skill can facilitate creative thinking because a highly skilledperson is better able to develop new techniques and skills. Highly skilled individuals are betterable to adjust their behavior to demands that arise, suggesting that skill is an importantdeterminant of the capacity to restructure.18 In engineering, this trend could be exemplified bysenior engineers approaching a problem breadth first, looking at many design solutions beforenarrowing on one, as opposed to junior engineers’ less creative depth first strategy19.In this paper, we focus on investigating the differences in creativity between freshman and seniormechanical engineering students. It is assumed that the differences between these two groups areprimarily due to their skill
awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Mr. Siqing Wei, Purdue University, West Lafayette Siqing Wei received bachelor degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is in the dual program to obtain master degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Ph.D degree c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25751in Engineering
; Rose, 2002). Even though we agreed to teach multimedia, I wanted to explore what kinds of activitieswere in the curriculum boxes. We took an extra field trip to the school to investigate them andfound they had been sitting untouched for several years in a closet. The boxes were organized inthemes of Engineering, Transportation, and Research and were targeted to teach a differenttechnological system (Transportation, Communication, Power and Energy, Engineering.) TheBYU students were surprised generally at the amount of information and activities packed intothese carts. They liked the fact that they could be moved from one classroom to the next andliked the structure of the lessons around themes. The students also liked the fact that
: a. Mathematics and basic science b. Humanities - language, history and culture. Social science and economic courses, if offered, normally belong to this portion of the program c. Engineering science - mechanics, materials, thermodynamics, fluids, basic electricity, etc. d. Special engineering - propulsion plant, power plant, systems and machinery, naval architecture, etc. e. Physical education - offered either as mandatory classes, or as activities beyond the scheduled hours f. Naval reserve training - offered by some schools as an integral part of the program g. Navigation and ship handling - several introductory courses are normally offered in a plain marine engineering curriculum and a
the reference point. An arrow from the reference point to the left is labeled ascooling and to the right as heating. An alternative is to make an arrow to the reference pointfrom the left as heating and from the right as cooling. In this way, the reference point willrepresent the desired conditions, and all the arrows to the reference point will be the tasks to bedone for different surrounding conditions. Different groups of students are surveyed to assessthe improvement, and the students’ feedback is included in this paper. Additional considerationto reinforce the teaching/learning process is also covered.IntroductionThermodynamics is an important curriculum for undergraduates in Mechanical Engineering, andit is often taught in two semesters
settingstandards in Afghanistan as they are more attuned to donor requirements.Finally, purists in civil engineering are reluctant to consider why more management-orientedcourses, as in construction management, maybe necessary to integrate in the curriculum to equipgraduates to successfully compete for civil engineering projects. Moreover, the integration ofinformation-based tools, such as, AutoCad, engineering graphics, digital drawings, and globalinformation systems (GIS) in civil engineering2 has not been fully considered as non-existenttraditional laboratories remain the focus of attention.To address some of these issues, a series of workshops and meetings were held in 2006 withthose who follow the Kabul University model with an attempt to modify the
AC 2008-750: DIVERSIFYING PARTICIPATION IN FIRST LEGO LEAGUEMarion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Marion C. Usselman is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Marion received her Ph.D. in biophysics from Johns Hopkins University and has taught in the Biology Department at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. She focuses on equity issues in education and K-12 educational reform. She has co-directed the Georgia FLL program since 2001.Jeff Davis, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jeffrey Davis, an associate professor of computer engineering at Georgia Tech
contexts.Architecture of the online learning environmentWe have developed an online learning environment that is an integral part of the RPTcurriculum. This technology is tightly integrated into the curriculum. The online learningenvironment has three major structural components: navigation, a case library, andlearning supports (Fig. 1). The navigational scheme enables learners to navigate torelevant cases, and also facilitates accessing answers to questions contained within thesystem. The case library is comprised of primary and transfer scenarios (cases asexemplars and as problems to solve respectively) as well as operating experience andevent reports (cases as remindings). The learning supports in the learning environmentconsist of embedded narratives, the
Page 22.558.3assessment from the introduction to engineering course are presented. A brief section on thecurrent state of the summer camps is also covered before the conclusions.ENGR 1010 Introduction to Engineering Course ProjectThis section presents the most recent attempts on integrating animatronics into ENGR 1010Introduction to Engineering course with a semester long project. The main objective of thisopen-ended team project is to design and develop an animated robot or puppet. The teams arecomposed of three to four students and required to follow a process based on product design anddevelopment. Main stages of the process are described below in their actual sequence: Concept Development: Through a brainstorming activity students
passing rate of these courses, but has also dramatically (and positively) affectedstudents’ perceptions of themselves and what they are doing in a STEM major. We describebelow the reform curriculum we have adopted, an important peer-learning strategy employed inthe department, our peer-to-peer support system, and then the impact of our honors sectionsbefore displaying assessment data from these courses.Matter and InteractionsThe Matter and Interactions curriculum has been in development in the Physics EducationResearch Group of North Carolina State University since 2003.1 A rich thread of approachingproblems through computer programming in VPython undergirds the course, freeing theinstructor from dealing with the highly restricted set of
of agile competition in practice will depend on “an agile education system” thatwill impart the right skills, knowledge, and motivation to participants. With these objectives in mind, andto address manufacturing education needs to promote and understand agile manufacturing concepts, aunique graduate level course is being offered at the Department of Industrial Engineering, SUNY-Buffalo. Theobjective is to provide young manufacturing engineers with core competencies in both manufacturing andinformation technology, and the creative integration of the two to accomplish an agile industry. In this paper we discuss the curriculum design and experiences of this course. In a more general sense, itis our desire to share the motivation behind
240 hours ofpracticum, were formed to support practice-based, professional community service beyond thetraditional classroom experiences.Innovation and Entrepreneurship Courses Fostering entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial thinking in students is integral to theprogram's culture and is highlighted as an essential part of the curriculum in our UTEP catalog.We are currently considering a curricular revision to provide a more holistic approach tointegrating entrepreneurial thinking throughout the curriculum. As a result, we expect to havemore opportunities to assess the related competencies critical for developing entrepreneurism inour students. Figure 1. The main engineering design stream courses in the program
possible labs/experiences, the students once again went back to thecurrent curriculum, this time examining its overlying structure. The curriculum is devised in sucha manor that for the first two years students take core-engineering courses and in the junior yearthey start taking civil engineering courses. The students were looking for a ways to integrate thenew “Hands on” course into the curriculum. The difficulty they encountered was coordinating thelabs in such a manor that the material would be covered in the corresponding introductory coursebefore the students were presented with a lab. Several options were developed. These includedoptions in which the “Hands on Experience” was comprised of two courses offered in the junioryear, to an option
Professor, Electrical/Computer Engineering, UAF Earth & Planetary Remote Sensing, UAF Geophys- ical Institute Associate Director for Science & Education, Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration 2009-2012: Director, Air Force Research Laboratory Air Vehicles Directorate 2006-2009: Deputy Director, Air Force Office of Scientific Research 1999-2003: Deputy Head, USAF Academy De- partment of Astronautics 1992-1996: Assistant Professor, USAFA Department of Astronautics 3. PUB- LICATIONS 1. Cunningham, K., M. C. Hatfield, and R. Philemonoff, Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Alaskan Civil Research, 2014 Arctic Technology Conference, 2014 2. Hatfield, M. C., and J. G. Hawkins, Design of an Electronically
Electronics Engineers, “IEEE Code of Ethics.” [online] available: https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html, [accessed 6/29/19].[20] E. Burton, J. Goldsmith, and N. Mattei, “How to Teach Computer Ethics through Science Fiction,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 54-64, 2018.[21] R. Tractenberg, K. FitzGerald, and J. Collmann, “Evidence of Sustainable Learning from the Mastery Rubric for Ethical Reasoning,” Education Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, 2016.[22] R. Tractenberg, R, “Institutionalizing Ethical Reasoning: Integrating the ASA's Ethical Guidelines for Professional Practice into Course, Program, and Curriculum,” Collmann, J., Matei, S.A. (eds.) Ethical Reasoning in Big Data: An
approach of engineering and math, physics, chemistry or biology with engineering as the core topic. 7. Freshman/sophomore course credits in which the course encompasses an integrated approach of engineering and the humanities or social sciences. 8. Freshman/sophomore engineering students participating in formal instruction involving oral and written communications. 9. Freshman/sophomore engineering students participating in formal instruction involving professional issues of ethics and social responsibility. 10. Courses represented by items F1-F9 are a part of the regular (institutional issued) course/program catalog. 11. Gateway dollars spent on curriculum innovation and institutionalization initiatives for
students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Dr. Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington Susan Bobbitt Nolen is Professor Emerita of Learning Sciences & Human Development at the University of Washington. She earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at Pudue University. Her current research interests focus on student engagement in engineering practices and social interaction during learning activ- ity, and their relationship to engineering identity and opportunity
AC 2012-3987: SPATIAL ABILITY IN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTSMs. Kristin L. Brudigam, Lake Travis High School Kristin Brudigam is a mathematics and engineering teacher at Lake Travis High School in Austin, Texas. She earned her undergraduate degree in mathematics education from Wayne State College and her mas- ter’s degree in science education with an emphasis in engineering education from the University of Texas, Austin. Additionally, Brudigam is certified to teach civil engineering/architecture and Introduction to En- gineering Design as part of the Project Lead the Way curriculum at Lake Travis High School. Brudigam developed a curriculum entitled ”Careers Involving Mathematics” as an undergraduate in the John G
1566data or programs located in different laboratories. Laboratory development is integrated to thepresent curriculum and this may point in the direction of multifunctional laboratories.Among the laboratories included in this report are: fluid dynamics, heat and mass transfer,instrumentation of physical systems, propulsion laboratory, manufacturing lab and theautomatic controls lab.III. Inspiring Elements for Laboratory Development and AcquisitionThere are primarily four factors that inspired idea for development of an efficient laboratorysystem for the mechanical engineering program. First, the newness of the program offered anopportunity to start from a clean sheet of paper. Authors share the view that this isconsidered an advantage
more integrated sequence.Courses in the classical areas of Statics, Mechanics of Solids, and Civil Engineering Materialswere repackaged into a pair of four-credit mechanics courses which combine content from theseareas. The first course (Mechanics I) integrates elements of Statics and Mechanics of Solidsalong with a few topics from Civil Engineering Materials. The second course (Mechanics II)integrates the remaining elements of Mechanics of Solids with the majority of Civil EngineeringMaterials.A key pedagogical component in this integrated curricular restructuring is a structuredimplementation of problem-based learning: the use of overarching problems. An overarchingproblem is a common design and/or analysis problem encountered in the
relatively new feature of HCD modes of contextualization, butthis emphasis on the bigger picture is a cornerstone of other approaches to contextualizingengineering education. Appreciating complex interactions not only between designers and users,but also between engineers themselves, other human and non-human actors, and broader socialand cultural factors is an important aspect of a mode of contextualization that we describe associotechnical thinking. In this mode, contextualization is a key aspect of curriculum because ithelps students to understand what engineering is: namely, that engineering work is asociotechnical endeavor [10], [38]. Educators who practice this type of contextualization pursue“sociotechnical integration” as a learning outcome
Session 2430 Skills Assessment in Hands-On Learning and Implications for Gender Differences in Engineering Education Daniel W. Knight, Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, Susan J. Poole and Lawrence E. Carlson Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory and Program College of Engineering and Applied Science University of Colorado at BoulderAbstractA comprehensive course evaluation plan is a helpful tool for the development and revision ofnew curricula. One component of an evaluation plan is the assessment o
great responsibility. Itcan be argued that there is no other profession that has a greater responsibility to society thanengineering. Contrary to other professions, the engineering profession touches everyone in theUS daily. From the bridges we drive over to the houses we live in; engineering is an integral partof a person’s life. People are confident in the engineering profession and believe it will do theright thing for society. People expect their daily lives will not be wrought with concern for theirsafety due to an engineering failure. It is therefore incumbent on the engineering profession toensure that the engineers produced by our institutions have character that embraces proper ethics,which seeks to protect society from unethical
, facultyreasoned that they could facilitate assimilation if they worked to construct lectures andother learning activities that acknowledged other topics that students were learning andpointed out the links between these topics and the information that they were presenting.Support for this approach can be found in other sources."The context in which one learns is also important for promoting transfer. Knowledgethat is taught in only a single context is less likely to support flexible transfer thanknowledge that is taught in multiple contexts. With multiple contexts, students are morelikely to abstract the relevant features of concepts and develop a more flexiblerepresentation of knowledge."9As an example of how curriculum integration may be applied in an
other some foundational understanding and a basis to ask more in-depth questions. This was an important first step to finding common ground. The Montessori expert saw that systematic problem solving was an essential part of engineering that had great promise within the Montessori program while the engineering expert saw the balance of sensorial experience and spiral learning was fruitful for teaching engineering foundations. 2. Curriculum-specific brainstorming: In the next phase, the Montessori expert took the engineering expert through a typical set of lessons. Through this, two Montessori content areas were identified as the richest potential for the seamless integration of engineering: the Great
the classroom. Educators nowadays mostly consider the learning process as a shareddiscovery and triggering of knowledge involving teachers and students in complementary roles.This is in contrast to previous models which envisioned knowledge being “given” to students bylearned (and autocratic) professors.The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET,) has, by its standards,encouraged professional maturity upon graduation. In the accreditation process, an institutionmust critically expose its curriculum and convince the accreditation team that professionalrequirements are met. The accreditation process invites a cross-referenced analysis of all coursesand activities, including details of each course’s contribution to the various
Japan.However, although knowledge of standards should be integral to engineering and technologyeducation, standards education is still generally acquired after students graduate from college –in their professional lives and as needed. Private corporations, government agencies and otherprofessional organizations have provided this training for the last century, because mostengineering and technology programs in the United States do not have standards education intheir curriculums. In the college curriculums, consideration of standards has been generallylimited to applications in the design of senior projects. Page 14.1070.2The Engineering Accreditation
mapping of identified universities (table 3)with identified best practices. Figures 3-5 show specific best practices adopted by USuniversities that offer master program in logistics & transportation related programs. Table 3: University mapping best practices List of best practices for graduate education Number of universities practicing best practices A, Best Practices Related to Program Content 1. Clearly stated program requirement 22 2. Well-rounded curriculum 19 3. Up-to-date and effective course content 27 4. Well integrated research 25 5. Continuous
Paper ID #15656UAS Design in Active LearningDr. Michael C. Hatfield, University of Alaska, Fairbanks Michael C. Hatfield is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and Associate Director for Science & Education, Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration. He earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from Ohio Northern University; an M.S. in electrical engineering from California State University Fresno, and a Ph.D. in Electrical/Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Alaska Fairbanks.Dr. John Monahan, University of Alaska
engineering courses are given as electives in the senior year the student is veryunfamiliar with this material.The electrochemical engineering course developed a Rowan University has been designed tointroduce various topics of electrochemical engineering through an integration of experiments,projects, homework and lectures.Current Electrochemical Engineering Education within Chemical EngineeringIn many cases aspects of electrochemical engineering have been regulated to subsections ofstandard texts such as in Perry’s 7th Edition of the Chemical Engineering Handbook. Arelatively small section on fuels cells under the title, Electrochemical Energy Conversion (6