materials for them. Some teachers have reached out to us to ask for guidancein designing an engineering lesson for their students and we’ve provided ideas, suggestions,and recommendations for how they could create a lesson based on the subject topics andconcepts they are teaching. We’ve also provided additional professional development andtraining throughout the academic year for interested teachers. We’ve also planned several fieldtrips to Virginia Tech for their students to see the university campus and visit some engineeringlabs.In addition, research will be conducted on the impacts of engineering integration initiatives. Bymaintaining these relationships and providing sustained support, we hope to have a lastingimpact on engineering education
Paper ID #33015Using the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) to TrackStudents’ Growth and Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Learning StrategiesCourseMs. Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University Abigail Stephan is a doctoral candidate in the Learning Sciences program at Clemson University. Broadly, her research interests include intergenerational learning in informal settings and self-directed learning. Since 2017, Abigail has been the graduate assistant for the General Engineering Learning Community (GELC), a program that supports first-year engineering students in their development of self-regulation and time
students traveled to Bolivia tocomplete the construction of the bridge. During their four-week stay in Bolivia, the students wereasked to keep reflective journals that were guided by a series of weekly writing prompts. Weconsidered the following research questions in the study: To what degree did the project advance the students’ mastery of technical concepts? Page 24.94.2 How did complexities (e.g., linguistics, local construction practices, diverse social and cultural environment) related to the site affect students’ perceptions of engineering design/construction, particularly within a global and social context? How
feedbackwould greatly shorten the feedback cycle, and supplement more detailed summative feedbackprovided when a student work is graded.If the system is woven throughout the lecture it may be helpful to have a teaching assistant inclass to help with the system, as it is challenging to simultaneously look for questions coming in,look for good student responses to post and discuss, answer questions, and lecture.ReferencesBunce, D. M., VandenPlas, J. R., & Havanki, K. L. (2006). Comparing the effectiveness on student achievement of a student response system versus online WebCT quizzes. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(3), 488.Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sciences
Paper ID #21615and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 480 K-12 teachers and 115 high school studentresearchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di-rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of over1,000 students annually. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Fundamental—Determining Prerequisites for Middle School Students to Participate in Robotics-based STEM Lessons: A Computational Thinking Approach1. IntroductionIncreasing interest in the utilization of robotics in K-12 STEM education has drawn significantresearch interest and curricula development
, graduating in May 2023 and a Graduate Research Assistant in the Center for Engineering Education at the University of Texas at Austin. Their research revolves around investigating how LGBTQ+ students resist the hos- tile culture of engineering and, more broadly, STEM. They mentor a group of LGBTQ+ undergraduate engineers and investigate the collective resistance by LGBTQ+ students through student driven organiza- tions with them. They are especially interested in rethinking ways in which DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) can be approached to be more inclusive and effective. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Modeled Professionalism, Identity Concealment, and Silence: The Role
, and welfare consequential to civilprojects. Additionally, ASCE believes that implementation will enhance the stature of theprofession in general.As the graduate committee in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering atBrigham Young University (BYU), the authors of this paper were charged with planning forpotential impacts that a change in the academic requirements for licensure would have on ourdepartment. The authors used this opportunity to ascertain if civil engineering departments atother universities were making changes in their programs and if they were taking planningactions based on these proposed licensing requirements. The purpose of this paper is tosummarize the results of a survey conducted to aid in this effort
explicitly included writing instruction and emphasis on whatwas important in technical writing and the process of writing. The workshops also included timein-class for students to work on and revise work, with the help of WC staff, designated WCtutors and the course instructors. This structure therefore incorporated active learning andexplicit technical communication instruction that was not included in the course previously.Future work will evaluate the impact of these workshops on the quality of writing.In 442, the students worked in groups of four and received extra credit for setting up a groupmeeting with a WC tutor prior to submitting their report. They could receive extra credit for thetutor reviewing their experimental plans and
experience abroad, and mentoring new staff. Isabelle collaborates with faculty from the Vanderbilt School of Engineering to provide study abroad opportuni- ties for Engineering students. As a result of their joint efforts, Vanderbilt has increased the number of Engineering students studying abroad, which now exceeds the national average.Dr. Christopher J. Rowe, Vanderbilt University Dr. Christopher J. Rowe, M.Eng., Ed.D., is associate professor of the practice of engineering management and director of the division of general engineering at Vanderbilt University. He holds degrees in biomed- ical engineering, management of technology, and higher education leadership and policy. His research and teaching interests in
for FEWS. Figure 1. Project objectives mapped to components of the Traineeship under the Stewardship framework.The key components of theTraineeship are: 1) Dissertation research on a FEWS issue for the generation of new knowledge; 2) A graduate certificate in Data-Driven Food, Energy and Water Decision Making, which consists of 3.5 credits of core courses and 9 credits of electives as described in Table 1 that represents conservation of knowledge; 3) A Graduate Learning Community [3] for transformation of knowledge that includes a two-year series of monthly workshops and weekly small-group activities designed to enhance the trainees’ interdisciplinary
style by incorporating additional forms ofactive learning activities. (Buchanan; 1991; Campbell and Smith, 1997; Felder, 1995;McKeachie, 1986; Tschumi, 1991).Our implementation was based on the followingconcepts; • Professors should be designers of learning experience and not teachers. • Education is a cooperative enterprise that works best when cooperation between instructor/student and student/student is allowed, • University students are adults. If the students are not the given opportunity to practice adult behavior, they will not able to learn such behavior, • Instructors are experts/helpers. Instructors help student to learn how to be independent and take responsibility for their own learning, • Most
Mechanics CourseAbstract This evidence-based practice paper will assess the impact of reflecting on student learninglevels as compared to typical assessments of understanding (quizzes) in a fluid mechanics course. Problem solving skills are critical to becoming an effective engineer. With minimalapplication opportunities for upper-level course material in the typical engineering curriculum,students are often not sufficiently prepared to accomplish rigorous design projects in industryimmediately following graduation. Having the requisite knowledge is only one part of the task;being able to effectively utilize and apply prior knowledge requires more advanced learningoutcomes. Fluid mechanics is a lecture-based course in which deep
formats and routine laboratoryexperiences. This approach to education often results in graduates who do not have a full range Page 10.1053.1of important employability skills and competencies needed in business and industry, such as theability to apply knowledge skillfully to problems of practice, communicate effectively, work as Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationmembers of a team, and engage in lifelong learning. As a result, engineering technicians oftenenter the workforce inadequately
give better accessibility to different things. Like if you think a lot of designs in transportation that allows people to go to different places to… see different things, to… have different experiences. Solving problems that arise was cited by four teachers as another aspect of engineering. Researcher: I asked you “is engineering important?” You said “yes.” Why is it important? Lily: Well, I think that as we progress for the future, new and different problems arise. And I think there is a need for more immediate communication, more immediate transportation. Umm… and I think technology and engineering kind of go hand-in-hand to help those things happen to make our lives more efficient
Orleans’ Chapter of the Structural Engineering Institute. Norma Jean also has served in the past on several National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) committees and task forces, serving as chair of the Board-level NCEES Education Committee and is an Emeritus Member of NCEES. She was named by the Governor of Louisiana to Louisiana’s licensing board for pro- fessional engineers, LAPELS, serving as Chairman of the LAPELS Board in 2011-12. Mattei received her BSCE in 1982 from Tulane University and practiced as a consulting engineer in the New Orleans area for a decade before returning to Tulane (PhD, 1994). Her research areas of interest include engineering ethics, public policy and leadership
instance, to view a water and wastewater treatment plant or a brownfield restoration. Thisresearch investigated the use of VR via a head-mounted display (the Oculus Go) to provide a virtualfield trip to undergraduate and graduate students. The findings focus on the impact to students interms of the knowledge gained and students’ perception to determine if the use of VR provided avaluable educational experience. This research does not compare VR field trips to in-person fieldtrips as the VR field trip is intended to be used when a traditional field trip is not feasible.Background Physical field trips are incorporated throughout students’ education as they provide mean-ingful, lasting learning and exposure to activities not available in
microelectronics on several defense satellite programs. In 2009 she left industry to pursue a PhD in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado, where her research focused on the development of novel biomaterials for cardiovascular tissue engineering. At the GWW School of Mechanical Engineering, Kathryn teaches the junior level Machine Design and se- nior level Capstone Design courses, as well as advises the BSMS students. In October 2016 she will release a Machine Design MOOC on the Coursera platform, focusing on static and fatigue failure analysis techniques.Dr. Robert Kadel, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Rob Kadel is Assistant Director for Research in Education Innovation with the Center for 21st Century
Learning in EngineeringDr. Patti Wojahn, New Mexico State UniversityGermain Degardin, New Mexico State UniversityMuhammad Dawood, New Mexico State UniversityMelissa Guynn, New Mexico State UniversityRachel Boren, New Mexico State UniversityIntroduction Engineering programs often struggle to optimally support and retain promising students. Toattempt to address that issue at a Southwest HSI land-grant university, our interdisciplinary teamof researchers set out to study the impacts of putting learning and success more directly into thehands of students. We began exploring what we could learn from preparing first-yearengineering students to take more control of and responsibility for their learning and their growthas learners [1]. With faculty and
not always the best way to gather information about the lives of peoplefrom other cultures and backgrounds." From Brayboy’s Toward a Tribal Critical Race Theory in Education ``Stories are not separate from theory; they make up theory and are, therefore, real and legitimate sources of data and ways of being." This key framework is important for our team when researching the experiences and current issues that Nativos face on Isla Barú.These comments foster confidence that students saw connections between CSTs and their designthinking, decision making, and outcomes.Scaffolding Contextual InformationOne factor informing students' adoption of alternative design frameworks and CSTs appears tobe the degree to which the
biotech companies. According to this report, the primary goalin workforce development should be to develop, “short-term, customized training curricula” thatprovides training in core skills needed for entry level jobs in the biotechnology industry, andaddress the needs of recent high school graduates, dislocated workers and individuals changingcareers. WFI’s 2003 report followed the October 2002 governor designation of the biomedicalindustry sector as a “high impact” sector. “High Impact” also signifies high wage, high skill jobproviders. In addition, these business sectors are eligible for state investment tax credits andperformance incentives to biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and medical devicemakers for expansion or relocation to
publishedEnvironmental Engineering for the 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges modeled off the2008 NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering. This study was commissioned to identify the mostpressing challenges environmental engineers can help resolve or manage [7]. The studyidentified five broad and interconnected challenges that must be addressed for people andecosystems to thrive in the future, which are: - Grand Challenge #1: Sustainably Supply Food, Water, and Energy - Grand Challenge #2: Curb Climate Change and Adapt to Its Impacts - Grand Challenge #3: Design a Future Without Pollution or Waste - Grand Challenge #4: Create Efficient, Healthy, and Resilient Cities - Grand Challenge #5: Foster Informed Decisions and Actions To
facilitate participation of a larger, more diverse student base.• Disseminate research products and findings to the broader engineering education community.II. MotivationA. The Lecture/Laboratory DisconnectIn curricula that teach EE concepts, hands-on laboratories that accompany circuit theory, signals& systems, and digital design courses are often scheduled separately, partly because textbooksoften adopt a written-work and software paradigm. Additionally, organizing students and topicsin laboratory-only environments is more efficient than interspersing hands-on assignments withlectures, so unless lecture and laboratory courses are paired, laboratories can be separated in timefrom their corresponding lecture material, making it difficult for
AC 2011-1459: ENHANCEMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING IN EXPERI-MENTAL DESIGN USING VIRTUAL LABORATORIES - YEAR 3Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He cur- rently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels.Christine Kelly, Oregon State University
AC 2011-533: INCORPORATING TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW OF CIVILENGINEERING STUDENT PROJECTSLuciana Barroso, Texas A&M University Luciana R. Barroso, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Structural Engineering in the Department of Civil Engineering, in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She has been with Texas A&M University for more than 10 years, and in that time has taught over a dozen different courses ranging from the freshman to graduate levels. She has received funding for her engineering education research from the Department of Education FIPSE program and from the NSF CCLI program. She also has been involved in several professional developments that were provided by the NT
those of prior years (Fig. 1). Graduation Rates For the incoming class of2004, the impact of EGR 101 on 6-year graduation rates is overwhelming (Fig. 2). Of thestudents who took EGR 101, 71% completed a bachelor's degree from Wright State University,and 52% completed theirdegrees in an engineeringor computer science(CECS) field. Thiscompared to rates of 40%and 15% for students whodid not take EGR 101.Based on tuition revenueassociated with increasedenrollment and graduationrates, the Wright Statemodel is now fullysustainable. Figure 2. Impact of EGR 101 on 6-Year Graduation RatesHighlights from a CCLI Phase 3 InitiativeA nationwide adoption
R. Teetor Educational Award. Dr. Reisel is a member of ASEE, ASME, the Combustion Institute, and SAE. Dr. Reisel received his B.M.E. degree from Villanova University in 1989, his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University in 1991, and his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University in 1994.Marissa Jablonski, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Marissa R. Jablonski is a Graduate Student of Civil/Environmental Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM). She serves as program coordinator of the NSF funded FORTE (Fostering Opportunities for Tomorrow's Engineers) program at UWM designed to recruit and retain undergraduate minorities and
barriers that Latinx and Native Americans have in engineering. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence fellow, a Diversity scholar, a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Jazmin Jurkiewicz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Jazmin Jurkiewicz is a first-year PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds de- grees in Chemical Engineering (B.S.) and Engineering - Innovation, Sustainability, and Entrepreneurship (M.E.). Her research interests include counseling informed education, inclusive practices, and teaching teams in STEM education.Dr. Kenneth Reid, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
well defined, with onlyone correct solution. Under current engineering training, students are asked to solve these“textbook” problems, which generally are simple, formulated in particular forms and havestandardized approaches and answers. In industry, however, engineers often face complicatedproblems with no immediate and absolute answers. Hence, engineering graduates often findthat techniques they have learned in college are not practical for solving industrial problems. Examination-oriented education effectively turns assessment into a tool for these kindsof competition. Schools tend to focus on how to help students pass the selective examinationsand how to increase promotion rates. Teachers tend to pay closest attention to the “best
transgenderstudents, the best practices at other institutions, the attitudes and desires of the WPIcommunity, and what design changes might be most successful in that context. The workthey had done was not only a valuable learning experience for them, but it introduced acampus-wide conversation about transgender students and it concluded with specificrecommendations tailored for WPI’s particular institutional context. The report hasprompted WPI’s administration to take a new approach to bathrooms: the campus nowincludes either single-stall or multi-stall gender-neutral bathrooms in 17 buildings and theuniversity has made a commitment for gender-inclusive bathrooms in all new buildings.All gender-inclusive bathrooms are indicated on WPI’s interactive campus
with many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution, etc. on transportation and oper- ations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics-focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are an integral part of her service-learning logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to assess the impact of good supply chain practices