reference.They then design a poster discussing their research into the assigned topic. While MRS providesa PowerPoint Poster template, there is no specific format for the poster and students areencouraged to present their material that best fits their research. Students are also encouraged toremember that posters are a visual experience so font size, organization, and graphics are allimportant at conveying your point and that language needs to be concise. The poster mustinclude the following sections as a minimum: • Background: Give an overview of the relevant history or technical details that inform the problem you are interested in. • Thesis/Problem Statement: What specific aspect of the topic is your group focusing on? Make an
UnitedNations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (SDG 4, SDG 5, and SDG 10). Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX Copyright 2024, American Society for Engineering Education 2Based on lessons from The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement,1 it is important to firstidentify the goal of education and then to identify the best way(s) to reach that goal. Finally, thispaper considers the impacts of improving methods to meet the goal. In their book Investment inLearning, Bowen and Fincher assert that three primary goals of education are 1) practicalcompetence
generalframework for project planning that can be used by students and faculty advisors to outline goalsand objectives of senior design Capstone projects that requires team members to organize anddesign/build the project with limited resources. This paper also describes a capstone projectwhich served as a pilot study for the capstone project course which will be implemented in theDepartment of Engineering Technology in spring 2012 for the Civil and Electronics EngineeringTechnology majors. Electronic Name Tag System project was carried out by the SummerUndergraduate Research Training (SURT) program student during the summer of 2011. Thebasic project requirement was to design and build an Electronic Name Tag using the PIC16C57microcontroller. The main
directly observe what happens in engineering design, model the practiceof their teacher, and reflect on the ideas they learn, including addressing any relatedmisconceptions. Teachers encourage the development of their learners by making tacit knowledgeexplicit, modeling effective strategies for completing tasks, providing scaffolded support whenlearners are practicing new tasks, and offering specific feedback for improvement15. Thisapprenticeship is vitally important for the transferability of what is assumed to be learned in anorientation or training session to become actual practice. As part of this research, additive manufacturing is being explored as a means of implementingthe theoretical cognitive learning concepts. Research on the use of
. For some people, it means alot of work and efforts preparing the best lecture possible in order to teach a course. It needs tobe understood that Online Learning should not be the same in every field. If we consider lecturesin the field of social sciences, they may require a big amount of graphs, pictures, tables, anddiagrams, in arts, they may require audio, high-quality images, and video. However, it is adifferent story when STEM courses are considered. Even between the fields that compose theSTEM area, there are remarkable differences between the teaching styles. For example, in math, Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Arlington, March 21
operations on advanced machining lines that could be rapidly reconfigured to meet changes to a product’s design or production volume. In 2003 he joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of British Columbia as junior chair of the NSERC-sponsored research program in Virtual Machining. His work at this time focused on the modeling of cutter/workpiece engagement geometry to support process modeling for aerospace machining applications. In 2007 he joined the faculty of the Engineering and Design Department at Western Washington University where he is currently a professor in the Manufacturing Engineering program. His teaching and scholarship interests lie in the areas of geometric modeling, design
Engineering Education and Practice, First., Wiley & Sons, 2018, pp. 3-27.[20] K. McAlpine, “Equity-centered engineering: A Q&A with Alec Gallimore,” Michigan Engineering, Jun. 23, 2021. https://www.engin.umich.edu/2021/06/equity-centered-engineering-a-qa-with-alec-gallim ore/ (accessed Feb. 17, 2022).[21] Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, “Our shift toward Equity-focused Teaching,” Equity-focused Teaching. https://crlt.umich.edu/equity-focused-teaching[22] P. Gurin, E. Dey, S. Hurtado, and G. Gurin, “Diversity and Higher Education: Theory and Impact on Educational Outcomes,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 330–367, Sep. 2002.[23] W. Peoples and A. Dillard, “5 Lessons From a Race
to Physics practical are written forundergraduate students; laboratories are used as a platform to reinforce the lecture material.However, in many instances, learning more effective observational and recording techniques,deductive reasoning, and hypothesis formation are the key objectives of the laboratoryexperience [13], [14].The experimental learning units in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)are extensive and can take the form of hands-on pedagogies, field visits, practical training andprojects, schematic design, and more [3], [11], [15]. STEM professions require courseknowledge to grasp the growth of specific experimentation skills in addition to the idealunderstanding. Hands-on labs make it simpler for students to
themotivations and interaction channels between the academia and industry, and intends toanswer to following two questions:1) For what purposes would universities and industry jointly involve in educational UIC to trainfuture engineers?2) What are the best practices of educational UIC in facilitating university-industry relations inChina?To address the research questions, we undertake an explorative case study in a highereducation institution (the authors’ home institution) in China, investigating the motivationmechanism and interaction channels concerning university-industry educational collaborationfrom both universities and industry sides at organization and individual levels. By taking thisdiverse perspective, our study contributes to the discussion
frequently serves as a mentor and invited speaker at CS education and outreach events.Dr. E. F. Charles LaBerge, University of Maryland, Baltimore County E. F. Charles (Chuck) LaBerge is Professor of the Practice of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering and Undergraduate Program Director for the Computer Engineering Program at UMBC (University of Maryland, Baltimore County), where he teaches a wide variety of courses ranging from Introduction to Engineering for freshmen to Error Correcting Codes and Information Theory for graduate students. From 1975-2008, he was employed by Honeywell’s Aerospace Research and Technology Center and its predecessor organizations
becomes drastically less effective. Newequipment is procured (major cost), but technical staff are not properly trained. Maintenancecontracts not signed for critical (and costly) equipment. Replacements for faculty and staff are notplanned well in advance. When sustainability is not practiced, and is not an integral part of theculture, how can it be taught effectively?Policy Making IssuesABET criteria for accrediting engineering programs [24-26] states that Student Outcomes (SO)“describe what students are expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation …knowledge, skills, and behaviors.” In their earlier (a to k) version, SO (c) was defined as “an abilityto design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic
education was focused on the performance based engineering for structural systems under hazard loading, and application of innovative construction materials (fiber reinforced concrete) for underground construction. Her Ph.D. dissertation was focused on developing generalized performance-based seismic design procedures for residential buildings with a simplified format to be implemented by practice engineers. Her M.S. research was focused on performance of underground tunnel lining made from steel fiber reinforced shotcrete material. Dr. Liu is experienced in teaching structural engineering related courses and has held multiple positions as instructor at a number of engineering programs.Dr. Puttagounder Dhanasekaran
Engineering Technology,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 1-8.[9] Jones, S. A. and Houghtalen, R. (2000). “Using Senior Design Capstone as Model for Graduate Education”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 126(2), 83-88.[10] Shapoorian, B. (2012). “Implementing an Interactive Program of BIM Applications for Graduating Students.” ICSDEC, 1009-1016.[11] Rassati, G.A., Baseheart, T.M., and Stedman, B. (2010). “An Interdisciplinary Capstone Experience Using BIM,” Structures Congress, 1689-1698.[12] ABET: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - Website. [Online]. Available: https
” Engineering &Manufacturing New Graduate Professional Development Rotation Program. Within thatprogram, NG is extremely proud that the company female population over the period of time is30 % and the total of minorities and females approaches 50%. In addition NG has a growingNew Graduate Leadership Training Program run out of our Baltimore facility that has also beenrecognized as “Best Manufacturing Practices” where 52% of the almost 250 participants in thelast three years are women and minorities.Northrop Grumman is the second largest employer for Engineers graduating from the NC StateUniversity College of Engineering over the past four years, having hired in excess of 75 newgraduate engineers for the Baltimore location alone. NG has a very
from teachingand a stipend for research activities every year for two years for each awardee. The strategysought to support junior female faculty at a teaching institution which also has a strongscholarship requirement for tenure and promotion. Through the support of the grant, theretention rate and promotion of female faculty in STEM disciplines was increased. By the endof the grant, six awardees will have benefitted from the grant. Metrics to measure the impact ofthis strategy are in place. The efforts will be continued through a university-wide, competitiverelease time program.Strategy 3, Leadership Development, was to formalize professional development opportunitiesfor faculty on the topic of leadership, previously not available at Gannon
Engineering. One of thegrants funded entrepreneurial multi-university wireless senior design projects, while the othersupported a series of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department senior design teams withentrepreneurial commitment. Additionally, Florida Tech has been an active partner of the NSF-funded Partnership for Innovation - Center for Entrepreneurship and TechnologyCommercialization (CENTECOM) along with UCF, USF and Florida A&M University. Theresponse to these grants has been extremely positive, with 7 of 13 entrepreneurial senior designteams in 2005 intending to launch businesses around their senior projects. Additionally, therewere twelve graduate E-teams presenting their business ideas at the EngineeringEntrepreneurship Business
ofengineering, preparing students for a broad spectrum of roles in research, design, anddevelopment. These programs provide a strong theoretical understanding of engineeringprinciples, allowing graduates to contribute to cutting-edge innovations and theoreticaladvancements. Ultimately, ET in both community colleges and traditional engineering programsplays a crucial role in the engineering landscape, each attracting many students with uniqueinterests and career aspirations. Whether one chooses to pursue an ET program, geared towardsapplied skills and immediate industry integration, or a traditional engineering program, focusedon comprehensive theoretical knowledge and diverse engineering applications, they will findrewarding opportunities in their
AC 2012-5200: WOMEN OF WESTERN: THE VOICES OF WOMEN - AD-VANCE CATALYST AT A COMPREHENSIVE INSTITUTIONProf. Kathleen L. Kitto, Western Washington University Kathleen L. Kitto is currently the Special Assistant to the Provost for Strategic Initiatives and Acting Dean of the Graduate School and Vice Provost for Research at Western Washington University. Kitto has served WWU for more than 20 years and has played a number of roles within the university including eight years as the Associate Dean of the College of Sciences and Technology, seven years as the Chair of the Engineering Technology Department, and one year as the Director of the Advanced Materials Science and Engineering Center (AMSEC). She was actively
the Data Science curriculum in computing education, and broadening participation of underrepresented populations in computing professions. She is currently a dean's teaching fellow for the College of Engineering at Purdue University.Tiantian Li Tiantian Li (Olivia) is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is a Purdue graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering, with a concentration in Pharmaceutical Processing Engineering. She has completed Purdue’s Certificate of Systems Engineering and Quantitative Research, Assessment, and Evaluation in Education Certificate. Her research interest is in the assessment of systems thinking skills and systems awareness. She is also
issuesincluding the perceived value of licensure among faculty members, the relationshipbetween licensure and promotion/tenure, and the licensed faculty member as a role modelfor colleagues and future engineers.This paper details the research design, implementation of the study, and the resultingfindings. The findings and conclusions of this study will be of interest to a variety ofacademic and licensure stake-holders, including: civil engineering faculty members (bothlicensed and unlicensed), academic administrators, and licensing organizations such asthe National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES).A Review of the LiteratureIn the realm of academics, what is the value of experience as a practicing engineer andthe value of
student remarked, “we had toproblem-solve, for example, find a way to get solar panels onto roofs.” Students alsocommented on the enormous sense of accomplishment, seeing their designs implemented, thepotential to make an impact, a new passion for their vocation, and a chance to see the lives thatcan be changed by their work. As related by one female student, “When you know that yourwork will impact someone’s life, you know you need to get it right, and it makes you driven tosucceed. I think that all too often, students are more focused on just getting the work done,rather than on the impact their work may have in the future.” Another female studentcommented that, “the obstacles were learning experiences. I learned much more from solvingcommunity
, Jackie Gray, Jennifer Holbrook, Sadhana Puntambekar (1998). Learning by Design from Theory to Practice. Proceedings of ICLS 98. Atlanta, GA, 16-22.LAWRENCE J. GENALOis Professor and Assistant Chair of the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at Iowa State University.He received a Ph. D. in Applied Mathematics with Systems Engineering emphasis in 1977, served as Chair forFreshman Programs and DELOS Divisions, and runs the Toying With TechnologySM Program at Iowa State.DENISE A. SCHMIDTis the Associate Director of the Center for Technology in Learning and Teaching within the Department ofCurriculum and Instruction at Iowa State University. Her research interests include technology use and integration in
for Today’s Practicing Engineers”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1997 Conference •”Successful Model for Corporate-University Col- laboration”, International Association for Continuing Engineering education (IACEE), 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor •”Designing Engineer Educa- tional Partnership Model”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with Michigan Technolog- ical University •”Reengineering a Successful Graduate Program”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute •”Developing Product and Manufacturing Integra- tion Engineers”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with
grids and micro grids. Jayashri has a deep interest in learning and teaching, and consistently implements strate- gies using technology innovations and industry partnerships to improve students’ active learning. She is institutionally and internationally recognized for the impact of her innovative, research-led and highly effective teaching and leadership. She leads best practice advanced teaching in electrical engineering through imaginative initiatives, including blended industry lectures, teamwork and flipped mode strate- gies. Esteem indicators include Senior Fellowship of the Higher Education Academy awarded by Ad- vance HE (UK), UNSW Teaching Excellence Awards and the Australian Awards for University Teaching
instructional practices linked to advanced manufacturing and materials and 21st centurySTEM skills.Program Design and ObjectivesThe Inspiring the Next Generation of a Highly-Skilled Workforce in Advanced Manufacturingand Materials program used materials and advanced manufacturing as the focus for the teacherresearch experiences in engineering. The advanced manufacturing and materials focus wasselected based on the aforementioned regional needs and strengths in addition to the fact that allthree participating universities have strengths in this area. Specifically the main objectives of thisprogram were to: Transfer the program’s team-based applied engineering research activities into the teacher participants’ classrooms through experience
Engineering Students Transform Into Student Engineers Who Thrive in Industry Placements (Practice Paper),” in SEFI 2023 Conference Proceedings, Dublin, Ireland, 2023.[9] D. Rogalsky and R. Ulseth, “Design-Based Research: Students Seeking Co-Op in Refined Educational Model,” in 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual Meeting, 2021.[10] J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Second. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc., 2013. [Online]. Available: www.sagepublications.com[11] R. Ulseth, “Self-Directed Learning in PBL,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Aalborg University, 2016. doi: 10.5278/vbn.phd.engsci.00091.[12] L. Singelmann, Y. Wang, and D. Christensen, “A Self-Study of the Iron Range Engineering
Paper ID #6655Developing a Marketing High-Technology Products and Innovations Course:First Year ReviewDr. James V Green, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. James V. Green leads the education activities of Mtech at the University of Maryland as the Di- rector of Entrepreneurship Education with responsibilities for the Hinman CEOs Program, the Hillman Entrepreneurs Program, and the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program. As a Senior Lecturer and Associate Director with Mtech, Dr. Green designs and teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in entrepreneurship and technology commercialization. Dr. Green’s research
potential to influence the engineeringprofession for great benefit to society. As noted by Chan and Fishbein: “As the world becomes more complex and interrelated, so do the problems engineers face. The engineering profession and individual engineers need to adapt or else risk getting lost in these global changes, thus abandoning our social responsibilities.” 11The University of Wisconsin-Stout’s institutional mission encourages faculty and staff to“integrate applied learning, scientific theory, humanistic understanding, creativity and research tosolve real-world problems, grow the economy and serve a global society.” However, with thepolytechnic designation comes an increased focus on applied learning techniques and careerfocused
challenges allows organizers toproduce a best-practice approach and enhance educational and personal performance amongparticipants. Opportunities for growth, learning and improvement lie within the obstacles andchallenges of innovation and pitch competitions. Further research will explore the best practicesorganizers utilize when dealing with these challenges while planning and running ICPs.AcknowledgmentThis research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant (DUE (2120936).Any opinions and findings expressed in this material are of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the NSF.References[1] D. P. Price, "Introducing University Pitch Competitions: An Analysis of the First Five Years," Journal of Higher
connected inmy classroom was a big takeaway. Fostering connections for students- among each other, withfaculty, and with professionals in the field should be designed into our courses. The good news isthat this doesn’t demand a course re-design or any intense transformation- we can do it withminimal time but with intention and purpose- and it can make a big impact on our student’ssuccess.AcknowledgementsI would like to thank the TLDG (Teaching and Learning Development Grant) Program at SimonFraser University for providing funding for this work.References[1] S. L. Dika and M. M. D’Amico, “Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first‐generation college students in STEM and non‐STEM majors,” Journal of Research in Science