, planned quarterly shutdowns, and work on cap-ex projects. The mine shut down in 2016 and I want back to school at The University of Minnesota - Duluth and earned my M.E. in Industrial Engineering with a minor in Engineering Management. I also earned my black belt in Six Sigma. I'm currently working as a an engineering instructor for Minnesota North at the Mesabi Campus, where I teach first and second year engineering students.Frankie K. Wood-Black (Division Chair, Eng., Phys. Sci. and PTEC)Liz Cox © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Building Partnerships to Bridge the Transfer Gap and Increase
science mission of theirchoosing for a 1U CubeSat based on an Arduino Uno microcontroller platform. Teams areprovided identical Arduino sensor kits and are tasked with identifying suitable additionalhardware and software within cost, weight and volume constraints, meeting their unique missionobjectives. A total of 15 hours of virtual learning content are provided to motivate and guidelearners through multiple skill development modules. Teams then submit a preliminary designreport (PDR) detailing their designs, their mission success criteria and operational plans forcompetition judging. Finalists are invited to the University of Southern Maine to build theirdesigns and test them prior to a high-altitude balloon launch.2.0 Methods2.1
social sciences (with thelatter focusing in particular on science and technology studies or STS). We often articulate theIDSs as bridging engineering's “technical, creative, and social dimensions.” Because our socialscience faculty are largely trained in STS, “sociotechnical integration” is a departmentalhallmark, so a tagline for Design Engineering is “sociotechnical integration through design.”This approach to educating engineers has been challenged by—but also advanced because of—ABET accreditation requirements and our efforts to navigate the accreditation planning andreview.EDS offers, and therefore (mostly) controls the content of, the design spine courses (in additionto some of the focus area courses) within the overall curriculum. Because
usability.”The ABET student outcomes (General Criterion 3) include: - An ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics. - An ability to apply the engineering design process to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration for public health and safety, and global, cultural, social, environmental, economic, and other factors as appropriate to the discipline. - An ability to function effectively as a member or leader of a team that establishes goals, plans tasks, meets deadlines, and creates a collaborative and inclusive environment.MethodsDocumentation analysisTo identify common and distinguishing elements across courses
participatingin and delivering high-performance sustainable infrastructure projects. Finally, this study wouldbe valuable for implementing SI and enhancing the project management skills of the future AECworkforce.BackgroundSustainable infrastructures (SI) must be planned, built, and maintained carefully to fulfill theirintended function due to their complex design and construction. Such complex projects typicallyinvolve a wide range of stakeholders. These stakeholders hold diverse roles and responsibilitiesincluding setting the project's parameters and performance standards to running and maintainingthe finished infrastructure, all of which vary as the project progresses [1]. The path to sustainablegoals, which might include zero energy, zero carbon, and
the active involvement of others: direct reports, other managers, other team members, other department employees, and those above them on the organizational chart. Sometimes even their suppliers or customers! In this course, you will learn about teamwork and people management, and gain an introduction to strategy, finance, and project management. You will practice writing concise, persuasive analyses and action plans and verbally defending your ideas.ABET student outcomes are listed below in Table 1 [3]. Outcomes that are taught and assessedin EML are denoted in the table:Table 1. Student Outcomes taught in EML: ABET # Student Outcome Taught in EML course 1 an
, 2023 Robotics Empowered Convergence Engineering Education He Shen, Aren Petrossian, Joseph Vizcarra, Eva Schiorring, Mark TufenkjianAbstract: This paper presents the design and first-time offering of a convergence engineering course,“Introduction to Autonomous Robotic Systems,” where students from four engineering majors worked ininterdisciplinary teams to create submarine robots and accomplish complex autonomous missions. Thetechnical knowledge covered in the course included: robot design, mechanical analysis, sensing andactuation, electrical system design, guidance, navigation, control, robot operating system, computer vision,object recognition, and mission planning. The students are engaged in a whole project cycle within
bachelordegree program within the four year timeframe and a lower likelihood of taking more than fouryears to complete the degree, female minority STEM students had the highest percentage of dropor stop attending rates. These findings offer some initial insight into the challenges faced by female minoritystudents in STEM fields in terms of degree completion and retention. This analysis marks thebeginning of a journey to understand their experiences, and plans are in progress for the nextphase of this study, which is scheduled for the fall 2023 semester. The next phase will focus onidentifying the barriers that these students face and will include activities aimed at improvingtheir confidence, preparedness and sense of belonging. Section 6.0
parallel with the new program presented here.As a liberal arts college, an engineering degree would need to have some flexibility to fit theoverall college culture. Initially planned to fit within the college’s BA footprint, a degree neededto provide some formal engineering training while still pursuing external interests such as varsitysports and musical ensembles. Many students come into college still exploring their interests, soa program with flexibility to discover engineering while in college would serve them better thanprograms at other institutions in the greater geographic area that provide specialized engineeringdegrees.Pilot ProgramThe engineering program started in the physics department, with a proposal for an EngineeringScience major
’ assessment of the climatewithin the first-year engineering experience. In this paper, findings from the second year ofpiloting our workshops are described. In this second iteration of training, new teaching assistantsparticipated in our foundational training in GIDBEA, and returning ones built on theirintroductory knowledge to learn about social justice and principles of inclusive leadership. Thedata shows that most of the teaching assistants found the workshop content and activitiesrelevant to them as peer educators. Several teaching assistants shared inclusive leadershipstrategies that they planned to implement in the coming semester. The goal of this study is toinform plans for implementing solutions into training that address deficiencies
presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3317Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., & Edstrom, K. (2007). Rethinking engineering education. The CDIO approach, 302(2), 60-62.cDettman, M. A. (2000, June), Industrial Partnerships At Western Kentucky University Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 10.18260/1-2--8453Dobrowski, T. (2008, June), Building Industry Relationships Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3797Foltz, L. G., Gannon, S., & Kirschmann, S. L. (2014). Factors that contribute to the persistence of minority students in STEM Fields. Planning
resultsshowed higher student success with writing-intensive courses in developing critical writing skillsin a construction management course [2]. Challenges of developing writing skills amongundergraduate STEM curricula are addressed by Mayo and Wheaton [3] who state that writingassignments can be developed such that they assist students in connecting their technical work toreal-world applications. In their lesson plan, the students were expected to post their work on apublic platform encouraging students to produce quality work. Richards and Milanovicestablished partnerships with professional writing faculty, industry members and technicalcourse instructors to mentor senior design project students in effective writing through pairedteaching [4]. In a
provided was in the area of structural engineering. Nine students were selected toparticipate in the Site; four students selected were from institutions outside Cincinnati, and five wereselected from UC. These included three women, one Native American male, one Hispanic male, oneAfrican American male, and three white American male students, and each group worked on a separateproject during the two summer months. Each group were supervised by the Project Director (author)and a Faculty Mentor, one Graduate Student Mentor (Research Assistant), and a Lab Technicianduring the complete duration of the REU Site. The whole research program was planned and conducted,the details of the projects selected for the students, and procedures were used to evaluate
building, or their homes, and theylearned different methods to analyze the results. We also engaged teachers in themapping and evaluation of control systems in either their school facilities or theirhomes to manage heating, cooling, and fresh air. They learned state-of-the-artdata analysis methods to identify opportunities to reduce energy demand. Totranslate their research into curriculum, science education faculty from CSATSengaged teachers in professional development focused on engineering practices.Weekly sessions supported teachers in identifying engineering practices that weretranslatable to secondary classrooms. As a culminating product, the teachersdeveloped a classroom research project plan for their students to complete in theacademic
summative assessment.Initial course delivery offered an opportunity to refine the course design throughout the semesterbased on instructor observations, formal and informal student feedback, and changingenvironmental conditions. End of course surveys and assessment data were used to evaluateinstructional effectiveness and inform future iterations of the course design.Introduction & Instructional ContextAfter the initial emergency shift to remote learning in March 2020 due to the global Covid-19pandemic, careful preparation for future semesters of continued uncertainty and disruptionbecame a necessity. Beginning in Summer 2020, planning for the Fall 2020 semester began inearnest. An undergraduate course, Engineering Management 2110 – Managing
courses on various skills within the major is not possible due to unit restrictions.Thus, our program evaluates how to imbed interpersonal and professional skills instructionthroughout the core of the Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering and Managementcurricula.This pilot study evaluates students’ ability to function effectively on a team where membersprovide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks,and meet objectives (ABET Student Outcome No. 5) [2]. Teamwork is a topic that falls under abroader category of professional skills [4] taught to engineering students. In fact, Kalturel-Konaket al. [4] assessed professional skills as ethics, teamwork, global awareness, and creative
responsibilities, family obligations, etc…) withinthe course schedule [2] or have social interaction preferences [3]. However, challenges do existfrom both the student and instructor perspectives. One study highlighted the online students’frustration due to lack of instruction interaction, inability to chat with peers to clear up questions,and difficult in paying attention online versus in-person [4]. Another study noted the high quantityof planning and preparation required of faculty teaching in a HyFlex mode in order for the learningto be effective [5]; since faculty cannot predict how many students will participate in each formatfor each class session, they may need to make changes on the fly to accommodate group work, forexample.Virtual Synchronous
intent that these changes will have impacts on improving the culture of the departmentand the educational experience for students. This department is planning on using Scrum as theirprimary mechanism for departmental operations.ScrumScrum is an agile methodology that encourages the collaboration among members of a ScrumTeam in the incremental development of a product [18]. The development emphasized achievinga minimal viable product. This product is developed over a series of Sprints (timeboxes). Sprintscan last one to four weeks long. During a Sprint the Scrum Teams works on items from a productbacklog that lead to the release of the product. The product backlog is generated by productowner. Each backlog item is prioritized for its value and
, clients, and other stakeholders. The in-person event was modified by requiring teams topre-record their poster presentations, then followed up with a live, virtual session for furtherdiscussion. An unanticipated benefit of this change was that many project clients who arenormally scattered across the globe could view the pre-recorded presentations and attend the live,virtual discussion session. Students were able to directly interact with their clients, when intypical years, that would not have been feasible.Additionally, as project materials were abandoned on campus as students retreated, many teamsno longer had the necessary resources to continue with their earlier plans. Instructors helpedguide teams to work on other significant final
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at California State University, Fullerton (CSUF). Her research interests include traffic flow modeling, statistical methods for transportation data analysis, and sustainable transportation planning. Her work has been published in several peer-reviewed journal publications and conference papers, and presented at numerous academic conferences. Dr. Reina has also served as an advisor of undergraduate research and applied projects such as those conducted by the student chapter of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and awardees of the Dwight David Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship. American c Society
arenot location and schedule bound. The extended Q&A period allowed a due diligence phase oftenutilized in business plan competitions and helped mimic how investors might make investmentdecisions [2]. The overall scores were lower than in previous years, indicating a more thoroughevaluation. Other benefits included the elimination of order bias [3] and less stress for thestudents.Based on our experiences from last year and feedback from our judging panel, we will beimplementing this new format to the competition moving forward. These changes enable betterevaluation of the project teams and ensure that the best ideas are evaluated and win thecompetition. This paper provides an in-depth understanding of how we decided to add a due-diligence
than what is required to sustain economic need (President's Council of Advisors onScience and Technology Policy Report, PCAST, 2012). Poor quality introductory courses are citedas reasons why STEM students do not persist in their planned majors (O'Neal et al., 2007; PCAST,2012). Graduate TAs teach many of these courses, and although they are not cited as a majorreason for STEM majors leaving, can certainly contribute to overall success or failure of a course(O'Neal et al., 2007). TAs may not have prior teaching experience and/or any training to teach, as graduateprograms typically focus largely on research training. Furthermore, they may not haveopportunities for teaching professional development. This can lead to challenges, not only
projects, campus scavengerhunts, themed hands on activities, and strategies for academic and career planning will be used tohighlight student engagement and course improvements.Summary of Related Literature A consistent factor that influences learning is the powerful impact of engagement,defined as the level at which students invest physical, psychological, emotional, and intellectualenergy in educationally related activities [1]. Successful engagement early in a student’s courseof study is critical as early engagement is sometimes insufficient at large universities, wherestudents do not normally feel “belonged” early due to large class sizes or lack of interactionamong students for a variety of reasons [2]. FYS classes have a statistically
reduce the number of exams in the semester, and could be completed remotely.This Work-In-Progress paper will discuss the efforts to implement this project in a remote/hybridinstruction fall semester, including comparison between student performance on the exams andprojects, and feedback from students.BackgroundA transition to online learning driven by the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring 2020 semester,continued through an entirely online semester in the summer, provided some preparation forhybrid teaching in fall 2020. Exams, the likely planned means of assessment and which hadoriginally been planned and scheduled to be held in-class, were now taken online. While thiscould require some adjustment and planning, the impact could potentially be
. ➢ Integrate ethical considerations from the outset. 3.4 Ethical implications ➢ Collaborate with ethics committees and external experts. Legal and regulatory ➢ Work closely with legal experts to ensure compliance. 3.5 compliance ➢ Conduct legal reviews and obtain necessary approvals. ➢ Ensure effective resource allocation. 3.6 Resource constraints ➢ Prioritize tasks to meet project goals within constraints. Performance and ➢ Manage computational resources efficiently. 3.7 scalability ➢ Plan for scalability to handle large volumes of data. Team
less important than the students experiencelearning how to use the presented technologies to implement their design. Working through arealistic design process prepares students for future professional work on the next generation ofIoT products, one of our desired goals.We encountered many external challenges throughout the development of this course, including apandemic, that drastically changed many of our original plans. This paper documents ourexperiences, shares the positive results we achieved and outlines future plans for courseimprovements.Motivations for the CourseThe conceptual framework for the course originated through conversations with industry partnerswho were concerned with the technical know-how of recent college graduates
develop a plan tomitigate the risk. Asking the teams for pitfalls in several deliverables was another way to give usvisibility to challenges and offer feedback throughout the project. Note that asking for challengeswas a theme throughout the deliverables, but we won’t explicitly mention each time it was askedin the remaining short descriptions.PR2: Conceptual Design Candidates – Due week 7At this point in the project, we asked each team to identify which design or pair of designs theyare continuing to pursue, along with rationale for both the continuation and abandonment ofother options. In the lecture portion of the class, we discussed techniques for effective decisionmaking and design narrowing. To reinforce the value of these techniques, we
Procedure (ELFP)The class stopped short of seismic analysis beyond the ELFP, as the topics were deemed tooadvanced for this student level.Class exercisesAs mentioned, an incorporation of active learning exercises was a major pedagogical strategy inthe development of the course. This paired with force diagrams and images of real-lifestructural scenarios helped make the connections between loading principles and theirapplications. These exercises are described in Table V. Table IV: Class Exercises“Smarties” ExerciseThe goal of this exercise was to demonstrate the concept of load transfer and teach tributarywidth. Students are given a floor plan printed on a piece of paper with a grid imposed on topat scaled 1’x1
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Dr. Gambatese’s expertise is in the broad areas of construction engineering and management, and structural engineering. He has taught many courses over his career on a variety of subjects including: construction safety, contracts and specifications, planning and scheduling, structural analysis and design, temporary construction structures, construction site systems engineering, and engineering economics. He has performed research and published numer- ous articles on construction worker safety, work zone design and safety, prevention through design, risk management, sustainability, constructability, innovation, and construction contracting. He is a licensed Professional Civil Engineer in
critical success factorin engineering. It is taught by an engineering professor. Engineering and scientific know-how aregiven added power when communicated with clarity and simplicity in presentations that arethoughtfully planned and effectively executed. Each student makes a large number of shortpresentations to sharpen their skills and increase their confidence. Students grapple withcapturing the essence of complex technical subjects and expressing it through key words, dataand images. Students develop a wide range of skills: visual representation of data, systems andmechanisms; structuring and sequencing a talk; delivering speeches with vivid voice and bodylanguage; and finally, skills in connecting with an audience and achieving the desired