. Salazar, "Faculty as Change Agents: Why Faculty Development is Crucial for Hispanic-Serving Institutions," Escala Educational Services, Santa Fe, 2015.[2] National Science Board, "Higher Education in Science and Engineering," National Science Foundation, September 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20197/trends-in-undergraduate-and-graduate-s-e-degree- awards. [Accessed 10 September 2020].[3] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, "Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering, Special Report NSF 19-304," National Science Foundation, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs
has chaired several sessions and international meetings on Carbon and/or Electrokinetics within the Electrochemical Society, Society for Hispanic Professional Engineers and AES. He was the recipient of the Public Impact fellowship at UC Irvine in 2010, in 2019 both Junior Faculty Eastman Award for Excellence in Mechanical Engineering, and the Esin Gulari Leadership and Service Award in CECAS at Clemson University, and in 2021, the Impact Award from the Hispanic Latinx Heritage Month at CU.Sallie Turnbull Sallie Turnbull is the Director of Internships and Career Programming at API, a company providing experiential education for high school, undergraduate and graduate students. Sallie has been working in the field of
oppression, such as intersections of race and gender or sexuality andnation, which highlights the combination of oppressive forces that work together to produceinequality (Collins, 2000). In addition, intersectionality effectively examines contemporary issuesthat show the limitations of a singular race- or gender-based approach (Hancock, 2007). Forinstance, Black female athletes have traditionally been subjected to racial and gender-basedprejudices and stigmas regarding their participation in sports (Zenquis & Mwaniki, 2019). Sellerset al. (1997) investigated the college life experiences of African American women student-athletesand observed that they differed significantly from both White women student-athletes and AfricanAmerican men student
degrees from Columbia University: an M.S in Anthropology, an M.S. in Computer Science, and a B.A. in Mathematics, and a B.S. in Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics. Hammond has received over $13.5 million in research funding from NSF, DARPA, Google, Microsoft, etc. Hammond mentored 17 UG theses, 29 M.S. theses, and 9 Ph.D. dissertations. Hammond is an ACM Distinguished Member, has received numerous best paper awards, and is the recipient of the 2022 TAMU Distinguished Achievement Award for Teaching, the 2021 ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award, the 2020 TEES Faculty Fellows Award, and the 2011 Charles H. Barclay, Jr. '45 Faculty Fellow Award. Hammond has been featured on the Discovery Channel and other news sources
the Relation of Reflective Thinking to theEducative Process. D. C. Heath, 1933.[2] D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development..Prentice-Hall, 1984.[3] J. Eyler and D. E. Giles, Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning? Jossey-Bass, 1999.[4] D. A. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books,1983.[5] K. B. Yancey, Reflection in the Writing Classroom. Utah State University Press, 1998.[6] L. K. Fiss, L. A. Meadows, M. Raber, K. B. Henquinet, and R. Berkey, “An EducationalFramework to Promote Self-Authorship in Engineering Undergraduates,” 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, https://peer.asee.org/32058, 2019.[7] L. A. Meadows, M. Hollister
the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] H. Ehsan, A. P. Rehmat, H. Osman, C. Ohland, M. E. Cardella, & I. H. Yeter, “Examining the role of parents in promoting computational thinking in children: A case study on one homeschool family (fundamental),” In Proceeding of American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), Tampa, Florida, 2019.[2] A P. Rehmat, H. Ehsan & M. E. Cardella, “Instructional strategies to promote computational thinking for young learners,” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, vol. 36. no. 1, pp. 46-62, 2020, doi: 10.1080/21532974.2019.1693942.[3] H. Ehsan, A. P. Rehmat, & M. E. Cardella, M. E, “Computational thinking embedded in engineering design
/MINNO_Innovation_Project.pdf?se quence=1[8] N. Roy, F. Schlosser, and Z. Pasek, “Stimulating Entrepreneurial Interest in Engineers Through an Experiential and Multidisciplinary Course Collaboration,” SAGE Journals, vol. 2, no. 1, July, 2019. Accessed January, 11, 2022, doi: 10.1177/2515127419856602. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2515127419856602[9] M. Stevens, C. Carmen, M. Stevens, and E. Stevens. (June 15, 2014). Using a Marketplace to Form Multidisciplinary Systems Engineering Capstone Project Teams. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Available: https://peer.asee.org/using-a-marketplace-to- form-multidisciplinary-systems-engineering-capstone-project-teams[10] K. Meah, D. Hake II, and S, D
in 2019. She has written curricula and published a number of works in engineering education in both higher education, P12 and international spaces. She is a co-founder and the Director of Innovation Programs and Operations for the non-profit research group, Ad- vancing Engineering Excellence in P-12 Engineering Education and has successfully launched PROMISE Engineering Institute Global, for international future faculty development. Dr. Gurganus teaches several first and second year Engineering classes along with the Mechanical and Multidisciplinary Engineering Senior Capstone design courses and Global Engineering at UMBC. As an active member of American Society of Engineering Education, She is currently serving
power mechanisms, promote the reform of student-centered teachingmodel, and form the joint force of quality assurance.AcknowledgmentsThis research is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the CentralUniversities (2022ZX014). Sincere acknowledgement is sent to the insightfulfeedback received from the anonymous reviewers whose suggestions helped improvethe quality of the final version of this paper.References[1] Y. Yang, P. Li, M. Liu, “On global trend of engineering education accreditation,” Research in Higher Education of Engineering, no. 5, pp. 5-10, 2019.[2] Y. Ding, E. Zhao, “China's engineering education has entered the global ‘first echelon’”, People’s Daily, 2018-09-27.[3] J. Chen, J. Hu, Research on the Reform of
] G. Tipker, G. Golub, M. Dube, C. Tejesh and J. Zhang, Jing, “Integration of 3-D PrintedDrone Project in General Engineering Curriculum”, American Society of Engineering Education,126th Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019, Paper ID # 27759.[4] B. Hur, D. Malawey, J. Morgan and C. Ma, “3-D Printed Metal and Plastic Propeller Designand Manufacturing for Smallscale, Underwater Thrusters”, American Society of EngineeringEducation, 126th Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019, Paper ID #26855[5] O. Rios “Teaching Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing Concepts Using 3-D ComputerModels and 3-D Printed Parts”, American Society of Engineering Education, 125th AnnualConference and Exposition, 2018, Paper ID # 21827.[6] Eslahi, A., Chadeesingh, D.R
across engineering curriculum. AEE Journal, 6(2).3. Brunell, L. R. (2019). A real-world approach to introducing sustainability in civil engineeringcapstone design. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.4. Scott Stanford, M., Benson, L. C., Alluri, P., Martin, W. D., Klotz, L. E., Ogle, J. H., Kaye,N., Sarasua, W., and Schiff, S. (2013). Evaluating student and faculty outcomes for a real-worldcapstone project with sustainability considerations. Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education and Practice, 139(2), 123-133.5. Valdes-Vasquez, R., and Klotz, L. (2011). Incorporating the social dimension of sustainabilityinto civil engineering education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education &Practice, 137(4
, Laura Hill, Kristen Andrews,John Lens, and others in the Contemplative Practices Learning Community, graduate studentMaddy Pimental and along with all the undergraduate student focus group leaders: SachiSakaniwa, Zoe Schlosser, Maja Paulk, River Bond, and student participants of the StructuralSteel Design course.References:[1] T. Estrada and E. Dalton, "Impact of Student Mindfulness Facets on Engineering Education Outcomes: An Initial Exploration," ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, June 15, 2019.[2] B. Rieken, M. Schar, S. Shapiro, S. Gilmartin, and S. Sheppard, "Exploring the relationship between mindfulness and innovation in engineering students," in Proceedings of the American Society for
(Author, 2019).One the second day, the second-grade teachers learned about and reflected on the YESEngineering Pollinators unit; the fourth grade teachers learned about and reflected on theEngineering Safety Vests unit.Participants Two two-day workshops were held, each held for all the grade-level teachers at AthensArea School District. We had the capacity to have more teachers in attendance, so four teachersfrom two other rural school districts attended. Athens Area School District has two elementaryschools, with a total of approximately 125 students per grade. Two teachers from PikeElementary School (50 students/grade) and two teachers from Dahoga Elementary School (70students/grade) also attended the second-grade workshop. The second
learning.References:[1] P.D. Rogers and C.C. Martin, C.D. (2019). “Using an inverted classroom approach to promote active learning in construction management and engineering courses,” 55th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings. 2019, Associated Schools of Construction 2019.[2] M.J. Lage, G.J. Platt, and M. Treglia, M., “Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment,” The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. 2000.[3] S. McCallum, J. Schultz, K. Sellke, and J. Spartz, “An examination of the flipped classroom approach on college academic involvement
community.In 2019, the AE Department reinvigorated its commitment to student success with the introduction of an“Architectural Engineering Tutoring, Engaging, Advising, and Mentoring” program (AE TEAM). AETEAM was designed as an open peer-mentoring opportunity for the purpose of increasing the probably ofsuccess for every student matriculating in AE. The AE TEAM environment is rooted in the “studioconcept”. Studios provide workspace on a 24/7 basis to all students in a program to work, share, andmotivate each other [19]. These studio environments continue to be part of all AE programs. This paperreviews the formulation, management, and challenges of AE TEAM with the expressed intent of inspiringother programs to create similar pedagogical
.[6] E. O. McGee and W. H. Robinson, Eds., Diversifying STEM: multidisciplinaryperspectives on race and gender. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2020.[7] B. Guy and A. Boards, “A seat at the table: Exploring the experiences ofunderrepresented minority women in STEM graduate programs,” Journal of Prevention &Intervention in the Community, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 354–365, Oct. 2019, doi:10.1080/10852352.2019.1617383.[8] J. Holly, “Disentangling engineering education research’s ANTI‐BLACKNESS,” J EngEduc, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 629–635, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20364.[9] Freeman A. Hrabowski, III, “Broadening Participation in American Higher Education—A Special Focus on the Underrepresentation of African Americans in STEM
, “Chemical Engineering Major Selection Throughout the First Year: A Mixed-Methods Approach,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[8] X. Chen, C. E. Brawner, M. W. Ohland, and M. K. Orr, “A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.[9] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and R. A. Long, “Engineering Matriculation Paths: Outcomes of Direct Matriculation, First-Year Engineering, and Post-General Education Models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2012.[10] C. E. Brawner, M. M. Camacho, R. A. Long, S. M. Lord, M. W
during the design process. It does not directly measure changes in how theyapproach the process, but instead measures changes in how they describe and conceptualize theirapproach. This is a limitation of our research methods.Scoring ProcedureResponses from students enrolled in the Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 offerings of SEED Labwere scored. In Spring 2018, 18 students completed both the pre and the post case studies and 31students completed both in Spring 2019, for a total sample size of 49. Each of these studentscompleted both the pre and the post case study, for a total of 98 case study responses. TABLE 1 SCORING RUBRIC
persuasion, and Dimension 5: Abstract vs. non-abstractinformation. In the academic year (AY) 2019-2020, total of 97 student artifacts (N = 97) werecollected. For this analysis, we grouped documents into similar assignment genres: research-papers (n = 28), technical reports and analyses (n = 5), and engineering laboratory reports (n =35), with individual engineering students represented at least once in the laboratory report andonce in another category. Findings showed that engineering lab reports are highly informational,minimally-persuasive, and featured more immediate elaboration on claims and data. Conversely,students’ research papers in academic writing courses were highly involved, highly persuasive,and used deferred elaboration. The analyses
Paper ID #32621Project-based Learning in a Persistent COVID-19 EnvironmentCade FleaherMr. Dechathon Suwanakeree, United States Military AcademyMr. Scott Amos CollinsGeoff KirkMr. Antonio La TorreLt. Peyton James PisacaneLt. Col. Kevin P. Arnett P.E., United States Military Academy LTC Kevin Arnett is a fifth year Assistant Professor at the US Military Academy. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering from USMA in 2001, his M.S. Civil Engineering from U.C. Berkeley in 2011, and his PhD in Structural Engineering from UCSD in 2019. He teaches structural analysis and design of steel structures, and is a licensed Professional
, W.F. Denetclaw, C.G. Gutiérrez, S. Hurtado, G.H. John, J. Matsui, R. McGee, C.M. Okpodu, T.J. Robinson, M.F. Summers, M. Werner-Washburne, & M. Zavala. “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM.” CBE Life Sciences Education, vol. 15(3), pp. 1-10, 2016.[5] L.V. Garcia-Felix. “Latinos not engaging in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) careers.” Journal of Academic Perspectives. Vol 4, pp. 1-21, 2019.[6] D. Hernandez, S. Rana, A. Rao, & M. Usselman. “Dismantling stereotypes about Latinos in STEM.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 39(4), pp 436-451, 2017.[7] C. Peralta, M. Caspary, & D. Boothe. “Success factors impacting Latina/o
risk toAfrican-American defendants than to Caucasian defendants (Larson, Mattu, Kirchner & Angwin,2016). New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) has employed the ManhattanTraffic Model that fails to disaggregate transportation data by gender (Perez, 2019), therebyplacing an extra burden on caregivers, predominantly female care workers, who must take multiplebuses to navigate the city's periphery. Software systems used for policing that deploy predictivealgorithms like Chicago's Strategic Subject List (SSL) disproportionately target African Americanindividuals and neighborhoods for increased policing (Brayne 2017; Ferguson 2017; Karppi 2018;Sheehey 2018). The significance of systems that are engineered by technologists for
analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 31, pp. 542–550, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.031.[15] B. Hui and S. Farvolden, “How Can Learning Analytics Improve a Course?,” in Proceedings of the 22Nd Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education, New York, NY, USA, 2017, p. 1:1-1:6, doi: 10.1145/3085585.3085586.[16] C. Brozina and D. Knight, “Learning Management Systems: What More can we Know?,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, Washington, Jun. 2015, p. 26.1072.1-26.1072.14, doi: 10.18260/p.24409.[17] E. Duval et al., “Learning dashboards & learnscapes,” Educ. Interfaces Softw. Technol., pp. 1–5, Jan
: using a randomised control trial to estimate the impact of an at-home lab kit on student attitudes and achievement in a MOOC,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 234-252, 2019.[5] J. Donnell, P. Varney, D. MacNair, A. Ferri, “Optimizing Efficiency and Effectiveness in a Mechanical Engineering Laboratory using Focused Modules,” in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017.[6] J. Ma and J. Nickerson, “Hands-On, Simulated, and Remote Laboratories: A Comparative Literature Review,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, no. 3, 2006.[7] M. Koretsky, C. Kelly, and E. Gummer, “Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual
conceptual knowledge through multiple problem-solving experiences.The PBL labs as described in this paper were implemented for the first time in fall of 2019. Thiswork-in-progress paper mainly focuses on the details of the PBL labs developed, theirimplementation, and the challenges identified from the observations and the students’ coursefeedback collected at the end of the semester. The qualitative information described in this paperis based on the student feedback that was collected as a pilot study to determine the feasibility ofthis research and to investigate the initial implementation outcomes. The author is currently inthe process of developing detailed assessment and survey tools to evaluate the effectiveness ofthe PBL implementation that
role of human-centered design in design for manufacturabilityin engineering.The Context of the Study The study took place in an undergraduate engineering course that introduced 190 studentsto Design for Manufacturability tools and methodologies. In Fall 2019, there were 15 laboratorysections of this course. Each section had 12 to 15 students and was facilitated by two graduateteaching assistants. TAs first received a one-hour training session on human-centered designfrom a Senior Design Strategist at the Design Center, and a one-hour training session onstorytelling techniques from an industrial enterprise and systems engineer. In the first week oflaboratory sessions, the TAs implemented an activity that engaged students in redesigning
diversity-focused nature that promotesresearch collaboration across different types of institutions. ICTAS expects the partnerships toresult in research proposals and the hope is that collaborative partners at Virginia Tech andHBCUs/MSIs maintain their working relationships beyond the duration of funded partnership.During the last three years (2016-2019), 50 awards of $10k were made to help build and fostercollaborative efforts between Virginia Tech faculty and HBCUs/MSIs partners. As a result,twenty-three different HBCUs/MSIs and at a minimum of 38 distinct collaborative pairs wereinvolved in the program. Within Virginia Tech, six colleges and four centers/institutes wereinvolved with the ICTAS D&I Investment, with most of the awards
influences (e.g., weather). Where students might havepreviously been focused on using a written report to regurgitate a standard procedure and presenta single data point with weak contextual connections, here they were able to fit their data puzzlepiece into a larger picture and work collaboratively to hypothesize broader meaning behind it.Evaluating Effectiveness of the Rotational ScheduleOutside of subjective feedback from the instructor and students, the relative newness of theprogram has made more quantitative comparisons with a pre-pandemic lab experiencechallenging. The first iteration of the Introduction to Environmental Engineering course andlaboratory were run during the Summer 2019 semester, as the new laboratory space was beingoutfitted
on that enthusiasm to others.Miss Rachel Lee Tilly, North Carolina State University Rachel will be receiving my B.S. in Chemical Engineering from NC State come May 2019. She is heavily involved with the Goodnight Scholars program as well as the engineering education outreach efforts by the Engineering Place and its partners. She believes it is important to get future generations excited about STEM in any way, shape or form. Developing a passion for something at a young age can be a powerful tool for success in the future. Teaching kids helps remind Rachel why she fell in love with engineering in the first place.Dr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Dr. Laura Bottomley, Teaching Associate Professor
. Lord is a fellow of the ASEE and IEEE and is active in the engineering education community including serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education. She and her coauthors were awarded the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 and 2015 Best Paper Awards for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research.Dr. Breanne Przestrzelski, University of San Diego Bre Przestrzelski