. Figure 3. Twiddle Factors. 2Substituting, an xn x n N 2 and bn xn xn N 2 20into Eq. 17 and Eq. 18 respectively, yields N / 2 1 X ( 2m ) a( n )W N nm 2 21 n 0 N / 2 1 X ( 2m 1 ) b( n )W N n WNnm
post- quizzeson parts of a citation, the reading quiz, and slides for this session as well as links to the LibGuidecreated for this class, a “Basic Guide to MLA Documentation”, a Citation Builder, a citationlocator, and electronic reserves with directions on logging on. Week eleven included the pre-and post- quizzes on intellectual property (see Appendix B), the reading quiz, slides for thissession as well as links to the LibGuide created for this class, electronic reserves with directionsto log on, United States Patent & Trademark Office, USPTO patent search page, USPTOClassification page, and an additional “folder” which contained links to patent image websites.(For a full listing of links see Appendix C.)ResultsThe three content modules
enableimmediate localized hands-on exploration of STEM education principles, devices, and systemsthat have historically been restricted to expensive laboratory facilities. a Page 25.943.2a Hardware/software platforms are now readily available from a variety of sources including RPI’s Mobile StudioI/O Board and similar products developed by National Instruments® and Digilent®.Notable among these is the Mobile Studio learning platform developed at RPI. b A typicalexperimental configuration for a mobile studio based activity is shown below. The laptop, USBcable and Mobile Studio I/O board and Desktop Software provide the necessary
impact. It follows from analysis, therefore, that increasing the dropheight increases the energy that is dissipated during impact [15,24].Similarly, from the relation between linear impulse and linear momentum, the vertical impulsethat acts on the particle during impact is given by [1-6] ∫ ⃗ (⃗⃗⃗⃗ ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗)where the subscript “a” stands for ‘after impact’ and “b” stands for ‘before impact’. Hence, ta isthe time immediately after impact and tb is that immediately before impact. Similarly, Va is thespeed immediately after impact and Vb is that immediately before impact. Since energy isconserved during the free fall of the ball before the impact occurs and is conserved again duringrebound of the ball after
need to be addressed. If administrators, developers, andtechnologists are more aware of faculty and student concerns with current online coursedelivery methods, then they can focus their efforts to develop and improve the mosteffective tools for online engineering courses. This is a key first step to expanding theimplementation of online education in engineering.Bibliography1 Parsad, B. and Lewis, L. (2008). "Distance Education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006-2007. First Look." (NCES 2009-044).2 Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2006). "Making the Grade: Online Education in the United States, 2006."3 Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2008). "Staying the Course - Online Education in the United States 2008."4 Tabata, L
3 6% 6% 17% 4 23% 4 5 5 18% 65% 65% A. B. Figure 5. Survey results showing parent-reported child (A) engagement and (B) stimulation on a scale of one to five as percentages of the total number of respondents.SummaryMuch was learned
., Getz-Kikuchi, R. Price, T. and Karanian, B.Social Participation in the VirtualUniverse.National ASEE annual proceedings, Vancouver, BC, June, 2011.[7] Smith, K. et al. Connecting and expanding the engineering education research and innovationspecial session. FIE, Oct. 14, 2011.[8] Wankat, P; Felder, R. & Smith, K.The scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Engineering.2002.[9] Saxenian, A. L. The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. HarvardUniversity Press. 2006[10] Stefik, M. & Stefik, B. Breakthrough: Stories and Strategiesof RadicalInnovation: MIT press, 2004.[11] Schein, E. Organizational Culture. Jossey-Bass, 1985.[12] Heifetz, R. and Linsky, M. Leadership on the Line.Harvard Business School Press, 2002
female engineers. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Page 25.1326.14 Engineering, 17(1), 69-96. doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v17.i1.606. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122.7. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36-49. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.368. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Sheu, H.-B
Rubric sub-dimension.The students were also required to give written feedback in response to eight prompts associatedwith the three MEA Rubric dimensions (APPENDIX B). The written feedback was collectedthrough a series of textboxes. The Mathematical Model dimension had five textboxes, the Re-Usability & Modifiability dimension had two textboxes, and the Share-Ability dimension hadone textbox to complete. The explanations of required focus for the peer feedback within thethree dimensions follow. Page 25.1323.5For the Mathematical Model dimension, the students were required to write feedback concerningthe degree to which the teams’ math model
Education. 37. Lawanto, O. and S. Johnson. Students' cognitive self‐appraisal, self‐management, and the level of difficulty of an engineering design project: Are they related? in 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14, 2009 ‐ June 17, 2009. 2009. Austin, TX, United states: American Society for Engineering Education. 38. Harper, B. and P. Terenzini. The effects of instructors' time in industry on students' co‐curricular experiences. in 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22, 2008 ‐ June 24, 2008. 2008. Pittsburg, PA, United states: American Society for Engineering Education. 39. Strayhorn, T. Measuring the educational benefits of diversity in STEM education: A multi
3400 or ENGR 3600 do not have a strong design component; however, these courses do teach systems as a sociological methodology, which can be applied to economic, environmental, social, political, and ethical issues relating science and engineering practice. ENGR3400 focuses one-third of the course on ethical and value issues as they relate to science and engineering. B. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility: One of three units in ENGR 3400 is dedicated to ethics as they relate to entrepreneurs involved in the development of the Internet. The course looks at ethics as part of a new business value system as well as the “hacker ethic,” which some speculate may be emerging in
AC 2012-5087: ARTICULATION OF CURRICULUM ACROSS UNIVER-SITIES, COMMUNITY COLLEGES, AND ADULT AND CAREER CEN-TERS TO MEET THE EMERGING INDUSTRY REQUIREMENTS IN CLEANAND ALTERNATIVE ENERGYMs. Margaret Anna Traband, University of Toledo Margaret Anna Traband, M.B.A., is the Grant Director for the National Science Foundation Partnership for Innovation grant entitled An Innovative Model for a New Advanced Energy Workforce. Traband earned a bachelor’s of arts from Bowling Green State University and her master’s of business adminis- tration in entrepreneurship and technology commercialization from the University of Toledo. Previously, Traband worked as the Program Manager for the University Clean Energy Alliance of Ohio (UCEAO
note are those organizations that have repeatedlysponsored our project: Harris, Air Force Research Laboratory-Munitions Directorate (EglinAFB), Cummins, Keuka Wind, Center for Advanced Power Systems, and Danfoss-Turbocor.Their involvement has been the key to the continued success of our program.Also would like to thanks the three international universities, the chair of all three engineeringdepartments at our university, for their vision and leadership which is also a key to making theinternational and the multidisciplinary projects a reality.References1. Globalization of Science and Engineering Research, Science and Engineering Indicators 2010, the National Science Board.2. R. Hovsapian, C. Shih, B. Harvey and O. Okoli , An Overview
citizens who will help decide the US future.We hope to be able to continue these excellent programs for many years. The METSTEPprogram is funded through the 2013-2014 year. The CIRC program is funded through the 2014-2015 year. Additional funding needs to be found for the CIRC/METS and lower division S-STEM programs for their continuation after the 2012-2013 academic year.References 1. Zhang, G., Anderson, T., Ohland, M., Carter, R., and Thorndyke, B., “Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation and Retention: A Longitudinal and Cross-Institutional Study”, (2002) Annual American Society for Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, Montreal, Quebec, 14 pp. 2. Sleeman, K.A. and Sorby, S. A., “Effective
AC 2012-3167: INFORMATION ASSURANCE STUDENT GROUP: HOWTO TURN A CLUB INTO A VALUABLE LEARNING EXPERIENCE FORSTUDENTSDr. Julie Ann Rursch, Iowa State University Julie A. Rursch is currently is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. She will graduate with a degree in computer engineering with a focus on secure computing. Her research includes a unique approach to critical infrastructure modeling which provides emergency planners and first responders with resilient and flexible critical infrastructure evaluation in the face of non-recurrent, disruptive events. Her approach creates a new paradigm for modeling critical infrastructure sectors, analyzing real
AC 2012-5133: INSTRUCTOR’S PERSPECTIVES OF TRANSFORMINGA TRADITIONAL ENGINEERING ECONOMICS COURSE INTO A FULLYONLINE DELIVERYMs. Pil-Won On, University of Missouri, Columbia Pil-Won On is am Instructional Designer/E-learning Specialist at the College of Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia. On holds an M.S. in instructional systems technology from Indiana University, Bloomington.Dr. Luis Occena, University of Missouri, Columbia Page 25.787.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Instructor’s Perspectives of Transforming a Traditional Engineering
AC 2012-4464: INTEGRATION OF A COMPUTATIONAL LAB SEQUENCEINTO A JUNIOR-LEVEL QUANTITATIVE PHYSIOLOGY COURSEKurt A. Thoroughman Ph.D., Washington University, St. Louis Kurt A. Thoroughman, Ph.D., is the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies and an Associate Profes- sor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis. Thoroughman has joint appointments in the departments of Anatomy & Neurophysiology and Physical Therapy.Mr. Ranjan Patrick Khan, Washington University, St. Louis Department of BMEMs. Haoxin Sun, Washington University, St. LouisPatricia L. Widder, Washington University, St. Louis Patricia Widder serves as Teaching Lab Coordinator in the Biomedical Engineering
AC 2012-3867: COMPARISON OF A FIRST-YEAR EXPERIENCE COURSEWITH AND WITHOUT A LIVINGDr. Thomas J. Vasko, Central Connecticut State University Thomas J. Vasko, Assistant Professor, joined the Department of Engineering at Central Connecticut State University in the fall 2008 semester after 31 years with United Technologies Corporation (UTC), where he was a Pratt & Whitney Fellow in Computational Structural Mechanics. While at UTC, Vasko held adjunct instructor faculty positions at the University of Hartford and RPI Groton. He holds a Ph.D. in M.E. from the University of Connecticut, an M.S.M.E. from RPI, and a B.S.M.E. from Lehigh University. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in Connecticut and he is on the
AC 2012-3301: A PHYSICS LABORATORY ACTIVITY TO SIMULATETHE OPERATION OF THE TOUCHSCREEN ON A SMARTPHONEProf. Gary P. Hillebrand, University of Detroit Mercy College of Engineering and ScienceMs. Meghann Norah Murray, University of Detroit Mercy Meghann Murray has a position and conducts research in the Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry at University of Detroit Mercy. She received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in chemistry from UDM and is certified to teach high school chemistry and physics. She has taught in programs such as the Detroit Area Pre-college and Engineering program. She has been a judge and mentor with the Science and Engineering Fair of Metropolitan Detroit, FIRST Lego League, and FRC Robotics. She
AC 2012-2943: A SURVEY OF DISTANCE LEARNING PROGRAMS THATOFFER A MASTER’S OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGDEGREEDr. Wayne E. Whiteman, Georgia Institute of Technology Wayne E. Whiteman is a Senior Academic Professional and Director of the Office of Student Services in the Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He received his B.S. degree from the U.S. Military Academy in 1979, a master’s degree from MIT in 1987, and a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1996. Whiteman is a retired Colonel in the U.S. Army and completed 24 years of active military service. He served on the West Point faculty from 1987 to 1990, and 1998 to 2003. He has been at Georgia
AC 2012-3834: ARE WE UP TO THE TASK OF CONFRONTING A DE-CLINE IN STUDENT PERFORMANCE? A PANEL DISCUSSIONDr. Kathy Schmidt Jackson, Pennsylvania State University Kathy Jackson is a Senior Research Associate at Pennsylvania State University’s Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence. In this position, she promotes Penn State’s commitment to enriching teaching and learning. Jackson works in all aspects of education including faculty development, instructional design, engineering education, learner support, and evaluation.Dr. Mark D. Maughmer, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Mark D. Maughmer received his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in aeronautical and astronautical engineering from the University of Illinois
AC 2012-3854: THE MIT LEWIS SURVEY: CREATING A BLUEPRINTFOR A COLD WAR TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, 1947-1949Dr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor of history in the Department of Science and Technology Studies and the Director of First-year Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He has published Calculating a Natural World: Computers, Scientists and Engineers During the Rise of U.S. Cold War Research with MIT Press (2006) and is currently working on a book on the history of engineering education reform in the United States. Page 25.1322.1
AC 2012-3217: THE USE OF A PROJECT CIRCUIT IN THE TEACHINGOF A BASIC ELECTRIC CIRCUITS COURSEProf. James P Becker, Montana State University James Becker is an Associate Professor of electrical and computer engineering at Montana State Univer- sity. His professional interests include microwave circuits, radio frequency electronics, nanoelectronics, pedagogical research, and distance education. He is a 2004 recipient of the NSF CAREER award.Dr. Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engi- neering at Montana State University (MSU). She works on various curriculum and instruction projects including instructional development
AC 2012-5212: USING A P3 FUNDED PROJECT AS PART OF A CAP-STONE DESIGN CLASS IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERINGProf. Stefan J. Grimberg, Clarkson University Stefan J. Grimberg completed his PhD in 1995 from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Since that time he has been a faculty member of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Clarkson University. He received his Diplom in Chemical Engineering from the Technical University of Munich, Germany (1987) and his Masters in Environmental Engineering from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1989). Dr. Grimberg’s research focuses on delineating the role of microorganisms on contaminant transport in atmospheric and aqueous systems. Most
AC 2012-3063: USING A PAIR OF IPODS TO MEASURE ANGLE OFTWIST IN A TORSION EXPERIMENTDr. Surendra K. Gupta, Rochester Institute of Technology ”Vinnie” Gupta is a professor of mechanical engineering, and a member of the graduate faculty of mate- rials science and engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology (Rochester, N.Y.). He is a recipient of the 2000 Eisenhart Award for Excellence in Teaching. At RIT, he teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in applied mechanics, computational techniques, and materials science.Mr. Steven John Kosciol, Rochester Institute of Technology Steven John Kosciol is Lab Manager of the Mechanical Engineering Machine Shop. He teaches the lab section of the course ”Manufacturing
AC 2012-5325: UTILIZING A COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL REALITYENVIRONMENT AS A TRAINING TOOL FOR CONSTRUCTION STU-DENTSDr. Tulio Sulbaran, University of Southern Mississippi Tulio Sulbaran received his Ph.D. in civil engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology with a con- centration in construction management and with a minor in computer engineering and strong statistical background. He has more than eight years of work experience in the A/E/C (architecture, engineering, and construction) industry with office and field experience in scheduling, estimating, and project man- agement in the United States and several international locations, including Venezuela, Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia, and Thailand. Sulbaran is an
AC 2012-3961: REVISITING A LIBERAL ACTIVITY IN A COLLEGE OFENGINEERING ENGINEERS AS POETS 10 YEARS LATERMr. Craig J. Gunn, Michigan State University Craig Gunn is the Director of the Communication Program in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. His duties include the integration of communication skill activity into all courses within the mechanical engineering program, including overseas experiences. He works closely with the Cooperative Engineering Education Division of the College of Engineering to monitor the com- munication skills of students who co-op during their college years. He is currently the Editor of the CEED Newsbriefs and is co-author of a number of textbooks focusing
Implementation Review of a Service-Learning Project into a Freshman Level Plastics Engineering Course Gonca Altuger-Genc1In an effort to provide students with a vast array of experiences, educators support their in-class teaching withproject-based, experiential and hands-on learning approaches. As these approaches have been implemented intoundergraduate engineering curriculum, the need for incorporating the service component became necessary. As theimportance of service learning became more evident, higher education institutions incorporated service learningconcept into the engineering education. University of Massachusetts Lowell incorporated service-learning intomany of its undergraduate
: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2).3. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. 90, 85, 86.4. Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100, p.90.5. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals; Handbook I: Cognitive Domain New York: Longmans, Green.6. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking
. Dennis Jr, W. J. (2011b) Entrepreneurship, Small Business and Public Policy Levers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49, 92-106.13. Ylinenpää, H. (1998). "Northern Light" or "Out in the Cold" - A comparison of two Nordic regions. Conference on SMEs and Districts: Hybrid Governance Forms, Knowledge Creation & Technology Transfer’, LIUC, Castellanza.14. Siegel, D. S. (2007). Quantitative and Qualitative Studies of University Technology Transfer: Synthesis and Policy Recommendations. Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, eds. D. B. Audretsch, I. Grilo & A. R. Thurik, 186-199. Page