addition to providing numeric CATME feedback, students provided written feedback on teammember strengths and areas in which team members could improve using another assessmenttool, called “I like, I wish” (ILIW) (Calleja, 2020). Students were given the following prompt: “Think about interactions with your teammates, and reflect on your team charter. How are things going? What's working well, and what do you wish might improve? Reflect on each team member, what are 1-2 behaviors that you like, 1-2 behaviors you wish they would take on. Reflect on your own behaviors. Are they consistent with your team values? Is there something that you believe you could improve? Communicate honestly, generously, and clearly
the ECE major. 5. Facilitate student interest in robotics.Theoretical Motivation The theoretical motivation that drove course redesign was centered on evidence-basedpedagogy pointing towards the benefits of project-based learning. Fundamentally, Kolb’sExperiential Learning Model asserts that a cycle of concrete experience, reflective observation,abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation results in higher student learning [10].Implementation of Kolb’s method along with the integration of theory and hands-on practice inand introductory engineering course at Harvey Mudd College saw a statistically significant gainin student learning and an increased enthusiasm amongst female students [5]. To incorporatethese theories, our
will breakdown the results to look at the responses in the individual classesand we as the faculty reflection on what they did (or tried to do) during the transition to onlinelearning. In addition, the results will be put into context with other elements of the surveyevaluating student self-efficacy and outcome expectations. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Our findings suggested that teaching strategies made students feel supported and indicatedthat discussion forums, flexible deadlines, and clear expectations were among the helpful.Keywordsstudent paper, Engineering Education, Online Teaching, Teaching strategies, COIVDFan
school analytics curriculum andeducation to reach underserved students, such as those from rural areas. At least thirty 9th-12thgrade mathematics, computer science, and pre-engineering teachers will participate in AR-DATAand work with faculty mentors, graduate students, curriculum coaches, and industry experts in asix-week RET Summer Program and academic-year follow up to develop and disseminatelearning modules to enhance current curriculum, attain new knowledge of data analytics andengineering applications, and benefit professionally through the RET program activities. Thelearning modules developed will reflect current cutting-edge analytics research, as well as thedevelopment needs of next-generation analytics workforce.KeywordsData Analytics
reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. More at http://srl.tamu.edu and http://ieei.tamu.edu.Dr. Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University Dr. Richard got his Ph. D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1989 and a B. S. at Boston University, 1984. He was at NASA Glenn, 1989-1995, worked at Argonne National Lab, 1996-1997, taught at Chicago State University, 1997-2002. Dr. Richard is an Instructional Associate Professor, Aerospace Engineer and NSF REU Program Director at Texas A&M since 1/03. His research focuses on computational plasma model- ing using particle methods with spectral methods on Maxwell and Boltzmann equations. He has applied the lattice Boltzmann method to study
, somestudents felt that the tools would not prevent them.Conclusion:We hope that using such tools can help instructors quickly detect plagiarism and develop astrategy to address it. The idea is not to use the tool to police cheating but rather to detectopportunities to educate and leverage the cheating incident as a teachable moment [3]. Anyadopted strategy to deal with cheating should be appropriate with transformative experiences oractivities that include reflecting, thinking, and developing new skills and experiences [4].Students who cheat are less likely to attain the course learning objectives. Thus, we shouldprovide them help and assistance to make sense of the experience and develop better decision-making skills. Otherwise, they may develop
with each contacting the shell at a point. In such designs, hoop stress is irrelevant. (iii) Upon curing, some trusses have their bases geometrically distorted as a result of differential curing of individua joints. Initial loading causes the truss (joints and beams) to oriented with the loading axis, which is reflected by small sections of load- displacement relation. (iv) Beams do not fail under external tensile or compressive loads (Figure 3), but bending, which will be covered in subsequent course of ME 2355 Mechanics of Materials. Elastic modulus of the beams is therefore of secondary importance compared with the flexural rigidity. (v) Some joints fail as the glue is not properly cured
: “You just got [the scholarship] becausethey’re looking for girl engineers.” She responded: “I thought it was my hard work that got methe scholarship. I never thought that it was because I was female until he made that comment. Ithought it was just because ‘oh hey, look at me’ and then he said that and it made me feel badabout it.” While these types of responses were rare for soon-to-be graduating students, they weremore common in focus groups of students entering our programs.High sense of belonging, acknowledgment of privilege, power and oppression. The other half ofresponses from students who identify along social identity categories that are centered in USculture also reflected a strong sense of belonging in CBEE, but this group
well as experienced professionals. A seasoned leader and former high school special education teacher, Meeropol reorganized and restructured NSBE’s Programs Division to reflect strategic priorities and make better use of resources. Through its programming, NSBE strives to increase the number of black engineers graduating from college each year and to make Engineering a mainstream word in homes and communities of color. Prior to NSBE, Meeropol served as Assistant Superintendent for Postsecondary & Career Education for the District of Columbia.c American Society for There he oversaw theEngineering $35M/year Education
ofthe summer training. Although the majority strongly agreed (45.2%) or agreed (45.2%) with thepace, 7.7% thought the training session might have been too long. To address this potentialissue, a preliminary interest survey for the 2018 professional development workshop askedapplicants if they prefer a two-week training with weekends free or a delivery of nine days in arow. The results were split, and therefore the 2018 training will be delivered in the sametimeframe but with additional sessions for reflection. Table 3. ACADEME Fellows perceptions of the quality of the professional development workshop Statement % % Agree % Strongly
) Facilitated Discussion with Attendees – Attendees will have the opportunity to reflect on presented findings. Guided questions will be used to facilitate discussion on how attendees can implement the findings to better understand and support Black women in academic and professional STEM environments. (10 minutes) Debrief and Resources – Presenters will summarize the discussion by highlighting key points and provide resources for content and continued connection.Reference1. U.S. Department of Education National Center of Educational Statistics: National Studyof America: Indicators of Social and Economic well-Being. Retrieved on August, 28, 2014 fromhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/cwg/data-on-women.
Undergraduate Education (VALUE) rubric from the Associationof American Colleges and Universities (AACU) [4]. Figure 4 shows the adapted VALUErubric which students completed for each presentation. Figure 4. Adapted peer evaluation rubric based on Oral Communication VALUE rubric from AACU [4].All groups received an average score of 4 from their peers in each category except for the“What’s in a Lever” group which received a 3 in Organization and Delivery with studentscommenting on the lack of clarity in the video. The authors noted that not all comments fromstudents were reflected in the peer evaluation scoring. For example one student commentedon “Is Elastigirl ‘Stretchier’ than a Rubber Band” that the “material seemed a
pedagogy [1]. John Dewey [8] who is most commonly associatedwith the theory of experiential learning described this learning approach as simply ‘learning bydoing”. This echos Confucius’s famous quote that states the following: I hear and I forgot, I seeand I remember, I do and I understand. Critical pedagogy is a philosophy of education and socialmovement. Critical pedagogy includes relationships between teaching and learning. Itsproponents claim that it is a continuous process of what they call "unlearning", "learning", and"relearning", "reflection", "evaluation", and the impact that these actions have on the students, inparticular students whom they believe have been historically and continue to be disenfranchisedby what they call "traditional
the overall lessons we learned from this experience and discuss next summer’splans as a result of our analysis and self-reflections.1. IntroductionIn recent years, Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) educators,professionals, business leaders, and policymakers have recognized and highlighted therequirement to build a strong and technologically trained workforce. This requires a strongeducation system with qualified and trained educators. While the American college leveleducators are willing to train this workforce, the K-12 education system is currently challengedby a crisis of inadequate teacher preparation in STEM disciplines leading to low studentpreparation and performance1. Furthermore, the K-12 science teachers will be
teach engineers how to effectively workin teams [11, 12]. Pandemic is a cooperative game where players are members of a Center forDisease Prevention and control team tasked with treating and curing four global diseases. As acooperative game, players only win against the game instead of against each other. In that study,we found, through reflection and experiential learning, the students were able to not only extractproper teamwork but also put it into practice [11, 12].However, we recognize the Pandemic game does not cover all teamwork skills and may onlysimulate the use of other skills at a mediocre level. As such, the goal of this work in progress isto identify other commercial games capable to address the shortcomings of Pandemic for upper
varioussituations such as: lack of awareness, general disinterest for their studies, struggle interpretinghomework or assignments, difficulties when expressing themselves both written and verbally,lack of reading habits, little or no discipline for studying, little retention of acquired knowledge,and low grade reflection, independence, and/or generalization. These situations, when added tothe fact that the course requires the use of mental processes that are generally complex andrequire creativity, ingenuity, and discipline, can cause a high desertion rate and a low retentionrate. This is, consequently, reflected in the low passing rate, which is currently about 35%.Second, the teaching method being implemented by many faculty has lost sight of the fact
degree of organic pollutionin the samples. The scientific principle of the experiment is to measure the oxygenconsumption due to biological organisms in the wastewater. The sample has to keep in asealed container fitted with a pressure sensor. Pellets of sodium hydroxide that absorb carbondioxide are added in the container above the sample level. As time passes, oxygen isconsumed and carbon dioxide is released, which will then be absorbed by sodium hydroxide,and thus the pressure in the container decreases. From the drop of pressure, the sensorelectronics computes and displays the consumed quantity of oxygen, which reflects theamount of organic pollutants in the wastewater.We observed active cross-disciplinary collaborations throughout the whole
that faculty grades are based on academic achievement and externalgraders are based on project success. These reflect two unique perspectives on the capstoneprocess, which leads to future studies related to what bias affect the scores of faculty andexternal judges.IntroductionEast Carolina University’s Department of Engineering (ECU’s DoE) is a general engineeringprogram offering five discipline specific concentrations. ECU’s DoE has a two semester longSenior Capstone Design program that spans two distinct courses. The first semester requiresstudents to compete a conceptual level design for an industry sponsored project. The secondsemester requires students to complete a detailed design and often requires build/test objectivesbe completed. The
the course, reflection on factors that would encourage ordiscourage students from pursuing their projects, and employment status during and after thecourse. The results of the interviews were assessed through thematic content analysis. Theinterviews suggest that (1) that students do not continue with their projects because they cannottake time away from the paying jobs that are supporting their education, (2) that studentscompleting their junior year do not want to take time away from their senior-year studies, and(3) that students completing their senior year do not want to take the risk of pursuing a startupwhen they could instead obtain a “real” job. Additionally, student startups appear to have beendiscouraged by their expectation in the
representation reflecting the designer’s interpretation of the current situationand desired situation. Consequently, problem framing is an essential part of the engineeringdesign process. Also, engineering design situations often involve multiple, conflicting views andstandpoints, which requires engineers to consider various contexts including both technical andnon-technical issues in structuring and representing a design problem for the situation. Jonassenet al. (2006) illustrate that an engineering design problem involves a variety of goals andconstraints that sometimes contradict each other and include not only technical but also non-technical factors. In terms of the non-technical goals and constraints, they state that engineeringdesign
• Individualism versus Collectivism (IDV)• Masculinity versus Femininity (MAS)• Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI)• Long-Term Orientation (LTO) Top 5 Nationalities Represented in the COE Power Distance IndexHIGH LOWHofstede’s Theory of Cultural Dimensions• Power Distance (PDI)• Individualism versus Collectivism (IDV) o A society's position on this dimension is reflected in whether people’s self-image is defined in terms of “I” or “we.”• Masculinity versus Femininity (MAS)• Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI)• Long-Term Orientation (LTO) Top 5 Nationalities Represented at the COE Individualism vs. CollectivismIND COLHofstede’s Theory
experience guidance/training 3. Impact on students who serve is4. Impact on those served can be documented through reflective, (and is) documented qualitative, and quantitative methods Community Service Learning at West Point• Tasked with building an experiential independent study project for every Civil Engineering Student• Only had 1-2 per year; needed 16-20 per year• Developed projects in 3 areas: – UG Research – Competition – Community Service 4 Service Projects at West Point• FBI Training Facility• Reconfiguration of training facilities for Homeland Security
] [A,B] Coursera Udacity [A,D] 2 yr. college [A,D] [A] K-12 Non-CompletionA changing environment: The dynamic demographic 3trend is certainly reflected at the Ph.D. level. * *Engineering is affected more: Only ~38% PhDs are US citizen or permanent residentSource: Info Brief NSF 12-303Targeted investment in Engineering
available.Results: Both engineers and non-engineers show increases in learning outcomes and confidenceas illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. Females attain par with male students in design self-confidence. Figure 1: Increases in Engineering Students’ Figure 2: Changes in a non-engineers’ explanation of Confidence and Success, and Decrease in Anxiety how a toaster works. Pre and post test results. using [4].Acknowledgement: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under award1650889. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References:1. Sarfaraz, A.R., and T.A. Shraibati, (2004, June), Responding to
-actionable problem statement that summarizes the needs centered design and readings on topics such theand insights identified through interviews with healthcare development of medical expertise, types of cognitive bias,professionals. Methods recommended for formulating and clinical decision-support systems. Through individualactionable problem statements include creating a Madlib or reflection and class discussion of the interviews withwant ad. However, such approaches did not resonate with healthcare professionals, the students identify actionableour student group. In this presentation, we describe our problem statements pertinent to health informationexperiences using Twitter as a method for students to
system.were calculated as the weighted total of scores on the key In conclusion, a personalized quantitative facultymeasures. Overall evaluation score was then calculated evaluation metrics and score system is developed andbased the scores in the 3 areas weighted by faculty member’s successfully implemented in our department. It is anefforts distribution in the 3 areas. objective, consistent, quantitative, flexible, transparent, and dynamic scoring system that reflects faculty performance in3. Results three areas (i.e., teaching, research and service). This To
in-1. Introduction class discussions which helped students overcome their Students, who are actively engaged in learning, learn confusion or misconceptions on the topic(s) learned. Theymore [1, 2]. The purpose of a think-pair-share activity is to eventually were able to successfully solve the problem(s)put the teaching and learning into the hands of the students. by taking turns in explaining the concepts and problemResearch has shown that student-led reflection and solving techniques.organized discussion will lead to greater learning outcomes 3.1 Evaluation Results and Conclusionsthan simply
. The purpose of this paper isto reflect on the increase of blended learning course formats and provide evidence of studentsatisfaction and cost savings using a quality assessment model. While the research on blendedlearning is just beginning, colleges and universities are seeing the pedagogical advantages. It ishoped that this paper will get a dialog started. The blended classroom: Is it the best of bothworlds?Theoretical BackgroundWhat is blended learning?The traditional face-to-face classroom is still the norm in most universities. With the availabilityof Web-based technologies, numerous classes also include a Website where students have access
engineering management students. Changes were made toan introductory sophomore level EM class. Students were required to participate in life-long learning activities including reading business books and interviewing managers.These activities were graded as part of the required course. Additionally, the studentswere asked to identify learning activities they would complete the semester following thecourse – which would not be reflected in their grades. Recommendations forincorporating life-long learning initiatives in the engineering management undergraduatecurriculum are also presented.Introduction The current ABET guidelines place an emphasis on life-long learning for ourundergraduate students. In the report “Engineering Change: A Study of the
may enhance creativity. Texts from antiquity have survived and been translated which provide wonderfulexamples that are germane to modern circumstances. The successful Socratic methods areidealized in Plato’s works as a humbling succession in prodding the mind to reflect via directquestioning inquiry. The outcome to be expected is that mental gymnastics provide the exercisethat generates good habits of critical thinking. These were espoused at Plato’s Academy whereAristotle, it’s most famous student, developed logic, categorized the early fields of study thatform the basis of many of today’s disciplines, and evolved more practical uses of learning withinthe peripatetic school. These are many of the bricks of the foundation of Western