. Page 26.866.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Humanizing Signals and Systems: A Reflective AccountAbstract:In this paper, I authentically and reflectively depict my journey as an engineering educatordelving in the challenge of integrating technical content of a continuous-time signals and systemsclass with the social, value-laden realities that encompass such concepts. I refer to this particularchallenge as humanizing the technical content of signals and systems. Specifically, I describe thesignals and systems course and how I structured content and assessment plans to create space forhuman values. Additionally, I critically examine how some barriers that worked against myefforts
include (1) technology and collaboration strategies for green building design and construction, (2) global virtual teams, (3) applications of BIM and COBie in operations and (4) bringing BIM to the construction site via mobile. She has received funding from the National Science Foundation, U.S. Army, U.S. Department of Education, Mechanical Contractors Association of Western Washington, University of Washington Royalty Research Fund, University of Washington Capital Projects, the College of Built Environments’ BE Lab and was awarded the College of Architecture and Urban Planning 2007 Dean’s Development Fund.Anne K Anderson, Washington State University Anne Anderson is an Assistant Professor in the School of Design
Innovation and Regional incubators, venture capital Entrepreneurship Activity availability Based on Graham, R. Creating university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems evidence from emerging world leaders. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2014)A month later, four to five members of each team bring results from their landscapeanalyses to a multi-day workshop. Presenters from a wide variety of universitiesintroduce Pathways teams to model programs in innovation and entrepreneurship. Thesesessions are interspersed with an introduction to a specific planning and change processcalled “strategic doing.” Based on “lean” principles,7 strategic doing emphasizes rapid,iterative activities based on well-defined
regarding how to develop a curriculum map, amultiyear assessment plan as well as direct and indirect measures for assessment areillustrated. A list of do’s and don’ts are provided based on the information that wasobtained from the assessment.INTRODUCTIONIn today’s competitive environment, employers are placing a high value on graduates thathave demonstrated relevant skills and knowledge in any discipline. To establish that thegraduates have learned the required knowledge and acquired the required skills,instructors turn to annual and long-term assessment processes. These assessmentrequirements may vary with each institution. However, there are certain assessmentprocesses that these institutions are required to adopt by accrediting bodies such
26.358.3excellent rate.Programming changes occurred during the first five years of this program. A major addition theprogram occurred in spring 2005 with the introduction of the “Guaranteed 4.0” by Donna O.Johnson.7. This learning system is taught to all CIRC scholars and the major reason that moststudents in the program improve academically and are more efficient in their time spent learning.Another part of the 4.0 Plan that is very valuable to helping the students organize their life sothat they plan for adequate learning time is a detailed time management schedule. Students findthis system very helpful and many continue to use this system after they graduate. The“Guaranteed 4.0 Plan” is an excellent learning system and is considered to be a major reason
reference.The records and deliverables associated with the progress of the project collected through ashared Google drive as well as personal observation during the competition period were used ascomplementary sources for the current analysis and discussion. Figure 3. Sample of the survey used to assess the learning experience of students in the SD competitionResults and DiscussionThe results of the surveys are presented according to the three phases considered in the analysis:beginning (the design and planning phase of the project), middle (development phase of theproject), and end (final phase of the project and contest week). The survey response rates were 5students, 27 students, and 22 students for the
electrical engineering. In addition, eachfaculty member had some limited amount of experience overseas. The consulting engineer hadextensive experience with EWB teams and in developing engineering solutions worldwide.The concept of “Do No Harm” was woven throughout the course by exposing students tointernational case studies. One class per week was dedicated to considering success ofhumanitarian engineering projects and the unfortunate frequency of failed – though well-intended – projects. Assignments forced the students to reflect upon positives and negatives andincorporate the best in their plans. Additionally, the students were challenged to develop a designand prototype to transport water from a creek on campus considering appropriateness
Unlock Regional Excellence(CAPTURE) program sponsored by the Florida Board of Governor (BOG) and addressescurriculum mapping and articulation to support student degree completion in computer scienceand engineering programs. Specifically highlighted as part of the transfer model are curriculumalignment and mapping, degree-specific “flight” plans, and program-geared advising. Thecollected data validates the effectiveness of the proposed model in increasing both the studentpipeline, and graduation rates. The process has also deepened our understanding of the needs ofstudents to better align student careers aspirations with industry workforce needs. Theeffectiveness of the collaborative model could be replicated among other institutions interested
examples that show the benefits of a cognizantview of the ideas that define the discipline with increased involvement of an integratedcommunity [14].Course DescriptionAt Fulbright, engineering concepts covered by the first-year course UG1070: Creating & Makingare focused on cross-disciplinary approaches. Focus on transferrable skills mixed with practicalexposure highlight elements of design, human psychology, technology literacy, project planning,and project management. The design work incorporates primarily human centered design withother concepts of ideation and divergent thinking to spur innovation [1], [15]. Psychologicalconcepts covered involve self-inquiry through Myers-Briggs and Jungian analyses and focusedon investigating the
science resources. With input from the EngineeringLibrarian, the UEL and STEM librarian developed a lesson plan to introduce students to a varietyof resources in a fast-paced manner. Rather than provide in-depth introductions to one or tworesources, the workshop would provide a high-level overview of a variety of resources. As first-year students were likely unfamiliar with the library, the workshop started with an introductionto the library as a physical space and the library website as a virtual space. Students learned howto use the library catalog to find books and e-books. They were also introduced to the library’sresearch subject guides, which provide relevant resources for individual subject areas. The bulkof the workshop featured
,summarize the results of evaluations by the student participants in and judges of thiscompetition, and describe plans for the development of these programs. Section 2 providesbackground on EPICS and the EPICS Entrepreneurship Initiative. Section 3 describes how theNational I2P® has been extended to encompass social entrepreneurship efforts in addition toEPICS. Section 4 summarizes the results of evaluations by the students and judges whoparticipated in the 2006 National I2P® Competition for EPICS and Social Entrepreneurship.Section 5 describes future plans for these efforts, including the 2007 competition and the creationof the Innovation Initiative for Social Entrepreneurship as the new umbrella for all of theseactivities
decisions, and cost-benefit analysis, 2.0 Embodies a system baseline for evolutionary development in spiral phases with exit criteria for each phase, 3.0 Features an entrepreneurial component to assess marketability, profitability, intellectual property, financial risk, business plan development, and tech transfer, 4.0 Contains a methodology for feasibility analysis, trade-off studies, and risk assessments, 5.0 Takes a holistic approach to project development considering the entire project over its life-cycle The system engineering entrepreneurship approach is especially beneficial for technicallydiverse, dynamic projects or programs that span departments, colleges, or universities andrequire the integration
and engineering; environmental sciences; andhuman factors & industrial/organizational psychology. In a mere 40 years, WSU has risen tothird among public institutions in Ohio in research expenditures (over $60 M annually); the firstcapital campaign has just exceeded the $100 M mark. The distinctiveness of WSU includes:Kaplan/Newsweek College Catalog’s recommendation as one of 26 universities nationwide for“high level of individual attention from faculty”; and its recognized leadership in accessibleprogramming for people with disabilities as evidenced by the recent NSF IGERT award tosupport a new interdisciplinary Ph D. concentration in Learning with Disability. WSU’s currentStrategic Plan (2003-2008) “On the Horizon, Building our Future
generaland health care in particular.Biomedical engineering applied with an early large emphasis on the maintenance, electricalsafety, and electronics aspects of medical equipment. This encouraged the consideration ofbroader safety aspects in health care.Biomedical Engineering Professionals who divides into two main categories: the ClinicalEngineers (CE) or Biomedical Engineers and the Biomedical Engineering (Equipment)Technicians (BMET) required a special training to be qualified to be very trusted technicians.In Saudi Arabia, as a developed country, the Government spends billions dollars annuallyexpenditure on the health sector. The Ministry of Health has finalized plans to establish newhospitals and renovate and expand 324 existing hospitals and
an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy and the Chief of the Electronic Systems Division. He received his BS degree in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University in 1989. He completed his MS degree in Systems Engineering at the Air Force Institute of Technology in 1992. In 2000, he completed his PhD in Electrical Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His graduate work and research have focused on nonlinear control theory, automated path planning, and decision making. His current research is exploring the control aspects of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles. In 2004, he completed a one-year exchange
fundamental science and math courses (See Appendix A) 3. Provide a program with a very specific core of existing engineering and business courses that provides approximately 16 credit hours for specialization in either engineering or business using existing courses. It seemed that this option could eventually lead to accreditation. 4. Provide a program with a very specific core of existing engineering and business courses and an additional set of four to five new courses typically found in industrial engineering and manufacturing programs such as Facilities Planning and Design; Page 12.1238.3 Production
ofundergraduates enrolled in ECE was 399, as shown in Figure 1. 261 of these students weremajoring in Electrical Engineering and 138 were majoring in Computer Engineering. Thesecond plot on figure 1 is the ASEE national ECE undergraduate enrollment data between 2004and 2011. 2012 data was not available at the time of publishing this paper. Corrective Action Plan InitiatedFigure 1: ECE undergraduate enrollment over the last nine reporting periods.When analyzing the enrollment increases for OU-ECE, the ECE enrollment numbers from theASEE data is used as a baseline. The ASEE data shows that national ECE undergraduateenrollment declined from 102,012 to 81,501 between 2004 and 2008. This 20.1% decrease waslower
geographical area. The work presented here is a good indicator that thestrategy does work on a group with these characteristics.III. Strategies and ImplementationThe summer accelerator program has evolved over the three years in the number of hoursallocated to math activities. However, the three camps have in common the following strategies:a) Recruitment of students giving priority to students with low grades in previous math classes;b) Pre-test used to categorize students according to their level of math and to arrange studentgroups that are at a similar level;c) Individualized study plans for each participant and usage of a problem-generator software thatincludes video and tutoring capabilities;d) Low student/instructor ratio per class;e) Freedom
producing one of theproducts resulting in four unique products each semester. Students are assigned to groupsbased on their choice of product. The project begins with team planning and a discussion of the design. Studentsmust apply problem solving and critical thinking skills as they undertake their project.Preuss21 points out that there are guidelines to help expand a project into a foundationaloutline for project-based learning. Such criteria and constraints parallel those that arefound in industrial practice. Preuss22 cites Steinburg’s23 work in referring to thefollowing qualities of project based activities: authenticity, academic rigor, appliedlearning, active exploration, adult relationships and assessment practices. To help
evaluationsystem even the best thought out design problem will not fully realize its potential to culminatean engineering student’s undergraduate experience, and it will fall short of supporting ABET’sfirst criterion. Whereas, the pairing of a well designed capstone problem and a carefully plannedassessment and evaluation system will empower both students and faculty to make the most outof a capstone design experience while achieving all the requirements for accreditation.Capstone Project Development To create a capstone design that supports our program objectives, we base our problemstatement on a structure that is planned to be built in or near the USMA community. Designingfor an actual need gives our students a real-world feel for their design
, American Society for Engineering Education”When the teacher prepares a thorough and complete lesson as discussed above, all the effortbecomes the documented content for the course. The material, the final goal, as well as the sub-goals that support the final goal, should become explicit and well organized by the end ofpreparation. That is, the lesson plan, the lecture material, and explicit learning outcomes can beeasily represented in a structured fashion - in distinctive modules and hierarchical layers. Thisstructural information about the content can be easily represented in XML (extensible markuplanguage) format and stored in XML-based files, including multimedia content and hyperlinks toexternal reference sources. The modules of documented
students built K’NEXelectrospinning stations, and identified the process variables and material’s propertiesthat control the resulting fiber diameters and product yield. They wrote a short proposalpositing their hypothesis and a detailed experimental plan to optimize the fiber diametersand yield using their electrospinning station. The students implemented their experiment,trouble shot equipment failures, and collected their nanofibers. In collaboration with alocal university their nanofibers were imaged using an SEM and the students analyzedthe fiber diameter distributions with Image J software and a statistical package in Excel.The electrospinning activity was supported through a series of short lectures and inquiry-based activities designed to
creative potential of our citizens. One of the three critical areas addressed inthe strategy includes, “Invest[ing] in the Building Blocks of American Innovation” by focusingon education, research, technology and building of infrastructure. The nation’s push towardscreating an innovative and creative workforce is likely to have significant impacts on STEMeducation at both the K-12 and university levels.In engineering education, the National Academy of Engineering (2004) envisioned the Engineerof 2020 to possess not only strong analytical skills, but also characteristics such as practicalingenuity and creativity.1 As the Academy notes, “Yesterday, today, and forever, engineeringwill be synonymous with ingenuity – skill in planning, combining, and
/CAM software. These courses included Intro to CAD, Advanced CAD, CAD/CAM Applications, Engineering Design Using Solid Modeling, and Parametric Graphics Design. She also taught Descriptive Geometry, Manu- facturing Simulation (ProModel), Process Automation & Robotics, Production Planning & Process Con- trol, Statics & Strength of Materials, and Machine Design. As a Project Director, she managed several departmental projects funded by the institution’s Research, Scholarship and Professional Growth Com- mittee, the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Utah Science Technology and Research initiative, and/or the Utah Center for Aeronautical Innovation & Design. She wrote proposals, acquired and managed
ethical issue? The possible responses were “agree strongly with viewpoint A,” “lean toward viewpoint A,” “neutral,” “lean toward viewpoint B,” and “agree strongly with viewpoint B.”• How would you describe your interest in this ethical issue? The possible responses were “high,” “significant,” “moderate,” “little,” and “none.”• Do you think your viewpoint would change with thorough study of this ethical issue? The possible responses were “yes,” “probably,” “maybe,” “unlikely,” and “no.”• How relevant is this ethical issue to your career plans? The possible responses were “very much,” “considerably,” “somewhat,” “hardly,” and “not.”• How important is this ethical issue to society? The possible responses were “very much,” “considerably
-supported opportunities, and 3) year-round advising support on career opportunities. This paper focuses on the challenges we faced indeveloping and maintaining the META program and presents the positive outcomes, such asstrengthened industry and community college relationships, engaging student activities, studentinternships, and the increase of students entering SMET fields, particularly civil engineering.The paper reflects plans for sustainability by further collaborations with our community collegeand industry partners.IntroductionRepresenting a joint effort of New Mexico State University, Santa Fe Community College(SFCC), Luna Community College (Luna CC), and five regional civil engineering industrypartners, the Minority Engineering Transfer
of knowledge in school andbeyond. Thus, teaching students self-regulatory skills in addition to subject-matter knowledge isone of the major goals of education. However, SRL is not well known and utilized by theEngineering and Technology education community for facilitating student learning.Self-regulated learners are purposive and goal-oriented, incorporating and applying a variety ofstrategies to optimize their academic performances. However, the application of self-regulationto learning is a complicated process involving not only the awareness and application of learningstrategies but also extensive reflection and self awareness. This paper describes the developmentof the instructional strategy and its implementation plan, which integrates
REU program that we now use for recruitment. Asample YouTube video is available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLXgAAriFb0Social InteractionsThe REU participants resided in an on-campus residential hall, with dining facilities, in two suites(one each for males and females) on the same floor. Each year we recruited one REU fellow fromVirginia Tech which proved very effective in planning and implementation of social activities.Our REU fellows explored several local attractions and undertook weekend tours to neighboringcities. The author and his graduate students organized 2-3 picnics for social bonding eachsummer.Concluding CeremonyOn the final day of the 10-week program, typically in August, a concluding ceremony lasting 4.5hrs. was
and investigate what others have done.(2) Imagine: students brainstorm possible solutions and choose the best one.(3) Plan: students draw diagrams and make a list of materials needed.(4) Create: students follow their plan and create a model that can be tested.(5) Improve: students recognize what works and what does not, as well as come up with different options to improve their design. Through the Fellow-teacher collaboration in four classrooms of second, third, and fourthgrades, 60 students were introduced to the field of soil mechanics and conducted theaforementioned three activities. Each activity required 90 to 135 minutes, divided into two orthree 45-minute class periods, on consecutive weeks. During the
learning, and developed theircompetency to integrate technology into the mathematics and science curricula.NASA personnel and university faculty offered courses that included lesson planning, classroomapplication of problem-based learning, application of mathematics and science content as relatedto real-world problems, and the effective use of technology as a teaching tool. In addition, pre- Page 10.1397.2 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition”Copyright © 2005, United States Government as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics andSpace