, 2020.[3] Y. Lambrinidou and M. Edwards, "Learning to Listen: An Ethnographic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education," ASEE, p. Paper ID#8224, 2013.[4] J. R. Herkert, "Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 7, p. 403–414, 2001.[5] N. Gabiam, The Politics of Suffering: Syria's Palestinian Refugee Camps, Indiana University Press, 2016.[6] C. Baillie and M. Levine, "Engineering Ethics from a Justice Perspective: A Critical Repositioning of What It Means to Be an Engineer," International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10-20, 2013.[7] H. L. Brown-Liburd and B. M. Porco, "It's
.81.3.151-159.[5] M. S. Patterson, L. R. Gagnon, A. Vukelich, S. E. Brown, J. L. Nelon, and T. Prochnow, “Social Networks, Group Exercise, and Anxiety Among College Students,” J. Am. Coll. Health, pp. 1–9, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1679150.[6] J. Thibodeaux, A. Deutsch, A. Kitsantas, and A. Winsler, “First-Year College Students’ Time Use: Relations With Self-Regulation and GPA,” J. Adv. Acad., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 5– 27, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1932202X16676860.[7] M. Kebritchi, A. Lipschuetz, and L. Santiague, “Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education: A Literature Review
courses, or through research centers [2].However, bio-inspired engineering is less common in K-12 education. In 2019, the NSF funded aK-12 project entitled Biologically Inspired Design for Engineering Education (BIRDEE), tocreate socially relevant, accessible, and highly contextualized high school engineering curriculafocusing on bio-inspired design. Studies have shown that women and underrepresentedminorities are drawn to curricula, courses, and instructional strategies that are integrated,emphasize systems thinking, and facilitate connection building across courses or disciplines[4].The BIRDEE project also seeks to interest high school girls in engineering by providingcurricula that incorporate humanistic, bio-inspired engineering with a focus
received his Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from The Ohio State University. His research and teaching interests are in the areas of simulation modeling, logistics optimization, and inventory analysis applied to manufacturing, distribution, and health-care systems. He serves as an Asso- ciate Editor for the International Journal of Modeling and Simulation and is active in IIE, INFORMS, and ASEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Creating a Multi-College Interdisciplinary B.S. Data Science Program with ConcentrationsAbstractThis paper describes the development of a multi-college
correspond to the two different study cohorts consisting of the ELDM alumni and CoEComparison group. The ELDM alumni cohort was surveyed in 2018 and reported on previouslyby Gehr (2019) and Lang et al. (2020). Within the ELDM cohort, contact information wasavailable for 451 alumni. A recruitment email was sent with a link to the study survey and 136responded, resulting in a response rate of 30.2%.The College of Engineering non-ELDM cohort was surveyed in 2019. Contact information wasobtained through three LinkedIn alumni groups where an initial group of 600+ individuals werecontacted to make initial connections. All contacts were consolidated from the followingLinkedIn groups: “Penn State Engineering Alumni Society (Official)”, “Penn State
thank their committee for their advice while designing this dissertationresearch project, and specifically Dr. Allison Godwin for feedback on this paper. Also, the authorwishes to thank each participant who was involved in this research project, especially Simone,who specifically shared an insightful story that has the power to shape undergraduate engineeringeducation.References[1] NASEM, “Fostering the Culture of Convergence in Research,” Washington DC, 2019. doi: 10.17226/25271.[2] D. M. Riley and Y. Lambrinidou, “Canons against cannons? Social justice and the engineering ethics imaginary,” in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.23661.[3] L. R. Lattuca, D. B. Knight, H. K
engagement of all students enrolled in our seminar.References[1] R. M. Lima, P. H. Andersson, and E. Saalman, Active Learning in Engineering Education: a (re) introduction. Taylor & Francis, 2017.[2] D. Schon, “The reflective practitioner,” 1983.[3] J. Turns, B. Sattler, K. Yasuhara, J. Borgford-Parnell, and C. J. Atman, “Integrating reflection into engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2014, vol. 35, p. 64.[4] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer,” Australasian journal of engineering education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 2–16, 2003.[5] R. Dimeo, “Sketchnoting: an analog skill in the digital age,” ACM SIGCAS Computers
contentknowledge test of the module The Physics of Sound and Mathematics of Music includes 20multiple-choice questions. Each question has only one correct answer and three other distractors.The content knowledge test of the module Introduction to Robotics contains 17 multiple-choicequestions. Each item has only one correct answer and three other distractors.To asses, if there was a gain in Content Knowledge, a paired t-test was implemented comparingthe Pre-Test and the Post-Test only of the participants that completed both.The results of the surveys and content knowledge Pre and Post Tests taken in preparation for thestart of the academic year 2018-2019 are below. All the Professional Development series wereconducted by the same instructor, who is also
between elements of the program that show growth (orotherwise) with time, and those that are consistent throughout the program. Eight questions (Q1–Q8) and median ranked responses are presented (Figure 4 and Table 3) inthe order that they appeared in weekly surveys. Weekly trend analyses are notably different between Figure 4. Weekly Survey Results. KTRL lines plotted for 2017 (marked with circles) and 2019 (marked with Xs). See Table 3 (below), for accompanying KTRL line equations and their respective Kendall’s Tau correlation coefficients.SUMMER 2020 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 15 ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION
Paper ID #30184Development of Employability Skills in Engineering Disciplines throughCo-opMs. Haaniyah Ali, York University Haaniyah Ali is a Mechanical Engineering undergraduate student from York University, class of 2020. She has worked on engineering co-op education research projects since September 2018 and presented her first paper at a conference in June 2019. She is passionate about understanding the co-op education system, to provide the best experience for students. She is also very involved in her school community and works with students and faculty alike to improve community engagement.Dr. Jeffrey Harris, York
Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen- bethke-wendellNicole Alexandra Batrouny, Tufts University PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University. Interests: upper elementary engineering education, integrated science and engineering, collaboration in engineering, decision making in engineer- ing.Dr. Tejaswini S. Dalvi, Univeristy of Massachusetts, Boston c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Elementary Students Navigating the Demands of Giving Engineering Design Peer Feedback (Fundamental) Throughout the design process, practicing engineers seek out feedback on their
. Phillips, Oklahoma State University JOHN PHILLIPS, a registered engineer and Associate Professor of Architectural Engineering, practiced as a structural engineer for nine years before returning to his alma mater to teach at Oklahoma State University. He teaches architecture and architectural engineering students in undergraduate and graduate courses that include Statics, Analysis I, Timbers, Steel, Concrete, Steel II, Concrete II, Steel III, Concrete III, Masonry and in the Comprehensive Design Studio. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Benchmarking Architectural Engineering CapstonesAbstractArchitectural Engineering programs that create students capable of being
Paper ID #29276Implementing Abbreviated Personas into Engineering EducationMajor Jonathan Kralick P.E., United States Military Academy Jonathan graduated from USMA in 2009 with a BS in Mechanical Engineering. After serving in the 82nd Airborne Division as a Combat Engineer for several years he was selected to join the Special Forces. As a Green Beret, he has worked with several partner nations throughout Africa. Jonathan completed his MS in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University in 2019 focusing on Dynamics and Manufacturing and is currently an Instructor in the Civil and Mechanical Engineering Department at USMA
of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] A. Akera, “Setting the Standards for Engineering Education: A History [Scanning Our Past],” Proc. IEEE, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1834–1843, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2729406.[2] B. Seely, “‘Patterns in the History of Engineering Education Reform: A Brief Essay,’” in Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century, Washington D.C.: National Academcy Press, 2005, pp. 114–130.[3] R. A. Cheville, “A Century of Defining Engineering Education,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, 2014.[4] C. R. Mann and M. Press, “A Study of Engineering Education,” Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of
of Rural and Small-Town Students: Opportunities to Learn, Aspirations, Preparation, and College Enrollment,” Educational Researcher, vol. 50, no. 9, p. 0013189X2110275, Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x211027528.[6] L. Bjerke and Charlotta Mellander, “Mover Stayer Winner Loser - A study of income effects from rural migration,” RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, vol. 130, Feb. 2019.[7] K. P. S. Goodpaster, O. A. Adedokun, and G. C. Weaver, “Teachers’ Perceptions of Rural STEM Teaching: Implications for Rural Teacher Retention,” The Rural Educator, vol. 33, no. 3, Nov. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v33i3.408.[8] L. F. Hutchison, “Addressing the STEM Teacher Shortage in American
the process change/perspective but perspectives and o State Appreciation for process broadened perspective; some situates one’s own critical narrative reflection of process perspective; a lot of o Reflect on importance story for engineers reflection on process o Perspective change o Peer interaction/ Process o Score for how impactful was the processReferences1. ABET. (2022). ABET. (2022). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020. Retrieved
. Sadler, P.M., et al., Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science education, 2012. 96(3): p. 411-427.3. Tai, R.H., et al., Planning early for careers in science. Science, 2006. 312(5777): p. 1143-1144.4. Falk, J.H., et al., Taking an ecosystem approach to STEM learning. Connected Science Learning, 2016. 1: p. 1-11.5. Falk, J.H., et al., Understanding youth STEM interest pathways within a single community: The Synergies project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2016. 6(4): p. 369-384.6. Clark, A. and R.L. Kajfez. Engineering Identity in Pre-College Students: A Literature Review. in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
, Teaching Engineering Students Freehand Sketching with an Intelligent Tutoring System. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 135–148. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17398-29[11] B. Williford, M. Runyon, and T. Hammond, “Recognizing perspective accuracy: an intelligent user interface for assisting novices,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2020, pp. 231–242.[12] T. Inadome, M. Soga, and H. Taki, “Development of sketch learning support environment using augmented reality and step-by-step drawing,” Workshop Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2012, pp. 482–490, 2012.[13] Y. S. Kim and E. Wang
infrastructure resilience, and engineering ed- ucation. She taught 11 courses at UConn, including Statics, Structural Analysis, Senior Capstone Project, and new Structural Health Monitoring and Sensors courses. Dr. Jang is the recipient of the 2018 Civil Engineering Educator of the Year award from the Connecticut Society of Civil Engineers, the 2021 Dis- tinguished Engineering Educator Award from the UConn School of Engineering, and the 2021 ASEE Emerging Leader Fellow Award from the Civil Engineering Division. She is the newsletter editor of the ASEE Civil Engineering Division and the treasurer of the ASEE Northeast Section. In addition, she is a faculty advisor of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) UConn Chapter
.[6] C. R. Østergaard, B. Timmermans and K. Kristinsson, "Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation," Elsevier, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 500-509, 2010.[7] S. A. R. Vakil, "The racial politics of STEM education in the USA: interrogations and explorations," Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 449-458, 2019.[8] L. L. Martins and F. J. Milliken, "Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups," The Academy of Management, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 402433, 1996.[9] Engineering, National Academy of, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering Education to the New Century, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
graduates and institutional support at their post-graduation employer (typically auniversity or academic institution) are key to increasing the representation of minorities inSTEM faculty roles [4]. To increase the number of doctoral degrees earned, there must be anincrease in the number of Hispanic students entering graduate programs. According to theEngineering by the Numbers ASEE report, even though Hispanics represent 18.7% of the USpopulation, only 9.2% and 6.1% of master and doctoral degrees, respectively, are awarded toHispanic recipients [5]. Further, the numbers decrease again when faculty appointments areconsidered, where only 3.6% of faculty appointments in engineering are held by Hispanicprofessors.Convincingly, increasing Hispanic
problemsolving engineering tasks,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, 2019. [5] H. H. Hu, C. Kussmaul, B. Knaeble, C. Mayfield, and A. Yadav, “Results from a survey of faculty adoption of process oriented guided inquiry learning (pogil) in computer science,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2016, pp. 186–191. [6] T. Nokes-Malach, J. Richey, and S. Gadgil, “When is it better to learn together? insights from research on collaborative learning,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 27, p. 645–656, 2015. [7] S. Shehab, L. Lawrence, E. Mercier, A. Margotta, E.Livingston, M. Silva, and T. Tucker, “Towards the effective implementation of
student performance in an accounting course,” Journal ofFinancial Reporting and Accounting, vol. 14, no 1, pp.129-146, 2006.[17] R.L. Navarro, L.Y. Flores, J. Legerski, J. Brionez, S.F. May, H.N. Suh, . . ., A. Jung “Social cognitive predictors of engineering students’ academic persistence intentions,satisfaction, and engagement,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 66, no. 2,pp.170-183, 2019, doi:10.1037/cou0000319.[18] D. Oerther, “Integrating Biological Principles in Environmental Engineering:Summary Results Of A Three-Year Pilot Study,” in 2003 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings,June 2003, pp.8-721, doi:10.18260/1-2—12315.[19] J. Serrano-Mira, J.V. Abellan-Nebot & G.M. Bruscas-Bellido, “Knowledge Retentionof Manufacturing Concepts in
understand engineering education’s ruling relations as gendered and raced,” 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[7] J. Cruz and N. Kellam, “Beginning an Engineer’s Journey: A Narrative Examination of How, When, and Why Students Choose the Engineering Major,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 556–582, 2018.[8] J. Karlin, R. A. Bates, C. Allendoerfer, D. Ewert, and R. R. Ulseth, “Building Your Change- agent Toolkit: The Power of Story,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition – Engineering Library Division Papers, 2018.[9] J. Karlin, R. A. Bates, C. Allendoerfer, and D. Ewert, "Building Your Change Agent Tool- Kit: Channeling the Power of Story," Association for
2018,” World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2018. 8. “Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Education (TUEE), Parts I-IV,” ASEE-NSF workshop Report, https://www.asee.org/member-resources/resources/transforming- undergraduate-engineering-education. 9. Benešová, A., Tupa, J., “Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0,” 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, FAIM2017, 27-30 June 2017, Modena, Italy. 10. Das, Kleinke and Pistrui, Reimagining Engineering Education: Does Industry 4.0 Need Education 4.0?, American Society for Engineering Education, 2020. 11. Das, Pistrui, Kleinke, Gehrig
knowledge to build a morediverse and representative future.References [1] S. Zweben, J. Tims, and Y. Timanovsky, “ACM-NDC study 2019—2020: eighth annual study of non-doctoral-granting departments in computing,” ACM Inroads, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 26–37, Aug. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3410475 [2] S. Zweben and B. Bizot, “2017 CRA Taulbee survey,” Computing Research News, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1–47, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://cra.org/resources/taulbee-survey/ [3] E. M. Mercier, B. Barron, and K. M. O’connor, “Images of self and others as computer users: The role of gender and experience,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 335–348, 2006, publisher: Wiley Online Library. [4
learning in the workplace: The Learning Evaluation and Reflection Narrative (LEARN) framework,” J. Work. Learn., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 658–671, 2018.[4] D. Fisher, A. Bagiati, and S. Sarma, “Fostering 21st century skills in engineering undergraduates through co-curricular involvement,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24–623.[5] H. Ozturk, L. Cartee, and F. Ligler, “Professional Development for Engineers: A Certificate Program for 3D Undergraduate Experience in Engineering Education,” 2019.[6] A. Webster-Wright, “Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 702–739, 2009, doi: 10.3102/0034654308330970