Ohio State University, M.S. and Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. He holds a Professional Engineer certification and worked as an Engineer and Engineering Manager in industry for 20 years before teaching. His interests include project management, robotics /automation and air pollution dispersion modeling. Page 11.1420.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Utilizing Collaboration for a Real World Engineering EducationAbstractIt is becoming increasingly difficult for educational institutions to offer quality engineeringprograms. The costs associated with laboratory and related
Session 2426 The platform allows faculty and students to develop and conduct Internet based labprojects and our development process provides a case study for constructing similar cost-effective systems in other areas for research and teaching based on Internet technology. Webelieve that this can significantly change the way science and engineering are taught andlearned in both secondary and post-secondary educational systems. The new approach is cost-effective, easily accessible by everyone, useful in promoting "learning by doing," and indeveloping a student’s capability and motivation to engage in lifelong learning. Our eventualvision is a National Internet-Based Laboratory for Research and Education that providesstate-of-art facilities and
. Page 8.806.6 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationReferences1. Backman, L. 1993. “Computer-aided liability,” Civil Engineering 63(6). ASCE. pp. 40-43.2. Behr, R. A. 1996. “Computer simulations versus real experiments in a portable structural mechanics laboratory,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 4(1). John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. pp. 9-18.3. Belarbi, A., Behr, R. A., Karson, M. J., and Effland, G. E. 1994. “Formal assessment of the AN/EX structural engineering teaching laboratory,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 2(2). John Wiley and Sons, Inc
Caine8 state thatthe brain learns optimally when appropriately challenged, but downshifts under perceived threat.The aforementioned self-efficacy enhancement activities are applied in the Computer IntegratedManufacturing (CIM) course at the University of Southern Colorado in the IndustrialEngineering Program. The CIM course is a senior-level design-based course dealing withmodern technologies such as automation, computer-numerically controlled (CNC) machines androbotics. The CIM laboratory curriculum includes hands-on experiences with programmablelogic controllers (PLC), CNC mills and robots. PLCs are industrial grade computers usedextensively in automation. In this study, we concentrate on the PLC experience. A set oflaboratory exercises based
-38855 Wernigerode, Germany +49 3943 659-322 gwoestenkuehler@hs-harz.deAbstractIn this paper, a curriculum for an introductory digital electronics course using VHDL based on a customdesigned development board is presented. The development board is centered on the ispM4A CPLD.The development of the CPLD teaching aid is the direct result of collaboration between engineeringfaculty at Hochschule Harz (University of Applied Studies and Research) in Wernigerode, Germany andSouthern Polytechnic State University in Marietta, Georgia, USA. The discussion that follows includesan overview of VHDL in engineering education, an overview of the ispM4A, a design review of theteaching
is executed via the NXT. Occasionally a situation arisesthat demands that both the instructor and the group of students work as a team to resolve theproblem. This allows the instructor to be included in the student’s plan and refrain frominterjecting a sophisticated solution that may be above the student’s level of comprehension.These situations benefit both the student and the instructor and can only be obtained fromexperience.IntroductionSince the Fall 2009 semester, the approach used in teaching the course Introduction to TechnicalProblem Solving (ME 105) has been based on the model discussed in the paper ComputerApplications in Mechanical Engineering2. The mode of delivery is two 50-minute lectures and Proceedings of the 2015
distributed and renewable energy technology research. Weaver is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Illinois. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Michigan Technological University.Jeremy John Worm P.E., Michigan Technological University Jeremy John Worm is the Director of the Mobile Sustainable Transportation Laboratory at Michigan Tech and a Research Engineer in the Advanced Power Systems Research Center. Worm teaches several courses pertaining to hybrid vehicles, and IC engines. In addition to teaching, his research interests include internal combustion engines, alternative fuels, and vehicle hybridization. Prior to coming to Michigan Tech, Worm was a Lead
Paper ID #45552Multiple Instructors in a Flipped Classroom EnvironmentProf. Sean Walker, University of South Alabama Dr. Walker is an Associate Professor at the University of South Alabama in Mobile, AL and Program Coordinator of the Systems Engineering Program. They received their Ph.D. in Systems Design Engineering from the University of Waterloo, in Waterloo, Canada, in 2012. Dr. Walker has taught at the University of South Alabama since 2016 and has won multiple teaching awards from Mortar Board and Tau Beta Pi. Sean’s research interests include Engineering Education, Sociotechnical Systems, and Sustainable
grading implementations: laboratory and research courses The specifications grading approach was implemented in two semesters of a largeundergraduate research course and a co-instructed chemical engineering senior laboratory courseat the University of Connecticut both had a variety of individual and group assessments. Thegrading scheme was explained to the students on the first day of both courses along with a duedate matrix for assessments. The student evaluations of teaching after the first semester indicatedmixed feelings regarding the grading scheme. Based on this feedback, the instructors made themotivation for using specifications grading more transparent and provided handouts withchecklists to the students during the second semester
is not an ABET requirement.Traditionally, surveying courses have emphasized lecture sessions covering surveying principlesand methodologies, complemented by laboratory exercises particular to various surveyingmethods and utilizing surveying instruments [5]. However, alongside this conventional approach,PBL is being introduced, offering students hands-on experience in applying theoreticalknowledge to real-world scenarios [4]. PBL encourages critical thinking, interdisciplinarycollaboration, and the development of essential professional skills such as problem-solving,communication, and project management. Prince and Felder present strong evidence thatinductive teaching methods are more effective than traditional deductive teaching methods
Jordan) have been significantly involved in this process. This effort has beenrecognized through recent funding of a state equipment grant for an instructional laboratory anda large grant of over $600,000 from NSF for institutionalizing our reform efforts in the COES.The education faculty assists the collaboration by combining the strength of their knowledge ofthe teaching/learning process with the COES’s "hands-on" approach to teaching engineeringscience principles. Our course brings a tremendous opportunity for secondary and elementaryeducation majors to see science "jump from the page" through challenges to their priorconceptions, interactive discovery of new ideas, and a synthesis of a stronger foundation ofknowledge.V. AssessmentOne
. inognize themselves as stakeholders instead of mere recipients chemical engineering from NUS in 2011. Heof knowledge can be a productive, beneficial, and agreeable teaches courses in kinetics, process design, and food technology, and is enthusiasticalternative for all. Stakeholders as defined by Nuseibeh and about the use of technology in teaching andEasterbrook[1] are “individuals or entities who stand to gain learning and promoting student engagement
willing to learn and share ideas. In theseevents, faculty bring a lunch, CERTI provides dessert, and various topics are presented anddiscussed, such as end-of-semester course evaluations, academic dishonesty, classroomdisruption management, best practices in laboratories, and technology tools for teaching (thelatter presented in conjunction with the educational technology office).Instructors from engineering disciplines have made up about one-third of the attendance for thepast two years at faculty development events, followed closely by those in the hard sciences andProceedings of the 2012 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education
, laboratory courses have strengthened this knowledge by allowing hands-onapplication. This tradition is further strengthened by teaching simulation techniques to thestudents. This Analyze/Simulate/Experiment philosophy allows students better catch theirmistakes as they are less likely to make the same mistake in all phases. The associations may beindicated as shown below. re Co pa m m pa Co
newgraduates from other areas difficult. The model that is evolving provides only upper divisioninstruction from the degree granting institution. Upper division instruction is provided through theuse of interactive live-broadcast lectures and classes that combine students from the distant and maincampus locations. A regional university center hosts the laboratories required for upper divisionstudents and is centrally located with respect to the population distribution. This approach requiresthe development of partnerships with the region’s community colleges to provide the explicit lowerdivision curriculum that students require to meet their degree objectives.This paper will describe the model in its current state of evolution and report on its
Tagliatela College of Engineering at University ofNew Haven takes a multipronged approach to the teaching of process safety. This includesintegration of SAChE Modules into most required Chemical Engineering courses, safetyactivities in the unit operations laboratory, incorporation of safety topics in the ChemicalEngineering Design sequence, and the availability of an optional Process Safety course. Thisapproach is in keeping with the programs philosophy that integration of topics is the bestapproach to support learning of critical concepts and skills. This approach is also consistent witheducational psychology principles that learners are better able to incorporate concepts when theyare offered in context and at an appropriate level of complexity.At
evaluations by students can prompt a bitter discussionbetween professors about the effectiveness of teaching versus the likability of the professor.Evaluations in general have long been the topic of disgruntled professors and students.A transformed ergonomics lab structure resulted in low student evaluations prompting a quickfix using active collaborative learning techniques. The results of active collaboration on theinstructor evaluation were surprising. A substantial increase in perceived teaching effectivenessbased on a 5-point Likert scale shows the positive effect of active collaborative learning in theergonomics industrial engineering laboratory and classroom
this goal by sharing our findings with thenext cohort of Teaching Assistants in our department. We see an opportunity to build communityamong the Graduate Students that will have their first teaching experience and more experiencedfellows in our department.ConclusionsStudents perceived a sense of community in the classroom and the laboratory, and they perceivedthat building a strong community requires deliberate efforts to connect with people. As noted bythe laboratory instructor, students actively engaged during the weekly meetings and mademeaningful connections inside and outside their assigned teams. Students felt that class contentwas delivered, and communication drove the teams forward. Students expressed their motivationto work further
with experienced researchers in a Community of Practice (e.g.,faculty, postdoctoral researchers, and graduate students in a laboratory setting). Outcomes ofthese experiences include increased STEM knowledge and experience, scientific researchpractices, career awareness, and STEM self-efficacy and identity. RET programs typically aim tosupport translation of research into classroom practices through curricular development by aProfessional Learning Community, which leads to improvements in STEM teaching andlearning, and includes outcomes such as increased persistence in STEM teaching andpedagogical content knowledge (Krim et al., 2019).The Berkeley Engineering Research Experiences for Teachers plus Data Science (BERET+D) isan example of one such
problems4.3. Lab work structure One of the components that integrates the Mechanics I course that needed deep reformwas the laboratory, mainly concerning lab classes. Former written protocols were abandoned. These were produced by the instructor whogave a rigid orientation, leaving no room for students’ creativity. Quite often students did notprepare their work properly and were passively following protocols. Although being 1st yearstudents with little lab experience, the new learning-teaching paradigm clearly pointed inanother direction. A new challenge was being proposed to the students. They would have to Page 15.237.7create and implement
Publishing, 2021.16. Deniz, Sabri, Ulf Christian Müller, Ivo Steiner, and Thomas Sergi. "Online (remote) teaching for laboratory based courses using “digital twins” of the experiments." Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 144, no. 5 (2022): 051016.17. Maksimović, Mirjana, and Nikola Davidović. "The role of Digital Twin technology in transforming engineering education." In 9th International scientific conference Technics and Informatics in Education, pp. 264-270. 2022.18. Zacher, Serge. "Digital twins for education and study of engineering sciences." International Journal on Engineering, Science and Technology 2, no. 2 (2020): 61-69.19. Sepasgozar, Samad ME. "Digital twin and web-based virtual gaming technologies for
relationship between K-5 educators and scientist mentors allowed for the integrationof the NGSS into their research experience. Educators were encouraged to ask questions, analyzedata, design solutions, and obtain, evaluate, and communicate information. This structurefacilitated relationships and scientific debates that deepened their understanding of theengineering problem and process. The educators had authentic engineering experience in thecentralized teaching laboratory during morning sessions, followed by afternoon sessionsdedicated to curriculum development. The K-5 educators integrated the engineering design skillsinto classroom applications by creating STEM-inspired curricula, which facilitated technical andPD relationships.The afternoon
AbstractIn this paper, we describe an exploratory study to support efforts in revising first-year coursesrequired for engineering students. It is common to include some form of introductoryprogramming or spreadsheet computation topics in first-year courses. The inclusions of thesetopics is ostensibly to provide foundational computational skills needed in later courses.However, there are many challenges associated with teaching and learning these skills, the leastof which is selecting which skills to include in the finite time allotted for a first-year introductorycourse that may also be tasked with teaching foundational problem solving and professionalskills. This study is the first stage towards identifying a core set of skills for inclusion that
. Oscilloscope measurements are also used in themajority of labs for voltage measurements of AC signals. Most of the labs require thestudents to demonstrate a particular skill for the Teaching Assistant, such as performing aparticular measurement reading.Procedure:During the spring, summer, and fall of 2009 approximately 109 students participated inthis study that used a series of surveys to determine what kind of background mightimprove their performance in the ECE sophomore introductory laboratory. Thesesurveys were given the second and third weeks of class (after the second lab period).Two surveys and an aptitude test were given electronically to each student. The firstsurvey was a Prior Experience Questionnaire (PEQ) consisting of 148 questions
laboratory experiments, realworld design projects and research. The solutions of these problems require not only proficiency inthe technical principles, but, as importantly, require a mastery of written and oral communicationskills and the ability to work as part of a multidisciplinary team. In the sophomore year,communication (written and oral) and design (semester long multidisciplinary design project) areintegrated. The course is team-taught by faculty from the College of Communication and theCollege of Engineering. Students pick one of two design projects. The first is to design and build aguitar effects pedal. The second involves an economic and engineering analysis of the design andoperation of a baseball stadium.Introduction In 1992
overall student enthusiasm3. As the courseevolved, a wide variety of teaching techniques was incorporated, including traditional lectures,cooperative learning, hands-on activities in the computer laboratory with “electronic workbooks”developed by the authors, lectures and demonstrations in a multimedia classroom, and individualwork sessions. Additional variety was achieved by rotating lecture responsibilities between thetwo professors or by creating a classroom setting with both professors interacting. Moreindividual attention was possible with two professors to answer questions during work sessions.When the authors began team-teaching the course, three tests and a final examination were givenduring the semester. Later, the testing frequency was
) are taken by chemicalengineering undergraduate students typically between junior and senior years with the aim ofreinforcing fundamentals learnt in lecture courses. A distinctive feature of UOLs compared toundergraduate laboratories in other fields, like chemistry, is the use of the so-called pilot-scaleexperimentation[3] which introduces students to new scales of experimentation, mainly orientedtoward the manufacturing industry. From the educational point of view, pilot-scaleexperimentation in UOLs is a unique experience for undergraduate chemical engineeringstudents but it might hamper the ability to teach laboratory courses outside of lab facilities. Thiswas a significant challenge during the global COVID-19 pandemic, which pushed
January through July of 2007, there was a tremendous amount of information exchangedbetween the two universities concerning course logistics including over 70 e-mails and 30telephone calls. A course website3 was created at JMU to add the necessary course and tripinformation and all of the involved students (both JMU and UCR) were required to post aphotograph and a short biography of themselves as a means of virtual introduction. A programlogo was made by the UCR Media Center and was used on T-shirts, binders, and pamphlets topromote the program.Budget PreparationFor this experience, the budget included items such as faculty, teaching assistant, andadministrative support (JMU and UCR) salaries, guest lecturers and guides, admission tickets,tours
, power supply, benchtop multimeter, andlaboratory PC. The room has a closet that can store several lab kits to serve different classes. Thelarge open space in this laboratory enables students to collaborate and communicate well witheach other as well as with the laboratory instructors. Figure 1. Lecture room and Laboratory room for embedded system educationIII. Course Curriculum using MSP432 MCUsA. Digital Electronics CourseThis ESET 219 digital electronics course is designed to teach students about digital electronicsand their applications. The focus is primarily on the design of combinational and sequential logic © American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 2020 ASEE Annual
AC 2007-1887: NEW DEVELOPMENTS FOR COURSES IN EMBEDDEDMICROCONTROLLERSTodd Morton, Western Washington University Todd Morton has been teaching the upper level microprocessor and digital courses for Western Washington University's Electronics Engineering Technology program for 18 years. He is the author of the text ’Embedded Microcontrollers’, which covers assembly and C programming for the 68HC12. He has also worked as a design engineer at Physio Control Corporation and has worked several summers at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory as an ASEE-NASA Summer Faculty Fellow. He has a BSEE and MSEE from the University of Washington