Collection

2025 Northeast Section Conference

Authors

Nusrat Zahan; Sidike Paheding

transformations, respectively. A. Quantitative AnalysisB. Model Analysis In the analysis of the UFO 120 and USR 248 datasets, data augmentation is found to be effective in enhancing PSNR and This study examines how data augmentation affects under- SSIM over models.water image super-resolution (SR) on three popular models,namely SCRNN, SRDRM, and DEEP SESR. SRCNN is TABLE Ihighly effective due to its simple and lightweight architec- Q UANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DATA AUGMENTATIONture, making it an ideal choice for IoT-based devices. Its

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1: Course Design & SE Competencies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachana Ashok Gupta, North Carolina State University; Greg A. Dunko, NantHealth

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

. Light source shall not have any recurring cost. J. Supporting 28. Light source shall not require any extra accessories other than mounting accessories: hardware. 29. Light Source may be aesthetically pleasing. K. Extra Features 30. Source may be smaller than a pocket book. Table 3: Example of Step 2 for Case Study done in-class.Step 3: Quantify some of the requirements from the list in Table 2 & Table 3 Previous Requirement After quantification 1. Must provide light. Q: How much light is 1. Must provide enough light for evening and night time

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa J. Cutright, University of Akron; Lakiesha N. Williams, Mississippi State University; Linda T Coats; Debora F Rodrigues, University of Houston (CoE); Judit Eva Puskas; Frank "Fritz" J Claydon, University of Houston (CoE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

% 100% 83%The last session was the 'round table' discussion where participants could ask any question(s)they wanted. A few of the questions from the participants, and the corresponding answers arelisted below. Answers will be in an abbreviated form rather than a full discussion. Q: How to submit multiple proposals a year and still have them be different? Ans: Change the lead investigator to reflect focus of research and/or tasks. Can also expand area(s) of potential topics or focus more on one subset. For instance the focus of a task can change based on where it will be submitted. Q: How to choose/select grad students? Ans. Will change with time. A MS student from home institution is easier as you

Conference Session

Pedagogy and Teaching Preparation in Graduate Programs

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Chang Kyoung Choi, Michigan Technological University; Nancy B. Barr, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

this topic or subject matter, considering the peer presentations and reflections? 2. Which part of the class do you find more thought-provoking, the teacher presentation or the student presentations? 3. Did the student presentations motivate you to participate and explore other related topics? 4. Does the Q&A based on your reflection induce you to participate in the presentation? (Question changed in F' 19 to "How and why does the Q&A based on your Reflection induce you to participate in the presentation?") 5. Please write your three most valuable takeaways from your peers' presentations. 6. Do you think breaking a class into two parts (professor's lectures and the peer presentations) helps you

Conference Session

Design Based Energy Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer M Peuker, University of Alaska, Anchorage; Steffen Peuker, University of Alaska Anchorage

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

through each branch in m3 /s. Analysis: For each pipe: 4 Q Flow rate and velocity: Q = VA ⇒ V = [m/s] (1) π D2 ρV D Re = (2) µ 1 ε 2.51 For turbulent flow 0.5 = −2.0 log + (3) f 3.7D Re · f 0.5

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Chiu Choi

( Cq , A) isdetectable, where Q = Cq T Cq .The input u is found to be of the form u = − Kx , where K = − R −1 B T Px . The matrix P is thepositive semi-definite solution of the algebraic Riccati equation AT P + PA + Q − ( PB + N ) R −1 ( B T P + N T ) = 0The MATLAB command [K,P,E]=lqr(A,B,Q,R,N) computes the feedback gain matrixK, the solution P of the algebraic Riccati equation, and the closed-loop poles of the optimalsystem A-BK. The matrix N is set to zero when omitted. An example of using this command tosolve an LQR problem is given below. 0 1  0 Example: Consider a state-space model with A =   , B =   , C=[1 0], D = [0

Conference Session

NEW Lab Experiments in Materials Science

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Harvey Abramowitz

frequency.Quantile Plots4Suppose the fraction, f, of a sample is less than or equal to the value q(f). q(f) is termed thequantile for that fraction. For a particular probability distribution, q(f) can be determined for anyvalue of f and any sample size. It is expected that the experimental quantile (i.e. the quantile forthe data obtained in the experiment) will be very similar to the theoretical quantile if the datafollow the theoretical distribution closely. Put another way, if the experimental data is plottedagainst the theoretical quantile the points would be expected to lie along a straight line. If true,then the sample is considered to be normally distributed. A quantile plot may be constructed asfollows:1. Order the experimental data xi from

Conference Session

Software Engineering Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter J. Clarke, Florida International Univeristy; Debra Lee Davis, Florida International University; Raymond Chang Lau, Florida International University; Tariq M. King, Ultimate Software Group, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

Unit Subsystem System Levels of TestingFigure 1: Average percentage increase in the number of test cases, statement coverage, and branchcoverage for each testing level for all the teams.These results were positive for Questions (Q.) 16 - 19 with all the scores above 3.24. These ques-tions focused on the effectiveness of WReSTT in helping students to understand testing conceptsand how to use the testing tools. Q.20 (M = 2.97, SD = 1.16), the lowest value in the table thatfocuses directly on the usefulness of WReSTT, shows the students felt that the number of tutorialswere somewhat inadequate.Table 3: Students’ mean scores (standard deviations) in Section 3 of the survey

Collection

2010 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Ing-Chang Jong; William T. Springer; Rick J. Couvillion

(MoMF). As usual, the loading function, shear force, bending moment, slope,and deflection of the beam are denoted by the symbols q, V, M, y , and y, respectively.Example 1. A simply supported beam AD with constant flexural rigidity EI and length L is actedon by a concentrated force P  at B and a concentrated moment PL  at C as shown in Fig. 2.Determine (a) the slopes A and D at A and D, respectively; (b) the deflection yB at B. Fig. 2. Simply supported beam AD carrying concentrated loadsSolution. The beam is in static equilibrium. Its free-body diagram is shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 3. Free-body diagram of the simply supported beam AD● Using MoI: Using the symbols defined earlier and applying the method of

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Donald Richards

e d Net Charge dt qsys = ∑ q& − ∑ q& in i out e d Linear Momentum dt Psys = ∑ external Fj + ∑ m& V − ∑ m& V in i i

Conference Session

Computer Engineering Topics

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Jamieson, Miami University; Nathaniel David Martin, Miami University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

) = 2 − D(1) = 1.000102 D(2) = D(1) ∗ R(1) = 0.1111111102 R(2) = 2 − D(2) = 1.0000000102 D(2) = D(2) ∗ R(2) = 0.111111111112 Q = N ∗ R(0) ∗ R(1) ∗ R(2) = .10001010101012 Q = 0.5416510 0.4062510 /0.7510 = 0.541666610The Newton-Raphson method follows a similar process, except it approaches the inverse of thedenominator, and multiplies the inverse of the denominator with the numerator. The algorithm forthis method is xi+1 = x1 (2 − D ∗ xi ), where i is the number of iterations, and D is thedenominator. After multiple iterations, xi will approach the inverse of the denominator. Thesetwo algorithms are based on the same mathematical principle but have differentimplementations.2.5 Very High RadixAs you increase the radix of the SRT division

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Laboratory and SoC Developments

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandip Das, Kennesaw State University; Craig Chin, Kennesaw State University; Sheila Hill, Kennesaw State University

clear idea about the lab objectives, what to expect and what to do before coming to the in-person lab. Q4 There was a pre-lab exercise and the pre-lab helped me to better prepare for the in- lab, hands-on lab exercise. Q5 If a student answered ‘NA’ for Q 4, then the student was asked Q 5(a) (a) There was no pre-lab exercise. I believe, a small pre-lab exercise would help to familiarize me with the lab topic and prepare me better for the in-lab, hands-on lab exercise. Else, the student is asked Q 5(b) (b) The LTspice simulations in the pre-lab were helpful to get a clear understanding of the lab objectives and what to expect in the hands-on

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

and a project demo. All the project presentation videos were collected and posted before a Zoom meeting of Final Project Q&A session was held. During the synchronous Q&A session, each group was assigned a 10-minute slot to answer questions from the instructors, who had watched the project presentation videos before the Q&A session. The students were also encouraged to create a website for their project, which could be used to strengthen their personal profiles for later use.5) Design and distribute surveys at multiple points of the semester to understand students’ learning conditions, preferred teaching modes, feedback on the course modules, challenges, and learning outcomes to adjust the course content and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kerul Suthar, Auburn University; Thomas Mitchell ; Anna Claire Hartwig, Auburn University; Jin Wang, Auburn University; Shiwen Mao, Auburn University; Laura Parson, North Dakota State University; Peng Zeng, Auburn University; Bo Liu ; Peter He, Auburn University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, North Dakota State UniversityDr. Peng Zeng, Auburn University Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Auburn UniversityDr. Bo LiuDr. Peter He, Auburn University Dr. Q. Peter He is Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Auburn University. He obtained his BS degree in chemical engineering from Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, in 1996 and MS and PhD degrees in chemical engineering in 2002 and 2005 from the University of Texas, Austin. Besides engineering education, his current research interests are in the area of systems engineering en- hanced data analytics with applications in manufacturing, renewable energy, food-energy-water nexus, and broad area of disease detection/diagnosis and

Collection

2013 North Midwest Section Meeting

Authors

Xiang-Fa Wu

. Appl. Phys. 89, 3018-3026 (2001).25. C. B. Huang, S. L. Chen, C. L. Lai, D. H. Reneker, H. Y. Qiu, Y. Ye, and H. Q. Hou, “Electrospun polymer nanofibres with small diameters,” Nanotechnology 17, 1558–1563 (2006).26. C. B. Huang, S. L. Chen, C. L. Lai, D. H. Reneker, H. Qiu, Y. Ye, and H. Q. Hou, “Electrospun polymer nanofibres with small diameters,” Nanotechnology 17, 1558 (2006).27. Y. Z. Zhang, J. Venugopal, Z. M. Huang, C. T. Lim and S. Ramakrishna, “Crosslinking of the electrospun gelatin nanofibers,” Polymer 47, 2911-2917 (2006).28. S. H. Tan, R. Inai, M. Kotaki and S. Ramakrishna, “Systematic parameter study for ultra-fine fiber fabrication via electrospinning process,” Polymer 46, 6128-6134 (2005).29. W. E

Collection

Chemical Engineering Education

Authors

Satyen Gautam; Sachin Jangam; Kai Chee Loh

. be further enhanced if a portion of the marks are assigned • Peer assessment can allow students to build mutual trust towards participation.[28] To promote student engagement, it and confidence in one another. was decided that a small portion of the marks will be assigned • Course review and content selection can help students towards student participation; assignment of marks will be improve on their judgment and critical reflection skills. dictated by: (i) quality of questions asked during Q&A ses- • Reciprocal peer teaching can extend students’ learn- sion; and (ii) usefulness of

Conference Session

Technical Session I

Collection

2018 FYEE Conference

Authors

Aysa Galbraith, University of Arkansas; Heath Aren Schluterman, University of Arkansas; Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas; Brandon Crisel, University of Arkansas

Tagged Topics

FYEE Conference Sessions

attitudes that are a concern in Fall and those 1111 and requires some extra work on assignments for expected to be influenced by their first semester in FEP. honors credit. GNEG 1121 Introduction to Engineering II: GNEG TABLE I 1121 is the most common second course taken by FEP QUESTIONS SELECTED FROM PITTSBURG FRESHMAN ENGINEERING ATTITUDES SURVEY. students, and students who have completed GNEG 1111 Q Question and qualify to take calculus I or higher math may enroll 6 The future benefits of studying engineering are worth the effort

Conference Session

FPD9 - First Year Learning & Assessment

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joe Guarino, Boise State University; Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University; Randi Walters, Boise State University; Bill Clement, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

) coupler link; frame link B) ground link; frame link C) ground link; coupler link D) coupler link; side link7. Omitted8. Grashof’s Criterion is ___________ when S is the length of shortest link, L is the length of longest link, and P and Q are lengths of the intermediate links. A) (S + L) - (P + Q) B) S + L ≤ P + Q C) (S +L)² - (P + Q)² D) S² + L² ≤ P² + Q² Page 13.393.129. Some four-bar linkages have dead points (or toggle points), which occur when two moveable links ___________. A) create a 45˚ angle B) create a 90˚ angle C) line up D) move continuouslyElectrical Engineering10. The

Conference Session

Novel Measurement Experiments

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Henrik Åkesson, Blekinge Institute of Technology; Lars Hakansson, Blekinge Institute of Technology; Ingvar Gustavsson, Blekinge Institute of Technology; Ingvar Claesson, Blekinge Institute of Technology; Johan Zackrisson, Blekinge Institute of Technology; Thomas Lago, Acticut Inernational AB

Tagged Divisions

Instrumentation

) th e d riv in g fre q u e n c y f (2 ) f (1 ) f (3 ) f (4 ) F q  [H f ] f (5

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

K. V. Sudhakar, Universidad de las Americas-Puebla; Tadeusz Majewski, Universidad de las Americas-Puebla; Luis Maus, Universidad de las Americas-Puebla

11.767.6 Fig.3. Spectrum of reproducing signalMathematical model of the tape recorder is given below I ⋅q + c ⋅ q + k ⋅ q = Q(t) (9)where I, c, k are the parameters describing the inertial, damping and elastic properties of thedriving system. The generalized coordinates q of each rotating element can be presented as asum of two components; one from steady-rotation and the second one from vibrations. It meansthat qi = qoi (t ) + α i (t ) .Vibration of the elements adjacent to the head gives a variable component of the tape velocity.Velocity of the tape in the front of the head from the angular velocity of two neighboringelements is defined by the relation

Conference Session

Evaluation: Technology and Tools for K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeff Gregorio, Drexel University; David S Rosen, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Brandon Gregory Morton, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Alyssa M Batula, Drexel University; Michael Caro; Jeffrey Scott, Drexel University; Youngmoo Kim, Drexel University; Kara Martine Lindstrom, Drexel University, ExCITe Center

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

interesting?”. Surveys from 2013-14 hadadditional questions “Was this activity challenging?” and “How creative were you feeling?”Results from each activity are summarized in Table 1, shown as means scores ± standarddeviations. Note some activities did not permit enough time to get a significant sample of surveyresponses. Page 26.1034.10Students felt they learned the most from Instrument Acoustics 2, Music Information Retrieval,Speaker Building, and Waves and Sounds. Consistently among the most enjoyable are the gameshow-style Analog & Digital and Music Production. The most interesting were Analog & Digital Q A&D

Conference Session

Flipped Electrical and Computer Engineering Classrooms 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vignesh Subbian, University of Cincinnati; Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati; Jason C Heikenfeld, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

. dn ( x ) J n (diffusion) = qDn dx Dn = mn kT / q = q(cm / s)(1 / cm ) 2 4 a. Which type of current requires that the particles have charge in order to move? __ drift. __ diffusion. __ both. __ neither. b. Which type of current requires a concentration gradient of the particle distribution in order to move? __ drift. __ diffusion. __ both. __ neither. c. Why do we have a ‘q’ in the front of both equations? One sentence max. d. What is mobility, basically? One sentence max. Look at

Conference Session

Classroom Practice I: Active and Collaborative Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ray Essick, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Mariana Silva, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Emma Mercier, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

). Collaborative and cooperative learning in higher education: A proposed taxonomy. Cooperative Learning and College Teaching, 2, 2-5.[9] Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning. In Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 1–19). Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:What+do+you+mean+by+’collaborative+l earning'?#0[10] Facer, K. (2014). What is space for? Towards a politics and a language for the human in education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(1), 121-126. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2013.839229[11] Florman, J. C. (2014). TILE at Iowa: Adoption and Adaptation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (137), 77

Conference Session

Innovations in Electrical Engineering Courses

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University; George Jonathan Roskovich, Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

towards the studentsagreeing or disagreeing with a particular learning strategy. On a scale of 0-4, zero being stronglydisagree, four being strongly agree and two being neutral, the response towards the question, “Ifeel that developing intuition for control is important” (Figure 3.1) the average score was 3.66.While the students displayed their belief in the importance of intuition, they also displayedoverwhelming support for the teaching styles implemented in the course that were designed tocater to visual learning. When asked the importance being able to visualize concepts as theylearn, the total average score was above 3.6. Q: I feel that developing intuition for control is important

Conference Session

Innovative Topics in ChE Curriculum

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Milo Koretsky

important terms toconsider are illustrated in the 1D control volume at the melt-solid interface in Figure 4a. Atsteady-state, the enthalpy of fusion Δh fus , must be balanced by the energy transferred into thecontrol volume by heat from the melt, Q& , and the energy leaving the interface through the solid, lQ& s . n&Δh fus = Q& l − Q& s (10) Page 10.790.9 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Vikas Jain; Durward Sobek

Significantly Below Met Significantly Above[4] Did you establish a budget for the design project? Yes No (If NO, go to Q # 5) If yes, did the project meet this budget? Yes No (If YES, go to Q # 5) If no, was this extra cost justified? Yes No[5] How much did your company benefit as a direct or indirect result of the design project outcome? 1 2 3 4 5 No Benefit Benefited Somewhat

Conference Session

Laboratory Innovations

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Awlad Hossain, Eastern Washington University; Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University; Martin W. Weiser, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

center of mass. Thisassumption can be later checked to see if it is valid.The cylinder is assumed to be at an initial temperature Ti and is then placed in still air at atemperature T∞. The coefficient of convection and surface area of the body are referred to as hand A, respectively. If the body is at a temperature T, then, the heat transfer Q due to convectionis given by Q = dU/dt = hA(T-Tinf) (2)where U is the total energy stored in the system. The temperature T obviously varies with time.The quantity Q can also be expressed in terms of the heat capacity C of the material. Indeed, bydefinition C is Q C

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaditya Khanal, The University of Texas at Tyler; Prabha Sundaravadivel, The University of Texas at Tyler; Mohammad Abu Rafe Biswas, The University of Texas at Tyler

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

set of questions, which were unique to each course, asked about the student's agreeability to meetoutcomes defined in the course syllabus. The second and third sets of questions were based on a surveypreviously used in an EOP-based course[6]. After data collection, it was compiled and statisticallyanalyzed by converting the Likert-type rating scales to numerical values as shown below, where 1 and 5represent responses that strongly disagree (1) and strongly agree (5) with the presented sub-questions,respectively. Sustainability/EOP-related questions (Q. 2 and 3) related used in the survey are shown below:Table 2: Question 2 - This second part of the survey aims to assess how the course project helped you in learning andapplying course topics

Conference Session

Aerospace Technical Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Rowland, Dept. of Civil & Mechanical Engineerint at United States Military Academy; Andrew Bellocchio, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

 1.328Wing Re wing  Do,wing  C Do,wing q Swet ,wing  Re wing VtrimL C Do , fusela ge  1.328Fuselage Re fusela ge  Do, fusela ge  C Do, fusela geq Swet , fusela ge  Re fusela geHorizontal VtrimcHT 1.328 Re HT  C Do , HT  Do, HT  C Do, HT q Swet , HTTail

Conference Session

Engineering Mechanics Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

lab.The major tasks of the analysis are: 1. Identify symmetry (Alt B) to simplify analysis [analyze just the left or right half, starting from the top attachment]. 2. Add a dummy load (Q) at the location of maximum deflection [the lower left corner in Alt A and the middle of the lower span in Alt B]. 3. Use statics to determine the vertical reactions. 4. Identify one reaction as redundant (R) in Alt B [horizontal force on either side]. 5. Develop expressions for internal bending moments in all parts of the structure, as a function of the applied loads, dummy load, and redundant reaction load (Alt B): ALT A: pWL pWL