in Industrial Engineering from UPRM and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Dr. Santiago has over 20 years of experience in academia and has been successful in obtaining funding and publishing for various research projects. She’s also the founder and advisor of the first ASEE student chapter in Puerto Rico. Her research interests include investigating students’ understanding of difficult concepts in engineering sciences, especially for underrepresented populations (Hispanic students). She has studied the effective- ness engineering concept inventories (Statics Concept Inventory - CATS and the Thermal and Transport Concept Inventory - TTCI) for diagnostic assessment and cultural differences among
in Engineering (WIE), American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and SWE. She is the Students activities chair, IEEE Northeast Michigan Section since 2014. She is the member of Institutional Review Board Committee, reviewer of Consumers Energy Engineering Talent Scholarship, and member of C of IDEAS at SVSU. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Using Cost-Effective Robotics Kits in Engineering EducationAbstractThe field of robotics is multidisciplinary, employing fundamental knowledge and building uponskills acquired in electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and computer science courses.Hands-on engagement, which has become
Engineer to the broadcast industry and as an R&D consultant to in- dustrial clients. He has been nominated twice for the UCSC campus-wide Excellence in Teaching Award and received recognition by the School of Engineering’s yearly Excellence in Teaching Award 17 times since 1998. He is a Member of IEEE and ASEE, faculty advisor to UCSC’s Chapter of Tau Beta Pi and Trustee of the UCSC Amateur Radio Club’s station license, callsign: W6SLG. He has taught a broad spectrum of classes in both computer and electrical engineering. He especially enjoys teaching senior level engineering design classes he wrote in the areas of RF and mixed-signal High-Speed Digital design that bring together both theory and practice.Prof. John
. Williams, “OPINION: Why EM? The potential benefits of instilling an entrepreneurial mindset.,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2018.[7] M. Dyer, “STEAM without hot air: strategy for educating creative engineers,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 74–85, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2019.1693122.[8] N.-H. Kang, “A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea,” Asia-Pac. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 6, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y.[9] M. Mcauliffe, “The potential benefits of divergent thinking and metacognitive skills in STEAM learning: A discussion paper,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Change, vol. 2, no. 3, May
teaching behavior, ratherthan tool use per se, which the authors posit is not necessary for faculty observation programs[22]. Excluding the use of instructional artifacts misses tool mediation, a key tenet of ActivityTheory and an essential point in our work. It is critical to capture when (and what) technologiesare used, if they successfully support the intent of the activity, and what the ramifications of thisuse are because tools shape the way people interact with their reality; knowing how to use a tooldemonstrates transmission of social and cultural knowledge [12].A more recent protocol, the Classroom Discourse Observation Protocol (CDOP) [5], developedin 2019, references the RTOP, TDOP, and COPUS, and distinguishes itself from those
, C. B. Zoltowski, L. Kisselburgh, and A. O. Brightman, “Enhancing engineering students’ ethical reasoning: Situating reflexive principlism within the SIRA framework,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 82–102, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20249.[17] J. Borenstein, M. J. Drake, R. Kirkman, and J. L. Swann, “The engineering and science Issues Test (ESIT): A discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 387–407, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z.[18] M. J. Drake, P. M. Griffin, R. Kirkman, and J. L. Swann, “Engineering ethical curricula: Assessment and comparison of two approaches,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, pp. 223–231, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005
, 2020.[3] Y. Lambrinidou and M. Edwards, "Learning to Listen: An Ethnographic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education," ASEE, p. Paper ID#8224, 2013.[4] J. R. Herkert, "Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 7, p. 403–414, 2001.[5] N. Gabiam, The Politics of Suffering: Syria's Palestinian Refugee Camps, Indiana University Press, 2016.[6] C. Baillie and M. Levine, "Engineering Ethics from a Justice Perspective: A Critical Repositioning of What It Means to Be an Engineer," International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10-20, 2013.[7] H. L. Brown-Liburd and B. M. Porco, "It's
.81.3.151-159.[5] M. S. Patterson, L. R. Gagnon, A. Vukelich, S. E. Brown, J. L. Nelon, and T. Prochnow, “Social Networks, Group Exercise, and Anxiety Among College Students,” J. Am. Coll. Health, pp. 1–9, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1679150.[6] J. Thibodeaux, A. Deutsch, A. Kitsantas, and A. Winsler, “First-Year College Students’ Time Use: Relations With Self-Regulation and GPA,” J. Adv. Acad., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 5– 27, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1932202X16676860.[7] M. Kebritchi, A. Lipschuetz, and L. Santiague, “Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education: A Literature Review
courses, or through research centers [2].However, bio-inspired engineering is less common in K-12 education. In 2019, the NSF funded aK-12 project entitled Biologically Inspired Design for Engineering Education (BIRDEE), tocreate socially relevant, accessible, and highly contextualized high school engineering curriculafocusing on bio-inspired design. Studies have shown that women and underrepresentedminorities are drawn to curricula, courses, and instructional strategies that are integrated,emphasize systems thinking, and facilitate connection building across courses or disciplines[4].The BIRDEE project also seeks to interest high school girls in engineering by providingcurricula that incorporate humanistic, bio-inspired engineering with a focus
received his Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from The Ohio State University. His research and teaching interests are in the areas of simulation modeling, logistics optimization, and inventory analysis applied to manufacturing, distribution, and health-care systems. He serves as an Asso- ciate Editor for the International Journal of Modeling and Simulation and is active in IIE, INFORMS, and ASEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Creating a Multi-College Interdisciplinary B.S. Data Science Program with ConcentrationsAbstractThis paper describes the development of a multi-college
correspond to the two different study cohorts consisting of the ELDM alumni and CoEComparison group. The ELDM alumni cohort was surveyed in 2018 and reported on previouslyby Gehr (2019) and Lang et al. (2020). Within the ELDM cohort, contact information wasavailable for 451 alumni. A recruitment email was sent with a link to the study survey and 136responded, resulting in a response rate of 30.2%.The College of Engineering non-ELDM cohort was surveyed in 2019. Contact information wasobtained through three LinkedIn alumni groups where an initial group of 600+ individuals werecontacted to make initial connections. All contacts were consolidated from the followingLinkedIn groups: “Penn State Engineering Alumni Society (Official)”, “Penn State
thank their committee for their advice while designing this dissertationresearch project, and specifically Dr. Allison Godwin for feedback on this paper. Also, the authorwishes to thank each participant who was involved in this research project, especially Simone,who specifically shared an insightful story that has the power to shape undergraduate engineeringeducation.References[1] NASEM, “Fostering the Culture of Convergence in Research,” Washington DC, 2019. doi: 10.17226/25271.[2] D. M. Riley and Y. Lambrinidou, “Canons against cannons? Social justice and the engineering ethics imaginary,” in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.23661.[3] L. R. Lattuca, D. B. Knight, H. K
engagement of all students enrolled in our seminar.References[1] R. M. Lima, P. H. Andersson, and E. Saalman, Active Learning in Engineering Education: a (re) introduction. Taylor & Francis, 2017.[2] D. Schon, “The reflective practitioner,” 1983.[3] J. Turns, B. Sattler, K. Yasuhara, J. Borgford-Parnell, and C. J. Atman, “Integrating reflection into engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2014, vol. 35, p. 64.[4] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer,” Australasian journal of engineering education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 2–16, 2003.[5] R. Dimeo, “Sketchnoting: an analog skill in the digital age,” ACM SIGCAS Computers
contentknowledge test of the module The Physics of Sound and Mathematics of Music includes 20multiple-choice questions. Each question has only one correct answer and three other distractors.The content knowledge test of the module Introduction to Robotics contains 17 multiple-choicequestions. Each item has only one correct answer and three other distractors.To asses, if there was a gain in Content Knowledge, a paired t-test was implemented comparingthe Pre-Test and the Post-Test only of the participants that completed both.The results of the surveys and content knowledge Pre and Post Tests taken in preparation for thestart of the academic year 2018-2019 are below. All the Professional Development series wereconducted by the same instructor, who is also
between elements of the program that show growth (orotherwise) with time, and those that are consistent throughout the program. Eight questions (Q1–Q8) and median ranked responses are presented (Figure 4 and Table 3) inthe order that they appeared in weekly surveys. Weekly trend analyses are notably different between Figure 4. Weekly Survey Results. KTRL lines plotted for 2017 (marked with circles) and 2019 (marked with Xs). See Table 3 (below), for accompanying KTRL line equations and their respective Kendall’s Tau correlation coefficients.SUMMER 2020 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 15 ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION
Paper ID #30184Development of Employability Skills in Engineering Disciplines throughCo-opMs. Haaniyah Ali, York University Haaniyah Ali is a Mechanical Engineering undergraduate student from York University, class of 2020. She has worked on engineering co-op education research projects since September 2018 and presented her first paper at a conference in June 2019. She is passionate about understanding the co-op education system, to provide the best experience for students. She is also very involved in her school community and works with students and faculty alike to improve community engagement.Dr. Jeffrey Harris, York
Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen- bethke-wendellNicole Alexandra Batrouny, Tufts University PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University. Interests: upper elementary engineering education, integrated science and engineering, collaboration in engineering, decision making in engineer- ing.Dr. Tejaswini S. Dalvi, Univeristy of Massachusetts, Boston c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Elementary Students Navigating the Demands of Giving Engineering Design Peer Feedback (Fundamental) Throughout the design process, practicing engineers seek out feedback on their
. Phillips, Oklahoma State University JOHN PHILLIPS, a registered engineer and Associate Professor of Architectural Engineering, practiced as a structural engineer for nine years before returning to his alma mater to teach at Oklahoma State University. He teaches architecture and architectural engineering students in undergraduate and graduate courses that include Statics, Analysis I, Timbers, Steel, Concrete, Steel II, Concrete II, Steel III, Concrete III, Masonry and in the Comprehensive Design Studio. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Benchmarking Architectural Engineering CapstonesAbstractArchitectural Engineering programs that create students capable of being
Paper ID #29276Implementing Abbreviated Personas into Engineering EducationMajor Jonathan Kralick P.E., United States Military Academy Jonathan graduated from USMA in 2009 with a BS in Mechanical Engineering. After serving in the 82nd Airborne Division as a Combat Engineer for several years he was selected to join the Special Forces. As a Green Beret, he has worked with several partner nations throughout Africa. Jonathan completed his MS in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University in 2019 focusing on Dynamics and Manufacturing and is currently an Instructor in the Civil and Mechanical Engineering Department at USMA
of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] A. Akera, “Setting the Standards for Engineering Education: A History [Scanning Our Past],” Proc. IEEE, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1834–1843, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2729406.[2] B. Seely, “‘Patterns in the History of Engineering Education Reform: A Brief Essay,’” in Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century, Washington D.C.: National Academcy Press, 2005, pp. 114–130.[3] R. A. Cheville, “A Century of Defining Engineering Education,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, 2014.[4] C. R. Mann and M. Press, “A Study of Engineering Education,” Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of
of Rural and Small-Town Students: Opportunities to Learn, Aspirations, Preparation, and College Enrollment,” Educational Researcher, vol. 50, no. 9, p. 0013189X2110275, Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x211027528.[6] L. Bjerke and Charlotta Mellander, “Mover Stayer Winner Loser - A study of income effects from rural migration,” RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, vol. 130, Feb. 2019.[7] K. P. S. Goodpaster, O. A. Adedokun, and G. C. Weaver, “Teachers’ Perceptions of Rural STEM Teaching: Implications for Rural Teacher Retention,” The Rural Educator, vol. 33, no. 3, Nov. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v33i3.408.[8] L. F. Hutchison, “Addressing the STEM Teacher Shortage in American
the process change/perspective but perspectives and o State Appreciation for process broadened perspective; some situates one’s own critical narrative reflection of process perspective; a lot of o Reflect on importance story for engineers reflection on process o Perspective change o Peer interaction/ Process o Score for how impactful was the processReferences1. ABET. (2022). ABET. (2022). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020. Retrieved
. Sadler, P.M., et al., Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science education, 2012. 96(3): p. 411-427.3. Tai, R.H., et al., Planning early for careers in science. Science, 2006. 312(5777): p. 1143-1144.4. Falk, J.H., et al., Taking an ecosystem approach to STEM learning. Connected Science Learning, 2016. 1: p. 1-11.5. Falk, J.H., et al., Understanding youth STEM interest pathways within a single community: The Synergies project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2016. 6(4): p. 369-384.6. Clark, A. and R.L. Kajfez. Engineering Identity in Pre-College Students: A Literature Review. in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
, Teaching Engineering Students Freehand Sketching with an Intelligent Tutoring System. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 135–148. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17398-29[11] B. Williford, M. Runyon, and T. Hammond, “Recognizing perspective accuracy: an intelligent user interface for assisting novices,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2020, pp. 231–242.[12] T. Inadome, M. Soga, and H. Taki, “Development of sketch learning support environment using augmented reality and step-by-step drawing,” Workshop Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2012, pp. 482–490, 2012.[13] Y. S. Kim and E. Wang