program had on the students, particularly on theirconfidence as a STEM researcher and their ability to integrate into the MAST Center researchcommunity. The program will culminate with the students presenting their results at the EmergingResearchers Nationwide conference, which will continue to provide the students new experienceswithin STEM and STEM research they would not have experienced otherwise. Future iterationsof this program will continue to refine the experiments while maintaining the creative aspect thatallows the students to participate in their optimization. The impact this program had on the studentsthat participates suggests research experiences are an effective experiential learning experience,even for HS students
developed an understanding of electric vehicle components, 4.23 4.00 their operation and simulation. 13 The teaching assistants were suitable for the course . 4.02 4.00 14 I learned a lot from my project. 4.71 4.50 15 Including both engineering and technology students in one class is a 4.42 4.25 positive feature of the course. 16 Overall, I felt the course has prepared me for a career related to electric and 4.19 4.25 hybrid vehicles. 17 Compared with other elective courses in the curriculum, I found this course 4.18 4.00 to be more
either incorporate or accept this knowledge or application of principles as a guideto everyday professional practice or personal conduct. An assessment practice based upon affective domain criteria would examine the student’sstate of mind resulting from one or more directed learning experiences as a result of thetechnology curriculum. Using the same proposed outcomes, measures are needed to detect howsuccessfully the student receives, values, organizes and integrates curricular content into his orher own life style. Unless one can determine if the student’s ability to successfully perform theseoutcomes when appropriate has been integrated into practice or conduct and it is evidenced inday-to-day behavior, the result has not been
capstone course, found that a problem-based learning format requiredsignificantly more time due to the additional feedback for students, and that a team-building Page 26.1412.2exercise could strengthen communication between student teams and the instructor 7. Problem-based learning has also been implemented into an entire civil engineering curriculum at theUniversity of Colorado, reporting promising evidence for future pursuit 8. Some report thatstudents gain twice the learning from problem-based learning compared to traditional lecture 9.Several key studies examined the impact of the learning environment. Grulke et al. found thatstudents in a
pathological), analysis and modeling of human postural control, and time-varying signals and systems. Engineering education research includes curriculum and laboratory development of biomechanics and bio-signal processing concepts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Student Reflections on Experiences Gained from an Open-Ended Problem-Solving Bio-Signals LaboratoryAbstractKolb’s Experiential Learning Theory maintains that learning occurs through a combination ofdoing as well as reflecting on the doing. Likewise, Schon’s Theory of the Reflective Practitionerhighlights the value of reflection within professional practice, in particular when dealing withcomplex problems within
Page 12.1069.8useful links. AT&T’s Virtual Academy11 offers online courses for integrating technology intocurriculum. There are numerous sites with links to fun engineering projects12.The 4000 Years of Women in Science project provides links biographies, references andphotographs of women in science history, including astronomy, mathematics, physics, biology,chemistry, and the social sciences (see http://www.astr.ua.edu/4000WS/4000WS.html).Contributions of 20th Century Women in Physics is a centenary project of the American PhysicsSociety, can be found at http://www.physics.ucla.edu/~cwpThe Pact62 is an autobiography of 3 inner-city African-American youths who made a pact in highschool to find a way to go to college and then medical school
limited IT support/or lack of support. Instructors having to createlabs is a problematic option since it is a very time-consuming overhead added to the regularactivities involved in teaching a curriculum. COVID-19 has recently compounded this problemdue to universities having to restrict access to labs.Creating virtual labs for cybersecurity classes has been given attention in the last few years, andASEE has published papers on the topic [1- 4]. Some universities are creating labs, while othersare using the NSF-funded SEED Labs Project. [5-7]. The authors are proposing an opensourceproject initiative that allows universities, students, and others to contribute their lab work to apublic repository hosted by an entity like GitHub. The work can be
States and ChinaOverviewLawrence Technological University [LTU, 1] and Shanghai University of Engineering Science[SUES, 2] were founded in 1932 and 1978, respectively. These specific particular datesrepresent two unique timeframes in the two countries where farsighted individuals implementedtheir “dream of preparing students for leadership in the new technical era into reality.” [1] Themotto of LTU is ‘Theory and Practice”, while SUES “integrates classroom-based learning withwork-based learning.”[2] Our two universities share similar student populations, mission/vision,and leadership.In fact, the vision of LTU is "To be a pre-eminent private technological university producingleaders with an entrepreneurial spirit and global view." Likewise, SUES
core curriculum.Within engineering, students often work as part of an integrated team. This was a new concept forstudents in the other disciplines. The “teamwork” almost became separate independent tracks thatcame together at the end. The teams seemed to work in a multidisciplinary rather than interdisciplinaryframework: each student in the team had their task to perform and those tasks were joined together at Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX Copyright © 2025, American Society for Engineering Education 7the end. In future offerings we
a lessresource-intensive manner. One benefit of the collaboration is the expansion to these non-travelexperiences. For example, activities in the summer program have extended to coursecollaborations during the academic year. Senior-level (i.e., “capstone”) design teams from thethree principal universities have collaborated on projects during the academic year. These joint-projects face all the challenges of typical capstone projects with the additional logistical andcultural issues of international collaboration. They are an excellent opportunity for our students.The institutions have also benefitted from first-hand experience with new programs. Forexample, the experiences at NUS with the development of their design-based curriculum
parentheses, are asfollows: Familiarity (583) concerns a basic awareness of a concept; Usage (375) is the ability to apply a concept in a concrete way; Assessment (152) indicates a level of mastery that involves the ability to select an appropriate approach from understood alternatives.FIGURE 2. PORTION OF ‘LEARNINGOUTCOMES’ SHEET IN CS2013 ‘CURRICULUMEXEMPLARTEMPLATE’ EXCEL FILE.Although developed to more readily allow a program to map their curriculum against theCS2013 Body of Knowledge, no computer science program is expected to implement all of theselearning outcomes; in fact, only 253 address what are referred to as “Tier 1” requirements,whereas nearly half (550) address purely elective content. While examining this sheet
throughout the course of engineeringprograms. In an in-depth study of students who switched out of science, math, and engineeringmajors, 77.9% of women cited discouragement and loss of self-esteem as a factor in switching.4Research has shown that women tend to drop out of engineering earlier and with higher GPA’s Page 14.1098.2than men, suggesting a lack of support and confidence. The crucial year appears to be thefreshman year when the largest drop in engineering students is seen5. Focusing on improving thefirst year engineering students’ experience has become a goal for many universities and colleges.Freshmen curriculum include required courses such
2006-1722: HOLD PARAMOUNT: DESIGNING AN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONTO OPEN MINDS AND SERVE THE PUBLIC GOODCarole Womeldorf, Ohio University-Athens Carole Womeldorf is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio University. Her areas of technical expertise and interests include distributed energy generation, combustion, heat transfer and fluid dynamics. She worked in the Fire Sciences Division of the Building and Fire Research Laboratory at the National Institute of Standards and Technology from 1993 to 2000. Dr. Womeldorf earned her Sc.B. et A.B. in Mechanical Engineering and English and American Literature from Brown University, her Masters of Science in Oceanographic Engineering from
, computers do the actual calculations. Thus, the primaryfunctions of the engineer are to select the proper model, input the proper data, check the output,correctly interpret it, and then properly implement the solution.Math literacy plays an important role in helping students develop these skills. Engineeringinstructors employ various mathematical constructs, such as graphs, tables, equations, and charts,to describe situations and concepts. Exercises and exams employ similar constructs to presentsituations. There is the implied expectation that students comprehend these constructs. If studentsfail to answer a question correctly on a test, it is presumed they didn’t know how to solve it.However, what if the students did not understand the
Paper ID #7978A Case Study of Engineering Faculty Collaboration: Co-Authoring an E-Book on Energy and SustainabilityDr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his current position, he worked as a learning scientist for the VaNTH Engineering Research Center at Northwestern University for three years. Yalvac’s research is in STEM education, 21st century skills
the computingfields. In order to make an impact all entities need to work together and continue to educate girls,teachers, educators, counselors, legislatures, and others regarding the importance of this issue.This paper described the complimentary efforts of two female faculty at Purdue University toeducate students, parents, counselors, and other constituencies on what IT is and careers withinIT. Support by a few male colleagues in various activities has also helped. All of these combinedefforts have had some success, but clearly, much more work needs to be done.Bibliography1 Martin, C.D. & Pearson, E., Jr. (January 2005). Broadening participation through a comprehensive, integrated system: Final workshop report. Arlington
industry isincorporating active learning in the curriculum: learning through listening, observation,interaction, and activity. Today, engaging students in a world filled with information anddistractions, we need to create learning environments for students that promote amultidimensional approach 1. The GO GREEN course at IUPUI is an excellent example ofovercoming the problem emphasized by George Bernard Shaw. The course instructors for GOGREEN used a series of intensified sessions which included short lectures, cultural interactions,international industrial site visits, case studies, readings, class discussions, and independentstudent work. The combination of all these experiences enabled the students to learn from seeingfirst hand examples of
Safety Coordinator, and lead for the SAFEChE (Process Safety Across the CHE Curriculum) modules as well as the Visual Encyclopedia of Chemical Engineering Equipment. Currently, he serves as a Director for the ASEE ChE Division.Dr. Joanne Kay Beckwith, Carnegie Mellon University Joanne K. Beckwith is an Assistant Teaching Professor of Chemical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University.Dr. Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis Janie is a Senior Lecturer in Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis. Her PhD is in chemical engineering from Purdue University. Research focus areas include laboratory courses, process safety, and chemical engineering pedagogy.Prof
the iLab batched architecture. The client through which theremote student interacts with the ADLab is implemented with Java, which allows for areasonable amount of platform independence.This paper discusses the software and hardware aspects of the ADLab architecture and givessome insight into some design decisions. The paper also reports that the system is beingtested at Obafemi Awolowo University and that student feedback so far indicates high studentsatisfaction with the remote laboratory.Keywords: iLab, ADLab, FPGA, remote laboratoryI. Experimentation and Remote LaboratoriesWhen applied within an engineering curriculum, experimentation is supposed to achievespecific goals. It allows students to develop skills in any combination of up
closing the gaps.As an Alliance, the program has provided comprehensive social and academic support forovercoming obstacles that historically underrepresented STEM students face. Measures comprisethe execution of interventions for the difficult transitions for students and include social andacademic integration strategies for the two-year to four-year transition; socialization into sciencethrough experiential learning, including domestic and international research programs andexperiences; and improving STEM pedagogy and curriculum to advance systematic change forhistorically underrepresented students. In addition to the development of interventions, alongitudinal research study explores the mechanisms that are bridges or barriers for
all of their peers, S-STEM studentsearn their scholarships based on merit, and so enter the academic institution excellingacademically. The presentation will focus on how the research team developed methods forculling an acceptable comparison group for quantitative analyses, based on available data andour attention to critical theory and intersectionality.Students with financial need and Students Of Color are more likely to attend 2-year colleges thantheir peers, thus including 2-year schools in the S-STEM program is a thoughtful improvementupon the “4-year only” model. Yet quantitative data regarding the success of community collegerecruitment, retention, and transfer of students in the 2-year S-STEM programs through 4-yearBachelors of
framework.Dr. Deniz Eseryel, North Carolina State University Deniz Eseryel joined North Carolina State University as a Chancellor’s Faculty Excellence Program clus- ter hire in the Digital Transformation of Education. She is an Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Counselor Education specializing in Digital Learning and Teaching. She is also a Senior Research Fellow at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. The important but little understood question that has motivated her program of research is: How can we effectively and ef- ficiently promote cyberlearning in complex knowledge domains such as STEM (science, technology, en- gineering and mathematics)? Towards this direction, she
semester, the researchers met at least every two weeks to share and recordobservations from the different sections and to discuss pedagogy, ensuring consistent instruction.These observations are integrated into the findings in the following section.Test performance data was measured on the final exam, based on student descriptions of thesesame two definitions. Again, Atlas software was used to compile the response and identify thecommonly-used words. Next, the researchers compared the trends in the use of common wordsfor each definition, respectively.Analysis and FindingsWhen asked, “What does an engineer do?” the findings suggest that the most significant changeswere increases in words such as product (+350%), problem (+315%), efficient (+300
Paper ID #33251Understanding Non-Traditional Students in Engineering and Computing(Work in Progress)Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International Uni- versity. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked profession- ally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on engineering and education, including courses on engineering design, systems in society, and learning theories. Stephen’s research interests include equity, culture, and the sociocultural dimensions of
building, self-managing teams, and sociotechnical systems.Dr. Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University Pilar Pazos is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engi- neering at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA. Her main areas of research interest are collabo- rative work-structures, virtual teams and team decision-making and performance.Mr. Preetham Sathish Ullal, Old Dominion University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Qualitative Inquiry into the Role of Web-based Collaboration Tools and Instructional Scaffolds in the Facilitation of Team ProcessesGlobalization and advances in information technologies drive organizations to use
Christine Trinter is an assistant professor of mathematics education with the Center for STEM Education at the University of Notre Dame where she teaches mathematics content and assessment courses with the Institute for Educational Initiatives’ M.Ed. program and data visualization courses for the Notre Dame Education, Schooling, and Society minor. Dr. Trinter’s research focuses on factors affecting teacher development, curriculum design, and technology usage in the mathematics classroom and she serves schools both nationally and internationally providing professional development in these areas.Dr. Chaoli Wang, University of Notre Dame Dr. Chaoli Wang is an associate professor of computer science and engineering at the
AC 2011-1639: CHALLENGES AND BENEFITS OF ESTABLISHING ANENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS CHAPTER AT WWUForrest Alden Copeland, Western Washington University While completing his undergraduate degree in Manufacturing Engineering Technology, Forrest Copeland helped establish the Engineers Without Borders student chapter at Western Washington University in 2006. Copeland completed his degree in 2009 and graduated as the Engineering department’s outstanding senior. He also received the Presidential Scholar Award due, in part, to his work with the Engineers Without Borders student club. Shortly after graduation, Copeland traveled with four other students and one professional to conduct an assessment trip in Guatemala for the
as an Assistant Professor (Teaching Track) in the Department of Chemi- cal and Petroleum Engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh when this study was conducted. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes (problem based learning, games and simulations, etc.) as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into engineering curriculum. More specifically, she isfocused on evaluating the effectiveness of games for increasing student motivation
and content knowledge. This is an important consideration for CS education, asteachers must understand how to integrate computer science skills and competencies into theirlesson plans. Pilot projects and localized programs have shown success in developing thiscapacity within teachers. For example, a researcher group from University of SouthernCalifornia collaborated with nine teachers in three elementary schools in the Latino communityof Boyle Heights in Los Angeles and created the Building Opportunities with Teachers inSchools (BOTS) program [11]. The focus of this program is to use robotics and other non-computer-based activities to teach CS concepts in a physical form. One of the long-term goals ofthe BOTS program is to provide a low-cost
found the written material more clear and understandable than the podcast” (p.146). Tynan and Colbran7 found that student podcast usage is strongly associated with anincrease in reading of course-related materials. Abdous, Facer and Yen2 conducted a studycomparing different types of podcast usage in courses: in one group of courses podcasting wasintegrated into the curriculum; the other group of courses had podcasting as supplementalmaterial to the course. "The students’ reported time spent on reading per week did not differmuch between the integrated podcast courses in comparison to the supplemental podcastcourses." (p. 47)Still other research reveals that when both podcasting and course reading materials wereavailable to students, a stronger