published on various aspects of communication in sociotechnical systems, including the use of sentence-headline design for PowerPoint slides. Page 24.1007.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Problem Framing as a Teachable Skill: A Practical Approach to Teaching Leadership CommunicationIn the preface to the 2011 edition of Leading Minds: An Anatomy of Leadership (1995/2011),Howard Gardner notes “the explosion of interest in the topic of leadership” (p. xv) that occurredbetween the two editions of the book.4 The Engineering Leadership Constituent
practices regardingearthquake risk mitigation, was asked to describe structural effects of various forms of earthmotion on the built environment, which is a better question for a civil engineer. She was able totalk about the social conditions of vulnerability to these hazards and about public understandingof seismic risk, but students seemed uninterested in this information. Instead, they approachedthis interview as a source of facts that they had already decided would be important for a designthat they already had in mind even though their faculty had encouraged them to try not to startdesigning until they had completed interviews. The first author took extensive notes on theexperience to refer to while writing this paper.When the students
different idea generationmethod. Since all idea sections were conducted at the same time, four different faculty memberstaught each section. All the faculty members teaching idea generation had prior experience inteaching the engineering design process. Within the idea sections, teams of four students wereformed which are referred as ‘concept teams’ throughout the paper. The students worked withtheir concept teams in the idea sections for the duration of the study. The ‘project team’ refers tothe actual senior design project teams to avoid confusion with ‘concept team’.Idea Generation MethodsThe ideation methods that were covered in this study were brainstorming, collaborativesketching, mind-maps, morph matrix, design by analogy, TRIZ, bio-inspired
and share their technical recipes with those interested. Done outsidethe confines of established engineering education curricular activities, Making comes from animaginative, creative mind-space and is a shareful practice. Making is defined by a do-it-yourself ideal and is historically rooted in efforts likePopular Mechanics magazine who demystified everyday stuff for hobbyists and the Whole EarthCatalog: Access to Tools5 who surveyed everyday tools for the counterculture movement of the1960s. Additional real-world touchstones are the growth of Radio Shack stores and the 1980stelevision program MacGyver where the lead character would resolve each episode’spredicament by fashioning an escape plan out of found objects6. Technology and
AC 2012-3797: EVALUATING IDEATION USING THE PUBLICATIONSPOPULAR SCIENCE, POPULAR MECHANICS, AND MAKE IN COOR-DINATION WITH A NEW PATENT SEARCH TOOL AND THE 6-3-5 METHODDr. Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy Dan Jensen is a professor of engineering mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy, where he has been since 1997. He received his B.S. (mechanical engineering), M.S. (applied mechanics), and Ph.D. (aerospace engineering science) from the University of Colorado, Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, and MSC Software Corp. His research includes design of Micro Air Vehicles, development of innovative de- sign methodologies
://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiiEeMN7vbQ. [Accessed March 06, 2024].[4] “Growing your mind,” Khan Academy, August 2014. Available:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtKJrB5rOKs. [Accessed March 06, 2024].[5] “The obstacle is the way by Ryan Holiday,” FightMediocrity, October 2015. Available:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rQfr7XAQi0. [Accessed March 06, 2024].[6] K.L. Meyers, M.W. Ohland, A.L. Pawley, S.E. Silliman, and K.A. Smith, “Factors relating toengineering identity,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, vol 14, no. 1, pp. 119-131, 2012.[7] J.S. Moser, H.S. Schroder, C. Heeter, T.P. Moran, and Y.H. Lee, “Mind your errors: Evidencefor a neural mechanism linking growth mind-set to adaptive posterror adjustments,” Psychologicalscience, vol 22, no. 12, pp
Paper ID #38044Experience with the Development and Implementation of Online andHands-on Rocketry Education and OutreachMr. John Juhyun Kim, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign John Kim is currently pursuing a master’s degree in aerospace engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His work focuses on the impact of hands-on kits and MOOCs towards enhancing science literacy.Timothy Plomin, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Tim Plomin is currently pursuing a master’s degree in aerospace engineering from the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign. His work focuses on the impact of hands-on
Paper ID #12099Mini-Design Projects in Capstone: Initial Design Experiences to EnhanceStudents’ Implementation of Design MethodologyMajor Cory A Cooper, United States Air Force Academy Major Cory Cooper is currently an Assistant Professor of Systems Engineering and Capstone Coordinator at the US Air Force Academy (USAFA) in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He holds a PhD an MSc in Systems Engineering from the Technical University of Delft and the Air Force Institute of Technology respectively. He has held various developmental engineering and program management positions in the US Air Force, to include Deputy Director for
AC 2012-3209: DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL WIND TURBINES FOR ISO-LATED COLONIA HOMES OF SOUTH TEXASDr. Kamal Sarkar, University of Texas, Pan American Kamal Sarkar completed his undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering from the Calcutta Univer- sity and graduate degree in materials science from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India. After finishing his Ph.D. from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, he joined the industry as a materials re- searcher. He has more than 20 years of diversified industrial experience using his experience in materials, computer visualization, and manufacturing. Presently, he is teaching in the Mechanical Engineering De- partment of the University of Texas, Pan American. His
(students were Day 1 expected to maintain an e-journal throughout the program) Engineering Design ● Explain and demonstrate the EDP Day 2 Process Introduction ● EDP Lab - Design an Aluminum Foil Boat Ask ● Introduction to One Health Day 3 ● Systems Thinking and Mind Mapping ● Criteria and Constraints Research and ● Introduction to circuits, sensors, and energy harvesting Day 4/5 Technical Skill ● Technical Tutorials on Hardware Platforms (Arduino and Development Lilypad) and Software Tools (TinkerCad) Imagine & Plan
topossible solution.19 For engineering teams using these, they may start out as just a representationof the problem as described by a customer, then grow features over time as the team movestoward a solution. An advantage of mind mapping is that it enriches verbal descriptions with itspictures and relationship arrows.There are hundreds of different variations on brainstorming and creativity techniques that areuseful in engineering education. All have in common a step where the participants arechallenged to widen their view of the issues to be solved, so as to bring in a solution from awider field. Burnett and Figliotti's book is an example of one targeting the classroom as thedomain for building creativity skills.20A Creative Problem Solving Tool
Paper ID #33437Inclusive Writing: Pre- and Post-COVID-19Dr. Teresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Director and Faculty Liaison to the Combined Plan Dual-degree Engineering Program at American University. Dr. Larkin conducts ed- ucational research and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with student writing as a learning and assessment tool in her introductory physics courses for non-majors. One component of her research focuses on the role
effectivedesign of engineering projects [49, 50].In this current iteration, five of the design teams had unrelated design projects, while theremaining four teams performed projects that were a subset of their larger research project. Thischoice was at the discretion of each team’s project advisor. The teams are formed from 37senior-level engineering students. Most teams have a majority of mechanical engineeringstudents with a minority of systems engineering or electrical engineering students. In this work,we sought to discover if varying the depth of instruction in the design process steps would havean effect on the students’ execution of the designette project, as well as their execution of theirlonger-term, real world project. It is with this in mind
Paper ID #22709Successfully Building a Diverse Telescope Workforce: The Design of the Aka-mai Internship Program in Hawai’iMr. Austin Barnes, Institute for Scientist and Engineer Educators Austin Barnes is a program manager with the Institute for Scientist and Engineer Educators, which is housed in the Division of Social Sciences at UC Santa Cruz. Coming from an educational background in astronomy and engineering, Austin manages the Akamai Internship Program, a seven week summer internship program in Hawai’i dedicated to retaining local undergraduate participants in science, technol- ogy, engineering, and mathematics
Engineering Education. Practice and Policy. Hoboken, N. J.: IEEE Press, 2016.[19] S. L. Goldman, “The Social Captivity of Engineering,” in Critical Perspectives on Nonacademic Science and Engineering, P. Durbin, Ed. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press, 1991.[20] J. Krupczak and G. Bassett, “Work in progress: Abstraction as a vector: Distinguishing engineering and science,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2012.[21] J. Trevelyan, The Making of an Expert Engineer. London: CRC Press, 2014.[22] J. Bruner, Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.[23] C. P. Snow, The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. London: Cambridge University Press, 1959.[24] R
Paper ID #18490Listening and Negotiation IIDr. Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy is Professor and Associate Chair for Global Engineering Leader- ship and Research Development in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Georgia Tech, with responsibilities for managing and expanding the School’s global/leadership education and research programs and impact, and directing the Institute’s Global Engineering Leadership Minor Program. Her research, teaching and professional activities focus on civil infrastructure decision making to promote sustainable
Paper ID #6619Toward more pragmatic engineering classes: Transformation from tradi-tional to Deweyan classes in technological literacy and competency approachesDr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Page 23.1254.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 TOWARD MORE PRAGMATIC ENGINEERING CLASSES: TRANSFORMATION FROM TRADITIONAL TO DEWEYAN CLASSES IN TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY AND COMPETENCY APPROACHES Mani Mina1and Iraj Omidvar2
class to see her as a real person – something studentssometimes place in the back of their minds; and 2) To remember that these conversations are,“an important step towards making us all more empathetic, compassionate, kind human beings -not words we typically associate with engineering.” (26 April 2019) The way sociotechnicaltopics are discussed may have huge effects on the audience. Having a level of connection fromsocial to technical by bringing in real emotions into the classroom is not only an effective way toreach students, but it shows a willingness to be open that may improve sociotechnicalunderstanding and natural integration.Simple IntegrationIn general, our team came away from the analysis process with a strong recommendation to
workshops thathighlight exemplary academic planning within our institution. Another external factor, marketforces, pointed to the need for interdisciplinary, “well-rounded,” and “T-shaped” students.17, 18 In addition to these external factors, internal factors also played a significant role in thedesign of the minor. For example, pre-existing faculty relationships influenced which classes weselected as core classes and student characteristics influenced logistical decisions related to theminor (e.g., prerequisites, capstone requirements, marketing strategies).Interdisciplinarity and General Education While the Innovation Pathways Minor is housed in the College of Engineering, it isimportant to keep in mind that it is a general
Paper ID #39794Is Poor Classroom Attendance a Virtual-Learning Hangover or the NewNormal? A Qualitative StudyDr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Dr. Matthew Cooper is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. He served as a researcher at RTI International before joining the NC State faculty in 2011. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, process safety decision-making skills, and best practices for online education. He also hosts the In The (Fume) Hood chemical engineering education podcast.E
Paper ID #34794The Role of All-Female STEM Spaces in Encouraging High School Girls toPursue STEM (Fundamental, Diversity)Dr. Mariel Kolker, Morris School District Dr. Mariel Kolker is a second-career teacher of high school physics, engineering and nanoscience. She earned her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rutgers University, and her MBA in Finance from Ford- ham’s Gabelli Graduate School of Business, and worked for a decade in the Power Generation, Trans- mission & Distribution Industry before entering teaching in 2000. She earned her Ed.D. in Educational Leadership in STEM from UMass Lowell. Her interests are in
Paper ID #27494Training Modules for Improved Storage Techniques to Reduce Post-harvestLosses of Maize in Ghana, Work in ProgressMs. Hallie E Supak, Texas A&M University I am a senior undergraduate student at Texas A&M University studying Biological and Agricultural Engi- neering. I have been working with my partner and co-author Victoria Baltazar since May on this project. We are apart of the Post-Harvest Engineering and Education (PHEED) research group under the super- vision of Dr. Janie Moore PhD focusing on post-harvest loss education and improvement in African countries with a special interest in women farmers
Engineering EducationAnnual Conference (2010) http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=246665 ibid.6 Bransford, John D., Brown, Ann L., and Cocking, Rodney R., ed., “How People Learn. Brain, Mind, Experience,and School”, National Academy Press, 20007 Willingham, Daniel T, “Why Don’t Students Like School?”, Jossey-Bass, 20098 ibid. Page 22.839.7
Paper ID #37143Work-in-Progress: Developing a Research Plan for a RetrospectiveAnalysis of the Effect of Bridging Courses on Student Success inGraduate StudiesDr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Dr. Matthew Cooper is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University where he teaches courses in Senior Design, Unit Opera- tions, Transport Phenomena, Material & Energy Balances and Mathematical/Computational Methods. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, process safety education and conceptual learning
) at the University of Texas, Austin. This program aims to provide elementary,middle and high school teachers with a first-hand research experience in the field ofnanomanufacturing. Other goals of the program include reinforcing the value of incorporatingscientific inquiry and engineering practices in STEM curricula and creating a community of like-minded teachers, scientists and engineering professionals. By the end of the 7-week program, teachers are expected to prepare a scientific poster tosummarize their research. Additionally, teachers prepare a complete lesson related to theirresearch topic that will be presented in front of NASCENT faculty, staff and schooladministrators and it will become a part of the school’s science
Paper ID #34090Design and Build at Home: Development of a Low-cost and VersatileHardware Kit for a Remote First-year Mechanical Engineering Design ClassTania K. Morimoto, University of California, San Diego Tania K. Morimoto received the B.S. degree from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, in 2012 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Stanford University, Stanford, CA, in 2015 and 2017, respectively, all in mechanical engineering. She is currently an Assistant Professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering and an Assistant Professor of surgery with University of California, San Diego. Her research interests
Paper ID #21208Engaging Children in Design Thinking Through Transmedia Narrative (RTP)Dr. Glenn W. Ellis, Smith College Glenn Ellis is a Professor of Engineering at Smith College who teaches courses in engineering science and methods for teaching science and engineering. He received a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University and an M.A. and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering and Operations Research from Princeton Univer- sity. The winner of numerous teaching and research awards, Dr. Ellis received the 2007 U.S. Professor of the Year Award for Baccalaureate Colleges from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teach
-Scoping/Problem Framing Problem-scoping or Problem Framing, the process by which engineers iteratively define and refine the problem, is an important part of the engineering design process but also one that requires specific skills and habits of mind. Few activities, however, are structured to help students develop these skills. Here we share three activities that were specifically developed to emphasize the problem-scoping phase of the engineering design process: The Paper Airplane Contest, the Changing Leaves Problem, and the Protecting Pelican Colonies problem. In these activities, students are presented with a client who has a rich, but ill-defined realistic problem. Students then engage in a structured
purpose. Before this course, I thought that a prototype was just a prerequisite to a final product. I thought the design process was to define the problem -> make a prototype or 2 -> make the finished process. What I learned in this class was that prototypes shouldn't test everything at once. Prototypes should be very quick to make and have a very clear validation goal in mind.” • “I think from now on I will consider whether I'm prototyping for desirability, feasibility or viability in the future.” • “The strategy of Subsystem Isolation is extremely useful—a prototype doesn't have to do EVERYTHING, it has to just fully do one thing. A divide-and-conquer approach allows an engineer to ensure
currently working towards incorporating writing assignments that enhance students’ critical thinking capabilities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Assessment of Gregorc Style DelineatorsAbstract Anthony F. Gregorc is a phenomenological researcher who is internationally recognizedfor his work in learning styles. In 1969, with the introduction of his Energic Model of Styles,researchers were provided with a valuable tool for helping individuals gain a betterunderstanding of Self and others. This work evolved into the Mind Styles Model in 1984.Gregorc Style Delineator is based upon a psychologically-formulated matrix of four descriptivewords. Gregorc indicates that there are