of variances that could be minimized, but not completelyremoved from the data. For example, the time of day, daylight and the weather conditions, and theASEE Annual Conference, 2015amount of light transmitted through the windows are all variable that can only be controlled to somedegree during the project. Options to minimize the false readings of the light reflected is to take the foot-candle reading for the lights off and blinds up, and subtract it from the reading from the lights on and theblinds up. With this, the light reflected by the windows can be somewhat removed and not considered asa contributing factor in the lighting.Another variance in the project is the amount of lamps that were burn out during the data collectionprocess. In
electrical engineering courses as well), but it is no replacement for repetition of key calculations that must be preserved in learning activities. Related excerpts from student feedback: 1. “Most of the band diagram concepts would have been difficult to grasp in a traditional lecture. It seemed like the video lectures helped, but actually drawing them out in class under different conditions (positive voltage applied to one side, currents in different locations, etc) really helped solidify the concepts.” 2. “Anytime the videos introduced a new equation to use… using it in class and breaking down each component helped clarify the most.” Excerpt from instructor’s own reflection
electrical engineering, computer engineering and computer science students. DLD,as the course is locally known, has long enjoyed a reputation as a fun class, and it’s been apopular choice for non-majors as an elective. In recent years, rapidly increasing class size and amove to a larger lecture hall resulted in an increased barrier between the instructor and thestudents; students became more passive and absenteeism increased. Hence there was a need toincrease student engagement, to help overcome the barriers created by increasing class sizes, andto restore the sense of fun.DLD has been a topic of considerable interest at ASEE for many years and recent ASEEpublications reflect several trends. The prevalent use of hardware description languages (HDL
) Average Start of Semester 4.0396 3.4322 3.9299 4.0403 Average End of Semester 4.3990 3.6449 3.9650 4.1044 Difference (End ‐ Start) 0.3594 0.2127 0.0351 0.0641 P value (Rank Sum Test) 0.000*** 0.076 0.863 0.0065**These results may be a reflection of the ways in which each of the institutions addresses theengineering disciplines in the first semester. A prior study by Hoit and Ohland reported up to17% increase in retention based on the redesign of a first-year engineering course to focus ondisciplinary knowledge.9 The Urban Public institution’s first-year engineering program
misunderstandings in communication,factionalism, and disagreements between teammates 15–17. On the other hand, the great advantageof working in multicultural teams is that people from different backgrounds bring a broaderrange of perspectives, points of view and ideas to the team discussion that ultimate lead to morerobust, flexible and innovative solutions 15,18,19. Culture’s structural organization and practices are often reflected on team-member’sperspectives and expectations of team dynamics. In hierarchical, context-orientated cultures such Page 26.1177.2as China and Mexico, levels of authority are well defined and interdependence from others in
redundancy. MSE-2 was removed because of redundancies withMSE-1 and to reduce the length of the final MSE-SE scale. MSE-3 was also removed forunclear wording (i.e., because of the initial use of the term qualities rather than properties).Because MSE-7 and MSE-8 were examining the same concepts as MSE-9, they were removedfrom the scale. MSE-10 was similar to MSE-11 and hence removed. MSE-16 was removed as itwas similar to MSE-15. After discussion, both MSE-17 and MSE-18 were eliminated becausethese concepts were emphasized in general chemistry classes. MSE-20 was also taken out of thescale because some of the course instructors did not believe the reflected content that wasadequately covered during the course (time constraints in certain sections of
other, the Mechanix system has very important contributions to make to learning, some ofwhich are already being realized. Student comments confirmed that Mechanix reinforced theproblem solving process, and offered incremental help throughout that process that studentsvalued (although students did suggest help messages could be more clear.) The software’sindication that a problem was correct up to a certain point helped students focus their learning;they did not have to backtrack to check that an earlier error was propagating to the final answer.Students expressed that this was especially helpful for complicated problems, but for simpleproblems Mechanix was no better than paper and pencil. Students also reflected that while theyfound sketching
these factors, it is common for themto interrupt their academic progress for a semester or two, and pick it up later (or even drop it). Inaddition, these students can only take one or two courses each semester. However, for those whopersevere, they are usually more motivated and often possess a genuine interest to learn theengineering concepts. Furthermore, the online learning environment is conducive to a morereflective mode of learning in which students take time to reflect and relate course materials totheir own professional and life experience [12,13]. Many of our colleagues with long careers inengineering education feel that these students are a joy to teach and some are their best students.Another triumphs of the program is the use of
their professional career Page 26.1236.2objectives in a civil engineering-related field.”[4] Reflective of these mission statements, thereexists common desire for classes and material covered within the education plan of civilengineering students to prepare them for the profession after they graduate.Universities generally undergo ABET certification because, as noted in the ABET website,“accreditation is proof that a collegiate program has met certain standards necessary to producegraduates who are ready to enter their professions.”[5] For students, accreditation of a programmeans that the school “knows their profession's dynamic and emerging
difficulty. The “HW Score” is the score that the student will actually receive for this homework (a constant factor multiplied by the Mastery Score, capped at 100%). The “Do a recommended question” button will take the student to a randomly chosen question with a high recommendation rating, or they can click on a specific question to do it directly.the student has a mastery score that reflects PrairieLearn’s estimate of the student’s ability on thishomework assignment. To increase their mastery score, the student must answer questionscorrectly, in any order they choose. A student can attempt a question as many times as they like(whether answering correctly or incorrectly), but question parameters are randomized on
determines the lower asymptote as θgoes to negative infinity. For questions where there is no chance of guessing, setting cj = 0yields the two-parameter logistic model (2PLM), whereas making the assumption that allquestions have the same aj yields the Rasch model (1PLM). Extensions to settings with multipleresponse options or where θ is multidimensional are available, but we will focus only on the caseof dichotomous responses reflecting a unidimensional underlying construct.If the question parameters are known, as is the case for a test composed of well-researched andvalidated items, then estimation of student ability level is a straightforward single variable
consistent with literature on introducing conceptsof race as a social construction to college-level classes13. Therefore, we sought to find a differentway to engage students on issues of race that broadened the conversation to issues ofenvironment, socioeconomic context, and marginalization/privilege for the second year of theexperiment.Using science to achieve health equity. Ethnic minorities are more likely than Whiteindividuals to receive poor health care14, 15. These disparities in key areas of health, whilealarming, reflect the realities of ethnic minorities’ social environments (i.e., racism,discrimination, and race-related stress), and are not simply the consequence of individualbehaviors and choices16. Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems
-expandedconstructs of false thinking and Bodenständigkeit or autochthony – sometimes calledgroundedness. These two constructs can be readily applied to the enterprise of engineeringeducation to better situate the engineer in the world and to discuss his place relative to his role insociety, his job, his colleagues, and related institutions. While there are many tools to evaluateengineering thinking and even emergent ones to evaluate divergent and creative thought, tools toevaluate the lack of thinking or thoughtlessness are not pervasive. Heidegger’s philosophyprovides reflections to better understand false thinking, grounded thought, and potentially aconstruct for delimiting thought or thoughtlessness – three constructs from which our moderntechnological
ThreeAbstractThree years ago, Texas A&M University held a summer camp to improve outreach to highschools and encourage interest in aerospace engineering. A critical evaluation three years laterevaluates the successes and revisions by the department. In an effort to improve the studentexperience, each subsequent camp reflects on lessons learned from previous camps, and thelatest camp is no different.In early years, additions included having practicing engineers participate in camp and integratingdifferent design tracks using a systems approach. In the most recent version of the camp, thestructure was modified significantly to accommodate additional students and provide anadditional field of interest. In addition to the previous aircraft and rocket tracks
elements: purpose, compensation,and a definite period of prior service in the institution.” We shall discuss each of these elementsin turn.Purpose: Bennett and Krueger3 claim “sabbatical leaves for faculty are important (to theindividual) because they serve to promote their professional development by providingopportunities for reflection, artistic creation, research, innovation in teaching, and professionalexploration.” Sabbatical leaves with industry for engineering faculty, from the point of view ofthe institution, is a form of personnel exchange. ASEE4 has taken a position that “time spent byengineering faculty and graduate students in industry can enhance transfer of new technologiesto industry, as well as provide practical experience and an
different disciplines (electrical, mechanical, etc.) to work in anenvironment that reflects how engineers work in the real world. Our vertical integration methodenables sub-cohorts from different years to work together on different stages of projects in a PBLsetting. The objectives of the SPIRIT program will ensure an interdisciplinary environment thatenhances technical competency through learning outcomes that seek to improve critical skillssuch as intentional learning, problem solving, teamwork, management, interpersonalcommunications, and leadership.Support for the student scholars participating in this program incorporates several existingsupport services offered by the host institution and school, including a university productdevelopment
the soon-to-be-graduates may have to do with the supplementalactivities and challenges incorporated into it.II – Revision of the Senior Professional Seminar at TCNJThe average class sizes at the School of Engineering at TCNJ are about 24 students - with arange of 18 to 30. The senior seminars however, are exceptions to this range. They do have thelargest enrollments ranging from 30 to 42 students. But this is by design as discussed here.Five years ago, we decided to re-evaluate and revise our senior seminar course. In this process,we designed and added a few more exciting challenges. These challenges, exposures, andadditional activities have provided the participants with the opportunity to: a) reflect upon andshow-case their future goals, b
have developed case studies that reflect the role of national “technologicalculture” in the diverse American and Dutch responses to the risk of flooding (which involvesstudents performing calculations as well as reading and discussion relevant fiction, and builds toan in-class design experience); that consider the capabilities and the complexities of improvedprosthetic designs for competitive athletes; and that describe the interdependence of the historyof aviation, and airplane design evolution, with engineering beam theory. Our approach to theinclusion of professional ethics in technical coursework appreciates the reasoning of Lynch andKline18-19, and focuses on “culturally embedded engineering practice.” Several of the case studiesalso
answers are rather vague in the student’s ears. Typical answers might be thatmathematics constitutes the basis for all scientific disciplines, that calculations underlie most studywork, that a good understanding of mathematics enables you to think clearly and logically and makeabstractions based on the present situation. Even less constructive responses might be thatmathematics reflects the beauty of nature, or that everything in nature can be explained inmathematical terms. These things may be true, but such answers are not helpful in relation to the Page 26.1402.2students’ ongoing struggle with arithmetic.One way of attacking the relevance
strongcollaboration with an individual lab instructor, as even the best experimental apparatus will notbe used if an instructor does not see the value of incorporating it into their course. It also seemsthat teams who incorporate pedagogical research produce more sophisticated apparatus from adesign perspective. Finally, reflections of the students involved in the development of theseexperiments are examined in order to gain insight into how students perceive and usepedagogical information in their designs.IntroductionIt has been established by a number of authors that laboratory experiments and experimentalapparatus can be effectively designed by undergraduate students. There are a number of reasonsto use undergraduate students to create lab experiments
their “favorite ASEE program or event” was a “talk on researchrelated to underrepresentation in engineering” and another respondent noted partnering withminority-serving organizations like Society of Women Engineers for events, which addressesMission IV. However, this aspect of the Mission was not adequately addressed in the survey. Themajority of respondents were female, however that may not be reflective of Student Chaptersassisting underrepresented groups to seek careers in engineering and engineering technology.Lastly, one response discussed the need for their ASEE Student Chapter to promote internship Page 26.236.7and fellowship
betranslated to 3 dimensional figure using inherent features. These are completely dimensionaldriven and use geometric relationships to reflect reality as close as possible based on the designintent 16.Students were given hands-on live tutorials on how to use SolidWorks® software tocreate and model the design of their intent. Figure 3 illustrates a sample 3D LEGO® part modelcreated by students. Page 26.269.5 Figure 3: 3D LEGO® Part Model Created in SolidWorks®Using uPrint® SE Plus 3D PrinteruPrint® SE Plus 3-D printer manufactured by Stratasys technologies was used to bring thestudent designed parts to life. This printer uses
designproject.There are some differences in the nature of the work compared between the two settings, firstthat the Tech 120 work is tied directly to a design project, while the PPI work could be a designprocess artifact, but was more typically a longer written document, more like a typical first-yearEnglish paper. In addition, the Tech 120 artifact is the result of teamwork, so it is unclear if thebibliography is the work of a particular student, or a reflection of the skills for the whole team.Meanwhile, the PPI assignment is for the individual, so individual learning gains are beingmeasured more directly, one of the stated benefits of badges in education.For PPI the incomplete rate (30.3%) is indicative of a failure to complete the course and receiptof an
National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation
complement the scientificliteracy portion of the SLIGS. Creation of a direct assessment, such as a concept quiz orassessment of class assignments, will allow for another means to assess improvement inscientific literacy without the chance for self-reporting bias seen by others.5 It is still importantfor the students to reflect on their own learning through the SLIGS. Studies have shown thatreflection allows for students to practice “scaffolding” which is the process of linking currentlearning to previous knowledge, an important skill for all students, especially engineers.6 Page 26.412.13 12Another
through understanding rather than memorization and copying. Learning how to think, how to self reflect, how to take personal responsibility for learning, and the development of expert problem solving skills are all reasons why this style of teaching is life changing for many students.Mr. Mostafa Amin-Naseri, Iowa State University Mostafa Amin-Naseri, is a masters student in industrial engineering in Iowa State University. He is interested in data mining and statistical analysis. He applies data analysis to educational data, building learner models and reporting tools for instructors, in order to evaluate and enhance educational systems and methods.Prof. Stephen B Gilbert, Iowa State University Stephen B. Gilbert
this paper is an Introduction to Engineeringcourse at a large public university in the United States (US), which includes about 30%international students (29% identify their home country as somewhere besides the US),and students in this first-year course will matriculate into all engineering disciplines atthe university. This unique section included assignments contextualized for internationalclients as well as direct interactions with international stakeholders via email/Skype.Background and LiteratureConceptual FrameworkThis study fits into the paradigm of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, as itincludes journals and reflections from the instructor and course team as well asinformation on student learning and performance on
QFD Page 19.6.10 Figure 6: An illustrative example of the final design concept3. Course EvaluationAt conclusion of the course, course participants were asked to voluntarily complete ananonymous questionnaire designed to solicit their reflections, satisfactions, and suggestions oftheir learning experience. A total of 56 responses were received. The accumulated results arepresented with respect to (1) the pedagogy of inverted, interactive and international learning; (2)project-based learning; (3) technology-enhanced learning.3.1 Evaluation of Inverted, Interactive and International LearningThis section presents participant’s satisfaction with the inverted
internationalmentoring project that pairs U.S. women of color in engineering with a prominent international Page 19.28.2engineer in their field and the participation of a delegation of GEESN participants at twointernational conferences 1) The Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of EngineeringInstitutions (LACCEI) and 2) the World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF). This paperprovides an overview of the literature and promising practices that inspired the formation of theGEESN initiative, as well as the development of both project components. To conclude, thepaper discusses the next steps for the GEESN and reflects on the potential for expanding andreplicating
that the entirecourse contained 171 PowerPoint slides, 5 academic papers, 2 handouts, 1 sample quiz and 20worksheets that involved individual and/or group reflection, composition, discussion and reportout. In this Phase I of the project, the objective is to establish a baseline picture of the SMEpopulation. 100 SMEs from the more than 1000 available have been targeted to be participants inENG1069 and to help align the course with industry requirements and direction. Phase II of thisproject is currently being built. In the following paragraphs we get an overview of the participantecology with regard to gender, age and other demographic information that establishes thecurrent makeup of the company SME base