Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Narayanan M. Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

Paper ID #8072A Case Study on Advancing Learning in An Upper-Level Engineering CourseDr. Narayanan M. Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Dr. Narayanan Komerath is a professor of Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Institute of Tech- nology, and director of the Experimental Aerodynamics and Concepts Group and the Micro Renewable Energy Systems Laboratory. He has over 300 publications, over 120 of them peer-reviewed. He holds three U.S. patents, and has guided fifteen Ph.D.s, more than 50 M.S.s and more than 160 undergraduate research special problem projects. He is a former chair of the Aerospace Division

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

John Dantzler; James Richardson; Tan-Yu Lee; Robert Leland

promoted in four ways2: 1. Mastery experiences, where students demonstratemastery by overcoming obstacles through effort. We promote mastery by using hard problems,and emphasizing explanations. 2. Reinforcement by seeing peers achieve mastery. We usecooperative learning, teamwork, and class presentations to create a learning environment inwhich students see the mastery experiences of peers. 3. Social encouragement. Students wererepeatedly given encouragement that the problems are hard, but can be solved with hard work. 4.Students must learn to manage emotional and physical reactions, such math anxiety, or the knotin the stomach when facing a challenging problem on a test.Transfer requires learning with understanding3. To achieve this we have the

Conference Session

ECE Online Courses, Labs and Programs

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Tim McCartney; Lynette Krenelka; John Watson; Dara Faul; Hossein Salehfar; Arnold Johnson

delivery method, the authors have tested and examined various ways to utilizethe power of the Web to synchronize and to better integrate the DEDP students’ learning activitieswith those of their on-campus peers. Using a combination of digital recording tablets, videocameras, white boards, and streaming servers, all of UND’s DEDP courses are now offered on-linethrough streaming video and/or downloadable files. The audio, whiteboard, computer and videooutputs from a course are condensed into a RealOne Player file that is placed on the Internet withinhours and can be accessed with minimal Internet connectivity. With the new format in place, thequality of the lectures and course material presentations has improved tremendously. The recordingand

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Poster Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Timothy Wiley; Hamid Khan

managerial effectiveness and those managers’ consequentpreparedness for excellent performance, were in direct contrast with forced ranking methodapplied in many organizations-- some of the forced rankings being too subjective to defend themerit of company’s lean-mean objectives in severe budgetary crisis. The study found the following “abilities” of ET managers as armors against subjectiveforced ranking. 1. Demonstrated ability in building trust with peers, superiors 2. Ability to establish priorities, and setting goals 3. Effective writing: expressing ideas correctly 4. Clearly understanding clientele (and customer) needs 5. Ability of budgeting managerial work time 6. Showing and having flexibility

Conference Session

Pre-College Programs

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Lori Bassman; Patrick Little

schools that participated in the program· Increase number of teachers with engineering design knowledge· Increase awareness of the nature/limits of science· Raise standards to which students hold themselves (i.e., encourage peer evaluation as an alternative to teacher-based grading)· Encourage and support implementation of results at the local level after the factThe goal of increasing student learning opportunities and skills was translated into the followingobjectives:· Provide a framework for student decision making and problem solving· Increase number of students exposed to engineering problem solving and engineering design processes· Offer another avenue for active learning· Expand use of groups and teams in classrooms

Conference Session

Enhancing Engineering Math with Technology

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Aaron Titus; Guoqing Tang

choice, multiple select, numerical, fill-in-the-blank, symbolic, and essay questions. Wewill demonstrate how to use these techniques to write more intricate questions to actively engagestudents in the learning process, help them understand basic concepts, and improve theirproblem-solving skills. We will also illustrate how to use assignments delivered by WebAssignto create a learner-centered environment by promoting interactive, cooperative learning amongstudents and increasing interaction between students and faculty.Through using WebAssign to deliver, collect, and grade homework and quizzes, we haveobserved that students have increased the number of hours spent on academic tasks outside theclassroom in Calculus and General Physics as well as

Conference Session

Integration of Liberal Education into Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vassilios Tzouanas, University of Houston, Downtown; Lea Campbell, University of Houston, Downtown

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

engineer in the group. d) At the next design meeting, focus the agenda on the impact of J. T.‟s behavior on the success of the project and threaten to speak with the project manager if he does not “shape up.” e) Have another senior-level engineer in the group have a private conversation with J. T. about his work.The final unit looks at the nuances of teaming within a virtual environment in which fellow teammembers may be located in a distant country and may come from diverse backgrounds. Toolswhich can be used to support and enhance virtual collaboration are explored. Discussion boardsand collaborative writing and editing within a course management program or via a documentediting program like Google Docs are used to

Conference Session

Active and Project-Based Learning

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren A. Rockenbaugh, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder; Derek T. Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

agricultural tools for developingcommunities.MethodsA pre-project survey was piloted in February 2010 to determine a baseline for ComponentDesign students’ attitudes toward engineering as a practice and profession, attitudes towardservice-learning and community, sense of belonging in engineering and “seeing” themselves as Page 22.1192.6engineers, confidence in technical skills specific to Component Design and non-technical skillsincluding teamwork, communication, and technical writing. All of the students in the coursewere required to complete the survey for a portion of their homework grade. The 21-questionsurvey was administered halfway through the

Conference Session

Ethics and Technology

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sylvia W. Thomas, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

students’ interviews with peers, friends, and family, on how aspects of theirresearch will affect the general public and the environment. The specific areas addressed inthis article are 1) Nanotechnology in Solar Cell Development, 2) Nanotechnology inElectronics, 3) Nanotechnology in BioEnergy, and 4) Nanotechnology and Fuel Cells.III. MethodologyAs utilized by anthropologists, sociologists, and psychologists, this work has employed acombination of techniques, “survey research design” and “convenience sampling”.4,5 Withthe summer research program having a duration of ten weeks and limited funding, these twomethods were deemed appropriate to address the two concerns of this work. Particularly,survey research designs are very valuable tools for

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-college Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrian Lee, Central Illinois Technology and Education Research Institute

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

towards teaching science,technology, engineering, and mathematics principles both within and outside the classroomenvironment. Collaboration amongst academic researchers and educational practitioners hasyielded exceptional opportunities for students to increase technological literacy throughparticipation in structured formal and informal learning activities. This paper outlines a resourcefor students to display their creativity and independent learning skills by presenting a journalisticapproach to publishing student-initiated research projects. Comparable in format to professionaltechnical journals, the establishment of a peer-reviewed, online and open-access journal gearedfor the 7-12 grade audience is presented. This concept is currently being

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Norine Meyer; Deborah Fisher; Cynthia Villanueva; Amy Strobel

more functional than large teams, the instructors limited the size of the course. Theplan called for three teaching assistants to lead up three task teams. Working with smallnumbers, there was no expectation that the course would lead to statistically significant results.The primary intent was to engage entering and 2nd year students in team relationships, whichwould help to build strong bonds with their School of Engineering peers and provide basic skillsin engineering concepts and team cooperation. Page 6.964.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD) Technical Session: Innovative Approaches to Teaching & Developing Engineering Leadership

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Benjamin Simon, Georgia Institute of Technology; James Field; Lauren Stewart, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

, L., Lee, J., Luo, W., & Hogan, D. J. (2012). Confidence: A better predictor of academic achievement than self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety? Learning and individual differences, 22(6), 747-758.[32] Su, W., & Huang, A. (2022). More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1005-1015.[33] Carless, D. (2012). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 90-103). Routledge.

Conference Session

Transgression, Conflict, and Altruism

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenna Tonn, Boston College; Avneet Hira, Boston College

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

reimaginingengineering education as one informed by tensions (Cheville and Heywood, 2016) and inherentto the “wicked” or sociotechnical pursuit of engineering design (Coyne, 2005; Norman &Stapper, 2015).We are writing from our positions as founding faculty members of an engineering department ina liberal arts institution coming from scholarly traditions in science and technology studies andengineering/engineering design education. In this paper, we hope to conceptualize “engineeringas conflict” as an analytical framework for engineering liberal education and share examplesfrom our curricular and program development work.Context and positioningBelow we share our disciplinary backgrounds and current teaching contexts to help situate howwe use the analytical

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 2 - Beliefs, Motivation, and Pedagogy

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Blessing Isoyiza Adeika, Morgan State University; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

such as LOPUS and COPUS [4].However, unlike manual observations, this study’s AI model will use computer vision and deeplearning techniques to automatically analyze the classroom videos and provide objective andtimely data on the learning process.Figure 2: Experimental-centric Learning cycle. 2. Social Constructivism and Collaborative Learning: Idaresit’s work [25] emphasizes the essential role of social interaction in constructing knowledge . Building on this, the study adopts the theory of social constructivism, acknowledging the significant role of collaboration and peer learning within experiment-centric classrooms [26]. Therefore, this study’s AI model will therefore go beyond individual analyses, utilizing graph

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 11

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Paul Fernandez, Utah Valley University; Walker Eads, Utah Valley University; Israd Hakim Jaafar, Utah Valley University; Abolfazl Amin, Utah Valley University; Abdennour C. Seibi, Utah Valley University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

, persistence, and has beenlinked to a boost in students’ motivation to learn (Ditta, Strickland-Hughes, Cheung, & Wu,2020). Undergraduate research experience was also found to better equip students for graduateschool or careers (Sell, Naginey, & Stanton, 2017; Altman, et al., 2019). Through undergraduateresearch, students learn professional skills such as maintaining notes, identifying researchproblems, reading scientific literature, collaborating with peers in a research setting, and writingand presenting findings to an audience in their field of discipline (Carpenter & Pappenfus, 2009).Undergraduate research is said to be one of ten high impact practices shown to enhance andimprove college student performance and success (Kuh, 2008). A

Conference Session

Broader Approaches to Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bono Po-Jen Shih, Pennsylvania State University; Benjamin Daniel Chambers, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Matthew James P.E., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

), and individualuniversity professors [4, 14]. At present, the paradigm of primarily using ethical theories andcodes of ethics has been challenged (e.g. [15]) and seems to be in decline [16, 17], and ethicspedagogies additionally include the development of case studies, codes of ethics, or decision-making processes by students, community-based engagement and learning, peer mentoring,critiquing ethical theories, and gamification of ethics education [18]. Specific strategies forpositioning course activities and modules further include stakeholders and the perspective-taking, communication, and engagement process surrounding different participant roles [19, 20,1 ABET requires continuous improvement of engineering programs and in the long run

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Alexander Steven Victor Krummi; Arynn J. Lorentz, Iron Range Engineering; Cody Mann, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Kaitlyn Mann; Andrew Lillesve, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED)

Paper ID #41559Preparing Students to Thrive in Industry: The Critical Role of a LearningCoachDr. Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Darcie Christensen is a probationary Assistant Professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University Mankato. She teaches for Bell Engineering, which is a subset of Iron Range Engineering on the Mesabi Range College Campus. Dr. Christensen received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University in the Summer of 2021. The title of her Dissertation is ”A Mixed-Method Approach to Explore Student Needs for Peer Mentoring in a

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

JAMES WANLISS, Anderson University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)

which we have created that are inalignment with ABET standards.Table 3. Course Learning Outcomes. Learning Outcomes Specific Goals 1. Demonstrate Independently use PyTorch to implement and analyze various Proficiency in PyTorch deep learning models. 2. Apply Deep Learning Apply deep learning techniques to solve engineering problems; to Engineering Problems demonstrate the ability to choose appropriate models for specific tasks. 3. Evaluate Model Evaluate the performance of deep learning models using relevant Performance metrics and make informed decisions based on the results. 4. Collaborate Collaborate with peers on coding projects

Conference Session

Two Year-to-Four Year Transfer Topics Part I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie A. Rursch, Iowa State University; Douglas W. Jacobson, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

the Iowa State University Information Assurance Center. Dr. Jacobson teaches network security and information warfare and has written a textbook on network security. Dr. Jacobson has received two R&D 100 awards for his security technology and has two patents in the area of computer security. Dr. Jacobson has given over 50 presentations in the area of computer security and has testified in front of the U.S. Senate committee of the Judiciary on security issues associated with peer-to-peer networking. Page 22.127.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 AAS + 2

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering by Design II

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Mohamed El-Sayed; Lucy King; Matthew Sanders; Jacqueline El-Sayed

creativity as a right brain activity, on both an individual andteam level. The key for successful brain storming sessions is to suspend judgment and allowcreative ideas to flow. After brain storming the students prepare a list of potential projects. Fromthe list of projects one is selected based on the following criteria: 1. Originality and creativity 2. Enough work for all the team members 3. The ability to deliver desired results within class time frame.In the second and third weeks lectures included the topics: the design process, project selectionand planning, bill of product, product attributes, project management, proposal writing andpresentation. Additional lectures relating the product attributes to the design criteria andengineering

Conference Session

Techniques for Improving Teaching

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Nicholas Steneck; Donald Carpenter; Trevor Harding; Susan Montgomery

students who are involved in campus organizations, such as fraternities, sororities,and athletic teams, are more likely to cheat than their peers 2,18,21,23.Finally, there has been some research performed on how situational factors, such as the pressureto succeed in school, affect academic dishonesty. Other such factors include external workcommitments, heavy course loads, and financial aid or scholarship requirements 1,4,24.Additionally, students frequently place the blame for cheating on the faculty, citing poorinstructional quality, irrelevant course material, and faculty apathy about cheating 23.Overall, we believe that the responsibility for reducing academic dishonesty lies with the entirecollege community, including students, academic

Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

Arezou Shafaghat, Kennesaw State University; Mohammad Jonaidi; Hoseoen Lee; Craig A Chin, Kennesaw State University; Ali Keyvanfar, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Engagers: Show hesitation or uncertainty, need additional support to engage moreactively.'Z' (Assessment Wants) explored are: - Direct Submission Assessment: For submission assignments that involve submitting workdirectly, such as assignments, projects, or exams. - Indirect Submission Assessment: For submission assignments that involve feedback orevaluation from others, like peer reviews or self-evaluations. - Qualitative Submission Assessment: For submission assignments that involve non-numericalevaluation, focusing on quality of writing, understanding, or creativity. - Quantitative Submission Assessment: For submission assignments that involve numericalevaluation, such as grades or scores. - Direct Formative Assessment: Assignments

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Interdisciplinary Course Design Opportunities for Chemical Engineers

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Baba Abdul, Washington State University; Edgar A. O'Rear, University of Oklahoma; Gary Robert Brown, Washington State University, Office of Assessment and Innovation; Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University; Paul B. Golter, Washington State University; David B. Thiessen, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

, and his impression about who is the primary determinant of the outcome [15].The value of the task is influenced by general or individual interest, its inherent challenge, thevalue attached to it by peers, its relationship to long range goals of the learner and the immediatepay off. The self confidence of the learner is influenced by his record of success at same orsimilar task, possession of all or most of the skills required for task completion, persuasion bypeer or someone else that success is possible, seeing peers succeed at the same task and theperceived difficulty of the task. The learner’s perception of the primary determinant of theoutcome is influenced by the perceived situation of control (internal or external), flexibility ofthe

Collection

1999 Annual Conference

Authors

J. Elaine Seat; Fred Weber; Daniel C. Yoder; Christopher D. Pionke; J. Roger Parsons

Review for Dynamics Final Exam Page 4.334.4 Figure 1. Course Outline, Spring 1998This hands-on learning experience is presented as a "physical homework" assignment toemphasize that this is something the student must do, and not simply a demonstration that theprofessor thinks is "cool." Students work in pairs (to encourage peer teaching), and their workis evaluated by one of the GTAs staffing the lab. This evaluation is on a proficiency basis,which means that both students in the pair must demonstrate a grasp of the concept and anability to use it. If either student fails to show proficiency, the pair is sent

Conference Session

CE Capstone: Innovations in Learning & Assessment

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregg Fiegel, California Polytechnic State University; Jay DeNatale, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

, and professional liability Demonstrate an ability to explain the reasons for seeking professional licensure after graduation Demonstrate an ability to write effective essays and technical reportsGraduates have an ability to Demonstrate an ability to compose and deliver an effective oral presentation communicate effectively Demonstrate an ability to prepare a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) for a civil engineering project Graduates have the broad education necessary to Demonstrate an ability to develop community consensus building techniques for a understand the impact of civil

Conference Session

Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Ethics Education

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel F. Jennings PE, Texas A&M University; Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

studentsdepending upon the class size. This is a key component of a student overall grade in the course.This assesses students’ ability to communicate in writing. Peer evaluations are used to assignindividual grades. Each member of each group is required to complete a peer evaluation formwhich is provided by the instructor in the course packet.Oral Presentation of the Written Leadership Project: Each group is required to make an inclass—oral presentation of their written project. All members of the group are required toparticipate. The class participation is highly encouraged in the whole presentation process. Forexample, each class member and the course instructor jointly assign a grade to the oralpresentation for each of the individual presenters.Guest

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Homero Gregorio Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

scienceeducation. Using the search terms “active learning,” “teaching, ” “learning,” and “team-based learning” in any field, the searched was focused on articles published in peer-reviewed journals between January 1993 and December 2013. A 20-year period wasselected intentionally in order to include relevant work related to cooperative learning donein the late 90´s, and to achieve saturation. In the initial search 49 articles were found.Analyzing the full text of every article refined the search. The final articles were chosen fordemonstrating all the following selection criteria: 1. The research must have used a type of active learning in the theoretical framework. 2. The research was focused on improving student learning in the engineering

Conference Session

FPD 1: The Path to Engineering

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Marisa K. Orr, Louisiana Tech University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Central Queensland University Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University and a Professorial Re- search Fellow at Central Queensland University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineer- ing students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $12.8 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011. Dr. Ohland is past Chair of ASEE’s

Conference Session

Themes in Renewable Energy and ET

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Chiou, Drexel University; Radian G Belu, Drexel University (Tech.); Michael G Mauk P.E., Drexel University; M. Eric Carr, Drexel University; Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

course sequence was organized following the ABET guideline forcapstone and/or senior project design courses. The senior design class is organized in a verystructured form.1. Teams: All students have to work in teams of three or four. We consider this to be theoptimum team size. A team of two may result in distress in cases where one of the students wasnot able to do his or her share of the work, while for teams larger than four may have difficultiesto choose projects which were challenging enough for such a big group of students and stillcould be finished within three-quarter time frame.2. Self and Peer Review: A very simple self and peer review system has been introduced. Thestudents must evaluate their own and their team members' performance

Conference Session

Thermodynamics

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nihad Dukhan, University of Detroit Mercy; Mark Schumack, University of Detroit Mercy

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

change. Abulencia et al.9 described an inquiry-based exercise in whichstudents were required to develop an instructional video that could teach a concept inthermodynamics using common metaphors, and to watch (and critique) similarly constructedvideos by peers. Prince et al.11 presented results that showed the effectiveness of inquiry-basedactivities in addressing some thermodynamic misconceptions held be engineering students, i.e., Page 23.1280.8heat, energy, temperature and entropy.Field43 described guided inquiry investigations of thermodynamic properties and cycles in asophomore thermodynamics class. Students were required to modify a