: Construction Terminology and Accreditation, Ethical Dilemmas, Resume and Career Plan, Engineering and Tech Expo (visit and summary paper), Professional & Trade Organizations, and Guest Speakers.MethodologyThe basic methodology for the development and delivery of the revised CM&E 111 is presentedbelow. The author attended the ACCE2 Mid-Year Meeting held in Phoenix (February 2012) to discuss first-year construction management courses with construction management program directors at the Baccalaureate Program Chairs Meeting. Approximately forty- five (45) ACCE accredited schools were represented at this meeting. The program chairs approved a request for a survey to collect first-year construction management course
composition and undergraduate majorsindicates that there is some positive correlation between the number of female students and thenumber of women faculty in any given department. For example, Canes and Rosen8 compareenrollment and employment data from 1973-1989 at Princeton, the University of Michigan, andWhittier College. Although unable to show a causal relationship between the gendercomposition of the faculty and undergraduate science and engineering majors, they stress theimportance of having women on the faculty to increase diversity in science and engineeringdisciplines since the “role-model concept” will “encourage female students to pursue careers inscience and engineering by providing greater visibility for women scientists and engineers
reviewed and considered efforts toredesign first-year engineering experiences at colleges and universities across the country andidentified skills that would better prepare first-year students for success in their future coursesand careers. A major recommendation was the adoption of a new two-course sequence for first-year students. This sequence will replace the current one-unit introductory seminar course forfirst-year engineering and computer science students.A backward design process — that began with student learning outcomes and produced contentand assignments that would support these outcomes — was used by a subsequent summerworking group to develop plans for the two-course sequence. This backward course design wasfacilitated using the TiLT
funding with smaller social science research grants. This compromise isboth pragmatic and unsustainable. Social science grants are considerably smaller than those inengineering, even without industry funding. This makes it difficult to build a research group thatcentres engineering culture as a topic of inquiry. If we really care about equity and social justicein engineering, we need to identify institutional strategies to fill the resource gap withoutdepending on corporate fundraising by individual faculty members.Lesson 4: Rapid-fire collective coding privileges experts over novices and practice over theoryIn 2019, I led a team of engineers and social scientists through the analysis of 29 career historyinterviews. After reading all 29
Women in Science & Engineering Speaker: A post-doctoral researcher in organic chemistry, Oct. 4 Transfer Agreement Guarantee (TAG) Workshop, Sept. 22, Sept 1, August 24 Student Panel – Student to Student: Experiences in Summer Internships, Sept. 9 Industry Speaker – Career Path from MESA to a Job! A professional Civil Engineer who works as a Transportation Engineer for the City of Menlo Park and also owns a consulting company, Sept. 2 Financial Aid – FAFSA Help – every Tuesday the Financial Aid Office helps students complete Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), Weekly The Guaranteed 4.0 Workshop, Mar. 21-22 Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society
and engineering degrees for Hispanic of Latino recipients, with Black orAfrican American doctoral recipients at 6.6%, and Native American or Alaska Native at .4% [5].Graduate Education Self-EfficacyChemers and colleagues find science self-efficacy and identification as a scientist to be strongindicators of commitment to a career in science [6]. The motivation for the article is derivedfrom the lack of diversity and inclusion in United States science education. Using a statisticalanalysis approach, the authors identify program components associated with underlyingpsychology that propel undergraduates to a commitment to scientific careers. The authorsacknowledge that previous studies found “...academic self-efficacy was a strong and
students feel ‘passionately’ about [23], [24]. Further, members ofunderrepresented groups have bigger increases in their interest in research than their non-underrepresented counterparts after taking such courses, which suggests that emphasizing theapplied sides of SDS may help with expanding participation in the field [23].In the current study, we expand upon this previous work on how students become interested inpursuing careers in SDS by investigating what drew SDS majors and minors to choose thiscourse of study over other possibilities. We present descriptive and qualitative results frominterviews with a group of academically talented students majoring or minoring in SDS and whohave low incomes. Based on these results and relevant literature
contributedsuggests that the organization may need to revisit its positively to staying, which may be due to factors such ascompensation strategies, particularly for employees with lower career growth potential.salaries. The non-linear relationship observed in the Years AtCompany plot points to the need for targeted retention On the other hand, Marital Status (Single) had a negativeprograms for both new employees and long-tenured staff, who impact on the prediction, meaning that the employee beingmay need more engagement to reduce the risk of burnout. The single increased the likelihood of attrition. Other factors, suchinteraction between Age and Tenure suggests that retention as
way to learn and grow that is reciprocal but asymmetrical [1].These attributes are found in the recent working definition of mentorship proposed by theNational Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine [3] and prescribed by the M360project: “Mentorship is a professional, working alliance in which individuals work together over time to support the personal and professional growth, development, and success of the relational partners through the provision of career and psychosocial support.” [3, p. 37].The benefits of faculty receiving mentorship are well documented and include increasedproductivity, career satisfaction, career success, organizational commitment, and general well-being [13], [14]. Comparatively, little
Abstract Your Voice is Power is a curriculum that seeks to promote racial equity and increaseinterest in computing careers by integrating elements of computing, music, social justice, self-expression, and entrepreneurship. The curriculum consists of five modules lasting 60-90 minuteseach. Students engage with music through lyrical analysis to extract and explore present themesof social justice using the OUTKAST Imagination framework. Students then engage withmusical concepts from a computing perspective to create their own remixes using EarSketch, aweb-based, learn-to-code through music platform developed at Georgia Institute of Technology(Georgia Tech). These elements are further supported by discussions around racial justice andthe
development as engineers. In this co-op based program,students gain experiences that will help prepare them for careers in engineering after graduation.Cooperative (co-op) experiences have been shown to prepare work-ready graduates, withevidence that students with co-op experiences are more likely to get full time employment aftergraduation and with higher starting salaries [8]. However, co-op experiences have been shown tohave the potential of adding to the psychological distress of students [9], reducing overallwellbeing. With co-op experience being a valuable tool for gaining and applying engineeringknowledge, identifying ways to support students thriving while on co-op is important.Programmatic Context. We explore student thriving at the Iron
students areforced to identify the appropriate stakeholders, interview these stakeholders, and analyze theproblem from the stakeholders’ points of view. Another approach was taken by Korach andGargac [8] where they re-vamped first-year curriculum by incorporating active learning exercisesinto the existing curriculum. Korach and Gargac [8] found that both instructors and studentsbenefited from the addition of entrepreneurial mindset activities. Instructors found the activitiesbetter engaged students in the course and generated excitement around the engineering field whilethe students developed beneficial skills for a successful career. There is no one size-fits allapproach to re-vamping and incorporating innovative thinking into curricula, but the
background in infrastructure design and management, and project management. Her con- sulting experience spanned eight years and included extensive work with the US military in Japan, Korea, and Hawaii. In 2008 Elizabeth shifted the focus of her career to education and academia, later receiving her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with a focus in Water Resources. Her work highlights a commitment to undergraduate engineering education and its improvement through best teaching practices. Her research efforts target ways to support and encourage diversity among students and how to create an inclusive learning environment. Professional interests include undergraduate research opportunities, service learn- ing, STEM outreach, team
education research community in the U.S. has specified the nature of instructionalstrategies in retaining students in STEM-related courses, with a focus on an integrated STEMcurriculum designed to improve non-cognitive factors, such as interest, while developingpositive attitudes towards STEM [5][6][7]. Interests and attitudes in science develop early in astudent’s life, and it is important to develop these attitudes as they are motivators towardspursuing STEM fields and careers [8] [9]. More recently, the National Academies of Sciences,Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) 2017 report on supporting student’s college success hashighlighted the importance of intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies and the evolvingneed for labor market recruits to
Paper ID #28137FACT: Femineer R Active Learning with Computational ThinkingDr. Kristina Rigden, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Rigden is the Director of Outreach Programs and the Women in Engineering Program for the College of Engineering at Cal Poly Pomona. In her position, she secures funding and provides several different outreach programming events to engage K-12 female students to pursue STEM majors and/or careers. Dr. Rigden’s research focus is the STEM pipeline from K-12 to college and career for underrepresented mi- norities. Her teaching and scholarship are grounded in the
8witness and call out misogyny. Her first workplace was a toxic environment thatdisadvantaged her because her coworkers did not know how to talk to women. Shehad to be the one to speak out and call out racism and sexism because she was theonly one experiencing it.Even at the start of her career, Leanne was placed at a disadvantage because thehomogeneity of engineering has failed to provide her a network to obtain jobs. It wasdifficult for her to get a position, yet easy for her peers who had connections withinthe industry. This shows the connectedness of racism within engineering and itseffects on opportunity. 8Masking identities in college“I was not the ideal
to these disparities.At Seattle University, if we analyze all students who matriculated between 2002 and 2010, and who atsome point in their academic career were enrolled in an engineering program, we find that only 19.5%identified as female, and only 9.3% identified as URM.Seattle University’s mission and values statement includes a commitment to the importance of diversityin educational excellence. While we have seen an increase in the percentages of female- and URM-identifying students entering our engineering programs over recent years, there is still much progress tobe made before we will reach a state of equality.A recent grant from the Boeing Company provides resources to address the barriers to access andsuccess currently faced by
Engineering Student in Qatar: Successes, Challenges, and RecommendationsIntroductionWithin the context of socio-economic transformations in the Arab Gulf and the development ofknowledge-based economies in the region, this faculty-student collaborative study investigatesthe experiences of female engineering students in Qatar at Texas A&M University at Qatar(TAMUQ). This project looks at personal experiences and institutional strengths and challenges–at university and industry levels, so as to present recommendations on how to better support,encourage, and prepare our female students for working in engineering-related careers. Byexamining TAMUQ students’ experiences within engineering, this research aims to contribute tothe
career pathways. The Cooper Union is acollege located in New York City that has been delivering STEM programming in the summerfor over 30 years. The high school summer STEM program offered by Cooper Union has varioussections that have traditionally been instructed by professors specializing in one of the fourengineering majors at the college: chemical, civil, electrical, and mechanical engineering. Eachyear, the program lasted six weeks and consisted of 120 hours of informal project-based learning,with each section grounded in different engineering challenges.Starting in 2015, the institution began to offer a new section called the “Makerspace” section inorder to address the demand for modern technologies and skills sets, such as rapid
-school SettingAbstractFor both genders characteristics of effective STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, andMath) after-school programs include opportunities for youth to build competencies, form bondswith peers and staff, and participate in program decisions. After-school program characteristicsfound to foster STEM interest and persistence of girls in particular across age, race and ethnicdiversity include collaborative, hands-on activities, mentoring, parent and community support,emphasis on practical applications, and teaching of science or engineering in a more holistic andsocial context 1,2,3,4,5,6,7. In addition, programs for girls that combine hands-on activities, rolemodels, mentoring, and career
identification of theskills needed by early career engineers as they enter the workplace.The Academic Pathways Study was originally designed to investigate these research questionsusing data from four cohorts of participantsa. In 2005, a fifth group was added (referred to as theCross-sectional Cohortb) that included students not in the original design and provided cross-sectional data from all four undergraduate years.APS Longitudinal data were collected at four pseudonymous institutions: Technical PublicInstitution, Urban Private University, Suburban Private University, and Large Public University.The Cross-sectional Cohort data were collected at a fifth institution (another large publicuniversity). The Broader Sampling Cohorts expanded the number of
, and mathematics (STEM) careers. These E3programs seek to create interest, provide exposure, and develop the academic skills necessary forstudents to pursue an engineering career. In addition, all pathway programs require parentparticipation. Our proposed E3 Pathway Programs are in line with the “best practices” describedin the National Association of Multicultural Engineering Program Advocates (NAMEPA) Region Page 14.946.3C Model Program Workbook21 and NACME’s Academic Gamesmanship: Becoming a “MasterEngineering Student”22.The students recruited into the UC’s College of Engineering through the aforementioned E3Pathway Programs are invited to
. Participants in Vinson and Stevens’ studyreported that industry-based internships helped them to clarify their career pathways [9]. Their studyfound that students who completed multiple internships had a better understanding of the sectors andenvironments in which they would like to work and were able to secure more desirable jobs thanthose who lacked such experience. Extra-curriculars, as Tomlinson notes, help students to build so-called ‘soft credentials,’ which they use to differentiate themselves in the labor market [10].Employers in Atkinson and colleagues’ study believed that extra-curriculars facilitate the formationof leadership, teamwork, and interpersonal skills and that students who participate in them are betterable to get along with a
education with the programs on hand. This includesexperience with UAS vehicle design, construction, and flight experience, as well as team dynamicsand exposure to the SEDP.Motivation.The desire for educational programs within the field of aerospace engineering continues to bepopular. This is both due to the increasing availability of technology and job opportunities withinthe aerospace engineering career field. According to the Department of Labor’s Bureau of LaborStatistics (April 2018), “Employment of aerospace engineers is projected to grow 6 percent from2016 to 2026, about as fast as the average for all occupations.” Rationale for this growth isattributed to several factors, including the increased use of cubesats, aircraft
. AssociateProfessors can be appointed without these higher education course credits but are required totake these credits within four to five years to receive tenure.Systems of career recognition have been established in a significant number of theseUniversities. Examples include appointment as Excellent Teacher at Uppsala University, and noless than four different models for appointing Excellent Teaching Practitioners at LundUniversity. Winka in her review of processes for career recognition in teaching at SwedishUniversities in 2017 [5] concluded that 22 of 47 Higher Education Institutions had establishedsuch systems. Similar requirements are emerging in many European countries [6].There is also a substantial movement in some UK universities to provide
/ Philosophy of Engineering Division of ASEE. He is Professor Emeritus and former chair of engineering technologies at Shawnee State University, Portsmouth, Ohio. He is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Management and Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronau- tics. Mr. Hilgarth has a 29-year career in academia instructing courses in industrial management, financial management, computer technology, and environmental technology, as well as leading seminars in the uni- versity’s general education program. Prior to academia, Mr. Hilgarth was employed as as engineer in the aerospace industry in laboratory and flight test development, facilities management, and as a manager in quality
preventing them from doing those activities, if anything.] 6. Understanding of engineering as a career Now I would like you to picture someone with a job where they design, create, and build things. What comes to mind when you think about this person? What do they look like? [Probe for characteristics of engineers as well as ideas about what the engineer does] [If student has not already used the term engineering] If an adult did that kind of work (designing, creating, and building) what would you call that? [Don’t use the term engineering--use their own terminology.] Do you know anyone with a job like that? [If yes: have them describe what those people do] What
Deepa is responsible for developing Boeing’s strategies to support early learning, primary and secondary education, and ensure alignment with post-secondary workforce initiatives across the company. Through- out her career, she has worked on a range of issues including U.S. public health, global health and eco- nomic development, the arts, and nonprofit capacity development. Prior to Boeing, she was a senior pro- gram officer for the MacArthur Foundation and a consultant with McKinsey. In 2012, President Obama appointed her to the National Council on the Arts. Deepa has an MBA from Northwestern University, an MPA from Harvard University, and an AB from the University of Chicago.Dr. Timothy Kieran O’Mahony, University of
biology and technical careers. 10 Language, Literacy, and Provides professional development for participants in Culture, PhD Candidate the Black Engineer of the Year national conference.Table 2 below provides the major categories presented in the PSOC framework, brief definitionsand key terms, and descriptive quantitative results of the number of responses that fit within eachcategory. The information presented in the table showcases results, which are discussed belowwith examples of each category provided in participants’ own words.Table 2: Results of phenomena observed in “non-STEM” data, based upon PSOC framework
extracurricular activities as an opportunity to gain further hands onexperience and knowledge about subjects that relate more to the real world. For example, Jimmysuggested he was eventually interested in joining the Engineering Car Racing team because hewas simply interested in learning more about how cars work and function. Beyond learning,Jimmy did not see too much value in extracurricular activities. Because he expected thatengineering companies would be more intently focused on his grades when considering him forinternships or future careers, Jimmy designated that he intends to prioritize his studies rather thaninvolving himself in extracurricular activities. This decision seems to align well with Jimmy’searlier assertion that responsibility and