studentswith the necessary cybersecurity knowledge to understand and analyze cyber securityvulnerabilities and threats to assess the likelihood of an attack as well as begin to understand theimpact of such an attack.The first section of the course was designed to provide a general understanding of cyber riskmanagement. In this course this starts with the DODI 8500.01 (“Cybersecurity”) definition: “Cybersecurity Risk Management. Managing cybersecurity risks is a complex, multifaceted undertaking that requires the involvement of the entire organization, from senior leaders planning and managing DoD operations, to individuals developing, implementing, and operating the IT supporting those operations. Cybersecurity risk management is a subset of
LearningIntroductionThis paper describes a case-based, mixed-methods study of how K-12 teachers support andscaffold student learning in a Problem-based Learning (PBL) engineering lesson. The studyexamined how K-12 engineering teachers planned to support student learning using scaffolding,how they implemented scaffolds during PBL engineering activities, and how they reflected upontheir PBL engineering lesson implementation.PBL in engineering educationEngineering practice and other design-focused fields involve solving complex problems, often incollaborative teams. Generally, these engineering problems do not have a single solution andrequire multifaceted skillsets from many domains. However, engineering students often findthemselves unprepared to manage messy
University, New Taipei City, Taiwan since 2004, where he also served as the Dean of the College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from 2007 to 2009. Currently, he is the president of Tainan National University of the Arts. He has published more than 270 articles related to parallel computer systems, interconnection networks, path planning, electronic design automation, and VLSI systems design in journals, conference proceedings, and books. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Developing Computational Intelligence Curriculum Materials to Advance Student Learning for Robot Control and Optimization Tingjun Lei1 , Timothy Sellers1 , Chaomin Luo1 , Zhuming
Resolution 946-22 [3]. While five years seems like ample time to make this transition, itis not. The timeline shows that the time between the announcement of the decision to thesubmission of every academic department’s plan was only sixteen months. This paper chroniclesthe conversion to semester effort during this time period for the architectural engineering(ARCE) program and suggests a formalized methodology that other programs and institutionscan use if found in the same situation. The paper attempts to focus on the process and thechallenges of this conversion more than the specific details of the ARCE curriculum. January 27, 2023 Each academic department submits its Academic Program Plan to the appropriate
last semester in high school was about two orthree hours. Many engineering freshmen do not put in the time that they should be in learningtheir classes until they hit the first quizzes or a midterm and suddenly realize that they have a lotof learning to make up to be on top of the class material. Many students do not know how tolearn material.This paper will explore the transition from high school to college relative to the number of studyhours a freshman engineering student devotes each week and the “solutions” that have been usedto help with this problem through a literature search. The paper will discuss how muchengineering students study their last year in high school, how much the students plan to “study”in college, and the reasons
. Table 1: Course Schedule Topics Week Workplace fundamentals and applications 1& 2 Teamwork skills: Management vs leadership 3 Project management skills: Overview of planning – How to do planning 4 Project management skills: critical thinking for design of experiments and 5 project management techniques – Agile Project Management Apply project management process: initiating, planning, executing, 6, 7 & 8 monitoring, and controlling, closing – Scrum, Backlog Refinement, and
, Virginia Tech Tremayne O. Waller is the Director of Graduate Student Programs at Virginia Tech. He was the Interim Director for the Office of Academic Diversity Initiatives (OADI) and Director of the McNair Scholars Program at Cornell University. He has also worked as the Associate Director of Advising and Diver- sity in the College of Architecture, Art, and Planning and Diversity Programs in Engineering at Cornell University. He completed his Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from Virginia Tech. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID
often have mixed results for continued development, Kitsios andKamariotou summarize 70 articles related to hackathons, open data, and ongoing entrepreneurialsuccess rates and propose a model for successful entrepreneurial development as an outcome forevents [14].Rationale for involvement in hackathons has been detailed from a participant perspective [7], [8],[15], [21] but not as widely for those planning the events, such as this paper investigates. Manyhackathons held by companies, libraries [16], or museums [17] focus on the output of products,apps, or ideas that streamline services or resources as a key motivator in running a successfulhackathon. Libraries, in particular, have focused on the benefits of civic engagement, life-longlearning
business finance, market cap, accounting, law, intellectual property, etc.,without turning the motivated student off while instilling an entrepreneurial mind set inthe researcher are the tasks of the teacher of entrepreneurial studies.To meet these challenges, at Cooper Union we are drawing on the talents of ourengineering alumni, friends and members of our extended family to deliver to studentstheir first round of education in developing an entrepreneurial venture and anentrepreneurial outlook on activities. Participants in the entrepreneurship course arerequired to form teams of not less than three nor more than five members and develop abusiness plan for a product or service of their choice. This development of a plan is amodel that has long
, including plans for future work. Course ObjectivesIn addition to the broad goals of the course, the goals of this new set of laboratories were formulated asfollows:1. Give students the experience and satisfaction of manufacturing a working mechanical device.2. Encourage self-learning.3. Introduce a truly team-driven project requiring participation by all students.4. Provide an environment where many manufacturing related issues like tolerances, design for manufacturability, etc. arise and can be discussed. Page 3.555.25. Engage students in a project which requires them to practice engineering design
AbstractDesign tasks are ubiquitous, complex, ill-structured, and challenging to students and professionalengineering designers. Successful designing depends on having not only adequate knowledge butalso sufficient awareness and control of that knowledge, known as metacognition. Researchsuggests that metacognition not only enhances learning outcomes but also encourages students tobe self-regulated learners who are metacognitively, motivationally, and behaviorally activeparticipants in their learning process.This article evaluates the extent to which students‟ task interpretation of the design project isreflected in their working plans and monitoring/regulating strategies. Butler and Cartier‟s Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) model was used to evaluate the
submitted to the mentor team a written proposal thatprovided background information about the environmental problem and a detailed work plandescribing the process by which the team planned to obtain contaminant data and socioeconomicinformation needed to develop an action plan to remediate the environmental problem (Figure 1).In addition to the written proposal, the team orally presented and defended its proposal to thementor team. The mentor team evaluated each proposal and graded the work according to thefollowing criteria: a clear, concise problem statement; defined objectives; well-defined approachthat will achieve objectives; defined project organization that delineates responsibilities of teammembers; anticipated deliverables; and a realistic
. IntroductionMentoring software engineering capstone projects is a challenging yet rewarding task for anymotivated faculty member. On the one hand, there is no better place in which to see the fruits ofone’s labor than when working alongside student teams as they “put it all together” and producea real software product. Observing that moment where the students show they have integratedand internalized what the faculty taught them for several years offset concern that some “maynever get it.” On the other hand, it is challenging for many reasons. One challenge is strictly atime management issue. Capstone project mentoring often involves meta-project management bythe instructor-as-facilitator. Ensuring teams are planning, estimating, and tracking detailed workcan
used in planning. The bottom part of the matrix shows the prioritizeddesign specifications and how difficult it will be to achieve these successfully6. Otherinformation that can be placed in QFD is product benchmarking data and target values. At any stage, QFD describes the matrix of what the customer wants versus how thesupplier will supply it. The first QFD matrix is used to translate customer wants(requirements of the actual end-customer) into product characteristics (broad details of howthe requirements will be met). The product characteristics are then translated through anotherQFD matrix into part characteristics. Part characteristics are translated into processcharacteristics. Finally, process characteristics are translated into
engineering applications. Many students have difficulty connecting math and sciencecourses to common phenomena seen all around and to future careers. This problem is furtheraggravated on Indian reservations in North Dakota because of their isolated locations anddistance from industries. The authors developed a weekend academic program, “SundayAcademy”, carried out on four North Dakota Indian reservations, to stimulate Native Americanstudents’ interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), to attract toengineering programs, and to engage high school teachers and tribal college instructors in theprocess of developing engineering and applied science lesson plans. The academy consisted of aseries of one-day academic sessions
years of experience working on the NE project. Lack of time to plan andimplement NE was cited as the topmost challenge for teachers. Inability to figure out books andproblems, pressure from administration, difficulties in lesson planning, group dynamics amongstudents, and safety of students while handling materials were some of the other concernsmentioned in the evaluation.Similar findings were uncovered in a survey of 70 elementary and middle school teachers doneby Coppola, S.M., Madariaga, L. and Schnedeker, M. [7]. They found that lack of time, access tomaterials and resources, and unfamiliarity with the content were major barriers that preventintegrating engineering into the classroom.Research MethodologyA list of potential barriers for NE
women5. Although it is evident that women are pursuingmaster’s and doctoral degrees in the sciences and mathematics, there is limited data thatexamines how women cope with the barriers of pursuing a post baccalaureate degree. UsingSocial Cognitive Career Theory as a theoretical lens, this study examines the coping efficacy ofwomen STEM students particularly as it relates to their post baccalaureate decisions. STEMdisciplines were divided into two groups: Science and Mathematics (SM) and Engineering andComputer Science (ECS). The following research questions were examined: 1. Is there a statistically significant association between gender and post baccalaureate plans? 2. Is there a statistically significant association between
in the Division of Undergraduate Education, and was on the faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Segal Design Institute at Northwestern University. Dr. McKenna received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: The process of conceptualizing and creating a strategic plan for the Engineering Faculty Impact Collaborative (EFIC) to support faculty development and mentorshipAbstract This is a work in progress paper that describes an effort to support faculty development andmentorship. The current faculty
Adjunct Faculty for the Transportation Systems and, the City & Regional Planning programs at MSU. Her research interests include engineering education, student success, online engineering pedagogy and program assessment solutions, transportation planning, transportation impact on quality of life issues, bicycle access, and ethics in engineering. She has several published works in engineering education and online learning. Dr. Petronella James earned her Doctor of Engineering (Transportation) and Masters of City & Regional Planning at Morgan State University (MSU), Baltimore, Maryland. She completed a B.S. Management Studies, at the University of the West Indies (Mona), Jamaica.Dr. Jumoke Oluwakemi Ladeji-Osias
in June 2009. 1During this 18 month economic slowdown, the leadership at EMH&T decided to position thecompany for future success. Responding to industry and technology pressures, EMH&T woulduse the recession as an opportunity to improve their engineering design process and upgrade theirengineering design software from AutoCAD® Land Desktop 2004 to AutoCAD® Civil 3D®.President Sandra C. Doyle-Ahern, MEn said that it was important to advance with Civil 3D togive EMH&T a competitive edge.2EMH&T founded in 1926, has 85 years of experience offering, “…an extensive array of servicesincluding civil engineering, land surveying, environmental management, landscape architectureand land planning.”3 EMH&T’s ability to remain
is a second year doctoral student at the University of Michigan in Higher Education. His research interests focus on organizational communication and curriculum planning in post-secondary education. Page 24.745.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Influences on Engineering Instructors’ Emphasis on Interdisciplinarity in Undergraduate CoursesIntroductionSolving many of today’s technological and social challenges will require interdisciplinarythought and action1-5, and the growth of interdisciplinary engineering programs6 suggests that
, college freshman-level course forthose interested in learning about innovative idea generation and new venture creation. The keycontrast is that the non-credit MOOC is open and free to anyone worldwide and the mini-MOOC is a tuition-based, three-credit course exclusively for University of Marylandundergraduates.Both the MOOC and the mini-MOOC are multi-disciplinary courses to help students to learn thebasic business, strategy, and leadership skills needed to launch and manage new ventures. Topicsinclude learning how to assess the feasibility of a new venture, as well as how to apply bestpractices for planning, launching, and managing new companies. Students discuss a wide rangeof issues of importance and concern to entrepreneurs and learn to
effectively measured. This paper introduces the differences between cognitive assessment taxonomy andaffective assessment taxonomy, distinctions between an assessment system and an assessmentstrategy, and identifies various approaches that can be employed to incorporate affective domainassessment into the overall engineering technology assessment plan. Unless this is done, apartial and less than comprehensive assessment program will result.I. Introduction Perhaps an appropriate place to start is at the end rather than at the beginning. This isbecause most believe they can recognize where assessment started, e.g., ABET, but unless theyare clairvoyant few understand the conclusion. ABET has defined the end game to be evidencethat
Session 2793 Small Steps and Big Strides: a Department-Based Plan for Integrating Technical Communication into an Engineering Curriculum David Adams, Roger Wallace Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Michigan State University (MSU)AbstractProviding technical communication instruction within existing courses can challenge thehuman and financial resources of a department. Such a challenge becomes even moredaunting in the absence of university or college funded programs. The Department ofCivil & Environmental Engineering at MSU has undertaken a three-year plan to
share five of these architectural designstudio courses along with an additional three architectural engineering design courses within theten semester plan. The entire architectural engineering curriculum is shown in Appendix 1.The commonality of the architectural design and architectural engineering curriculums exhibitsour fundamental belief in the required cooperative effort of various professionals to createarchitecture. As Mario Salvadori observes, “Lucky is the client whose architect understandsstructure and whose structural engineer appreciates the aesthetics of architecture”2A unique element of both curricula occurs at the fifth year level of the professional School ofArchitecture. Over twenty years ago, a capstone “Architectural Design
shortage of electrical engineers and technicians with adequateknowledge of industrial power distribution theory and practice has now reached a critical point.Electrical power distribution and loading as a specific learning module is a timely and essentialpart of the electrical and power systems curriculum.The industrial power distribution system, as any engineering system, typically includes threestages of a life cycle. These stages are:• Research And Design• Construction, Assembly, Adjustment• MaintenanceThe member of an engineering team (engineer, technologist, and technician) is required to workin three typical situations superimposed with the above mentioned stages of the life cycle: wherethe work is planned in advance; where there is no
students’ progress and problems.If student learning is a fundamental mission of a university, then we as faculty have good reasonfor undertaking assessment activities.Regional and professional accreditation agencies are committed to the assessment of academicoutcomes and now mandate that institutions develop and submit an academic outcomesassessment plan prior to their campus accreditation visits. The agencies are convinced thatassessing student learning and academic achievement is critical to the success of institutions and isinterested in working with institutions to develop an “assessment culture” on campuses. With thisin mind, assessment is seen as an ongoing process, rather than an exercise that occupiesinstitutions only in the year or two
Management Methodologies Support a Senior Project Research Course and Its AssessmentAbstractMotivated by required program learning outcomes and recommendations from a continuousimprovement plan focus group, Central Connecticut State University has uniquely organized itsmechanical engineering senior project design research class to include significant review ofDesign of Experiments (DOE) and Project Management (PM) methodologies. Both studies havebeen linked to computational software tools for students to use in their capstone experience. Theultimate goal of the class is a project design proposal in which researched backgroundinformation forms the introduction to a managed project plan which can include designedexperimentation within the
Session 1725 The Dilemma of Education in Participatory Design: The Marketplace Value vs. Community Value Kun-Jung Hsu Department of Construction Technology Leader University, Taiwan.AbstractThe concept of “participatory planning/design” has gradually become one of the main themesin professional design and social science. However, because behavioral patterns in spacedesign are closely related to the values of the designers concerned, the pursuit andconstruction of a good place is a basic and normative proposition in the
programs.Thus, the challenge is to retain the large number of students entering engineering program whileremoving the students who have no interest in being retained. Enrollment management activitiesmust address these issues while addressing the pressure to grow the institution populationwithout compromising engineering program quality.To manage growth in the engineering college, an enrollment management system wasimplemented in 2012 and employs program admission requirements and student performance aswell as performance metrics. The enrollment management plan was developed by a committeeof faculty and staff advisors in the college of engineering. The plan addressed the increase innew admits to the college as well as strategies to remove non-completers