-face semesters, students are put into teams of 3 to 4 and given modules todevelop and practice these skills (two for Arduino, two for PLCs).Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, ENGR 111 was augmented into a synchronous remote courseto avoid close proximity and shared tools in the makerspace. Arduino programming instructionwas performed using Tinkercad (tinkercad.com), a website that allows for Arduino programmingand circuitry simulations. PLC instruction was performed utilizing a free online PLC simulatorwebsite, “PLCfiddle” [1].At the end of each semester, students take a survey on their perceptions of the course. Includedin this survey are questions pertaining to programming instruction. These questions assessstudent confidence in programming and
Paper ID #37337Seeing Vs. Being: Film Representations of Women inEngineeringJessica LivingstonRichard A House (Associate Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Seeing vs. Being: Popular Film Representations of Women in EngineeringIn media representations of engineers and engineering, concerns of diversity and inclusionordinarily start with a simple yes or no question: Among our onscreen engineers, are women andpeople of color represented alongside white men? [1] Implicit in this question is the central logicadopted as a slogan by The Geena Davis Institute on Gender
from this opportunity [1] and [2]. Our graduatecertificate fills this opportunity gap by leveraging students' unique backgrounds and experiencesto broaden the participation of computing professionals.The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has demonstrated a need for a larger U.S. workforce incomputer science. As a result, there has been a rise in coding bootcamps, MOOC certificates,and micro-credentials to gain access to computing. According to the U.S. Bureau of LaborStatistics (BLS) Occupational Outlook Handbook, employment in computer and informationtechnology occupations is projected to grow 11% by 2029, much faster than the average for alloccupations. Within computer and information technology occupations, the employment ofsoftware
continue addressing with the STEM Pride at UM initiative.IntroductionPeople who identify as sexual and gender minorities, i.e. members of the LGTBQIA+ 1 community,face numerous challenges when studying in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) fields, which leads to a decreased retention of these students [1], [2], higher rates ofcloseting [3], and increased rates of mental health issues [4], [5]. These challenges were largelyunexplored in the past, but there has been a recent increase in the number of studies focusing onLGBTQIA+ students in engineering and STEM [6]. These studies have found increaseddiscrimination, harassment, and bullying towards LGBTQIA+ students, and a chilly climate inSTEM, described as implicit or explicit
) Historically, harassment has been categorized based on legal definitions, verbal and/orpsychological, and behavioral. For instance, Fitzgerald and colleagues (1997) categorized sexualharassment under three main subtypes (also known as the tripartite model): gender harassment(e.g., sexual hostility, sexist hostility), unwanted sexual attention, and sexual coercion. Othershave categorized four varying definitions of sexual harassment: (1) legal, (2) psychological, (3)sex-based, and (4) behavioral and categorized them under objective (i.e., quid pro quo) andsubjective categories (e.g., hostile work environment) (Berdahl, 2007; Fitzgerald et al., 1997;O’Leary-Kelly et al., 2009). In addition, harassment can be identity or non-identity-based (Raver&
participants significantly in various ways. With support of social relationshipdevelopment activities, students’ academic goals should be fulfilled in the class.This study examines the relations between social development activities and students’ grades.The objectives are to: 1) Identify potential latent factors using six (6) social developmentactivities and 2) identify a potential association between those factors and students’ grades. Theliterature review describes past and current research on social development activities andrelationships among class participants used to justify this paper. Exploratory factor analysis(EFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) are the methodologies used in this paper toidentify any relation between social
crucialfor today's engineers [1], [2]. Engineering graduates should be able to handle complex engineeringsystems and problems. Their design solutions must meet the needs of stakeholders at different levels,from direct users to regulatory entities. To achieve these goals, educating engineering students in systemsthinking, which can facilitate such goals, is crucial to the students’ success and requires a teaching andlearning approach that is supported by a socio-technical context-rich environment. Instead of offering aproblem statement with pre-defined knowledge, educators should begin with presenting an engineeringproblem to students, training them on how to obtain and extract proper information to identify the trueproblem themselves. Students will
Engineering Library identified Esploro, a research information management system poweredby Ex Libris, because there are several advantages: (1) we have full control of metadata; (2)publication records are indexed and searchable in our library catalog system; (3) publicationrecords are discoverable by search engines; (4) Smart Harvest, an automated content harvestingfeature, can load publication records from a variety of sources; (5) a complete list of publicationscan be easily generated for grant applications and reviews. Since the College of Engineering isthe first college to adopt Esploro, there is no standard workflow for us to follow. We developed aworkflow by trial and error: (1) making an initial estimate of the volume of the publicationrecords
, Undergraduate ResearchIntroduction and Relevant LiteratureThe idea of incorporating industry practices into software engineering education is not entirely novel.There is literature discussing the benefits students experience when software engineering courses aretaught in coordination with industry professionals. Generally, students appreciate when their courseworkis going to be relevant preparation for the industry, especially when those courses use industry tooling todo so [1]. More specifically, students appreciate tooling that provides automated feedback rather thanhaving to wait on a mentor or professor [2]. Such tooling is even more beneficial to students when theyare involved in the creation of the test harness itself as it prepares them for the
service desks to staff training projects[1]–[3]. This term appears to be used broadly, compared to the more narrowly focused terms“embedded” and “boutique.” At Oregon State University (OSU), this service most closelyresembles that of a hotel concierge [1]. OSU staff from across the library worked at a mobilestation positioned near the library’s entrance for the first few weeks of each semester. AtStanford University, monthly training sessions have been used to teach library staff membersabout services and resources across the library and to prepare them to refer users to those mostqualified to assist [2]. In both examples, staff across the library are equipped to serve asknowledgeable representatives for the breadth of library services both
” courses—relies crucially on concepts covered in the first few weeks of the course. If a student does notbuild an understanding of the foundational concepts covered during those first weeks, they willbe unable to understand the remaining material in the course. Such students either strugglethrough the rest of the course as they try to learn past material and keep up with the current topic,or they withdraw from the course entirely. Thus, helping students understand the concepts in thefirst weeks of the course is essential to their continued success. Methods for identifying andhelping students who are likely to struggle in CS1 courses would be widely applicable,particularly since those courses are known to have a low passing rate (68%) [1].Students
objectives are outlined. The framework for laboratoryactivities designed to fulfill the learning objectives and integrations into aerospace curricula wereexamined to connect the developed laboratory activities to undergraduate courses and academicprojects.1. IntroductionThe collection of Earth observation data relies on ground stations. In order to prepare aerospacestudents to work with satellites and space systems, they need to be aware of ground stations andtheir key functions. In the past, the cost of ground stations has limited their use to governmentand private space sectors, but with the decreasing cost of ground station components, groundstations are becoming more accessible to university aerospace programs. The next class ofaerospace
Title: Consensus Building Method for Expert Crowdsourcing of Curriculum TopicsAbstractState of the art curriculum development efforts are done with a committee often consisting oftwo to four faculty members but are commonly undertaken by the assigned course instructor.However, the small number of faculty participants in the curriculum development effort canyield an out-of-date and insufficient curriculum for students entering the industry workforce [1],[2], [3], [4]. Crowdsourcing has been used to gather more input from domain experts consistingof faculty and industry professionals [2], [3], [5]. However, these efforts can yield large amountsof inputs from various crowd workers resulting in additional time required for the
EnvironmentalEngineering to lead the corporate role of Chief Sustainability Officer). The lessons learnedthrough this study included: 1) integrating economics into the environmental engineeringclassroom provides an authentic context to understand the importance of adopting a systems-level view of the trade-offs inherent as part of the triple bottom line; 2) future work shouldexplore replication of the results in courses offered by other faculty and at other institutions aswell as more broadly disseminated results to encourage the adoption of similar approaches inother courses within environmental engineering curricula.IntroductionIn 2015, the United Nations adopted, “Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda forSustainable Development,” also known as the UN
where he worked on modeling the transient dynamic attributes of Kinetic Energy munitions during initial launch. Afterwards he was selected for the exchange scientist program and spent a summer working for DASA Aerospace in Wedel, Germany 1993. His initial research also made a major contribution to the M1A1 barrel reshape initiative that began in 1995. Shortly afterwards he was selected for a 1 year appointment to the United States Military Academy West Point where he taught Mathematics. Following these accomplishments he worked on the SADARM fire and forget projectile that was finally used in the second gulf war. Since that time, circa 2002, his studies have focused on unmanned systems both air and ground. His team
22 Introduction 23 Content Revision 54 Implementation 7 4.1 Lecture: Interactive MATLAB live script is incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.1.1 Example 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.1.2 Example 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2 Active learning by doing in-class group worksheets with MATLAB problems embedded . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
University with specializa- tion in Construction Management. His research focus is in the area of contract administration on heavy civil projects. His teaching areas include 1. introduction to the built environment and construction man- agement, 2. construction materials and methods, 3. construction equipment, 4. building construction cost estimating, 5. heavy civil construction cost estimating, 6. project planning, scheduling, and control, 7. temporary structures, and 8. contract changes and claims management.Mr. Chris Souder, M.S. Chris Souder graduated with an undergraduate degree in Construction Management in 1988 before going to work for Kiewit Pacific Co. in Northern California. Chris had a successful sixteen year
; supply chain design; and undergraduate, graduate, and online systems engineering education development and assessment. In 2018, she started the SmartBuildings CT program at UConn with funding from Eversource and the United Illuminating Company. She is part of the leadership team at the University of Connecticut that leads the newly awarded US Department of Energy’s Southern New England Industrial Assessment Center and that offers no-charge energy audits to 20 manufacturing facili- ties in CT each year to help them lower their energy usage and costs. Dr. Thompson was the recipient of the US EPA Environment Merit Award, Region 1 (2017).Prof. Matthew D. Stuber, University of Connecticut Dr. Matt Stuber is an Assistant
, Services, and Systems: Infusing the Entrepreneurial Mindset in Undergraduate and Graduate Industrial Engineering Training AbstractA typical IE course in sustainability engineering introduces students to engineering design,manufacturing, supply, and systems aspects while highlighting global sustainability, energymanagement, and life cycle analysis. Although such courses provide students with theknowledge required to assess the environmental impacts of existing products, services, andsystems, they suffer from a few common weaknesses: (1) they focus more on analysis and muchless on front-end design of environmentally sound products; (2) in many IE curricula, these areonly elective
virtual meetings and workshops, includinga virtual Kickoff Workshop, a hybrid Writers Retreat, and 1:1 coaching with the ProjectCoordinator and other writing mentors. By the end of the AWP, 27 authors had drafted 71activities in 17 areas of CS. Fifty-eight activities were revised and approved by the programas ready for classroom testing. Almost all of the authors planned to use the developed activitiesin their classes (88%) and share them with others (78%), while 75% planned to develop moreactivities. Almost all (88%) felt that the writing process impacted how they teach with POGILactivities. Thus, the AWP is an effective model to support faculty and produce quality activities.1. IntroductionCollaborative learning activities benefit student
redesigns, both to thiscourse and to other courses in our computing curriculum.IntroductionMuch work in computing education research has studied introductory programming or computerscience courses in undergraduate education, with the literature being extensive enough thatreviews consider hundreds or even thousands of published papers [1, 2]. Though programming istaught in many STEM disciplines, these introductory courses are often taught within computerscience and thus are typically referred to as CS1 [3]. Topics covered in a typical CS 1 courseinclude types, control flow, basic data structures (e.g., arrays), foundational problems andalgorithms (e.g., sorting), and simple recursion [4].CS1 courses are often seen as the entry point to computing
manufacturing landscape.As the demand for automation in assembly lines and manufacturing processes continues to rise,we recognize the importance of providing our students with relevant certifications [1, 2]. Our goalis to train and certify our faculty in the latest technologies, enabling them to guide students indeveloping integrated smart manufacturing systems that utilize industrial robots and PLCs fortasks like material handling, painting, assembly, and CNC machining. According to studies byDeloitte and The Manufacturing Institute, the skills gap in manufacturing may leave an estimated2.4 million positions unfilled over the next decade [3]. As the US manufacturing industry embracesIndustry 4.0 [4] and digital transformation, there is a growing
image processing. Pre- and post-course surveys suggest that these modules had a positive impact on student learning and that students recognize the importance of these skills in MSE.KeywordsMaterials science, Data science, Laboratory reportsIntroductionIn the modern age, scientists and engineers must be equipped with not only deep domainexpertise, but also several transferable skills if they wish to be successful at their jobs [1]. Wefocus on two of these skills in particular, data science (DS) and scientific writing (SW), whichhave been discussed in recent reports from the National Academies [2, 3], ABET [4], anduniversity educators [5–8]. These reports collectively highlight the importance of DS and SW inengineering practice and
Education.1. Introduction The competency-based education model, widely supported in the literature [1]-[3], hasbeen one of the paths taken by higher education institutions concerned with offeringundergraduate programs aligned to the market and societal needs. The concept of competencyaims to link the market and academia, stimulating debates about what future engineers areexpected to know, do, and behave professionally. This concept is also essential in studies onthe profile of the modern engineer, and higher education institutions have been underpressure to develop competencies in their students to align with society and the labor marketneeds [4]-[7]. Yet, to achieve that, a curricular transformation is necessary to adapt teaching to
) is an important concept for engineers. At the Old DominionUniversity, many engineering majors do not learn the TVM unless they choose to do anengineering management minor. This project-based investment exercise can be easilypedagogically justified by essential body of knowledge in favor of experiential learning [1] - [3],implementations of Kolb’s experiential learning cycle (KLC) [4] - [6], and project-based learning(PBL), the pedagogy implemented frequently in early engineering education [7] - [9]. Furthermore,the importance of TVM is emphasized in many Engineering Economy textbooks [10], [11] andengineering education articles [12], [13].Investment Project Description with Samples of Student WorkFigure 1 shows the description of the project
, Calgary AB T2N 1N4 May 1, 2023AbstractRecently, there has been increased pressure from industry, the local government, and theUniversity of Calgary to include industry-relevant learning opportunities in undergraduatecurricula to improve the transition of students from the university to the workforce. Inengineering education, laboratories are often viewed as a bridge between course content andindustry skills by grounding theoretical knowledge in practical experiments and developingfamiliarity with testing techniques and analyses used in industry. Yet nearly half of undergraduatemechanical and manufacturing engineering students enrolled in a mandatory third-year materialsscience course at the University of
,this method of instruction does not encourage deep thought or investigation into the significanceof standards and standardization. The need for improved integration of professional standards inengineering education has been long recognized [1].The inclusion of standards in the senior capstone course is part of the ABET accreditationprocess for engineering programs [2], and many students begin to develop a deeperunderstanding of the importance of codes and standards through the capstone experience. Thecertificate program described in this paper is designed to develop this deeper understanding ofcodes and standards earlier in a student’s academic career. The certificate program focuses onthe role of codes and standards within the engineering
understanding and application of both 2D and 3D visualization in their work.The following research questions guide this project:1. To what extent can a Spatial Visualization plugin for AutoCAD (SVA) contribute in improving the spatial visualization skills of architecture, engineering, and construction students?2. How do engineering and construction students perceive the usability and user-friendliness of the SVA plugin for 2D to 3D conversion in AutoCAD?MethodologyThe study consists of two major parts: 1) developing the SVA plugin and then, 2) assessing theeffectiveness of SVA in improving 3D visualization skills for engineering and constructionstudents and measuring the correlation between spatial visualization skills and planinterpretation
the evidence in the portfolio and triangulate with student ratings andtheir own observations of the faculty member’s teaching.Both the portfolio and peer review are guided by three pillars of effective teaching: StudentLearning, the Learning Environment, and Processes of Improvement. In the teaching portfolio,the faculty member documents 1) evidence of student achievement of learning outcomes, 2) howthe learning environment is used to motivate learning, and 3) the faculty member’s efforts tocontinuously improve as a teacher. The portfolio, essentially a teaching journal, is regularlyupdated and constitutes a real-time, growing record of the teaching stewardship.Then at each step of the tenure process, a snapshot of the portfolio is taken and
therequirements. Graduates entering the workforce need to present with both soft skills andtechnical skills to perform their job responsibilities successfully. Integrating a simulatedexperience within a construction cost estimating course provides an active learning environmentwhere students can better understand the full extent of the bidding process as a whole includingthe soft skills that drive and connect decision-making and the application of technical skills.Salas et al. [1] define simulation-based training as any synthetic practice environment that iscreated in order to impart competencies (i.e., attitudes, concepts, knowledge, rules, or skills) thatwill improve a trainee’s performance. The study [1] goes on to discuss the advantages ofsimulation