Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 5851 - 5880 of 23681 in total
Conference Session
Capstone Courses
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Martin Edin Grimheden, Royal Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
. This is due to the emphasis onearly prototyping, quick feedback and incremental development. It still might not be thefavorable method for use in large scale industrial development projects where formalprocedures might still be preferred, but the pedagogical advantages in mechatronics educationare valuable. Incremental development and rapid prototyping for example gives manyopportunities to reflect and improve. The Scrum focus on self-organizing teams also providesa platform to practice project organization, by empowering students to take responsibility forthe product development process.Among the results of this study, it is shown that it is possible and favorable to integrate Scrumin a mechatronics capstone course and that this can enhance
Conference Session
Tricks of the Trade I
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Marshall, University of Southern Maine; William R. Marshall, Alief Independent School District
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
. The more ways we find toprocess information the stronger learning (i.e., neural connections between brain cells) becomes.Research is proving that to enhance learning, we should be involving students in lessons by Page 25.469.2providing a non-threatening environment which allows them time to ask questions, seek solutions,reflect, share thinking about a theme or topic, and respond to other's viewpoints.In short, as teachers, we need to be able to accomplish learning by doing. Action helps to growthe brain. The real value of subject matter can be heightened for students through activitiesthat combine the classroom instructional context with real
Conference Session
Best of Computers in Education Division
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aditya Johri, Virginia Tech; Hon Jie Teo, Virginia Tech; Jenny L. Lo, Virginia Tech; Asta B. Schram, Virginia Tech; Monique S. Dufour, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
their instruments publicly available9, 17. In addition, one of the authors of the paperhas access to an instrument from a similar study by having worked as part of the research teamthat conducted that study2. Given the advances in technology, only the overall design of thesurvey was replicated but the exact questions were changed to reflect newer technologies. Surveyquestions were based on a Likert Scale and coded so that positive outcomes were represented byhigher response values. Two separate groups of students participated in the survey which washosted on a commercial survey-hosting website which the host university maintains a license.The survey was administered on two separate occasions, once in April 2010 and then again inMay 2010. In
Conference Session
Advances in Communication Instruction
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology; Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology; Risa Robinson, Rochester Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Observation constructive feedback to other student teachers, receive constructive feedback on your own teaching, reflect on how you can use the feedback you receive to improve your teaching.The first one-hour session begins with an introduction to The TEAK Project and motivation forthe overall workshop. Participants are given time during the session to consider what topic theywould like to address for their 15 minute microteaching exercise, as well as who their targetaudience will be. Depending on the workshop participants, the target audience may range fromelementary school students (for participants who will be teaching at summer camps or outreachprograms) to college students (for
Conference Session
Pedagogical Approaches for Software Engineering
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kevin A. Gary, Arizona State University, Polytechnic; Yegeneswari Nagappan, Unicon, Inc.; Supreet Verma, Delasoft, Inc.; Russell J. Branaghan, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Software Engineering Constituent Committee
are quite similar to mind maps8, though the context of application is different.Mind mapping activities are often done during discovery, where one is trying to understand anew domain. As examples, students may create a mind map to diagram comprehension ofreading a textbook chapter, or business analysts might create a mind map as part of an ideageneration or business modeling activity during requirements elicitation. Concept mapping, atleast in our context, is an activity that attempts to reflect the structural aspects of a student’sevolving conceptual understanding. Note in this description that we do not say that concept mapsthemselves are an assessment of any kind; indeed they can be interpreted in many ways. Forinstance, student teams
Conference Session
Assessment and Impact
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University; Susan L. Amato-Henderson, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
communication skills), accounted for11.49% of the variance.A similar factor analysis procedure conducted with only Senior Design students resulted in thesame factor components and structure; therefore, mean factors scores were also calculated forSenior Design students on each of the 4 factors. Because Senior Design students were all 4th or5th year students (while Enterprise participants included freshman through seniors), differencesin factor scores between Senior Design and Enterprise students (seniors only) were examinedwith ANOVA. Table 1 provides the mean factor scores for senior-standing Enterprise andSenior Design students across the four factors (6 point scale, ranging from -3 to +3, withnegative numbers reflecting disagreement that program
Conference Session
Retention of Women Students II
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Heidi M. Steinhauer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
developed the Academic Self-Efficacy Scaleand the Professional Self-Efficacy Scale. The Likert survey responses were used to generate thesemi-structured interview protocol to more fully investigate the impact of their participation ontheir perception of engineering.Two areas of particular interest are: 1) what professional skills were gained as a result ofparticipating, and 2) the impact of CDS on persistence to pursue engineering professionally. Allparticipants were interviewed to gain a deeper understanding of their survey responses. Closeexamination of their surveys and interviews may provide a key to motivating more youngwomen to persist in engineering as a career.The construct of perceived Self-Efficacy reflects an optimistic self-belief15
Conference Session
Spatial Visualization
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick; AJ Hamlin, Michigan Technological University; Norma L. Veurink, Michigan Technological University; Niall Seery, University of Limerick
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Design Graphics
about orthographic projection. Studentsurveys and classroom observations were recorded by the teachers.High levels of student motivation were observed during both phases and the studentsevidenced a clear understanding of the picture plane and its relationship with perspectivedrawings. The paper also reports that a number of ergonomic improvements which weremade to the sketching equipment (subsequent to ‘Phase One’) were beneficial and that theseenabled more controlled and reflective exploration of complex geometries. The manner inwhich students completed the activity during both phases of the study varied. Some studentsperformed the exercise in a slow, controlled and reflective manner, resulting in sketcheswhich were precise, with significant
Conference Session
Accreditation and Outcomes-based Education
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
instructors and students, or of the leaders of such influential bodies as ABET, theNational Academy of Engineering, or the American Society for Engineering Education, are not Page 25.1348.2in question. We cannot presume to know what any individual thinks without asking her or him,nor whether the pronouncements one might make in a professional capacity reflect one's ownbeliefs. Instead, this paper considers how the formal expression of professional aims embodied inABET's accreditation criteria, in university engineering department documents, and in writing onthose criteria by educators, helps to promote certain, ideologically narrowed approaches
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Poster Session
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward F. Glynn P.E., Villanova University; Frank E. Falcone, Villanova University
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
to determine the oral presentation grade. Near the completion of the course, the attributes and characteristics sheets originally prepared and submitted by each student, but now including all of the comments from their group members evaluating the student‟s performance as PM, are complied and given back to the students. Therefore, at the conclusion of the course, students have a clear record of their individual performance as PMs as measured against their own initial list of the attributes and characteristics of a ‘good’ PM. This seems to be an extremely effective summary document as part of this approach to introducing, stressing and measuring project management performance.Student Reflections
Conference Session
Improving IE Course Content
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hung-da Wan, University of Texas, San Antonio; Yi-Ching Liao, University of Texas, San Antonio; Glenn Kuriger, University of Texas, San Antonio
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
impact the lean tools can bring about. Consequently, lean simulation games havegained a special role in training workshops and educational programs of lean manufacturing.A lean simulation game typically contains a series of operations that reflect real-world tasks ofwork. In a simulation, several phases of lean implementation are carried out step by step todemonstrate the impact of lean. The simplified tasks allow the participants to learn the leanconcepts and skills in a reasonably short time. Many lean simulation games have been developedin the past. Verma5 reviewed 17 popular lean simulation games, such as the TimeWiseSimulation of the Lean 101 training program, Aircraft Simulation developed by Lean AerospaceInitiative (LAI), and some games
Conference Session
Curriculum Development
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Evelyn Hanna Laffey, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey; Kimberly A Cook-Chennault, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering; Linda S. Hirsch, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
STEM professionals.The 2006 report, Investing in America’s Future 12 , discussed the need to develop collaborationsbetween engineers and K-12 educators to provide authentic opportunities to build scientific andtechnological knowledge. RU RET-E aimed to provide such an opportunity by immersingteachers in engineering research during the six week summer program. Approximately 80% ofteachers’ time was spent in the research component.A review of adult learning theories5,6 suggests recognizing adult learners as experiencedindividuals who have valued knowledge, utilizing experience as a learning tool, promotinglearning through reflection and inquiry, and providing situated learning contexts. As such, RURET-E provides opportunity for teachers to share
Conference Session
Collaborative Projects in Architectural Engineering Education
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James B Guthrie P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Divisions
Architectural
concrete gravity systems, an understanding oftimber, steel and concrete lateral systems, structural material finishes and connections, tallbuildings, long span structures, cladding and deep and shallow foundation systems.These course learning outcomes and outlines reflect a rigorous architectural engineeringapproach that the ARCE faculty believes is appropriate for the course. However the classes havetypically also included content and approaches intended to both inspire the ARCH and CMstudents and provide skills specific to their future careers. This is reflected in the methodologiesused by individual instructors.Methodologies. Several types of classroom methodologies have been used by instructors. Allhave been successful in meeting the learning
Conference Session
Tablets Large and Small
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tonya Lynn Lauriski-Karriker, Colorado School of Mines; Emma Nicoletti, Colorado School of Mines; Barbara M. Moskal, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
the tablets with them at the end of class. A graduate student wasassigned to support the instructors with the software and technology during the first few weeksof the semester. The five instructors had varying titles and levels of teaching experience, whichare summarized in Table 1.As is reflected in Table 1, there were two graduate teaching fellows or graduate students whohad the appropriate background in probability and statistics to teach the course. These studentshad expressed an interest in learning how to teach at the college level. Both had taught thiscourse in the previous semester. There were two adjunct or part-time teaching faculty who taughtthe course. One had three years of experience and had previously taught this course four
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
Larry Richards
are designed with awareness of thevariety and range of individual differences between students. The labs are not gearedtoward the top of the class, nor the bottom. They cannot be too easy, or too complex. Weknow that most of our students have a moderate level of computer sophistication.Individual help is available for those who fall behind or do not understand the material.We have worked for years to get the level and timing of the lessons right; most studentscan complete most lessons with very little help. But each year we discover new problems:some due to the changing software, others due to the students. The lessons must beregularly updated to reflect software revisions and changed to incorporate new contentand exercises.The labs embody
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
Barbara L. Christe
particular area) to create focused content Selection of tools for assessment and inter-student communicationInvestigate the nature of student learning as it develops in an on-line class. Participants mustsynthesize information the instructor provides and ask questions about it. This is called inquiry-based learning. The role of instructor is also changed. Distance educators are facilitators. It isimportant to elicit conclusions from the students as they view the course content. Carefully craftassignments to reflect this process. Do not require a simple rote repetition of facts.Prepare tutorials for students who need extra material. These basic materials are often alreadyavailable on the web. Links to explanatory sites will provide additional
Collection
2000 Annual Conference
Authors
Timothy N. Chang; Daphne l. Chang
graduate, Page 5.322.1from the educational institute’s perspective, should reflect the student’s ability to thrivein the industry. Standard classroom evaluation is heavily based on individual paperaccomplishments: assignments, quizzes, exams, term projects, etc. While these areeffective measures, a serious gap remains in assessing the student’s ability with respectto the abovementioned industrial criteria. Traditionally, graduate engineering educationappeals to a focused group of candidates: those who wish to pursue an R&D career.However, with the changes in technological integration, a master's degree is now almosta necessary requirement for
Collection
2000 Annual Conference
Authors
Robert J Niewoehner; Joshua Filbey
daily by flight test. Themechanics of neither the cause nor solution were understood, but in a climate awash in unsolvedproblems and programmatic cost and schedule pressures, solved problems draw little interest.Successful completion of the program three years later provided time for reflection on the courseof events. Among other unanswered questions, engineers and pilots alike wondered “Whatcaused the PA wing-drop in the first place, and why was closure of the vent effective?” Inparallel with a wind tunnel study performed by a Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR)researcher, the Aerospace Engineering Department at the U.S. Naval Academy was tasked toperform a computational fluid dynamics study of the flow fields both before and after the fix.A
Collection
1998 Annual Conference
Authors
Mahmood Nahvi
a broad spectrum of observationsand examinations not easily available in the laboratory or by analytical approaches.5. References[1] Nahvi, M.J. “Dynamics of Student-Computer Interaction in a Simulation Environment: Reflections on Curricular Issues,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, November, 1996.[2] Nahvi M.J., Attala, E., Harris, J., and Nafisi, A.: “Use of Technology for Undergraduate Engineering Education: An Interactive Instructional Module Using Integrated Computer/Video System,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 224- 226, Vienna, July 1990.[3] Bourne, J.R., Brodersen, A.J., Campbell, J.O. and Dawant, M.M. “Models for Asynchronous Learning
Collection
1998 Annual Conference
Authors
Ingrid H. Soudek
seniorthesis was listed as the most valuable undergraduate educational experience.The approach that Vaughan took in shaping the Division, then named “Engineering English,”later “Division of Humanities,” and now “Division of Technology, Culture, andCommunication,” was broadly cultural: besides the training in communication skills, he placed astrong emphasis on “the role of the engineer in society” with a focus on the responsibilities ofthe engineering profession to society. In fact, the changing name of the Division reflects a full Page 3.301.1
Collection
1998 Annual Conference
Authors
Sima Bagheri; Qun Xiao; Jelena Balorda
. The orthophotoquad was scanned as a (*.tif )file andtransferred to a compatible format within ArcView (i.e., shape file) for use as a backgroundimage over which the other geocoded data were assembled. 2) US Census Bureau TIGER7(Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing) file, which is many fileslinked together using the integrated nature of the structure as the key. It relates all mapablefeatures, address range information and geographic codes, and reflects in change to one item inall other files simultaneously. TIGER file was reprojected for georeferencing using thePC/ArcInfo Data Automation Kit for input into GIS(ESRI, 1996)8. 3) USGS Digital LineGraph (DLG-3 )9 structure, which is a data exchange format providing a fully
Collection
1998 Annual Conference
Authors
Sudha Ananda Hariharan; Satinderpaul Devgan
outage.A stroke current surge terminating on the tower will divide between the tower and the shieldwires connected to the tower according to the tower and shield wire surge impedances Zt and Zs Page 3.318.9respectively. Voltage waves equal to the initial tower top voltage will travel along the tower andalong the shield wires at different velocities. The tower top voltage wave will be reflectedbetween the tower footing resistance Rtf and the tower top repeatedly. The shield wire voltagewaves will be reflected and further transmitted at the adjacent towers. The negative voltagereflections from adjacent towers and the tower footing resistance will
Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 5: Self- Efficacy
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeffrey Luke Morrison, University of South Florida; Chris S Ferekides, University of South Florida; Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
engineering course Itook. In this course, students were put into groups and had to complete an engineering task (inmy case, build a simple robot); however, the class’s primary learning outcomes focused on non-technical concepts like engineering ethics, which made this course like a mini capstone wherestudents had to find the information themselves to complete their projects. Reflecting on thisproject, I realized that researching and building circuitry for robots was the primary reason forselecting Electrical Engineering. Therefore, when I look at the department’s RED program, I seea similar ideology: an attempt to teach students more about the professional side of engineeringand empower students to take responsibility for learning. I still have not
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah Baka, Youngstown State University; Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
environment (Sonawane et al., 2021, p. 9). Fromthe student perspective, mentees experience a sense of belonging, productive goal setting,feelings of accomplishment, and emotional support (AuCoin & Wright, 2021, pp. 610-611).Moreover, participants in one study reflected that faculty mentoring was “more helpful thanother interventions” serving as a “crucial opportunity to learn about science, scientists, andscientific process…” (Ceyhan et al., 2019, p. 258). Chelberg and Bosman (2019) found facultymentorship to be especially impactful to underrepresented STEM students as it aided in their“development, retention, persistence, and navigation of the postsecondary setting” (p. 45).Zeller’s et al. (2008) research further emphasizes that mentoring
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sandra Anstaett Metzler P.E., The Ohio State University; Annie Abell, The Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)
/controversial topics c. Reflect upon their own professional identity and personal ethical values and the intersection with the discipline 3. Demonstrate ethical decision-making. 4. Demonstrate societal awareness through an ability to identify needs, challenges, and problems in a local, regional, and global context. a. Engage as a citizen leader professionally and academically b. Demonstrate engagement in professional societies c. Demonstrate the consideration of social justice in decision-makingD. Teamwork, Leadership, and InclusivityProgram Goal: The successful student will be able to contribute to a successful team by takingon different roles within the team, and through creating a collaborative
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel Loke, Nanyang Technological University; Jeffrey D Radloff, SUNY, Cortland; Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
education from teachers' perspectives. Moreover, the articles focused onlyon K-12 education were peer-reviewed articles and should be available in full text. We includedthose studies published between 2020 and 2024. This publication range was chosen to reflect themost current AI applications and practices being used in educational contexts and to capture thelatest related best practices. We then established exclusion criteria to omit any study that failed tomeet inclusion benchmarks. These included studies that were non-empirical, outside thespecified timeframe, and not written in English. Each selected study was initially evaluated forits relevance to the topic through reading the titles and abstracts, ensuring it met the qualitystandards
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Li Liu, California State University, Northridge; Andy Lin; Taeyou Jung, California State University, Northridge; Mauro Carassai, California State University, Northridge
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
thepersistence of students enrolled in a minority-serving institute in STEM majors and themotivation to pursue a STEM career, particularly in careers at the human-technology frontier.References[1] World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund. Global report on assistive technology. World Health Organization, 2022.[2] A. Manduca, E. Iverson, M. Luxenberg, R. Macdonald, D. McConnell, D. Mogk, and B. Tewksbury. Improving undergraduate stem education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development. Science Advances, 3(2):e1600193, 2017.[3] K. Shinohara, N. Jacobo, W. Pratt, and J. Wobbrock. Design for social accessibility method cards: Engaging users and reflecting on social scenarios for accessible design
Conference Session
Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Technical Session 1
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Oluwapemiisin Gbemisola Akingbola, Morgan State University; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University; Frank Efe, Morgan State University; Hannah Abedoh, Morgan State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)
the student,rather on the instructor as the case with the traditional form of leraning [4]. This has brought asignificant improvement during the learning process of many students. Active learning is apedagogical tool that has helped promote ‘students’ cognitive capabilities when it comes tomastery of the content [5]. Meaningful conversations, proper reflection, and content mastery areproducts of this learning mode [6].Experiment-centric-pedagogy (ECP), an instructional technique that facilitates activite learning,offers an alternate route for acquiring technical skills and information both inside and outside ofthe classroom. ECP enabls students with different learning styles to learn at their own pace and intheir own settings. Instructors
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 26
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Xinfeng (Kevin) Quan, Westlake University; Chaoyi Wang, Zhejiang Normal University ; Chenhui Zhang, Self-employed
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
students’ agentic engagement, self-efficacy, growth mindset, and other related aspects. 1In recent years, there has been increasing attention paid to students’ epistemic beliefs and theirimpact on learning efficacy. Epistemic belief, which reflects students’ views on the nature ofknowledge and knowing, plays a crucial role in the cognitive, metacognitive, and affectivedimensions of students’ learning. Research has demonstrated that interventions targeting epistemicbeliefs can significantly enhance learning outcomes (Greene et al., 2018). Epistemic cognition -mostly measured in terms of belief (Greene et al., 2018) – is identified as the apex of
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Division Technical Session 11
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Temileye Omopariola Ibirinde, Morgan State University; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University; Adebayo Iyanuoluwa Olude, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University; Niangoran Koissi, Morgan State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
, which is our desired result of the relevant cognitive load.This theory was used in designing the instructional modules for the course where experiment-centric pedagogy was implemented, as shown in Figure 2. 1. Information 2. Purpose of the 3. Instructional module Process 4. Reflection about the module a. Module Title a. Questions a. Materials needed a. Reflection b. Placement within the b. Module objectives b. Procedures curriculum c. Formative assessment c. Primary/ Secondary audience d. Summative assessment d. Standards