teammates. These initial findings openopportunities for future work on the role social network analysis can play in the analysis ofcollaborative learning.1. IntroductionReal world engineering design problems are frequently solved by teams; therefore, as educators,we are required, both by ABET and common sense, to give students the skills and attitudes thatenable them to work effectively in teams. One of the key skills is the ability to engage incollaborative learning with team members. In the process of acquiring the knowledge necessaryto solve the design problem, collaborative learning gives students the opportunity to both learnfrom and to teach their peers
careers, and are focused on those who are underrepresented in STEM and underserved. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Promoting the STEM Pipeline and Enhancing STEM Career AwarenessThrough Participation in Authentic Research Activities (RTP, Diversity) AbstractTo promote the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) pipeline andenhance the participation of students who have been historically underrepresented in STEMfields in the U.S, a team of faculty investigators with diverse expertise in STEM, education,public health and medicine have been working collaboratively on a National Institutes of Health(NIH)-funded STEM education project
social interaction problems nowadays, as research indicated“the majority of coursework in engineering education today focuses on technical knowledge and skills ofmathematics, science, and engineering as well as new graduates generally feel prepared for the technicalaspects of practice, but many have difficulty transitioning to the socio-technical practices and culture ofthe workplace[28] ”.Additionally, to explore the collaborative inquiry deeply, we conducted a longitudinal study for threeinnovative engineering design works (arc-path prediction, parallel design of robot structure andsymmetrical design for robots) in our research case “Robo”. It can be seen that the three dimensions ofcollaborative inquiry are significantly repeated in different
, pp. 1– 19, 2019, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219124.[23] C. Hendrickson and T. Au, “Quality Control and Safety During Construction,” in Project Management for Construction: Fundamental Concepts for Owners, Engineers, Architects, and Builders, C. Hendrickson, Ed. Prentice Hall, 2008.[24] P. Baybutt, “The validity of engineering judgment and expert opinion in hazard and risk analysis: The influence of cognitive biases,” Process Saf. Prog., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 205– 210, 2017, doi: 10.1002/prs.11906.[25] D. D. Anastasio, L. Bassett, J. Stransky, C. A. Bodnar, D. D. Burkey, and M. Cooper, “Collaborative research: Designing an immersive virtual environment for chemical engineering process safety
Environmental Engineering. He worked previously as an undergraduate research assistant on communicating scientific knowledge to developing communities and underground natural gas migration. He graduated from UTA in 2020 with his B.S. in Civil Engineering and obtained his EIT certification in 2021. His current research looks at sustainable remediation and the inclusion of environmental justice principles to better apply these frameworks to developing countries. He will be graduating in August 2022. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Promoting STEM Interest in Middle School Girls through Strategic
aprevalent source of evidence used to characterize engineering practice, including in studiesfocused on the experiences of early career engineers. Representative examples include: Korte’sstudy of organizational socialization among early career engineers based on interviews withnewly hired engineers and select managers6; research by Brunhaver et al. on gaps betweenengineering education and practice based on interviews with engineering students and newlyhired engineers7; and research by Trevelyan and Tilli that aimed to identify the specific kinds ofwork activities performed by recent engineering graduates in Australia.8Yet commentators have noted some of the limitations associated with interview data. Stevens etal., for instance, point out that
% to 71% with an average of 41 % frompre-post results. The Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy and NonprofitLeadership Community Research Institute (CRI) at Grand Valley State University istracking the long term educational choices of girls from the first three years using followup assessments in 10th and 12th grades, and two years after graduation. Results from thefirst year are encouraging, with 65% of the participants demonstrating an interest instudying more science, mathematics and technology, and an impressive 50% intending tomajor in a STEM related field. A limitation of our work is that these students may havepre-selected themselves which may skew our data.This paper presents preliminary findings which include the campers
use of narrative and storytelling has become acknowledged as hybridizing a cultural activitywith a research method, serving as one among many decolonizing methods that have a history ofuse in indigenous communities and communities of color37,39 (as indeed in white communities).Researchers in the social sciences have been using narrative to understand complexity withinindividuals' experience.33 Cynthia Winston and colleagues40 use narrative via the telling of “lifestories” to create cases of black students in STEM disciplines both as a way to think about theirpersonal psychological development and for students to learn about themselves. Culturalperformers including Anna Deavere Smith,41,42 the national storytelling project StoryCorps
started theiracademic journey at a community college46. In addition, 40% of those with a bachelor’s andmaster’s degree in engineering from 1999 to 2000 attended community colleges as part of theiracademic journey47. The main reason students choose to begin their higher education pathwaywith community colleges is the need to reduce financial costs of their education. According to a2005 National Research Council study, community colleges have not achieved their full potentialfor the following reasons:(1) a lack of understanding among parents, teachers, counselors, and students of theeffectiveness of community colleges in producing engineering graduates;(2) less than effective articulation agreements (policies and program designed to foster
begun to explore the many ways that technology can enhanceinternational education for professional school students, and there is a need to share our “bestpractices.” The Technological Innovation and Cooperation for Foreign Information Access(TICFIA) Program is a Title VI funded initiative designed to support projects that will developinnovative techniques or programs using new electronic technologies to collect information fromforeign sources.”. Engineering needs to become “engineering-plus-international flavoring”[1]. By example,Mazumder and Bean [23] write: “…an engineer must possess not only technical skills, but alsocross-cultural skills based on knowledge to the other culture and their own cultural biases”. Theydescribe the
grassroots. As engineering education scholarship develops its transnational agenda, I alsooffer this research design, my findings, and pedagogical efforts as points of entry for scholarsand educators to reconfigure the relationship between teachers, learners, and the contexts inwhich their interactions are situated.Background: Engineering to help (ETH) trendsTrends in the internationalization of service learning in engineering education suggest aburgeoning interest among students, universities and professional organizations in tackling issuesof social and economic development.4,5,6,7,8 Diverse campus-based and professional programshaving labels including humanitarian engineering, service learning, sustainable development,social entrepreneurship are
published in several venues, including Computers & Education, American Journal of Distance Education, Educational Administration Quarterly, and the Journal of Educational Research. Page 26.1363.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Self-Evaluation of Design Decision-Making Skills Gained through Student Generated Learning Aids Page 26.1363.2AbstractThis paper presents the findings from research in improving undergraduate engineering designdecision-making skills. This work is motivated by the need to provide
departments and programs, and how to achieve the motto of Wake Forest University: Pro Humanitate (”For Humanity”). Michael received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University, and his Masters and PhD in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania. He has broad research interests in materials and composite processing and design, primarily for solid oxide cells, but also for batteries, solar absorbers, and gas adsorption. He also has a passion for designing educational experiences that support student intrinsic motivation and character.Dr. Joseph Wiinikka-Lydon, Wake Forest University Dr. Joseph Wiinikka-Lydon is a Post-Doctoral Fellow at Wake Forest University, working with the De
. & Mclean, M. (1996). Peer Observation of Teaching and Staff Development. Higher EducationQuarterly, 50(2), 156-171.10 Bell, M. & Cooper, P. (2013). Peer Observation of Teaching in University Departments: A Framework forImplementation. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 60-73.11 Woodman, R. J. & Parappilly, M. B. (2015). The Effectiveness of Peer Review of Teaching when performedbetween Early-career Academics. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 12(1).12 Carroll, M. P. (2014). Shoot For The Moon! The Mentors and the Middle Schoolers Explore the Intersection ofDesign Thinking and STEM. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4, 14-30.13 Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. (2006
Paper ID #16930Group Problem Solving Coupled with Hands-on Activities: Conceptual Gainsand Student Confidence in an Introductory Biomechanics CourseDr. LeAnn Dourte Segan, University of Pennsylvania Dr. LeAnn Dourte Segan is a senior lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pa. Her primary teaching focus is in the field of solid biomechanics at the undergraduate and graduate levels.Dr. Emily R Elliott, Center for Teaching and Learning, University of Pennsylvania Emily R. Elliott is an Associate Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning at the University of Pennsylvania. She received her PhD in Biomedical
, preliminary results show that the odds of the STEM Core cohort students becomingcalculus ready is 3.22 times greater than that of the propensity match group.As we look toward the future, the role community colleges play in the economic health of ourcountry is critical. Community colleges help meet STEM workforce needs at the associate-degreelevel and prepare students for transfer to baccalaureate degree programs, providing criticaleducational pathways for traditionally underrepresented students seeking a degree and entry intothe workforce. Also, community colleges have become an essential partner to local industriesseeking skilled employees [26].For these reasons, community colleges are vital players in the implementation of the STEM Coreinitiative
that students are influenced by their observation of models (e.g., peers, parents,etc.). Beyond learning, researchers have identified that students’ retention rates are positivelycorrelated to their access to individuals who can provide affective, financial, or informationalsupport, especially in traditionally underrepresented groups [6]. Within these or similartheoretical foundations, engineering educators have identified several specific ways socialinteractions positively influence academic outcomes [7]–[12]. Among the methods for studying student interactions, Social Network Analysis (SNA) isuniquely suited to quantitatively explore relationships between social interactions and studentlearning. To conduct an SNA study, researchers
education research, teacher professional development, and secondary STEM education. In 2021, Erica received the ASEE Pacific Southwest Early Career Teaching Award and two awards at UNLV for mentoring undergraduate and graduate students. She also received the Peter J. Bosscher Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award in 2019 from Engineers Without Borders and was recognized as a Nevada Woman in STEM by Senator Jackie Rosen.Prof. Eakalak Khan, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Eakalak Khan is a Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction Department and the Director of Water Resources Research Program, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. From 2002 to 2017, he was a Professor in Civil and Environmental
was arranged to take place in South Africa for the firsttime in the summer of 2004, and was offered again in 2006 and 2008. Approximately the sameformat for the three visits was employed. The procedure followed in the program was first of allto set up a collaboration with the School of Bioresources Engineering and EnvironmentalHydrology (BEEH) at the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) in South Africa to facilitatestudent interaction via teamwork on mutually selected capstone design projects. Bothundergraduate and graduate students were recruited from the Department of Agricultural andBiological Engineering at a large, public mid-western research-extensive university during thefall semester prior to the summer visit.Early in the spring
in 1998 in the Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences. Since 1998, she has taught undergraduate- and graduate-level courses in green engineering and sustainability, life cycle assessment, environmental organic chemistry, groundwater restoration, and bioremediation. Her students are currently pursuing research projects in bioremediation and sustainable engineering, both ar- eas in which she is active internationally. She currently serves as the Chair of the Advisory Committee of the Center for Sustainable Engineering, a consortium composed of Carnegie Mellon University, Arizona State University, and University of Texas. Among her many activities in EES, she has served on the Cur- riculum Committee
explanation for this is that, on average, faculty spend the most time with53 students, compared with staff, administrators, and advisors. For most courses offered in higher education,54 this time is at least three hours per week; for research mentoring, the faculty contact time can increase55 dramatically [12]. Classroom interactions between students and faculty have a significant potential to56 influence students’ graduation path [13]. Yet, concerning the instruction by faculty, engineering students57 reported that the quality of instruction in engineering was lower than in their non-engineering courses58 [14], [15]. A 2017 study by Gandhi-Lee et al. found that most faculty are unaware of actions that59 positively influence STEM
coordinates the Long Island Alternative Energy Consortium, a collaborative effort among seven campuses to develop multi-disciplinary, multi-institution undergraduate and experiential education programs in renewable and alternative energies. In recognition of his academic activities, he received the 2012 SUNY Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Teaching.Dr. Nada Marie Anid, New York Institute of Technology Nada Marie Anid, Ph.D., is the first female dean of NYIT’s School of Engineering and Computing Sci- ences (SoECS). In this role, she oversees 80 engineering and computing sciences faculty members and approximately 3,500 graduate and undergraduate students at campuses located in Manhattan and Old Westbury, N.Y., the
AC 2008-1766: SMALL INTERVENTIONS, BIG IMPACTS: HOWMODIFICATION OF DELIVERY PROCESS OF IN-CLASS ACTIVITIES FORFRESHMEN CAN DRAMATICALLY IMPROVE LEARNINGAly Tawfik, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Aly Tawfik is the VTSTA President and a Graduate Teaching Fellow in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech. He is a doctoral student in the Charles E. Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. His research is in the area of transportation systems. He is currently a workshop leader for freshmen courses at Virginia Tech.Janis Terpenny, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Janis Terpenny is an Associate Professor in Engineering Education and Mechanical
designed to provide global competency to students so that claimsabout the success of educational practices might be evaluated [1] in [11]. This study contributesto the body of knowledge on how to and what prepares engineering students to be ready for theglobal job market and society they will face once they graduate by understanding how studentscome to appreciate cultural differences to interact effectively with different others in the contextof a global engineering course. This research supports the lifelong learning concept and ways todevelop the five competencies rated most important by the industry, which includes appreciatingand respecting cultural differences, collaborating and working on a multicultural team, using
warranted emphasis. Undergraduate research integrationinto curriculum promises benefits: student engagement and development of employer-desiredskills such as communication, teamwork, analytical reasoning, and the application of knowledgeto real-world settings. This paper details the FLC’s efforts to incorporate more research intoseven undergraduate classes by using discovery learning pedagogies and to begin compiling alist of best practices to share with others. The fact that these efforts span different undergraduategrade levels and disciplines offers key insights for any undergraduate program. Further,discussions about the formation and collaboration of the FLC at this university presents a guideto others for starting one of their
cooperation and collaboration. Three faculty members with apassion for inclusivity advise the group, each with different specialties: 1) systems researchand vision 2) systems research and practical skills expertise 3) CS education, inclusivepractices, and project management. This and other intentional components are highlighted inTable 3 and discussed further below.Figure 2: Total number of students on the computer systems research team per semester andunderrepresented groups in computing. SSD stands for students with services for disabilities.The components listed in Table 3 are extensions or variations of similarly successful orrecommended approaches discussed in the Related Works Section. Similar to ERSP, ourmodel has a designated faculty member