Illinois Institute of Technology,under the umbrella of a Distinctive Education Initiative within the Armour College ofEngineering, we challenged ourselves to build on these more traditional mechanisms forexposing students to research in a manner that would: 1) increase the opportunity for inquiry- Page 26.651.3based learning and creative engineering thinking; 2) prepare students for subsequent placementin a research laboratory; and 3) provide all engineering students at our institution an opportunityto perform mentored, self-directed research. Furthermore, as an engineering college within ouruniversity, we also felt that our solution should address
intellectualproperty and the substantial unattributed textual copying of another’s work.”1 But when it comesto defining “self-plagiarism,” things are more opaque. The phrase itself is almost meaningless, asStephanie Bird, among others, points out: “Self-plagiarism is not possible, since ‘plagiarism’refers to claiming the words and ideas of another as one’s own.”2The concept is not, as some suggest, “a relatively new evil.”3 As Callahan notes, it can be tracedback more than a century, to an 1893 letter submitted to the Atlantic Monthly.4 Current timeshave seen a renewed interest, perhaps due to the emergence of detection software used by manyjournals to identify plagiarized material.A review of the rather substantial literature shows that self-plagiarism, or
fully investigated. A greater number of talentedengineers is needed, and understanding how to increase diversity in engineering through out-of-school experiences affect choices of engineering careers will contribute to improving the typesand numbers of engineers entering the workforce to meet the challenges of the 21st century.In this paper, we used the lens of possible selves to address the following research questions: 1)How do students’ out-of-school high school experiences affect students' engineering identitynow and in the future?; 2) Are these experiences different by gender?; and 3) How doesengineering identity now and in the future predict students’ choice of engineering in college?MethodsThe data for this study come from the Outreach
Paper ID #11375Providing ME Students Opportunities to Enroll in Law School CoursesDr. Matt Gordon P.E., University of Denver Dr. Matt Gordon is Professor and Chair of the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. His research areas include numerical and experimental plasma physics, chemical and physical vapor depo- sition, electronic packaging, and bio-medical engineering. He has supervised to completion 26 MSME students and 5 PhD students. Publications include 1 book chapter, 32 journal publications, 47 refereed conference proceedings, 29 non-refereed publications, and 27 non-refereed presentations. He is
-based learning in EET hands-on courses is discussed. The assessmentresults have indicated that the instructional approaches used have been successful in meeting theteaching goals, which once again serves as evidence for the effectiveness of active learning asresearch studies have indicated.Keywords: electrical engineering technology, active learning, Bloom’s taxonomy, learningstyles, teaching methodologies.1. IntroductionThe traditional way engineering and engineering technology courses are taught is based ontraditional lecture, which is still the most frequent teaching method used nowadays around theworld.1 On the other hand, active learning has been attracting considerable attention over thepast years with numerous research studies indicating
engineeringdepartments were involved. The avenues of student participation included summer internships,independent project work, and Capstone Senior Design projects. By working on the solarfurnace project, students developed a myriad of valuable skills in such areas as projectmanagement, technical writing, communication, design, manufacturing, mechatronics, finiteelement analysis, circuit analysis, programming, and instrumentation. Additionally, 40 percentof the students who participated in the project chose to continue their engineering studies ingraduate schools around the country.1. IntroductionMultiple studies1-3 have shown the benefits of project-based learning. Students who participatein complex engineering projects develop a myriad of valuable skills
disciplines to successfully apply the results of basicresearch to long-standing global challenges such as epidemics, natural disasters and the searchfor alternative energy sources.”1 Clearly, the global preparedness of engineering students isbecoming an important educational outcome and is a natural extension to recent concerns by anumber of national commissions and scholars, who have also noted the impact of globalizationand the implication for continued U.S. economic leadership.2,3,4Hence, the purpose of our collaboration is to comprehensively study the various ways that wecan better educate globally prepared graduates given an already crowded curriculum.Specifically, we aim to better understand how the various international experiences both in
Engineering and Acquisition Division Director for the base. His areas of specialization include construction management, public works, and government acquisition & contract management.Ms. Sarah Isabel Romero, University of Florida Currently a graduate student at University of Florida achieving a Masters in Environmental Engineering Sciences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 1 THE LARGE SCALE USE OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY AND ITS BENEFITS OVER OTHER SOURCES OF RENEWABLE ENERGY.ABSTRACT As climate change becomes more of a reality, and as our non-renewable resources arebecoming depleted, finding "cleaner" renewable energy for
exclusive excellenceThe institutional context of this action research was a comprehensive undergraduate institution inthe Western United States, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly).Cal Poly’s many successes have created a traditional culture of exclusive excellence. Like many“successful” universities, entry and graduation highly favor those who have a wealth of historicaladvantages--this is particularly true for what is traditionally called “STEM”--Science,Technology, Engineering, and Math. These exclusive dynamics show up as gaps in access(Figure 1) as well as an apparent “achievement gap” with respect to students who aretraditionally underrepresented in STEM and other majors (Figure 2). At Cal Poly, this
), learningopportunities designed and delivered by the Center, and the faculty, staff, administration andstudents are the muscles that work to facilitate the changes.Stepping away from the metaphor, the framework that informs our work focuses on four settingsand three lenses from which to consider each setting. The four settings are: 1. Faculty, 2. Class/Students, 3. Administrators, and 4. the University.While the first three may be obvious, the forth is included not as an umbrella for the first three.The University is identified as a setting so that we explicitly consider the University as a whole,considering the institutional needs and strategic shifts. Considering the needs and shifts of theinstitution alongside those of faculty, students, and
provided a sense of community and place to receive advice to address these and other challenges. We found that the proposed collaborative qualitative research methodology was useful for not only exploring the experiences of new faculty, but also supporting the development of EERs. Introduction As the demands and expectations for faculty increase, many institutional leaders and future faculty question whether the typical graduate school model provides the necessary training for an academic career [1]–[4]. Prior studies suggest that graduate education provides students with anticipatory socialization of the role of a
against reference solutions submitted by theinstructors on various data sets. This computation task is run in the back end as is done through acloud hosting service such as Amazon Web Services (AWS).The web interface from a student’s point-of-view is shown in Figure 1. In Cody Coursework allquestions should be part of an “assignment”. Each assignment can have any number of questions.A start and end time can only be set at the assignment level, hence all questions in a givenassignment have a common administering time frame.When a student selects a question, its description will be shown in the right panel. The studentthen goes on to submit the solution to a given solution in a specified space. The solution is runthrough multiple tests and the
districts across Ohio preparing students for STEM career and college endeavors.Larraine A. Kapka, Sinclair Community College Assistant Dean and Professor, Sinclair Community College MSME, MS Ind Mgt, PE (Ohio) Over 20 years industry experience 15 years higher education experience c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Virtual Online Tensile Strength Testing SimulationAbstractSupported through NSF-DUE, this TUES Type 1 project is 1) developing an open source,virtual, online tensile testing laboratory simulation; 2) conducting research to compare the costsand learning outcomes for using on-site, hands-on tensile testing equipment versus an onlinesimulation; 3) creating close industry
followingresearch question: How and when do students use prototypes to engage with stakeholdersthroughout the design process? This research project was approved by a Midwestern university’sInstitutional Review Board.ParticipantsA total of 16 students from three different engineering capstone design courses were interviewedfor this study. Table 1 shows the distribution of students based on their gender, design course,and prior design experience. All student names were replaced by pseudonyms to ensureanonymity. Less than half of the students had not referenced previous design experience outsideof their capstone design project. Three students had higher education levels, having completed orwere currently in a Master’s Program while three students previously
the first semester of a two-course sequence in the first-year general engineering (GE) program housed in the Engineering Education Department withinthe College of Engineering Virginia Tech called Foundations of Engineering. The programoutcomes for the GE program are to equip students to 1. select a major that aligns with their interests and goals, 2. have the foundational academic, technical, and professional knowledge and skills needed to succeed in a degree-granting major, and 3. develop a sense of belonging and identification with engineering to support long-term persistence toward a degree.The Foundations of Engineering I course was designed to introduce students to engineering byexploring data collection and analysis
aside the part of themselves that wants to be a "teacher" in favor ofbecoming a "researcher." Since "good teaching comes from the identity and the integrity of theteacher." [1], overlooking teacher identity could negatively impact the academic experiences ofengineering students. In general, identity studies have become more prevalent in engineeringeducation research, particularly as they relate to engineering identity or other related roleidentities such as research, math, or physics [2], [3], [4]. Identification with a role or profession,such as engineering, contributes to motivation, self-efficacy, and improved performance in thoseroles [5]. Understanding engineering graduate students' identification with the role of teacher andhow that
innovative thinking.Quantitative data has been analyzed and published in an earlier paper. Here, we will discuss thefindings from the qualitative data collected and analyzed. Focus groups were conducted toinvestigate students’ perspectives regarding camp activities and content included in the program.Participants included lower and upper elementary students from 3rd to 6th grade, with a total ofsix focus groups held in Georgia and Ohio.This paper will address two key research questions: 1. How do participants define inventiveness and entrepreneurial thinking, and how do they apply these concepts both within Camp Invention and in real-world settings? 2. How do participants' favorite activities at Camp Invention foster inventiveness and
faculty did not care enough about their well-being and thatfaculty were fostering studio environments in which students could not get enough sleep andcould not afford project materials. This pilot study points to a need for further research intofaculty-student relationships and interactions and faculty pedagogical choices in designeducation.Keywords: design education; diversity; equity; inclusion; race; gender1. IntroductionEven though designers create the products and spaces that people of all backgrounds use everyday, most design fields are not diverse. White men are overrepresented in architecture, designengineering, and industrial design, and white women are overrepresented in interior design in theUnited States [1], [2], [3], [4]. Of course
initiatives, libraries, databases, funding, bibliographic mapping,interdisciplinary collaboration, strategic research tools; research intelligence; competitiveintelligence; gap analysisIntroductionIn recent years, leadership at Virginia Tech have set strategic goals and initiatives 1 to increaseour national and international reputation, increasing institutional support for expanding existingresearch and galvanizing new research. The University Libraries at Virginia Tech havecontributed to many aspects of this effort, including: researcher metrics, collaboration support,and providing data and analyses for new research areas. One special effort, called “DestinationAreas2”, involved a call for internal proposals for seed funding from the Provost’s
K-20 STEM Outreach while a National Science Foundation Fellow with the GK-12 Outreach Program at NCSU where she began Energy Clubs, an out-of-school-time program for third, fourth and fifth graders to introduce them to renewable energy. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Campus and Community Decarbonization – Campus as a Living Classroom of Transformative Energy PerformanceBackgroundIn the USA and Canada, hundreds of municipalities [1] and corporations [2], along with thousandsof universities and colleges, have the goal to decarbonize their entire operations by no later than2050. This goal is also commonly
, and societalneeds influence the design and application of robotics in both countries. Understanding thesedifferences provides insight into the emerging global direction of HRI and how robot design andfunction might evolve to meet human needs in different cultural contexts.Based on this gap, we developed a new interdisciplinary course to address the following: 1. Advancement of HRI: By focusing on next-generation service robots, this program addresses the growing demand for robots that can work alongside humans in real-world environments like healthcare, manufacturing, and logistics. The students’ exposure to HRI, a key aspect of robotics, directly contributes to the development of robots that can effectively
solutions developed as part of the CCDC Southside project for theOakleaf Forest Community.The Olde Huntersville Empowerment Coalition has collaborated with faculty from the Institutefor Coastal Adaptation and Hanbury Architects to submit two EPA Thriving Community Grantsusing design solutions from the 2017-2018 academic year of the CCDC. These proposals are aTier 2 Connecting Streets Proposal and a Tier 3 Empowerment Center and Urban Garden.3.0 Case Study Southside Norfolk3.1 Understanding the communitySouthside Norfolk, an environmental justice community, comprises the neighborhoods ofBerkley, Campostella, Campostella Heights, Oakleaf Forest, and Diggs Town in Norfolk,Virginia (Figure 1). This community faces systemic challenges rooted in both
dimension has at least two authors’ experiences.Dimension 1: Emotional wellnessThis dimension highlights the authors’ accounts of how immigration policies force them to makedifficult decisions that negatively impact their emotional well-being. One author explains: I am married to the best husband in the whole wide world, and I have two beautiful kids aged 7 and 5 ( I call them my jewels). Coming to study here meant separation from my family for only God knows how long. This is by far the most difficult, bravest, and scariest decision I have made in my life ( I hope and pray by God that I don’t regret it). I wake up some mornings, missing them like crazy.She
neurodivergent faculty,offering tailored guidance and support. The third narrative involves a speculative design exercisewhere faculty engaged in equity-centered institutional change used AI to create “dark futures”narratives and envisioned emancipatory interventions to prevent those futures from becomingreality. Together, these narratives illustrate how AI, far from being solely a technical tool, can bea relational and transformative force in engineering education.In many current conversations about AI in engineering education, AI is framed as a purelytechnical tool, often divorced from its social and ethical implications [1], [2]. AI can perpetuateoppression, domination, and control when designed and deployed without critical reflection.Furthermore
their growing presence, such courses oftenlack clearly defined characteristics and practical design frameworks. Consequently, severalchallenges persist—such as insufficient integration of comprehensive engineering elements,misalignment between course content and industry needs, rigid teaching methods, and limitedstudent engagement.This study addresses two key research questions: (1) What are the core characteristics ofgeneral engineering courses designed for postgraduate students pursuing professionalengineering degrees? (2) How can these courses be effectively designed to embody anddeliver these core characteristics? To answer these questions, the paper first conducts aliterature review to identify the defining features of such courses. Based
from the program. However, it is challenging to keep students engaged and attentive inthis age and time using traditional teaching mediums such as boards and slide decks.1 Theabstract and sometimes intimidating nature of engineering concepts—such as thermodynamics,material balances, or reaction kinetics—requires teaching approaches that are accessible,impactful, engaging, and frankly exciting.In this context, student engagement is more than a matter of participation; it directly correlateswith how well students internalize and apply the material. Traditional lecture methods canstruggle to keep students actively involved, especially in large classes where individualinteraction is limited.2,3 Without opportunities for hands-on exploration or
Intelligence research group. She is responsible for the Cyber-Learning & Data Sciences Lab. She belongs to the National Research System of Mexico (SNI level II), the IEEE Computer Society, the IEEE Education Society, the Mexican Society of Artificial Intelligence, and the Mexican Academy of Computing. She got 3 awards (2 Gold winners and 1 silver winner) for her participation in the Project ”Open Innovation Laboratory for Rapid Realization for Sensing, Smart, and Sustainable Products”. QS Stars Reimagine Education. She obtained seven first-place awards for Educational Innovation from Tecnologico de Monterrey. She has published more than 150 research articles in international journals and conferences. She has directed 12
, institutions, and policymakers. Byidentifying and synthesizing recurring themes, this framework will guide future research andpolicy development, ensuring the responsible and effective integration of GenAI tools inengineering education.IntroductionSince the introduction of generative pre-trained transformers and other generative artificialintelligence (GenAI) tools, the use of GenAI tools has grown significantly. While ArtificialIntelligence (AI) has been around for decades, GenAI has emerged more recently. The launch ofOpenAI’s generative pre-trained transformer model—more widely known as GPT— made thesetools widely accessible to almost anyone [1]. As a result, people across different fields havefound a range of uses for these tools, including in
difference in a student’s experience. Again, the direct methodis the most visible technique to stop bad actions so, yet again, I am preaching visibility.My interest in using visibility (or “getting the ball rolling”) is to protect and support students thatare underrepresented, or feel less than for some reason. One person showing support can make alarge difference in the experience of a student.Below are some experiences from my department and school around visibility.ANECDOTE 1: RACIST EVENTS (Lack of protection)The lack of visible, swift and meaningful response by our school in response to, among otherthings, racist events, in many cases hurt students more than the events themselves. Theperpetrator of one of the events was removed from the school
of the TCP/IP, a mobile remote shake tablelaboratory is further proposed to meet the learning style of the new generation. In this paper, thedeveloped interactive remote shake table laboratories will be discussed in detail and acorresponding teaching module for the proposed mobile shake table laboratory is demonstrated.IntroductionHistory frequently reminds us how destructive earthquakes can be. For example, the Loma Prietaearthquake (magnitude 6.9) in 1989 caused an estimated $6 billion in property damage and tookaway 63 human lives.1 The Northridge earthquake (magnitude 6.7) in 1994 brought an estimatedof $20 billion property damage and claimed the lives of 57 people with more than 5,000 injured.2To design and build safer and more