perceptions, self-efficacy, and identity ofengineers and those teaching potential engineers. A previous researcher, Yasar, used an iterativemethod in his development of a survey to assess K-12 teachers’ perceptions of engineers andfamiliarity with teaching design, engineering, and technology.2 However, Yasar’s participantswere all pre-college level students and professionals. This process consisted of a literature searchto find items for the survey and multiple field tests and revisions to come to the final surveyinstrument. In this work, we adapted Yasar’s method and directly surveyed undergraduateengineering students.2In order to inform universities about which experiences work best for ASE, we developed asurvey in order to extract information from
talentedlow-income students entering the STEM workforce, the NSF S-STEM program has grantedawards to various type of institutions in order to advance our understanding of how “evidence-based curricular and co-curricular activities affect the success, retention, transfer, academic andcareer pathways, and graduation in STEM of low-income students” [1]. To date there are anumber of publications that document effective practices and strategies to help talented low-income students succeed in different institutional and disciplinary contexts [2], [3]. Our projectbuilds on this literature by providing a combination of an academic scholarship and culturallycompetent mentorship for students at a Very High-enrolled Hispanic Serving institution (VH-HSI
engineering” due to their interest in pursuing medical, law, or any otherprofessional school. This program is not ABET accredited and preferable for students who do notintend on practicing engineering in the workplace, such as pre-professional degree students. Thesecond path is designed for “students who want to practice engineering around a focusedconcentration by combining or involving several academic disciplines. Both pathways involvestudents developing their plan of study or adapting a well-established plan of study and integratingtheir interests outside of engineering with various combinations of engineering disciplines.PositionalityTo illustrate the importance of providing context when situating research, I will share mypositionality as a
, as both desired by our department and mandated byour university, include maintaining the strengths of our current program as well as offeringflexibility in the curriculum for major/specific interest exploration that also supported increasingour 4-year graduation rates. Additionally, we aimed to ease the path for transfer students,especially transfer students from our state’s community colleges. However, the research on thepotential for improving graduation rates is mixed. For example, [4] in a study across 731universities found that when a university switches from quarters to semesters, first year gradesare lower, average time to graduation increases, and students are more likely to be enrolled inbelow a full course load. On the other hand
Page 12.772.2instructional-delivery methods. A common challenge for K-16 is the goal of demonstrating thewonder of discovery through constructivist approaches while assisting students in masteringrigorous content.STEM Education at Wright State University Founded in 1967 and located in Dayton, Ohio, WSU is a comprehensive public, doctoral,research-intensive institution of 17,000 students (13,058 are undergraduates) and 2200 facultyand staff. WSU offers more than 200 associate, prebaccalaureate (at Lake Campus), andbaccalaureate degrees, and over 50 graduate and professional degree programs, including Ed.S.,M.D., Psy.D., and Ph.D. degrees. The five Ph.D. programs are clustered in the STEMdisciplines: biomedical sciences; computer science
Session 2793 Cognitive Validation of a Computer-Based Assessment of Problem Solving: Linking Cognitive and Online Processes Gregory K. W. K. Chung 1, Linda F. de Vries 1, Alicia M. Cheak1, Ronald H. Stevens2, & William L. Bewley 1 1 National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) / 2UCLA School of Medicine / 2 Graduate School of Education & Information StudiesAbstractIn this study we tested a novel cognitive validation strategy that yoked participants
, leading efforts in research and assisting product devel- opment and testing. As part of her term at WillowWood, she was a two time recipient of the prestigious Thranhardt Award for Prosthetic Research Dr. Gerschutz passion for teaching has drawn her away from industry towards the academic setting, but has left her enthusiasm for bettering the lives of others. She is currently the Chair of the Biomedical Engineering Department at Trine University. Her focus areas of teaching include introduction to biomedical engineering, biomaterials, bioinstrumentation and dynamics.David A. Evenhouse, Purdue University David Evenhouse is a Graduate Student and Research Assistant in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. He
oftechnical skills immediately transferrable to the workplace [9], [10], [11], [12].Current engineering education research on identity and sense of belonging has identified severalengineering mindsets such as technical narrowness, meritocracy, the perceived “value neutrality”of engineering practice, and the profession’s pervasive identification with corporate-militaryvalues which can directly and indirectly perpetuate inequities for engineering undergraduates [1],[2]. The razor-sharp emphasis on technical education at the cost of developing human-centeredengineers and the insistence that engineering is a value-neutral practice leads to what is known asthe socio-technical divide. The danger of this divide is that it reinforces deeply embeddedcultural
USF. He serves as the R&D Initiative Director for the Ibero-American Science & Technology Education Consortium (ISTEC) responsible for fostering Teaching/Learning & Research col- laborations throughout the Ibero-american region among ISTEC’s members. Dr. Moreno has supervised over sixty master students and twenty doctoral students. Dr. Moreno has over 120 technical publications.Joel Howell, University of South Florida Joel Howell is a Professor of Practice in the University of South Florida’s Electrical Engineering De- partment. His focus is to help every student within the department develop skills and competencies through experiential learning activities, including community service, involvement in
and academia, later receiving her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering and Sustainable Water Resources. Her work highlights a commitment to undergraduate engineering education and its improvement through best teaching practices. Her research efforts target ways to support and encourage diversity among students and how to create an inclusive learning environment.Dr. Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC Dr. Carol Haden is Vice President of Magnolia Consulting, LLC, a woman-owned, small business special- izing in independent research and evaluation. She has served as evaluator for STEM education projects sponsored by the National Science Foundation, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the William and Flora
, where he is currently Professor. His research interests are in the areas of statistical signal processing and communications. Dr. Kozick received a ”2006 Best Paper Award” from the IEEE Signal Processing Society and the Pres- idential Award for Teaching Excellence from Bucknell University in 1999. He serves on the editorial board of the EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.Dr. Ying Tang, Rowan University Ying Tang received the B.S. and M.S. degrees from the Northeastern University, P. R. China, in 1996 and 1998, respectively, and Ph.D degree from New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, in 2001. She is currently a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at Rowan University
assessment. He is director of the Individual and Team Performance Lab and the Virtual Team Performance, Innovation, and Collaboration Lab at the University of Calgary, which was built through a $500K Canada Foundation for Innovation Infrastructure Grant. He also holds operating grants of over $300K to conduct leading-edge research on virtual team effectiveness. Over the past 10 years Tom has worked with organizations in numerous industries includ- ing oil and gas, healthcare, technology, and venture capitals. He is currently engaged with the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary to train, develop, and cultivate soft-skill teamwork competencies in order to equip graduates with strong interpersonal and
need foundations in mathematics and physicswhich are best taught by members of the departments of mathematics and physics, which there-fore offer service courses to students in other departments. Since the study of engineering at theundergraduate level has not traditionally provided a foundation for the practice of any professionother than engineering, few non-engineering students take engineering courses for purely utilitar-ian reasons. Page 4.603.1 The second reason for such courses is cultural. Nearly all institutions of higher learninghave “general education” or “core” requirements which constitute the school’s notion of what
in engineering identity, we believe anexploratory approach is appropriate for the data and the context in which it was collected. Thereflections were not designed for or intended for research purposes, and as we were not able toask follow up questions, the scope of the discussions in the reflections could breach a variety oftopics.Data Collection. Data for this study are reflective prompts that are a typical component of thecurriculum in our program completed by n=24 students. Three reflective assignments were usedfor this study; the assignments were given approximately one month apart in the order listedhere, by topic: Health, Wellbeing, and Belongingness. Each assignment consisted of fourreflective prompts, for a total of 12 prompts for
to measure students’ self-evaluation of their participation and potential distractions during the learning activity.Since 2017, the StRIP instrument has been completed by more than 1,000 students in US universityengineering programs. Seventeen engineering faculty have also been interviewed by researchers[14]. While many students embrace active learning and report positive learning experiences [15-17], the evidence-based results have also revealed a few reasons for their resistance. One of themajor concerns was lack of motivation. In other words, some students would not see the value inthe new learning techniques. Additionally, distraction coming from the internet or social mediasometimes negatively impacts their learning efficiency. It
Institute of Technology and Management (HITAM), Hyderabad since 2009 as Associate Professor of Computer Science Engineering. He is a Post Graduate in Computer Applications and Computer Science Engineering. Surendra completed IIEECP (IUCEE International En- gineering Educator Certification Program) during 2015 in the pilot batch. He is a Microsoft Certified Educator. Surendra is currently pursuing his PhD in Engineering Education at KLE Technological Uni- versity, Hubballi, Karnataka. His research area is Service Learning in Engineering.Dr. Rohit Kandakatla, KLE Technological University Dr. Rohit Kandakatla has completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University and is currently serving as the Director for
Mitchell,Ms. Jennifer Wygal, Mrs. Jessica Krager, and Mr. Matthew Robinson.References 1. Albers, L., Smith, A., Caldwell, K., McCoy, J., Bottomley, L., Parry, E., “The Impact of Out-of- School Time (OST) Math and Science Clubs on Elementary and Middle School Students, Teachers, Schools and the Undergraduate and Graduate Fellows that Facilitate Them,” American Society for Engineering Education, AC 2008-1907. 2. Bouffard, S., Little, P. and Weiss, H. Building and Evaluating Out-of-School Time Connections, The evaluation exchange. Harvard Family Research Project Volume XII Numbers 1&2, Fall 2006. 3. Jolly, E. J., Campbell, P. B. and Perlman, L. Engagement, Capacity and Continuity: A Trilogy for
-locatedmeetings among the researchers, categories were iteratively compared to identify themes relatedto the students’ perspectives, as suggested in [21]. The resulting themes were developed into acodebook [4].Quantitative Survey DevelopmentIn order to reach a broader population and gather more data, a survey was developed. Followingthe exploratory sequential study design, the qualitative findings were used to inform the contentof the survey. To first develop the survey, the authors of the paper worked independently andwrote several items pertaining to each theme in the codebook. The authors then worked togetherto edit the items and narrow it down to five items per theme, considering the best practices ofsurvey development: ensuring wording was clear
. Annis School of Engineeringat the University of Indianapolis. He and his coauthors were awarded the Wickenden award (Journal ofEngineering Education, 2014) and Best Paper award, Educational Research and Methods Division (ASEE,2014). He was awarded an IEEE-USA Professional Achievement Award (2013) for designing the B.S.degree in Engineering Education. He is a co-PI on the ”Engineering for Us All” (e4usa) project to developa high school engineering course ”for all”. He is active in engineering within K-12, (Technology StudentAssociation Board of Directors) and has written multiple texts in Engineering, Mathematics and DigitalElectronics. He earned a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University, is a Senior Member ofIEEE, on the Board of
strategies, spatial visualization abilities in undergraduate students, and best practices in GD&T instruction. He has conducted CAD and GD&T workshops for both industry and education professionals. Dr. Branoff has served in several roles within the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE including Director of Programs, Chair, Vice-Chair, Associate Editor of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal, and Director of Professional & Technical Committees. In 2013, he was elected into the Academy of Fellows of the American Society for Engineering Education, and in 2014 he received the Distinguished Service Award from the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE.Jaby Mohammed (Assistant Professor) Jaby
in infectious disease and epidemiology, providing crucial exposure to the broader context of engineering problems and their subsequent solutions. These diverse experiences and a growing passion for improving engineering edu- cation prompted Dr. Miskio˘glu to change her career path and become a scholar of engineering education. As an educator, she is committed to challenging her students to uncover new perspectives and dig deeper into the context of the societal problems engineering is intended to solve. As a scholar, she seeks to not only contribute original theoretical research to the field, but work to bridge the theory-to-practice gap in engineering education by serving as an ambassador for empirically driven
, implementation and deployment of the AT&T Services and Network in Mexico. He was also Siemens Business Services (SBS) Practice Director for Latin America where he was the main consultant in systems implementations in Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil. Dr. Pineda has extensive experience in Academia; he was a Professor at ITESM in Monterrey, Mexico and at the ”Universidad de Los Andes” in Colombia and currently at the University of Texas at El Paso. His current Research projects include: PI for ”Energy Se- curity Microgrid Large Scale Energy Storage (LSES)” for Raytheon-Energy Solutions, PI for ”Prognosis & Resilience Design for Complex SoS” with Raytheon-IDS, PI ”SOS Global Attributes to Design Space Mapping
the course can help students to understand and gain further insightinto the theoretical lectures. According to the study [4], data communications and networkingcourses are divided into three categories: (1) The fundamental and general topics of computernetworks using some practical examples, (2) Internet protocols, and (3) A set of programming andproject assignments. The traditional approach to teaching data communications consists of lecturescovering theoretical information and mathematical basis, and of laboratory sessions where studentscan understand better the communication process and how to program a communications protocol.It is very crucial to keep up in classrooms with today's industry requirements for graduates in termsof both
. For many, it is integral to the way theycommunicate with one another and document their activities. As such, their perceptions of theseconnections are possibly different than those of the authors, who might see social media as eithera distraction, or a potential “add-on,” to the learning and practice of engineering.Increasing our understanding of the students’ attitudes and dispositions towards social media,engineering and leadership can inform the development of engineering education and practice.Therefore, this study explores two related research questions: 1. How are social media, engineering and leadership related to one another from a student perspective? 2. How do student self-perceptions of their leadership skills change
Technology program at State Technical Institute at Memphis where she built one of the first interactive multimedia programs in a 2-year college; and owned and operated CC Design, a design and multimedia studio in Tallahassee, FL. Her research interests include computer-based interactive instruction for K-12, digital storytelling, curriculum design in digital media, and interactive multimedia art. Cornett has won numerous awards for design, illustration and interactive media, including Best of Show honors in the ADDY competitions. She is a registered Judge for the American Advertising Federation, and serves as a curriculum auditor for the Tennessee Board of Regents
AC 2012-4282: AIDING AND ABETING: THE BANKRUPTCY OF OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION AS A CHANGE STRATEGYDr. Donna M. Riley, Smith College Donna Riley is Associate Professor and a founding faculty member in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College. Her research interests include liberative pedagogies, engineering ethics, engineering and social justice, and exclusionary structures of power in engineering education. Page 25.141.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Aiding and ABETing: The Bankruptcy of Outcomes-Based Education as a
of the group. One approach that may prove promising forincreasing STEM education and employment opportunities for IwD is spatial visualization skillsinstruction, and some research suggests such an approach may also be beneficial for IwD. Thisresearch team implemented two pilot studies to explore: 1) how a curriculum designed forimproving the spatial skills of first-year engineering students contributes to the development ofspatial skills for IwD; 2) what modifications are needed to make the curriculum more accessiblefor IwD; 3) what are the limitations or benefits of virtual versus in-person teaching for thisparticular population; and 4) what are the perceptions of IwD regarding the curriculum and theircapacity for success in STEM. Results
seating and desks. Soundproofing was added to both rooms as thestudents’ research showed that a more quiet study space was desirable. Carpet padding wasincluded in the East Reading Room design, and limp mass, acoustic foam, and sound panelingfor both areas.Through this project, the Director of Public Services and the Engineering Librarian were able toserve as a client of engineering students. The students learned how important it was to meet theneeds of their client, which may not always be the most optimal or best option from anengineering standpoint. For instance, the students’ final design relocated the Research Help Deskto the back wall. When this was presented to the entire library staff, the students receivedcomments that the staff
address this problem, the STEM PBL project funded by the NSF-ATE program has created acomprehensive series of multimedia PBL “Challenges” focused on sustainable technologies aswell as professional development and training in their use for pre-service and in-service STEMteachers. The STEM PBL Challenges are self-contained multimedia instructional modulesdesigned to develop students’ problem solving ability and understanding of sustainabletechnology concepts and applications. Developed in partnership with industry partners,university researchers and other organizations, the STEM PBL Challenges provide students withauthentic real-world problems captured and re-enacted in a multimedia format designed toemulate the real-world context in which the
the competitive position ofthe college for applied research opportunities in the current environment for research anddevelopment; promote the general economic development of the region; expedite and simplifythe acquisition and utilization of research contracts; improve technology transfer; and linkapplied scientific research and technological advancements to economic development of theState.The Mining Engineering Technology (MIET) baccalaureate program has been a serving themining industry profession at the college since 1972. A bachelor’s degree in mining engineeringtechnology will qualify the graduate for mining industry entry positions in production,construction, preparation, equipment sales, and environmental controls and in assisting