Long Island University, and a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University. Dr. Lenox served for over 28 years as a commis- sioned officer in the U.S Army Field Artillery in a variety of leadership positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Di- vision. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd
Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011. Dr. Ohland is Chair of the IEEE Curriculum and Pedagogy Committee and an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Misty L. Loughry, Georgia Southern University Misty L. Loughry is a Professor of Management at Georgia Southern University, where she teaches strat- egy and organizational behavior. She received her Ph.D. in management from University of Florida and was on the management faculty at Clemson University. Prior to her academic career, she had a ten-year career in banking. Dr. Loughry’s research focuses on teamwork and social control
the University of Colorado Boulder. Jacob researches brain-machine interfaces, neural prosthetic devices, and engineering education.Mr. Brian Huang, Sparkfun Electronics Brian Huang is an Education Engineer for SparkFun Electronics, a cutting edge open-source hardware and electronics education company. Brian started his career in engineering with wireless transport tech- nologies for ADC Telecommunications in Minneapolis, MN. While working at ADC, Brian volunteered at the Science Museum of Minnesota and quickly discovered a passion for teaching and working with students - especially in an environment that fostered and supported the ”wow” factor associated with in- quiry and discovery. In 2007, Brian left the world
group,percentage of female and underrepresented minority participants (URM), and number ofparticipants (N). The values in parentheses indicate the percentage of those groups inthe general college of engineering population. Some organization names were changed topreserve anonymity of the institution.Team Purpose Females URM N (23%) (7%) (12%)SHLab Sustainable, human centered 48% 10% 170 designSociety of Women Stimulate women to achieve full 96% 5% 202Engineers (SWE) potential in careers as engineers (14
TED talk What makes us feel good about our work? This talk is really focused on what people need to feel that their work is rewarding, and leads into a discussion of design careers, the relative importance of money as students make career decisions, etc.RESULTS:Impact of these changes will be measured and discussed in terms of three measurements –teaching evaluations, final exam averages, and student surveys. The authors acknowledgethat none of these tools are perfect assessment tools, but all can provide some insight. Thedata used will be from the two years prior to this change, and the two years since thechange.The same instructor has taught the course for the four years being considered. In the 2years before the change, the
Paper ID #16776Work in Progress: Reviving a Transport Phenomena Course by Incorporat-ing Simulation and Laboratory ExperiencesDr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Lecturer in bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In her career, Marcia has been active in improving undergraduate education through developing problem-based laboratories to enhance experimental design skills; developing a preliminary design course focused on problem identification and market space (based on an industry partner’s protocol); and mentoring and guiding student teams through the
Paper ID #14539MAKER: From 2-D Projective Geometry to 3-D Object Recognition and 3-DPrinting Processes for High School StudentsMr. Bart Taylor M.Ed., A&M Consolidated High School A Dedicated career and technology teacher with fifteen years of experience in the classroom. Offer a proven track record of commended performance in teaching, and leadership, with a passion for educa- tion and a commitment to continually pursue student, school and district success. Experience includes classroom teaching, motivational speaking, district curriculum and instructional coaching, professional development planning/presenting, high
because Making is being championed by educational leaders across the country – aswell as the White House and President Obama himself – as a catalyst for developing interest andunderstanding in STEM. Indeed, if Making is to be acknowledged as a prominent pathway toscience and engineering careers, then it is increasingly problematic for it to be yet anothercontext in which the persistent underrepresentation of women and people of color tends to bereified – despite, of course, the fact that all communities and cultures have been engaged indesign and generative practices throughout history and circumstance.In seeking to contribute to the knowledge base about how to better engage underrepresentedgroups – and in particular, people of color – in Making
Engineering Concepts to Harness Future Innovators and Technologists) project. Professor Harriger’s current interests include application development, outreach to K-12 to interest more students to pursue computing careers, applying IT skills to innovating fitness tools, and wearable computing.Prof. Bradley C. Harriger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Brad Harriger has over 30 years of experience teaching automated manufacturing and has authored/co- authored several related articles. Professor Harriger has served in several leadership roles with Society of Manufacturing Engineers and the American Society for Engineering Education, and is a founding mem- ber of an international Aerospace Automation Consortium, serving on
in responsefollowing the event. Question 3 was not directly tied toan activity, requiring students to extrapolate from theirexperiences. The other two questions (2 and 6) wereanswered correctly by more than 80% of students atthe start.Student inspiration is more difficult to track, in partbecause we did not link responses from specificstudents between surveys. Hence, the lack ofsignificant change on these questions could represent asubset of students with increased interest and anothersubset with decreased interest, cancelling one anotherout. In relating biomechanics to careers, our activitiesmay have communicated the relevance ofbiomechanics to athletics, but in the future we plan tocreate clearer links between biomechanics andadditional
Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Study on Enhancing Advanced Physics Laboratory TeachingIntroductory physics laboratory (IPL) courses are designed to educate students on general physicstopics, but they lack the experimental sophistication and experience required for their future. Onthe other hand, diverse and high-quality advanced physics lab courses must be made available toprepare students for future careers and advanced degrees. In a recent AIP report, Equipping PhysicsMajors for the STEM Workforce, the report's first aim was "Varied and high-quality lab courses."With this in mind, an Advanced Physics Laboratory (APL) course for upper division studentsshould provide the following. • Physical aspects – access to a wide
the workshops helped them understandmanufacturing systems and associated skills. What skills did you learn? What do you think about the workshops? Figure 7. Word cloud from student commentsIn the third set of questions, students were asked about their future career interest: (1) Do youhave a job offer? (2) Do you prefer to work in manufacturing? (3) Do you think soft skills are asimportant as technical skills? and (4) Do you think soft skills impact employee performance andproductivity? The results of these four questions are shown in Figure 8. The vast majority of thestudents perceive that soft skills are just as important as technical skills. All students agree thatsoft skills can impact
authors are currently working in LEED Lab with two building projects: onefollowing the traditional path and one following the performance-based Arc Platform. Both haveadvantages and disadvantages. It is a balance between which is more beneficial for the students’education and which is more beneficial for the ultimate goal of certifying a building in LEEDO+M: Existing Buildings. The advantage of the traditional path is that it is the same procedure (and point structure)the students will be using in their future careers when working on the LEED certificationprocess. The skills and knowledge learned in this path are directly transferable, a fact that will bebeneficial to their future employers. By allowing students access to LEED Online they
StudentsAbstract Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) programs have been shown to promotepositive outcomes such as increased interest in graduate school and STEM careers for theirparticipants. Research has also shown how graduate students benefit from mentoringundergraduate researchers—namely they receive instrumental research support, improveteaching skills, and develop socioemotionally. Less research, however, has investigated the waysin which graduate students mentor undergraduate REU participants, and how the mentoring rolemay impact the graduate students. To address this gap in the literature, the current studyexamines the way in which graduate students mentor, and the impact of the mentor role ongraduate students participating in a
funded by the National Science Foundation (Awards #1826354 (RFE) and #1713547 (AISL)); one of these projects is developing a STEM summer camp that supports career pathways for Latinx students.Dr. Alberto Esquinca, San Diego State University Alberto Esquinca is an Associate Professor in the Department of Dual Language and English Learner Education at San Diego State University.Danielle Gadbois c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Asset-Based Practices in Engineering Design (APRENDE): Development of a Funds of Knowledge Approach for the Formation of EngineersAbstractAlthough different scholars have offered several reasons behind why Latinx
progress paper discusses the Academy of Engineering Success (AcES), an NSF S-STEMsupported program, which employs known best practices to support and retain underrepresentedstudents in engineering through graduation. The goal is to graduate more students fromunderrepresented populations in an effort to ultimately diversify the engineering workforce.This paper describes this program’s unique implementation of a specific subset of retention bestpractices, such as facilitating (1) the development of both a feeling of institutional inclusion andengineering identity by providing opportunities for faculty-student and student-student interaction aswell as major and career exploration, (2) academic support, including support for the development ofbroader
effects caused by the lack of parental participation in university education,prior educational disadvantages, among other risk factors (Cabrera, 2001). To overcome thesechallenges, many initiatives with both private and public funding have been deployed. Amongthese, engineering schools in the US have developed educational programs to instill engineeringabilities while students are still in high school. These programs have been called pre-engineeringprograms.Academic studies have showcased the benefits of pre-engineering education. For example, thesetype of programs in K-12 are linked to higher self-efficacy in engineering (Fantz, Siller &DeMiranda, 2011), increases in pursuing STEM careers due to the early exposure to math andsciences (Raines
relationshipwith Trane in Nashville, TN. This relationship between theory at the college and practice at Trane began todevelop more heavily during the construction of the Fields Engineering Center on Lipscomb University’scampus. The Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering had a vision to make their new engineeringbuilding not only a place to host learning, but also an environment that could be used as a learning toolitself. Trane, as an engineering company with a local Nashville office that has employed Lipscombengineering students and graduates, found value in preparing students for their future careers throughexpanded learning opportunities in the classroom. The company saw a need for real-world experiments tobe conducted in a learning environment and
in the areas of data analysis, IT, and manufacturing. She received her PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her MS in Mechan- ical Engineering from Case Western while working for Delphi. She completed her postdoctoral studies in engineering education at the University of Pittsburgh.Ms. Lisa Marie Stabryla, University of Pittsburgh Lisa Stabryla is a mid-career PhD student, a 2017 National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) fellow, and an aspiring faculty member. In the Civil and Environmental Engineering Depart- ment at the University of Pittsburgh, she is pursuing research questions related to the sustainable design of nanomaterials. She is also enrolled in the teacher
help our students navigate ethicallyambiguous situations and patterns of privilege likely to arise in their professional lives.Unfortunately, there are several barriers to this process. Our critical analysis of career historyinterviews with 15 engineers committed to ethics and equity highlight three such barriers: 1)dominant narratives in engineering that make it difficult for social justice viewpoints to beacknowledged; 2) limited organizational influence on the part of junior engineers trying tochallenge inequitable workplace practices; and 3) a fear that raising equity issues will result inpersonal attacks rather than positive change. Together, these three barriers—raised almostexclusively by female, racially under-represented, and LGBTQ
subsequent semester of study on the “stretch” problems,as well as describe our future study design. We measure engineering intuition by student successon these “stretch” questions and identify common factors (major, career aspirations, engineeringinternship experience, military service, learning preferences, overall GPA, engineering GPA, andoverall homework score) among students who display high engineering intuition, in an effort tobetter understand how we may promote this skill in all students.MethodsIn this research, we aim to assess how students evaluate assumptions or results in simulations on“stretch” problems. Here simulations refer to using software to solve problems (such asspacecraft orbits) which would otherwise be difficult to model. The
results early in my career.” That is adirect quote from an alumni survey I received in the summer of 2017. Year after year, alumnisurveys validate a strength of the ETAC of ABET accredited B.S. in Industrial EngineeringTechnology program at Missouri Southern State University: students gain hands-on experienceduring their studies through industry projects. Whereas students have multiple opportunities todo projects in industry while pursuing the degree, the capstone project provides an opportunityfor a culminating experience where students have the opportunity to identify, analyze, and solvebroadly-defined technical problems using appropriate methodologies and tools.Continuous assessment of the capstone project has led to many changes in the
Paper ID #30981Integration of C programming and IoT in a Raspberry Pi Controlled RobotCar in a Freshmen/Sophomore Engineering Core ClassDr. Shaghayegh Abbasi, University of San Diego Shaghayegh Abbasi received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Washington in 2011. In her thesis, titled ’Integrating top-down and bottom-up nanomanufacturing: Controlling the growth and composition of seeded nanostructures’, an innovative nanomanufacturing method is explored and optimized. Upon graduation, she started her career as Senior System Design Engineer at Lumedyne Technologies. She worked on design, simulation, and
Outcome 4), andthe ability to function effectively on a team (Student Outcome 5) [1]. Engineering educatorswork to identify the most appropriate curricular approaches to address these outcomes withintheir programs [2], [3].Internships or co-op experiences as well as capstone design projects are some ways in whichschools can address these important student outcomes in their curriculum. When incorporatingthese high impact experiences into a curriculum, research has also shown that internships thatdirectly relate to the academic program provide higher internship satisfaction and a higherperceived relevance to student’s career development [4]. Additionally, when students have achoice in the projects they work on and a genuine interest in the project
incorporate legitimate engineering tasks into curricula which help students advance towards and prepare for careers in engineering.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr
career as a structural engineer. She was a founding board member, and the first chair elect of the Hampton Roads Green Building Council. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Engagement in Practice: Adopting Service Learning and Community Engagement as a High Impact Teaching Strategy in Geotechnical EngineeringIntroductionTo meet the high calling of professional engineering ethical cannons and civil engineeringprofession vision to establish safe, healthy, equitable, and vibrant communities; undergraduateeducation programs need to prepare graduates to be well-rounded leaders in planning, design,and construction of public infrastructure and built environment
focus of the grant is on connecting students to high-impact practices such asundergraduate research experiences or internships that achieve the following: ● Achieve student-identified goals; ● Improve immediate and future financial stability, e.g. paid internships with additional scholarships, summer research experiences that provide academic year funding, higher hourly rate, STEM work experience; ● Include mentoring or professional development components; ● Inform self-knowledge about possible career choices; and ● Increase marketability for future competitive opportunities.The program reflects a personalized approach to supporting students and invites active scholarinvolvement in recruiting and supporting other scholars and
Lineberry, Mississippi State University Lineberry is currently a Ph.D. student in Engineering with a concentration in Engineering Education at MSU with a research focus in cybersecurity education. She received her MS in CS with a concentration in Information Assurance from North Carolina A & T State University. Her BS in CS was received from Voorhees College. Previously, Lineberry was Area Coordinator and an Instructor in CS at Voorhees.Dr. Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University Sarah Lee joined the faculty at Mississippi State University (MSU) after a 19 year information technology career at FedEx Corporation. As an associate clinical professor and assistant department head in the Computer Science and
fromCollege to Career”, AC2011-1421, Proceedings of the 2011 Annual American Association ofEngineering Educators Conference.[10] Erez, M., 1981, "Fostering a career in Engineering". Journal of Vocational Behavior,Vol.18,pp. 115-120.
with the institution that leads the outreach efforts, can be a good supplement to the development work of the institution’s alumni association and fundraising team.4. Engineering outreach to adults can enable participants to be more productive in their current employment or caretaking positions or aid in scientific discovery as citizen scientists.5. Educating adults of all ages may have a trickledown effect on STEM aspirations and career knowledge for the participants’ children, grandchildren, and other friends and relatives.ExamplesIn the remainder of this paper, we will briefly detail a wide array of specific examples ofengineering outreach targeted to adults including events focused on legislators, activitiespresented to residents of