are aimed to facilitate the understanding of these concepts for both learningand industrial practice. Thus, the objectives of the proposed images are to demonstrate to thestudents the followings: • The assumptions (Saint-Venant’s theory) made in developing the axial stress formula • The development of axial stress in a member • The effect of bearing stress on a member • Interaction between axial, bearing, and contact stresses • An application of optics in engineeringBasic theoryThe optical method of reflected photoelasticity (photostress) is utilized to achieve the goals inregard to the above objectives. Photostress is a technique for measuring surface strains todetermine the stresses on a part or structure during loading. With
three main moral theories studentsstudied were utilitarianism, ethical egoism, and rights ethics.Students also reflected on ethics as part of an electronic portfolio assignment. This electronicportfolio is owned by the student while he/she is enrolled at this university. BSE intends to useelectronic portfolios to encourage students to reflect on and maintain a record of theireducational experiences. Lastly, students worked in teams to perform research and present ethicsrelated material within the context of recent concerns and events related to natural disasters suchas hurricanes, tsunamis and earthquakes; this presentation assignment is presented in acompanion paper. 3 This basic ethics instruction creates a foundation for ethics instruction
reflection of their own use and disposalof products enlightens them further to the intricacies of technology and the environment.Life cycles of technology development, launch, and replacement highlight the rapid growth anddissemination of technology products. While strides in technology have scaled down the size ofproducts, it has also shortened time to obsolescence. For example, desktop computers havebenefited from the developments in circuitry miniaturization that have significantly reduced the Page 11.673.3materials requirements for significant increases in memory and speed. However, computers areeffectively a disposable item and are typically
participant teams scheduled a 45 minutefeedback session to review and discuss the results. These discussions were led by a persontrained and experienced in facilitating group discussion. We decided that this person should notbe the faculty advisor, since some sources of tension arise with the role or style of that person;and that it not be an undergraduate student. Some faculty advisors chose to remain for thediscussion; others decided not to attend. The discussion leader (usually one of the evaluationspecialists for the program) distributed the reports to each of the team members, emphasizingthat the results reflected simply how they, collectively, evaluated their team experience at thatpoint. Discussion questions centered on whether results were
exemplars to read about:LeMessurier, Inez Austin, or Fred Cuny. Inez Austin was a whistle-blower for environmentalconcerns at Hanford, WA. Cuny was a disaster relief specialist who did humanitarianengineering work in Chechnya, Ethiopia, Bosnia, Somalia, etc.During the in-class discussion, a number of students had selected the Cuny case and stated thatthey hadn’t previously considered the application of civil engineering to refugee camps fromnatural and conflict disasters. In their reflective essays on Civil Engineering that are due in theirJournals at the end of the semester, some students commented on the Cuny case study. Forexample, one male student in 2003 noted: “I mostly enjoyed learning how Civil Engineeringimpacts communities. The case study
improved by video-taping team activity. Also, scoringwith a combination of a standards-based rubric and a content or observations analysisseems the best way to assess the design preparedness of the students. In addition, morequestions could be included to reveal the group dynamics. A reflective interview with allthe students may also be an appropriate tool to consider for capturing the attitudinal andconceptual learning, and particularly the perceived change or growth that has occurred inthe students over two semesters of learning. Some of these ideas are already beingimplemented in the 2005-06 academic year.Acknowledgement1) The authors wish to thank the Boeing Company for its financial support of the projectand its evaluation, upon which this
experience.Just like a vine or a fruit tree, it may take several years from the time of planting to the harvest offruit; but relationships properly nurtured can provide a bountiful harvest.ArticulationArticulation, as defined in ‘The Concise Oxford Dictionary’ is an act of joining. When we workon getting articulation agreements, we are trying to find common, yet properly justifiable coursesof study that can be transferred. The academic process of forming articulation agreementsbetween community colleges and four year colleges, like a gate, can control the transfer processor stop altogether. It is important to reflect on how successful an articulation program anyinstitution has. OIT has articulation agreements with many of the community collegesthroughout
student population in the threesmallest majors in the College.IntroductionEngineering and technology educators and administrators have written about retention issuesextensively.1-9 An important factor in retention is the first-year experience.1 The body of workfor increasing retention is differentiated by two types of instruction, one that offers lecture style,passive learning environments and the other that provides experiential learning with hands-onexperience. Each institution should reflect and examine it’s own internal dynamics and reasonswhy students leave engineering technology programs as suggested by the study.5 This impetuswas the motivation for the assessment of retention issues in the smaller technology programs inthe College of
assess identity (Stets &Burke, 2000). Identity role theory. Identity role theory (Stets & Burke, 2000; Stryker & Burke, 2000)is rooted in a sociological framework that defines group identity by the observable characteristicscommon across those occupying a group-specific role. Identifying with a role consists ofincorporating the meanings and beliefs associated with that role into one’s self-concept. Thetheory posits that individual behaviors reflect those role-specified meanings and beliefs. In thisvein, identity role theory is concerned with predicting role-related behaviors. While the sameperson can occupy different roles (i.e. be a member of different groups), those roles that mostinfluence behaviors are considered to have a
], which identifiesinterconnectedness of student understanding as the key difference between rote learning andmeaningful learning. Rote learning allows students to reflect back what they have been told andeven follow procedures when there are no deviations, but meaningful learning builds on that toadd conceptual understanding in a way that allows students to innovate and problem-solve increative ways. Because of the importance of innovation and problem-solving in engineeringeducation, it is particularly important to make sure engineering educators promote meaningfullearning, not just rote learning.Linking the discussion back to concept mapping, Pearsall and her colleagues [10] conducted astudy looking at student-generated concept maps over the
finding time for research, effective teaching, the lack of collegial relationships,inadequate feedback/recognition, unrealistic expectations, insufficient resources, the lack ofmentors, technology, isolation, and little work-life balance.” From my observations as a newfaculty member returning to the academic environment following several years away, I proposethat many of these stresses can be addressed with some investment into developing new facultymembers. Kam Jugdev (2007) concludes that universities or departments that fail to prioritizefaculty development “risk isolating valuable resources.”As I reflected on the USAFA-wide orientation, the theme that faculty members are aninstrumental component to a vision much larger than teaching our
angle shotsin the app to give the object its 3D form. This formula of 36 pictures was successful in the app,but led to failure during initial attempts with the ReMake software. During initial effort, themesh software failed to create a 3D object. Rather, a 3D object would appear to be acombination of the table the object was placed and the object itself.After more in-depth research, the team began a new trial with the information learned4. Throughthese sources, it was learned that the use of our reflective wall plug-in iPhone charger was notthe ideal subject for meshes created by the software. The software has trouble recognizing pointswhere the light is being reflected consistently, which meant certain actions would have to betaken in order to
application of their knowledge inother courses such as: EGT116 (Introduction to Manufacturing), 265 (Manufacturing Processesand Metrology), 365 (CNC & Manufacturing Process Planning), 405 (Metrology and GeometricTolerancing), 465 (Automated Manufacturing Systems) and 380 (Machine Design). The changesin the EGT 212 course will be made under the basic assumptions of constructivism teachingphilosophy.ConstructivismIt is a theory based on scientific and observational studies about how people learn. “It says that people construct their own understanding and knowledge of the world, through experiencing things and reflecting on those experiences.” [12]When we learn something new it has to be reconciled with our previous experiences
-world challenges and problems [6]. PBL is particularly helpful for engineering students.Students learn about a subject by working for an extended period of time to investigate on acomplex question, challenge, or problem [6]. Therefore, a four-stage project is required forstudents to develop an injection molded product, which starts from product conceptual design,developing detailed 3D models and 2D engineering drawing, conducting Moldflow simulation toimprove the design, applying Mastercam to generate CNC tool path for mold fabrication,installing the mold and machine setup, fabricating the parts, inspecting the quality, and writing aself-reflection report to summarize the learning and analyze how to improve the quality andeliminate molding
thermodynamics), were flipped and involved pre-recorded videos and self-reflection guides, which we call Flip Lecture Sheets (FLS). FLS reflections had to be completedbefore class and were meant as a mechanism to ensure students actively watched the videos. Thelast three weeks (thermodynamic cycles) were focused on application and the course project.Pre-recorded videos were not used in this part of the course because the focus is on integratingthe knowledge gained throughout the course and applying that knowledge to solve more complexproblems. The culminating project was a key part of the last three weeks. From start to end,students were given progressively greater ownership and responsibility in applying knowledge.A theoretical framework guiding this
-point Likert scale. This data has received on-goinganalysis to compare the 2015 and 2016 cohorts, and to provide insight into any future changes.Perceptions of online lectures: In 2015, 73% of students agreed or strongly agreed that the onlinelectures were helpful, and 79% agreed in 2016. When asked if they prefer online lectures to in-person lectures, such as those in their other engineering courses, approximately half of both the2015 and 2016 cohorts agreed they would prefer online lectures. This was also reflected in thequalitative responses, where an average of half the respondents expressed a preference for theonline lecture format over the in-person format. These results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.Addition of tutorials: As mentioned
0% Very Bad 0%DiscussionAs seen in the previous section, there was very good agreement between the grades assigned bythe instructor and the students. The difference is statistically insignificant, and would not alterthe overall final course grade of any of the students. The instructor believes that similar resultswould have been obtained had the comparison been between the grading of the instructor and aTA. While it is premature to generalize this result, due to the limited number of samples, onemay reflect on the findings to deduce some lessons learned. The sample course was a seniorengineering one in which almost all the students had previously attended one or two courses withthe same instructor in
a host of instructional strategies andeducators have been significantly lagging in using them[1]. In fact, Henderson and Dancy [7] arguethat the improvement in engineering education lies not in finding more effective instructionalstrategies but in using the proven strategies.This paper describes our attempt to introduce a few RBIS in a rural Indian engineering college.We introduced simple strategies such as using audio-visuals, think-pair-share, formative feedback,problem-based learning in lab sessions, and project-based learning in design courses in a one-dayworkshop. Eighty faculty members, in two batches, attended the workshop, which itself used manyof the above RBIS. The participating faculty members reflected on the strategies in
other industries. The data does notdifferentiate the type of incidents that contribute to the injury rate. A low overall injury rate doesnot necessarily correlate to the degree of lab safety since some injuries will be unrelated to labwork. Actual injury rate is likely higher than the data shows because it only includes reportedinjuries above a certain threshold. The BLS tracks causes of days away of work by industry, butit groups education with health services, which is the industry with the highest injury rate.Therefore, no analysis was done on whether the types of injuries at universities could reflect labaccidents.Generally, city governments are responsible for building and fire safety. Other alternative safetymonitors are found at the
understand how to model the equation but also have to solve the equation. Cui,Rebello, and Bennett [31] mentioned that students need prompting and scaffolding to connect thecalculus knowledge with physics problems, so we did it with some success, reflected in thequantitative results shown in Figure 2.Figure 2 shows that there is a large percentage of students with a high score in the qualitativeindicator (44% of students had a score greater than 80%). From those, the spread in scores forthe quantitative part is large. On the other hand, all students who have a high score in thequantitative part (i.e., greater than 80%) also have a high score in the conceptual part. It seemsthat it is required to have a strong conceptual understanding, but this is
completeda questionnaire surveying their experiences with their current partner.During each laboratory meeting, the instructor would introduce the prescribed group assignment,then support the students as they completed the prescribed assignment. Attendance and tardinesswere recorded, as were observations made by the instructor during the course of the laboratory.After each laboratory meeting, the instructor would first reflect, then record their thoughts,impressions, and perspective on the laboratory they had just taught. As the laboratory instructorwas also the laboratory instructor for the subsequent course, Game Development II, observationswere continued for the first 4 weeks of the next class to explore the residual impact of thecollaborative
results as an experience; and• Reflective observation consists of reviewing the simulation results and reflecting on how to design a cache memory with a new idea.Two steps for design-based learning:• Abstract conceptualization consists of designing a new idea by porting the code into the Simple Simulator to implement; and• Active experimentation consists of finalizing the design after analyzing the simulation results. Figure 1. Flowchart of Kolb Experiential Learning Cycles.Simulating conventional cache schemes for experience-basedlearning:The Simple Simulator’s purpose is to design and implement multi-core cache memory schemes for computer architecture labs forsenior- and/or graduate-level students. Figure 2 shows the majorsteps to
grounded in the work of Crismond and Adams [94], who developed the InformedDesign Teaching and Learning Matrix based on a meta-literature review. The matrix includesnine design strategies that are fundamental to informed engineering design and include:understanding the challenge, building knowledge, generating ideas, representing ideas, weighingoptions and making decisions, conducting experiments, troubleshooting, revising or iterating,and reflecting on the process. In addition to identifying these strategies, the authors describelearning progressions to highlight the range of design behaviors that develop from beginningdesigners to informed designers.The design strategies in the Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix are intended to beused
. These steps aresummarized here: 1. Demonstrated examples during lecture 2. Online homework with intermediate step feedback 3. Traditionally presented textbook problems during recitation 4. Assessment during midterm/final examsIt was stressed during lecture that circuit analysis, and in this case mesh analysis, is a methodicalprocess that can be applied to any circuit. The steps of the method were demonstrated to eachsection using eight problems prior to the assignment of the online homework. For each lectureproblem the methodical approach reflected in the online homework was demonstrated on awhiteboard. This was the first step listed above. If students needed additional support in thisform, video lectures were also provided using
industrial setting.Progress of the Ongoing TasksExecution of a Service Learning Project Course (ENGR 294). In Fall 2019, Cohort I Scholarsattended a Service Learning Project (SLP) course which was implemented for the first time at theUniversity. This course creates an opportunity for students to engage with their local communityand provides students with a sense of pride and belonging through their efforts. Following theservice learning model, the course also has a reflection component to allow Scholars to deeplyconnect with themselves and the community. During the last session of the course, Scholarspresented a summary of their service learning project proposals to their fellow Scholars, peers, andfaculty. Cohort I Scholars will continue to work on
were normalized for each major. They were divided by the total number ofenrolled students in that specific major for that academic year-. This normalization reflects the percentage ofstudents in a major that attended or were recruited. In some cases, this percentage is higher than 100%, due tothe presence of pre-major students in both attendance and recruitment numbers. Pre-major students are notconsidered students of a specific major, but often reflect a desire for a specific major. The use of majorenrollment instead of total enrollment was intentional as the scope of the work looks explicitly to understandundergraduate students in their major. It also allowed identifying instances in which a major went above theirenrollment numbers
foundation for additionalqualitative exploration.Data Collection, Analysis, and AdaptationsAll survey data was collected through a digital instrument using Qualtrics software. Survey datawas primarily information on attitudinal shifts using quantitative Likert-type scaling. The surveyalso included some open-ended questions identifying new areas for exploration; additionalqualitative data was collected through regular reflections during the internship and semi-structured interviews at the end of the internship. Researchers used SPSS software forquantitative data analysis of the survey information. Qualitative data was coded both manuallyand using NVivo software. Protocols for research were approved by the Institutional ReviewBoard (IRB) at the
andautomation areas. These statistics clearly show there is a skill gap between industry needs andwhat current curriculum offers at community college levels and other levels. To fill these skillgap there is a need for industry driven curriculum development and this project reflected thoseissues. Driven by the program objectives, the Old Dominion University (ODU) and CCAMteam developed an approach to formulate the curriculum and courses. Since the mechatronicsprograms are mature, the approach for this project was to piggy-back on these programs tointroduce robotics technology programs into the current offerings. Mechatronics is aninterdisciplinary area of engineering that combines mechanical and electrical engineering and
prospectsfor each sub-workforce can vary significantly” [7, p.1], which necessitates a closer examinationof individual sub-workforces of interest.Within civil engineering, the accelerated rate of technological development, the declining stateof national infrastructure, and the degradation of the environment present new challenges tocurrent and future generations of workers. Civil engineers must respond to growing populationsin urban areas, intensifying natural disasters, and increasing calls for sustainability [9]. Work atthe intersection of human health, environmental protection, and built environment entailsresponsibilities that continue to broaden and these changes in practice need to be reflected incurricula. The American Society of Civil