surveyed. Student perception of instructor behavior and student expectations of theirinstructor during the pandemic were also assessed. This paper evaluates the differences in thoseimpacts for engineering (EAC) and engineering technology (ETAC) programs.1. IntroductionThe School of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University (WCU) houses fourundergraduate, residential programs – Electrical Engineering (EE), Electrical and ComputerEngineering Technology (ECET), Engineering with Mechanical and Electrical PowerConcentrations (BSE), and Engineering Technology (ET). Two of the programs are primarilyelectrical in nature – EE and ECET, while the other two are primarily mechanical – BSE and ET.The EE and BSE programs are accredited by the
disentangle the nuances among thedifferent groups considered and expand our understanding of the cultural elements in engineeringeducation relevant to student mental health and wellbeing.IntroductionMental health is an emerging topic that has rapidly become a largely discussed issue. Thisparticular discussion has highlighted the ongoing mental health crisis in students at manyuniversities and colleges in the United States [1]. As a whole, college-aged individuals are proneto mental disorders [2]. The effect of said struggles on college students is emphasized uponreturning to school and disrupts these individuals' educational paths [3]. This phenomenon canbe attributed to factors such as financial difficulties, relationship difficulties, concerns
, concerns-based adoption model, conceptual change theory, and earthquake engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Comparison of Conceptual Knowledge of Shear Stress in Beams Between Civil Engineering Undergraduates and PractitionersIntroductionAligning engineering education with engineering practice is essential to prepare students for theprofessional field. Graduate engineers continue to be challenged when connecting theirengineering courses to "real" engineering, which has led to concerns about whether engineeringundergraduates are adequately prepared [1]. Investigations examining the disconnect betweenacademic engineering preparation and
content knowledge, cultural knowledge, and ingenuity, but Comprehensive Ustudents are more self-aware and learn through relationships with others more than students atBig City U.1 IntroductionTo prepare our engineering students to be successful in complex real-world environments,universities must develop well-rounded engineers. This goes far beyond the technical—the 21stcentury engineer is a strong communicator; they are a collaborator and highly innovative. Todevelop students in multi-disciplinary and collaborative efforts, academic institutions around theworld have begun incorporating makerspaces into their campus communities.Makerspaces afford students an opportunity to come together with other students from varyingbackgrounds and expertise to
) in Fall 2020. Theapproach seemed suitable to support students to master the class learning outcomes, by movingfrom a breadth to a depth learning priority. The available research indicates that competency-based learning is ideal to support weaker students while maintaining rigor. It allows them to moveat their own pace and be more successful and confident as they gain a higher level of understandingin the required topics [1], [2].This paper utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods to show whether competency-basedlearning generates positive results in achievements and learning, and to understand whetherstudents positively reacted to mastery learning. The authors will answer the following researchquestions 1. What is the impact of CBL on
number of engineers.IntroductionThe history of engineering is extensive and can be traced back as far as people have been usingmathematics, science, and creativity to invent products, processes, and systems that improvehuman life and address the needs of society. Due to varying needs and degrees of expertiseneeded, specializations and disciplines within the field began to emerge. The formation of civilengineering, often considered the first engineering discipline, occurred during the perfect stormof rapid growth in the electrical, steel, and chemical industries and the increasing number ofinstitutions specializing in industrial arts [1]. Following shortly behind civil engineering wereadditional engineering disciplines that aligned with the
disciplines. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Computational Thinking in First-Grade Students Using a Computational Device (Work-in-progress)IntroductionIn recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on the importance of integrating andimplementing STEM and computational thinking topics across K-12 settings, and considerableattention is being given to essential concepts related to computer science subjects [1]. As codingand software development is a part of full STEM education, there is an increased interest inimplementing computational thinking and problem-solving skills in early education. Therefore,more studies have been done in the past
believethat our modules had a greater impact on those students who were newer to computationalthinking, over those who had prior experience and were enrolled in upper-level computationalcourses.1 IntroductionAccording to Wing, Computational Thinking (CT) is the thought processes involved informulating a problem and expressing its solution(s) in such a way that an information processor– human or machine – can effectively carry out that solution [1]. The educational philosophybehind Computational Thinking is that problems in every discipline can be solved by the tools ofcomputation such as algorithmic thinking, decomposition, abstraction, pattern recognition. Forinstance, one of the pillars of computational thinking is algorithmic thinking
proposal team, amajor reason our bid failed was the lack of a well-trained technology workforce and lack oftechnology education in the local schools [1]. A year earlier Southern Methodist University(SMU) started working with a local Independent School District (ISD) on a statewide grant toincrease the number of teachers in their district who are certified by the state to teach computerscience (CS) at the high school level. As an outcome of our first grant partnership, we developeda proposal to the National Science Foundation CSforAll: RPP program [2]. We met several timesover six months to develop a pilot program that we planned to base the grant upon prior towriting the grant. As a result, this past August our proposal was funded (NSF 2031515
theDepartment of Education.IntroductionThe need to have computer security has been in place for decades, going to back the mainframeand mid-level computers, but then the protection was limited to securing files on a single system.The landscape of computing is changed by the rise of computer networking and the Internet.Computers are now connected by using a wide range of topologies such as the Wide AreaNetwork (WAN), Local Area Network, and Metropolitan Area Network (MAN). The demandfor cybersecurity professionals across the United States is accelerating, according to the newdata published on CyberSeek [1]. Furthermore, the study conducted by Cybersecurity Ventures[2] shows that around 3.5 million cybersecurity worldwide will be unfilled by 2021. The
theories.The SceneThe CourseOur class in “Ethics for the Computing Professional,” a one-credit required course for computerscience majors, is offered at the junior level and most often taken by seniors, and most often fullyenrolled. It aims to bring moral philosophy to the budding computer scientist. The coursesyllabus covers the usual subjects of privacy, security, intellectual property, cyberabuse and othersocial detriments, and professional codes, but also reaches farther into philosophy, to equipstudents with the vocabularly and methods of the humanities. We use Herman Tavani [1] as thenominal textbook. (I designate an older edition so that copies may be purchased cheaply, and alsoprovide extracts, compliant with Fair Use, in Course Reserves at
unfulfilled. Ultimately, we aim to use this conceptual model to compare faculty adaptability indifferent contexts of curricular change. 1. Calls for change in engineering education: Enabling change agentsCalls for change in engineering education has constantly been shaped by “changing times and paradigms”(Felder, 2004, p. 32). The context within which engineering graduates are educated, and are expected tocontribute in the workplace, has always been a dominant factor in frameworks for calls for change(Jamieson & Lohmann, 2009). Characteristics of the context such as the influence of the global economy,the knowledge-based economy, changing demographics, increased integration among engineeringdisciplines and environmental factors are just some
classroom and lab at a single time. During the scheduled class time it wascommon for only 2-3 students to be in the classroom/lab and 1-3 students to be in the Zoomsession.All 17 students were required to attend class together in person on only 3 days during thesemester. On the first day of class a larger classroom with a maximum capacity of 24 wasavailable and scheduled. The instructor covered the typical “first day of class” material anddiscussed the revised mode of instruction. In addition, students were required to complete thefirst two tests in person. The instructor utilized two adjacent classrooms for the tests.Evaluation of AssignmentsAll assignment evaluation was done electronically. In previous semesters students were requiredto print out
about this groupof students. The second is the literature on confidence and its importance in student success. Theliterature on returners in engineering graduate programs is not yet extensive, although it has beengrowing in recent years. Literature on confidence, in contrast, is far more extensive and wide-ranging, with a longer history. Due to the wealth of literature in this area, only a small selectionis specifically cited in this paper.ReturnersRigorous study of returners in engineering graduate programs has only recently begun to bedone, with several studies performed over the past decade. Two of the earlier papers on thisgroup were published in 2011, with Peters & Daly [1] studying the transition of identity that tookplace when
the Industrial EngineeringCurriculum (award #1834465) [1]. The CLICK approach is an integrative curriculum approach.The approach leverages the benefits of immersive technologies, i.e., virtual reality and 3Dsimulation, to enhance student’s motivation and improve learning experiences and outcomes.Virtual systems can be created using these technologies to provide a theme where students canlearn the system principles and concepts across multiple courses in the curriculum. Immersivetechnologies make learning interactive and fun [2]. This approach is implemented in theIndustrial Engineering (IE) curriculum because of the unique focus of this curriculum on systems[3].The CLICK approach aims to address the problems in the current curriculum
lectures, modeling,and case studies. Research has indicated that real-life experiences and other life experiences arecrucial to enable students to learn system thinking principles [1]. Traditional teaching methods ina classroom environment may not provide these experiences. Hands-on discovery activities(HODAs), as a potential substitute for real-life experiences, may provide students an opportunityto enhance CST learning in the classroom [2]. By leading and participating in hands-ondiscovery activities in class, students may experience the CST principles they were exposed to inlectures and case studies. One key principle of this CST course design is that the lectures andstructured hands-on activities should reinforce each other.This paper presents
has afforded us theopportunity to improve the user experience in virtual learning design. In addition to a steadyincrease in distance education enrollment since 2012 [1], online engineering education isgrowing as more people gravitate towards flexible and accessible degree options. In an onlineasynchronous environment, instructor-student and student-student interactions must be integratedinto the course design. Furthermore, instructors must look to other mediums for feedback on thelearning experience than the standard look across the room at students’ faces [2]. Despite suchchallenges, many institutions have successfully built and grown online courses and degrees [3].Some institutions (e.g., Purdue University [4], UMBC [5], University of
praised by students and department for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. To supplement his teaching and research, he has been involved in numerous professional societies, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Structural BIM Integration, 3) 4D/5D BIM, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Innovative Construction Demolition, and 6) Carbon Footprint Analysis on Roadways.Dr. Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University Dr. Rachel Mosier is an Associate Professor at Oklahoma State University, with a background in
- cilitating productive collaborations of individuals who are geographically and culturally distributed. Dr. Zhang has published numerous papers in the areas of HCI, CSCW, KM, social informatics and related disciplines. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Content Analysis of Data Science Graduate Programs in the U.S. I. INTRODUCTION Data science is an emerging academic field [1], which has its origins in Big Data and CloudComputing and other complex science-related domains. Data Science is concerned with managinglarge and complex data and the use of data analytics technologies [1]. The three pillars of
contextualizing thedesign task by providing opportunities for students to consider both the technical and the socialdimensions (as well as their interplay) of their work.Keywords: Engineering; contextual social awareness; domain analysis; social frames; technicalframesIntroductionEngineering has a diversity and competency problem [1], [2]. The field too often createssolutions without representation from traditionally minoritized groups in the field and/orrelegates the needs of these populations to a secondary role. The low representation of racial andethnic minority groups and women in engineering in the United States is well-documented [3],[4]. The field consistently fails to hire and retain engineers from traditionally marginalizedgroups. As a result
researcher in the Tufts Center for Engineering Education Outreach and the Insti- tute for Research on Learning and Instruction. She holds a Ph.D. in engineering education from Virginia Tech and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Tufts University. Her research interests are focused on in- terdisciplinary curriculum development in engineering education and the political, economic, and societal dimensions of curricular change. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Contextualization as Virtue in Engineering EducationAbstractHow do we combat the “culture of disengagement” [1] in engineering education? How do weeffectively prepare students for the sociotechnical
?Cognitive Load TheoryCognitive Load Theory (CLT) characterizes learning as assimilation of knowledge into one’slong-term memory. However, it is our short-term (working) memory that first processesinformation. If the cognitive load (or mental effort) associated with a task exceeds short-termprocessing capacity, then learning cannot occur [1, 2]. Three sources of cognitive load canimpact learners [1-4]. Intrinsic cognitive load is the effort required to learn a specific topic. Forexample, the mental effort required to learn in an introductory engineering course may be lowerthan that required to learn in an engineering science or design-based course. Extraneouscognitive load is experienced based on inappropriate methods or excess information that
required prerequisite knowledgelevel make them less approachable by students. For this reason, the use of research articles ingraduate level courses has been mainly adopted in seminar style courses [1]. The proposedmethod uses these research articles to extend the learning of the students beyond the lecturecontent. The lecture videos provide the basic knowledge on the topic of the article, but the articleadvances to a more detailed part of the weekly topic.Continuous assessment was selected for the course, as it is a versatile method that has been usedin different forms and to a varying extent. Earlier studies in engineering education report severalbenefits from the use of continuous assessment in different disciplines. In chemical
guiding thiscase study is that organizational change toward sustainability of student success practices must:(1) be centered in the department; (2) focus on four departmental practices (incentives andrewards, financial resources, policies, and human resources); and (3) also engage the Universityof Texas at El Paso and discipline. Throughout the case study, we draw out the theme ofcontinuous improvement as an approach to organizational change.Scholars of STEM organizational change found that multiple and sometimes competing forcesinfluence how faculty respond to and implement proposed initiatives. In their empirical workstudying multi-University of Texas at El Pasoal STEM reform initiatives, Kezar, Gehrke, andElrod (2015) and Kezar and Bernstein
much emphasis is place on fundamentals for too long. Because the coursestrategy described here has been applied successfully in engineering curricula (and engineeringtechnology curricula on a reduced scale), readers can have confidence that the approach works.The motivation behind the approach is a desire to treat Engineering Economy like a trueengineering design course and to provide for students a truer picture of the complexity thatfinancial analysis in industry will entail.Instructional EnvironmentThe course offered through the Industrial Engineering department at a Western MichiganUniversity and is a required course serving four of the university’s programs. Table 1 providesan approximation of enrollments by major. As an upper division
computer equipped classroom.During COVID most students attended via Zoom meetings that were recorded. The class meetsfor two 1 hour and 15 minute sessions per week. A Learning Management System (LMS) isused (Blackboard up until fall 2020 when the University switched to Canvas) to provide lecturenotes, assignments, track grades, and so forth. Pre-COVID the LMS was not used to delivercourse content and no online teaching had been done except in the rare instances that theinstructor was unable to be present and a video lecture might have been given. During COVIDclass recordings were posted to the Canvas page although synchronous attendance to the livepresentations was expected. Thus, the course is a traditionally delivered course, not an onlinecourse
Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit district’s 1990’s expansions in the East Bay and SFO Airport at three billion to the New Starts program for the Federal Transit Administration with over a hundred projects and $85 billion in construction value. At the latter, he also acted as source selection board chairman and program COTR for $200 plus million in task order con- tracts for engineering services. Working for the third-largest transit agency in the United States, the Los Angeles County MTA, Michael managed bus vehicle engineering for $1 billion in new acquisitions and post-delivery maintenance support for 2300 vehicles with some of the most complex technology (natural gas engines and embedded systems) in the US transit
Technology Management from Indiana State University with a specialization in Construction Management. He joined academia in 2014. His research focus is on contract administration on heavy civil projects, as well as on construction education. His teaching areas include 1. introduction to the built environment and construction management, 2. construction materials and methods, 3. construction equipment, 4. building construction cost estimating, 5. heavy civil construc- tion cost estimating, 6. project planning, scheduling, and control, 7. temporary structures, and 8. contract changes and claims. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 COVID-19 and
1 COVID – 19 Community Relief Project: Design and Development of Disinfection Booth with AR/VR companion app AbstractAs the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak has been declared as a global pandemic sinceMarch 2020, engineering technology students at Sam Houston State University designed adisinfection booth to minimize the exponentially increasing morbidity rate through contactingwith the contaminated surfaces such as individual clothes. The portable disinfecting booth, whichis constructed with PVC and attached disinfectant spray tank, can reduce the infectious ratesignificantly by removing the infectious respiratory droplets lasting on clothes and skin by