instruction, can be a barrier to some of the faculty members.Generally, online learning comprises of a combination of synchronous (real-time) andasynchronous learning (on-demand). Most common pedagogies in online teaching includediscussion boards, audio and video submissions, text-based assessment, collaboration, emailsexchanges, text-based chat, audio and video conferencing, real-time polls, real-timecollaboration, and real-time assessment [1], [2]. These teaching modes can be classified as“surface structures” (pedagogies that transmit the information between the teacher and students),“deep structures” (pedagogies that encourage, higher order thinking and problem-solving) and“implicit structures” (pedagogies that develop a moral dimension in terms
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Chemical Engineering Students’ Learning Preferences at a Midwestern UniversityKeywords: chemical engineering students; learning strategy preferences; verbal-visual preferencesIntroductionThere continues to be calls for improving engineering education. For example, the NationalAcademy of Engineering publication entitled Educating the Engineer of 2020 [1] calls for thereinvention of engineering education. An important finding of that study was the importance ofaddressing how students learn in addition to what they learn and recommended more researchinto engineering education. This included how to better serve
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Learning Through Doing: Preservice Elementary Teacher Reflections on the Engineering Design Process Teacher education programs continue to pursue creative and impactful ways to introduceconcepts of engineering and design to preservice elementary teachers (PET). The purpose of thisself-study was to examine one approach to integrating engineering design pedagogy into anelementary science methods course. Preservice elementary teachers first participated in anengineering design challenge, spread across two three-hour class sessions and organized in thefive-step engineering design process conceived by Engineering is Elementary [1]. Then PETwere assigned the
expandunderstanding of making learning in the context of engineering design education and to illustrateeducational pathways within the engineering education curriculum.The main research questions of this project are: 1) How do engineering students learn and apply making? 2) What are the attributes of making in the engineering classroom?We have been focused on how students conceptualize making through their experiences in aproduct-based learning course engineering design course. We have explored a broad set ofdifferent contexts for learning and how to apply these frameworks including making activitiesand the undergraduate engineering classroom. Below are summaries of individual researchefforts that make up this larger research project.Making-Based
attendance ofa technical conference. All of our students choose to attend this conference at their own expense.This paper will discuss these challenges and provide a selected assessment.IntroductionThe authors present one pre-COVID planned experiment and three COVID changes necessary tosupport senior and first-year graduate Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) courses. 1. The pre-COVID experiment was based on offering two senior and first-year graduate classes in a 7-week format, one following the other. Thus, a student could complete two courses (6-credits), in one semester, dealing with two closely related topics. In this case, the courses were Digital Communication Systems and Wireless Communications. 2. The first of the
thesubject matter. It also shows students how computer tools can effectively solve largerengineering problems similar to those encountered beyond undergraduate education.1. IntroductionThis paper will not explore course design for teaching MATLAB or argue for its utility inengineering curricula. That is well-traveled ground. Many papers already demonstrate theusefulness of MATLAB and Simulink in undergraduate engineering courses. The goal here,instead, is to present techniques and strategies for using this tool in an upper-level course thathave made a marked improvement in effectiveness and student appreciation. The paper beginswhere I did with an advanced elective teaching assignment: believing that MATLAB is apowerful engineering education tool
, were even more in need for support during this transition. Although it may nothave been realized at the time, building virtual STEM experiences for K-12 students can ensurereach to a wider audience, in addition to enhancing traditional, in-person settings by creatingmore interactive and engaging content [1].BackgroundThe National Science Foundation (NSF) funds several Research Experiences for Teachers (RET)programs across the United States that are designed to support teachers through authenticresearch experiences with engineering faculty researchers. One of the goals of the early RETprogram was to foster deeper involvement of K-12 and community college faculty in engineeringresearch with the intention that faculty would bring this knowledge
. Suggestions for improvement include changing theangle of camera and the color of the objects, and incorporating a remote coding component.MotivationHands-on experience is an essential part of manufacturing engineering education. However, thecost of industrial scale equipment, limited lab time, and large student population have hinderedthis desired experience. The idea of using remote labs (RL) was first proposed in 1991 by aresearcher at Purdue University who created a remotely shared control systems lab [1]. Remotelabs have received much attention as Internet technology has become mainstream. Remote labscan alleviate the challenges listed above [2-7]. Over the years, there have been a few attempts toreview of RLs and suggest challenges/problems.Chen
Fundamentals (Fundamentals) course was developed in response to aninformal faculty survey to identify curriculum weaknesses, and it is intended to provide a strongfoundation in the civil engineering discipline6. It introduces students to tools and techniques,such as surveying, understanding maps and plan sets, field sampling, and data analysis, asrequired for their civil engineering curriculum as well as throughout their professional career.By incorporating software and surveying skills, the course also provides resume enhancement forfirst-year students seeking summer internships, which can further enhance their engineeringidentity7, 8.The objectives of the course are as follows: 1. Define the profession of Civil Engineering, 2. Develop
, with many of them as first-year freshman students. In this paper, we present preliminary findings of two first-yearenrichment programs in ASSURE-US: the student teacher interaction council (STIC) and thestudent summer research, as well as lessons learned from two years’ implementation of theproject in order to improve the project implementations for future years. 1. Introduction Billions of dollars are allocated every year to fund research, program development, and directservices aimed at increasing the number of women, minorities, and underrepresented populationsentering the STEM major/career pipeline. Nevertheless, disparities in STEM representation ofthe Hispanic community prevail. Hispanics account for 17.4% of the US population, and
goals for the course. The balance of a hybridcourse’s components was variable for (3) courses offered at UTK allowing the professors to createthe most effective teaching and learning experiences uniquely distinct for each course’s objectives.A “Rotating Face-to-Face” hybrid structure and a “Synchronous Simulcast” offering were twohybrid course modalities defined by the university beginning in Fall 2020 and extending throughSpring 2021. Professors were provided the opportunity to offer hybrid course experiences in eitherof these structures, among other modalities, to develop the balance of formal learningopportunities. As shown in Table 1, the engineering communications course design struck a precisebalance between face-to-face engagement and
-calculus. The Campbell School of Engineering allows anystudent admitted to the university to enroll in engineering; students are divided into tiers basedon their math preparation. Tiers I and II have math ACT scores of 24 or below or math RSATscores of 580 or below and start in Fundamentals of Mathematics (Tier I) or College Algebra(Tier II). Those with higher ACT or RSAT math scores are designated as Tier III and start in pre-calculus (or above if they have AP or transfer credits). To recruit for the S-STEM, students wereasked to fill out an application that included the four essay questions listed in Table 1, aiming toget a large number of students applying from Tiers I and II. We also had a kickoff meeting opento the entire engineering school
Learned: College Student Surveys as a Professional Development ToolIntroductionThe development and adoption of student evaluation of teaching (SET) were first recorded in the1920s [1] [2]. Since then, many proponents have researched the practice and suggested ways ofimplementing SETs to improve instruction. Student evaluations of teaching have mostly beenstandardized and accepted as a regular practice of assessing teaching effectiveness in mostcolleges, including my university. SETs have standard features that are described by Sproule [3]. 1. The SET is a survey about course content and teaching effectiveness with open-ended and close-ended questions. 2. The closed-ended questions present a scale of possible values
presented as translations of three course design considerationspertaining to 1) content and learning objectives [1], 2) constructive alignment [2] and 3)inclusive teaching [3]. Table 1 identifies the general course design considerations, the core ideabehind these considerations specific to this course development context, the way the designconsiderations were reframed given the open-ended nature of the course, and the strategy forimplementation for course design and instruction. By considering these translations, the specificlessons learned show how components are applied from course development through instructionleading to three implementable strategies: 1) journey mapping for holistic student experience 2)integrating course content, active
those outside thecommunity. However, within the context of engineering education, there is no shared vocabularyfor discussing the impact of research or a framework that characterizes the impact of federalinvestments in undergraduate engineering education research [1].” Brewer also cites the lack ofshared definitions, particularly related to who is impacted by the research [2]. For these reasons,our work to improve impact statements started with a focus on meanings and language in impactstatements. Specifically, impact statements can be useful to National Science Foundation (NSF)program officers who are often in the position of informing about and advocating for the projectsunder their management. These impact descriptions form the foundation
implications of their future work is an extremely important topic. There are many pitfallswith the traditional large lecture format in which ethics is taught to engineering freshmen. It istaught as an abstract philosophical topic, rather than an act of personal decision making situatedin the nuances of complex real-world contexts [1]. Often, engineering ethics instruction is taughtby a philosophy professor rather than an engineer. It is usually included late in the undergraduatecurriculum, such as during a senior capstone project, and is a relatively short subtopic (module)within a larger array of engineering content. As a result, students often do not see ethics as equallyimportant as other topics. They do not see it consistently integrated
Curricula to Engender Inclusive Professional Identities in StudentsIntroductionTo identify and solve the wicked problems [1] our society faces, science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) enterprises need a heterogeneous constellation ofperspectives, mindsets, and expertise. Diverse teams are appealing because of their documentedcapacity to outperform groups selected based only on ability when facing difficult challenges [2].However, organizational theorists note that equipping people with the skills necessary to worktogether productively on teams composed of diverse members remains a challenge [3].Additionally, the culture of engineering and computer science, in particular, is oftenunwelcoming toward those with
Alamos where he worked on modeling the transient dynamic attributes of Kinetic Energy munitions during initial launch. Afterwards he was selected for the exchange scientist program and spent a summer working for DASA Aerospace in Wedel, Germany 1993. His initial research also made a major contribution to the M1A1 barrel reshape initiative that began in 1995. Shortly afterwards he was selected for a 1 year appointment to the United States Military Academy West Point where he taught Mathematics. Following these accomplishments he worked on the SADARM fire and forget projectile that was finally used in the second gulf war. Since that time, circa 2002, his studies have focused on unmanned systems both air and ground
ofEngineers provide design and analysis of structures to resist blast effects from accidentalexplosions and terrorist or foreign threats. Current code provisions for designing structures underaccidental blast conditions and dynamic loading are given in Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-340-02 (Change 2, 1 September 2014). The field of structural blast safety is uniquely and acutelymore relevant to DOD agencies due to the nature of both malicious and accidental risks.Obviously, terrorist incidents address one component, but the requirement to safely storemunitions on DOD installations sparked the formation of the DOD Explosives Safety Board in1928 after the major accidental explosion at the Naval Ammunition Depot, Lake Denmark, NewJersey. The
structural laboratory demonstrations. While the lecture component covers thetheoretical concepts and derivations using diagrams and simplified drawings, laboratorydemonstrations are known to improve students’ understanding of the concepts through observationand experimentation [1]-[2]. Nevertheless, traditional modes of course delivery leave a gapbetween classroom depictions of idealized structural diagrams and a first-hand experience andperception of the structural members and their load-deformation behavior. This gap can result inreduced understanding of the physical phenomena and can be an obstacle to structural mechanicseducation and learning [3]-[6].An example of classroom drawings of deformation behavior of a simple cantilever beam is shownin
for the JROCT STEM Leadership Academy. He also serves as an assistant coordinatorfor the summer academy. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Leveraging the US Army JROTC Program to Increase the STEM Workforce PipelineIntroductionNumerous reports have documented our country’s critical and growing need for STEM savvyworkers –from technicians and middle-level managers to engineers and scientists. According tothe Innovation and STEM Fields issue of the New American Economy, the number of advertisedSTEM jobs outnumbered unemployed STEM workers by more than 13 to 1 in all but 10 states[1]. Compounding the growing demand for STEM workers
ofchange. In doing so, potentials for scholarship, concientização, and praxis via labor organizing inengineering are elucidated in order to provide direction toward liberation.Introduction and BackgroundEngineering is a field that both shapes and is itself shaped by oppression and inequitable powerdynamics. Engineering education researchers have sought to study facets and intersections ofracism [1-8], heteropatriarchy [4-10], capitalism [5, 6, 10], and militarism and colonization [8,11] within engineering. In many ways, engineering education researchers have shown how thesefacets are fundamental to what is currently considered engineering epistemology. Owing to thathistory, peoples marginalized along many and varied axes of interlocking systems of
Sadegh, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering, Boise State UniversityAbstract Researchers describe a need for increased access to and transitional support into STEMgraduate education for low-income, academically talented, first-generation and/orunderrepresented and minority (LIATFirstGenURM) students [1]. In October 2019, we wereawarded an NSF scholarship grant to build infrastructure and provide support to low-income,academically talented, firs-generation, underrepresented, and minority (LIATFirstGenURM)graduate engineering students. As part of the internal evaluation of the program, we interviewedseven enrolled and funded graduate student beneficiaries to determine if they encountered anybarriers during their recruitment and
experiences, to pursue careers in transportation-related fields;- Expose participating students to STEM topics through a set of pre-designed educational activities;- Introduce participating students to workings of various agencies serving multiple transportation modes through field trips and on-site seminars; and,- Enhance students’ leadership and professional skills through activities designed to introduce them to university life and the main requirements needed to obtain a college degree.The authors had presented a more detailed description of the curriculum (1) and the evaluation of theprogram in the first year. However, the following subsections provide a brief description of each of thesesessions.OVERALL STUDENT DEMOGRAPHY AND RACETable
are almost twice aslikely to drop out of high school as their peers [1]. The lack of high school graduation for thesestudents can be attributed to several factors such as school engagement, home and classroomenvironment, social and peer pressures, and academic problems [2]. Additionally, minority studentsand women who persevere in high school and elect to attend a college or university may selectScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) majors; however, they tend to choosefields such as life and health sciences. The underrepresentation of women in engineering and earthsciences is chronically low at 20% and 40% of these majors, respectively. Black and Hispanic/Latinxstudents’ representation is less than half of what would be
might suggest that there is a benefit to reforming teams mid-semester in each course to give students additional experiences to apply what they have learned tomore teams. 1. INTRODUCTION Research on improving teamwork skills has been conducted in various disciplines from differentperspectives. Providing teamwork training for trauma resuscitation staff could improve the clinicalcare of trauma patients [1]. Research in plant construction shows that adopting training policies andproviding motivators to the company’s staff help them achieve better performance and to improveteamwork experience [2]. Organizational competitiveness could be enhanced by using a frameworkintegrated and emphasized on teamwork [3
, ingeneral, and the ethical and social aspects of such practice, more specifically. Furthermore,various stakeholders have increasingly identified the role of engineering degree programs ascritical in preparing graduates for these realities. For example, the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) in their Educating the Engineer of 2020 report called on engineeringprograms to “educate technically proficient engineers who are broadly educated, see themselvesas global citizens, can be leaders in business and public service, and who are ethically grounded”[1, p. 51]. Other reports have likewise called on engineering programs to intensify their focus onethics, professional responsibility, engaged citizenship, and allied themes (e.g., see [2-3]). Inaddition
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Q Longitudinal Study of a Project-Based Learning Methods Replacement for Lecture Based Courses Introduction Incorporating project-based learning into first year experiences for engineering studentshas been shown to improve student motivation and success [1], [2]. Using hands-on projects [3],interdisciplinary projects [4], or implementing project-based learning approaches in courses [5]during the first-year of an engineering curriculum also improves student retention [6]–[8].Project-based learning enhances student learning, improves student self-efficacy [9] and betterprepares students for workplace challenges [10]. However
writtenin any modern-day programming languages and provides an excellent educational and pleasingpedagogical assignment for students in engineering and computer science that promotesinterdisciplinary knowledge transfer.IntroductionInterdisciplinary approaches to engineering education are widely recognized as necessary fortoday’s engineers to meet the societal challenges before them [1]. Among these societalchallenges are the opportunities presented by diversity, both demographically anddisciplinarily. A key goal of current engineering education practice is to “promote and sustaindiversity” [2]. However, despite recruitment efforts, women remain a minority in engineeringfields in the U.S. and conceptualizations of interdisciplinary pedagogical
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Michigan Ross School of Business. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Low-Barrier Strategies to Increase Student-Centered LearningAbstractEvidence has shown that facilitating student-centered learning (SCL) in STEM classroomsenhances student learning and satisfaction [1]–[3]. However, despite increased support fromeducational and government bodies to incorporate SCL practices [1], minimal changes have beenmade in undergraduate STEM curriculum [4]. Faculty often teach as they were taught, relyingheavily on traditional lecture-based teaching to