,” Equity Excell. Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 169–180, 2002.[6] K. Cross, K. Clancy, R. Mendenhall, P. Imoukhuede, and J. Amos, “The double bind of race andgender: A look into the experiences of women of color in engineering,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition Proceedings, 2018.[7] N. Griffith, N. M. Hurd, and S. B. Hussain, “‘I didn’t come to school for this’: A qualitativeexamination of experiences with race-related stressors and coping responses among Black studentsattending a predominantly White institution,” J. Adolesc. Res, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 115–139, 2019.[8] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Women,Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017
Student Persistence,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2016-June, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.27280.[3] K. A. Feldman, J. C. Smart, and C. A. Ethington, “Using Holland’s Theory to Study Patterns of College Student Success: The Impact of Major Fields on Students *,” Accessed: Aug. 31, 2021. [Online].[4] J. R. Edwards and A. J. Shipp, “Relationship Between P-E Fit and Outcomes 1 The Relationship Between Person-Environment Fit and Outcomes: An Integrative Theoretical Framework,” Accessed: Aug. 31, 2021. [Online].[5] C. Bohndick, T. Rosman, S. Kohlmeyer, and H. M. Buhl, “The interplay between subjective abilities and subjective demands and its relationship with academic success. An
Engineering (BME) and STEM.Undergraduate (UG) and PhD: degrees awarded in that year. Faculty: tenured or tenure-trackfaculty. Sources: Engineering by the Numbers, ASEE EDGE Graphic Explorer, NCSES Surveyof Earned Doctorates, NCSES Science and Engineering Indicators, NCSES Diversity andSTEM: Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities Several societal pressures and personal experiences are responsible for women’s decision notto remain in biomedical engineering and other STEM professions. Women turn away fromengineering often because of social expectations/pressure, perceptions that they don’t belong,and a hostile learning environment [3], [8]–[11]. In addition to this “chilly climate,” societalfactors (e.g., family responsibility) are also
Paper ID #36947Personhood at the ExtremesDr. Suzanne Keilson, Loyola University, Maryland Suzanne Keilson is a faculty member at Loyola University Maryland. Her background and degrees are in Applied Physics and her research interests include signal processing, biomedical and materials engineer- ing, design, STEM education and assistive technologies.. She has served in the Mid-Atlantic section of ASEE for a number of years and is active in ASME and IEEE activities. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Personhood at the ExtremesAbstractThis paper investigates
academic rank: Fall 2015, fall 2017, and fall 2018,” Digest of Education Statistics, 2019. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_315.20.asp[21] B. Rios-Ellis, M. Rascón, G. Galvez, G. Inzunza-Franco, L. Bellamy, and A. Torres, “Creating a Model of Latino Peer Education: Weaving Cultural Capital into the Fabric of Academic Services in an Urban University Setting,” Educ. Urban Soc., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 33–55, Jan. 2015.[22] Y. P. Bynum, “The power of informal mentoring,” Education, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 69–74, 2015.[23] J. Horowitz and K. Christopher, “The Research Mentoring Program: Serving the Needs of Graduate and Undergraduate Researchers.,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 105– 116, Apr. 2013
Hyflex learning model,” International Journal of Innovation and Learning, May 2019, Accessed: Apr. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/10.1504/IJIL.2019.099986[2] A. Hsu, “‘Where is my office anyway?’ As COVID recedes, remote workers prepare to head back,” NPR, Feb. 17, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.npr.org/2022/02/17/1080881870/return-to-the-office-remote-work-hybrid-sched ule-worker-productivity[3] E. Pandey, “Generation Z fears being left behind by the push to remote work,” Axios, Jul. 13, 2021. https://www.axios.com/2021/07/13/gen-z-remote-work[4] M. Arshad and R. R. Romatoski, “Effective Learning Strategies: Design of Course Structure for Engineering Courses Aimed for Hybrid
. Lawhorn. “Solar and wind generation occupations: a look at the next decade,” Beyond the Numbers:Employment & Unemployment, vol. 10, no. 4 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2021), [online]. Available:https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-10/solar-and-wind-generation-occupations-a-look-at-the-next-decade.htm.[4] D. Keyser and T. Suzanne, “The Wind Energy Workforce in the United States: Training, Hiring, and FutureNeeds,” Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-6A20-73908, 2019. [online]. Available:https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73908.pdf.[5] Sharma, S. and Sengar, N. “A Review of solar PV training manuals and development of survey based solar PVsystem training formats for beginners,” Solar Energy, vol. 241, pp. 72
University Center for Postsecondary Research. The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, 2021 edition. Bloomington, IN, Author, n.d.6. A.H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row, 19707. C. Forest, H. Hashemi Farzaneh, J. Weinmann, U. Lindemann. “Quantitative survey and analysis of five maker spaces at large, research-oriented universities.” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. New Orleans, LA, USA, 2016, pp. 1-128. V. Wilczynski, “Contributions of Academic Makerspaces to Design Education”. in Design Education Today. D. Schaefer, G. Coates, C. Eckert, Eds. Cham: Springer, 2019. pp. 91-114.9. B.R. Martin, “What's happening to our universities?” Prometheus, vol. 34
. [2] J. Keshwani and E. Curtis, “To Change the World: Student Motivation for Pursuing a Degree in Agricul‐tural or Biological Engineering To Change the World: Student Motivation for Pursuing a Degree in Agricultural or Biological Engineering,” American Society for Engineering Education,. 2017. [3] D. R. Keshwani and J. Keshwani, “Understanding Student Successes, Challenges, and Perceptions of Community: Work‐in‐Progress.” American Society for Engineering Education, 2019. [4] C. Hershock and M. LaVaque‐Manty, “Teaching in the Cloud: Leveraging Online Collaboration Tools to Enhance Student Engagement,” Center for Research on Learning and Teaching Occasional Papers , no. 31, 2012. [5] R
advisors teach?” NACADA Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 65–73, 2005.[4] B. B. Crookston, “A developmental view of academic advising as teaching,” NACADA Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 5–9, 1994.[5] D.G. Creamer and E.G. Creamer, “Practicing developmental advising: theoretical contexts and functional applications,” NACADA Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 17–24, 1994.[6] K. C. Davis, “Examining the efficacy of exam wrappers in a computer science course” Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://216.185.13.174/37120, July 2021.[7] C. Napier, “Thinking about thinking: the relationship between confidence, attainment and metacognition in computer science
, vol. 276, pp. 1-20, 2020.[5] N. Lieu Le and S. P. Nunes, "Materials and membrane technologies for water and energy sustainability," Sustainable Materials and Technologies, vol. 7, pp. 1-28, 2016.[6] L. Malaeb and G. M. Ayoub, "Reverse osmosis technology for water treatment: State of the art review," Desalination, vol. 267, pp. 1-8, 2011.[7] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, "The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education," J. Eng. Ed., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005.[8] W. Chen, U. V. Shah and C. Brechtelsbauer, "A framework for hands-on learning in chemical engineering education—Training students with the end goal in mind," Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 28, pp. 25-29, 2019.[9] S. Freeman, S. L
is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. Grant Nos. 1821638, 1821439, and 1821445. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. Koretsky, S. Nolen, B. Self, C. Papadopoulos, J. Widmann, M. Prince, D. Dal Bello, “For Systematic Development of Conceptests for Active Learning,” in Proceedings EDULEARN 19 (11th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies), 2019, vol. 1, pp. 8882–8892.[2] M. D. Koretsky, B. J. Brooks, R. M. White, and A. S. Bowen, “Querying the Questions: Student Responses and
, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] C. G. P. Berdanier, “Genre maps as a method to visualize engineering writing and argumentation patterns,” J Eng Educ, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 377–393, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20281.[2] M. Borrego, “Conceptual difficulties experienced by trained engineers learning educational research methods,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 91–102, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00920.x.[3] S. Dart, S. Trad, and K. Blackmore, “Navigating the path from technical engineering to engineering education research: A conceptual model of the transition
. "Assessment of student learning in an entrepreneurship practicum course." 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2017.[11] M. Pynnönen, J. Hallikas, M. Immonen. “Innovation Commercialisation: Processes, Tools and Implications.” In: Chechurin, L., Collan, M. (eds) Advances in Systematic Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78075-7_19. 2019[12] N. Duval-Couetil, A. Huang-Saad, and M. Wheadon. "Training Faculty in Entrepreneurship and Innovation: An Evaluation of the National Science Foundation Innovation-Corps™ Program." Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy 4.4: 583-608. 2021Appendix AInnovation commercialization surveyThe study is to assess the level of
projects that provide virtual educational experiences for K-12 students on marine science. She loves to cook, ride her bike, and play with her dog. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Reimagining Methodologies: Why We Center Marginalized VoicesAbstractWe are a student, alum, and faculty research team seeking to reduce harm, be responsive to /mitigate / reduce trauma, and grow justice within engineering education pedagogy / practice,related research communities (including ASEE), and the broader world. We seek to utilizeresearch methodologies that align with these aspirations, goals, and commitments. However,many standard
Paper ID #38132“What’s getting in the way?” Personal and ProfessionalBarriers to Engineering LeadershipCindy Rottmann (Associate Director Research) Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director, Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She conducts research on engineering leadership, engineers' professional practice, and ethics and equity in engineering. She is currently the Program Chair of the ASEE LEAD division.Emily Moore Dr. Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto
, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.24059/olj.v19i2.454.[5] O. Balci, K. Deater-Deckard, and A. Norton, “Challenges in teaching modeling and simulation online,” in 2013 Winter Simulations Conference (WSC), Washington, DC, USA, Dec. 2013, pp. 3568–3575. doi: 10.1109/WSC.2013.6721718.[6] M. Aldoayan, R. Sahandi, D. John, and D. Cetinkaya, “Collaborative Cloud-based Online Courses: Issues and Challenges,” p. 5, 2019.[7] C. Chhetri, “‘I Lost Track of Things’: Student Experiences of Remote Learning in the Covid- 19 Pandemic,” in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education, Virtual Event USA, Oct. 2020, pp. 314–319. doi: 10.1145/3368308.3415413.[8] J. Bourne, D. Harris, and F. Mayadas, “Online Engineering
minimal Brought no evidence of Work Product of work, in format evidence of evidence of work from last week (0) ready for report (4) work (3) work (2)Figure 1: Original individual report document flow (orange/blue) and revised flow (green/blue)Current DesignIn 2019, we moved to a new assessment model with a team of two to four faculty mentoring andassessing all capstone project teams. No team is assigned to an individual faculty member,instead the mentoring and assessment responsibilities are distributed so that each team hasopportunities to interact with all the faculty mentors. In parallel with this shift, we
construction software applications). Thefirst part of the survey results (as shown in table 1) show that the students believe that theCM260 has moderately prepared them for most conceptual topics except for project schedulingand project management, for which students responded with “slightly prepared”. The “slightlyprepared” could be due to the lack of background knowledge (e.g. construction workflows andthe sequence of construction activities courses that these students would learn after CM 260)among the students for learning the more complicated topics such as construction projectscheduling and management. However, it is possible that the students that took the survey mostlikely took their CM 260 course in the 2019-20 academic year and during the
, pp. 49-60, 2020.[3] A. M. Helmenstine, “How to Write a Lab Report,” thoughtco.com, https://www.thoughtco.com/how-to-write-a-lab-report-606052 (accessed Aug. 27, 2013).[4] R. O’Neill, C. Geiger, K. Csavina and C. Orndoff, “‘Making Statics Dynamic!’ Combining Lecture And Laboratory Into An Interdisciplinary, Problem Based, Active Learning Environment,” in 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii: ASEE, pp. 12.1618.1-12.1618.16, 2007.[5] D. Pink, Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us, New York, NY: Riverhead Books, 2009.[6] C. Walker, “Experiential Learning as a Strategy for Student Completion and Course Success in the Community College
.x. [Accessed Jan. 16, 2022][9] L. Mayo and C. Voter, “Introducing Students to Engineering by Helping Them RePicture Their World,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2019. [Online]. Available at: https://peer.asee.org/32265. DOI 10.18260/1-2--32265[10] N. Fouad, R. Singh, “STEMMNIG the Tide: Why Women Leave Engineering,” 2011. [Online]. Available https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/NSF_Stemming%20the%20Tide%20Why%20Wome n%20Leave%20Engineering.pdf [Accessed Jan. 16, 2022][11] A. Groth, “Most Big Companies Have A Tracking System That Scans Your Resume For Keywords,” Business Insider, January 24, 2012. [Online]. Available https://www.businessinsider.com/most-big-companies-have-a-tracking-system-that-scans- your
other video chat options for virtual instruction.References[1] National Center for Education Statistics, '"Number and percentage of undergraduate studentsenrolled in distance education or online classes and degree programs, by selected characteristics:Selected years, 2003-04 through 2015-16," 2018. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov[Accessed Jan. 25, 2022].[2] M. Cameron, et al., "2019–20 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:20): FirstLook at the Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic on Undergraduate StudentEnrollment, Housing, and Finances (Preliminary Data)," 2021. [Online]. Available:https://nces.ed.gov [Accessed Jan. 25, 2022].[3] A. G. Cavinato, R. A. Hunter, L. S. Ott, and J. K. Robinson, “Promoting student
research topics include Engineering Education, Structural Dynamics and Applied Mechanics. He has been a member of the National System of Researchers (SNI) in the Mexican Council of Science and Technology. He has held several position within the School of Engineering, including Head of School and his current post as head of the regional department of Sustainable Technologies and Civil Engineering for the Southern Region of Tecnologico de Monterrey, including seven campuses. His research interests include Computational Mechanics and Engineering Education. Prof. Rodriguez-Paz is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). He is the author of more
of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the Educational Research Methods Division of ASEE.Tamara Moore Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is a Professor of Engineering Education, University Faculty Scholar, and the Executive Director of the INSPIRE Research Institute for Pre-College Engineering at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on
structures, structural health monitoring, wireless sensor networks, and engineering education. She has taught multiple undergraduate and graduate courses including Statics, Structural Analysis, and Senior Design. Prof. Jang is the recipient of the 2021 Emerging Leader Fellow Award from the ASEE Civil Engineering Division, the 2021 Distinguished Engineering Educator Award from UConn, and the 2018 Civil Engineering Educator of the Year award from the Connecticut Society of Civil Engineers. She has served as the faculty advisor of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) UConn Chapter since 2012.Pablo Aguero-BarrantesRichard Christenson © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
, “Curriculum visualization in 3D,” in Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on 3D web technology, New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2007, pp. 177–180. doi: 10/cwn2wh.[2] S. Kriglstein, “Analysis of Ontology Visualization Techniques for Modular Curricula,” in HCI and Usability for Education and Work, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 299–312. doi: 10/dmvmx7.[3] R. Zucker, “ViCurriAS: A Curriculum Visualization Tool for Faculty, Advisors, and Students,” J. Comput. Sci. Coll., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 138–145, Dec. 2009.[4] S. M. MacNeil, M. M. Dorodchi, E. Al-Hossami, A. Benedict, D. Desai, and M. J. Mahzoon, “Curri: A Curriculum Visualization System that Unifies Curricular Dependencies with Temporal Student Data,” presented at the 2020 ASEE
). The Relationship of Student-Faculty Out-of-Class Communication to Instructor Immediacy and Trust. Communication Education, 48 (1), 41-47.7. Kim, S. J. & Lee, N. (2016). Team Building for Collaborative Learning Environment in Construction Education. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, June 26-29.8. Kim, S.J. & Lee, N. (2019). Key Factors in Construction Engineering and Management Education to Facilitate Student Engagement and Collaborative Learning. Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) Annual Conference, Denver, CO. April 10-129. Kortering, L. J. & Braziel, P. M. (1999). “Staying in School.” Journal of Remedial and Special Education, 20(2), 106-11310
, Better Explained, 2014.[16] O. E. Fernandez, Everyday Calculus: Discovering the Hidden Math All around Us.Princeton: Princeton UP, 2014.[17] T. Apostol, A Visual Approach to Calculus Problems, Engineering & Science, no. 3, 2000.www.mamikon.com/VisualCalc.pdf[18] www.mamikon.com[19] D. Raviv, “Have you seen an integral? Visual, intuitive and relevant explanations of basicengineering-related mathematical concepts,” in Proceedings of the ASEE National Conference,Salt Lake City, UT, June 2018.[20] L. Edelstein-Keshet, Differential Calculus for the Life Sciences, 2018 In:http://www.math.ubc.ca/~keshet/OpenBook.pdf[21] H. Kojima and S. Togami, The Manga Guide to Calculus, No Starch Press, 2009.[22] D. Downing, Calculus the Easy Way. 2nd edition
, 2016. 5. T. F. Smith, D. Wilson, D. C. Jones, M. Plett, R. A. Bates, and N. M. Veilleux, “Investigation of belonging for engineering and science undergraduates by year in school,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, June, 2012. 6. J. Edwards and A. Pizano, "Work in progress: Developing an engineering community in a fablab," in 129th annual conference & exposition of the American Society Engineering Education, Minneapolis, MN., June, 2022. 7. B. M. Dewsbury, H. J. Swanson, S. Moseman-Valtierra, and J. Caulkins, "Inclusive and active pedagogies reduce academic outcome gaps and improve long-term performance." Plos, vol. 17, no. 6, 2022. 8. E. J. Theobald, M. J
)0733-9364(2002)128:5(375.[2] F. Pariafsai and A. H. Behzadan, “Core Competencies for Construction Project Management: Literature Review and Content Analysis,” Journal of Civil Engineering Education, vol. 147, no. 4, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1061/(asce)ei.2643-9115.0000051.[3] J. K. Izwan, I. Sayuti, and N. Ramli, “The knowledge competency of civil engineers in construction industry,” IOP Conference Series, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755- 1315/244/1/012047.[4] M. Itani and I. Srour, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Soft Skills, Industry Expectations, and Career Aspirations,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 142, no. 1, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000247.[5] T. J. Siller, A