been recognized as a Diggs scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence fellow, a Diversity scholar, a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Evolution of Teamwork in engineering workplace from First Industry Revolution to Industry 4.0: A Literature ReviewIntroductionBefore the industrial revolution began, managing people was not an art and teamwork was notexplicitly understood or studied in engineering workplaces. According to Egel and Danielson [1],the focus in engineering workplaces were more on wages and less on process includingefficiency and motivation of people
of contextual factors that arecritical to addressing global issues such as sustainability, social impact and the environment.Helping students to address these contextual factors is critical to the development of an engineergraduate to have the skills and aptitudes needed for confronting the challenges of the 21stcentury. In recognition of this, considerations of social and environment context and factors arespecifically stated in ABET student outcomes 2 and 4 [1].Sustainability requires a balance between the competing interests of various stakeholders whichform a Triple Bottom Line [2]. These three aspects, sometimes called the ‘3 Ps’ are Economic(Profit), Environmental (Planet), and Social responsibility (People) [3] can be described as
for Engineering Education, 2020 The Five I’s: A Framework for Supporting Early Career FacultyEngineering Education Research (EER) has developed into a field of expertise and a careerpathway over the past three decades [1-3]. In response to numerous reports in the 1990s andearly 2000s [4-7], multiple EER graduate programs were established in the mid-2000s and agrowing number continue to emerge to educate and train the next generation of EER faculty andpolicy makers. Historically, many came to EER as individuals trained in other disciplines, butwith an interest in improving teaching and learning [8]. This approach created aninterdisciplinary space where many could learn the norms, practices, and language of EER asthey became scholars
relationship is called an isotherm. Environmental and chemical engineers useadsorption isotherm models, such as the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models, in the designof adsorption treatment works (see Benjamin and Lawler (2013) and Weber and DiGiano (1996)for a thorough discuss of adsorption isotherm models). The adsorption density can bedetermined with the Langmuir Isotherm Model (Langmuir, 1918) as follows. 1 Qm K ad Caq q = 1 + K ad Caqwhere,Qm = Maximum adsorption density (mg sorbate/g sorbent)Kad = Langmuir adsorption equilibrium constant (L/mg sorbate)This rational
3 edited books, 9 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 63 journal articles, and 164 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 40 M.S., and 5 Ph.D. thesis students; 64 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 500 K-12 teachers and 130 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di- rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of over 1,000 students annually. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Formation and Dynamics of Teacher Roles in a Teacher-Student
important since the national trend is to reduce existing programs to fit undera 60-credit hour ceiling.The Florida Department of Education (FLDOE) in partnership with the National ScienceFoundation Advanced Technological Education (NSF-ATE) Center of Excellence forManufacturing Education in Florida, FLATE (DUE 1204751), has addressed both the contentand credit hour criteria for the A.S. Engineering Technology Degree program offered in 24 statecolleges in Florida. The following two figures illustrate its design and structure. Table 1 presentsan example of the ET degree program with a specialization in Advanced Manufacturing asexecuted at one of these colleges, the College of Central Florida, in Ocala, Florida.The first diagram presents the degree
are learning and challenged tobecome the next generations of engineers. However, some of these interactions can becomedifficult when gender bias exists. Gender bias, as defined in this paper, is the unfair differences inthe way a person is being treated because of their gender. This can be conscious or unconsciousprejudice in thoughts and or actions.Research suggests that gender bias in academia is not only a question of whether male and femaleprofessors are evaluated more or less favorably but that women are also judged on differentcriteria than their male counterparts [1, 2]. The authors in [1] argue that female faculty areevaluated differently in intelligence/competence and personality. In the engineering disciplines,female faculty members
. Since engineers developed the first automatic sequence-controlled calculator, thisdisruptive innovation has led scientific computing into a new digital age, such as IBM’smainframe [1]. With the advent of new technological capabilities, engineering design will continueto transform, which impacts how educators teach design to future engineers [2].Each historic paradigm shift in engineering has impacted design education through the wayeducators teach as they attempt to prepare students for engineering practice [3]. For instance,consider the major educational shift experienced when designers shifted from sketches tocomputer-aided design (CAD) [4][5]. This shift, triggered by computational advances, changedhow engineers interact, document, exchange
are presented. The custom test apparatus and software are alsopresented and discussed.IntroductionThe motivation for this project came from observing the operation of a child’s toy. The toy was asmall stuffed likeness of an animated movie character. Embedded in the toy was a batterypowered module which played a short clip of the character’s voice when the toy was subjected torough handling. Disassembly of the module revealed a simple spring trigger mechanism to sensethe motion of the toy and cause it to activate the voice circuit when sufficient impact accelerationoccurred.Hands-on experience is a key part of effective undergraduate engineering education [1], [2].Coupling hands-on experience with team project-based learning further benefits
entering collegethat affected their high school academic performance. The theory and research are reviewed,along with the implication of finding so many students with depressive symptoms foradministrators, faculty, and advisors working with this cohort of students.IntroductionHigh school performance and standardized test scores have been shown to be strong predictors ofretention and strong academic performance, but they do not fully explain the variance instudents’ success rate. Research has shown there are many factors affecting academicachievement including emotional and behavioral variables [1], [2], [3]. One of these variables isdepression. In the past 20 years, the American College Health Association has continued toreport depression as one
-orientedprofession [1]. To meet the high expectations of the industry, students must learnand apply different knowledge and skills in college. To better prepare students forindustry, many studies emphasized the importance of students’ exposure tovarious learning environments [2]-[4]. Internships provide a learning environmentthat helps students gain different learning opportunities than those afforded in thetraditional classroom. By exploring a different learning environment in aninternship, students have a broader range of opportunities for professionalpreparation [2].Benefits of InternshipStudent internship experience provides various learning opportunities for students to cross theboundaries of classroom and industry [1]. For example, internships
wereeffective in increasing student perceptions and experiences in engineering.introduction There is currently a demand in the United States for the development of skilled K-12 andpost-secondary students with transferable technical skills, a knack for scientific exploration, andthe ability to drive innovation through engineering design processes [1]. Scientific explorationand engineering education enable students to develop 6C skills (critical thinking, collaboration,communication, creativity, citizenship, and character) vital to problem-solving and growth of theUnited States economy [2]. To help students become qualified, many institutions have offeredSTEM pipeline programs at the middle and high school levels to build equity and encourage
independently by the timethey graduate. Research in engineering education has demonstrated both the importance ofwriting in the engineering workplace and the extent to which new graduates struggle with thegeneric and rhetorical features of workplace writing [1], [2], [3]. The ME department establisheda committee of four engineers and one writing instructor to determine how better to preparestudents for writing in the curriculum and in their careers.As documented in a previous study, the committee first identified all of the courses in the MEcurriculum that included technical communication instruction. We then categorized thatinstruction by genre, including memos, presentations, reports, and technical drawings. Usingmemos as a starting point, we then
prompts in ill-structured tasks for collaborative problem solving in undergraduate engineering courses. Ill-structured tasks are important to engineering courses because they are similar to authenticproblems that students will encounter in their future workplaces [1], [2]. Solving ill-structuredtasks collaboratively allows students to expand their learning beyond “drill-and-practice”-typeproblem solving and engage in higher order thinking and co-construction of knowledge [3].Nevertheless, studies have indicated that it is necessary to scaffold ill-structured tasks becausethey are complex [4], [5], and students do not naturally implement effective collaborativeinteractions while solving these tasks [6]. However, it is not clear what type(s) of
of aproblem” [1, p.70]. Research shows that the quality of students’ interactions that take placeduring a collaborative problem solving activity under the collaborative, cognitive, andmetacognitive dimensions influence the outcomes of the activity [2], [3]. Consequently, whenintervening in groups, teachers must implement strategies that can facilitate the occurrence ofhigh quality students’ interactions such as elaborating on and negotiating ideas (collaborativedimension), providing explanations, causal elaborations or justifications (cognitive dimension) ,and monitoring individual or group understanding or progress on the task (metacognitivedimension) [4], [5]. Teachers can foster positive students’ interactions during group work [4
, maturity, and for settingthe example both inside the classroom and out. They bring a wealth of experience and act as rolemodels to non-veteran students. [1] Anecdotally, it is easy to see that veteran presence in theclassroom positively effects the performance of the other students in the course, given theirinherent team-oriented mentality. This work-in-progress study focuses on an attempting toquantify this positive effect of veteran students on the academic performance of their non-veterancounterparts. Initial results revealed that veteran students do have a positive, quantitative impacton the grades of the non-veteran students.The integration of veteran students into the day-program of mechanical engineering at The Citadeloffered an interesting
First-Year Engineering StudentsAbstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of peer tutoring experiences on upper-class male and female tutors who provided supplemental instruction (SI) for first-yearengineering students enrolled in required general chemistry and physics courses at NortheasternUniversity. Our previous research has shown a correlation between regular use of SI by first-yearengineering students and increased GPA, as well as gender-based differences in SI usage andeffects of SI. In this study, we turned our focus to the effects of the tutoring role on the tutors andsought to elucidate 1) whether tutors perceived that they benefitted from the SI experience, and ifso, in what ways, 2) how gender affected attitudes
has always been praised by students and department for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. To supplement his teaching and research, he has been involved in numerous professional societies, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Structural BIM Integration, 3) 4D/5D BIM, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Innovative Construction Demolition, and 6) Carbon Footprint Analysis on Roadways.Dr. Pavan Meadati, Kennesaw State University Pavan Meadati, Ph.D., LEED AP, is a professor in Construction Management
. The lab curriculum then begins with a few weeks of introductory SolidWorkssessions, where the students learn individually. Next, the project design groups are given anArduino kit to build and code multiple beginner level circuits. The lab ends with the last fewweeks solely dedicated to the final projects. These final projects will be described in furtherdetail later. A small midterm project is also implemented to further expose the students to aspecial research interest of the university and its subsidiaries. Further detail on the structuring ofthe course can be seen in last year’s paper [1]. An important note from last year is the choice ofprojects and availability of resources compared to this year.Application of dynamic learningThe type of
educators who seek to integrate virtual technologies into their new orexisting laboratories.1. IntroductionThe School of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AAE) at Purdue University recently experienced adramatic surge in new undergraduate student enrollment. One of the difficult tasks is toaccommodate the increased number of students with physical facilities that were built for fewerstudents. To this end, we proposed a countermeasure to cope with the situation withoutincreasing the physical lab space by creating a virtual lab (VL) space. We had several thoughtson the possible positive outcomes as a result of the VL implementation. First, VLs couldimprove the educational efficiency during the hands-on lab if students complete VLs as a part ofpre-lab
with whathas been observed by researchers who study Team Science. There are two National AcademyReports that do an excellent job of summarizing the Science of Team Science Enhancing theEffectiveness of Team Science identifies ‘Seven Key Features That Create Challenges for TeamScience’ that have impacted the ability of ECP participants to fully contribute to collaborations withR1 partners: 1) High Diversity of Membership; 2) Deep Knowledge Integration; 3) Large Size; 4)Goal Misalignment with Other Teams; 5) Permeable Boundaries; 6) Geographic Dispersion; and7) High Task Interdependence. Two conclusions from Team Science research that connectparticularly well with the experience of the ECP collaboration: ● ‘Team professional development
quantities ofworkers and calls for stepping up Industry 4.0 reskilling have become ever more urgent. Fivethemes have emerged: 1. The Workforce Must Embrace Frequent and Constant Change. 2. Teams Must be Flexible, Adaptive and Collaborative. 3. Companies Must Create Cultures of Inclusion and Transparency 4. Workers Must Become Life-long Learners & Dynamic Thinkers 5. The Need for Accelerated Education Workforce Development ReformAn empirical investigation, focused on Southeastern Michigan was conducted with the supportof local industry, educational institutions and government agencies. Three key segments ofupcoming generations, currently advancing in the talent pipeline, were investigated: 1) futuretechnical leaders
deeply in the future through the addition of personal interviews with the students: Is theconnection between the students’ perceived value of the content a stronger influence on theirmotivation than the instructional methods employed?I. IntroductionAs our knowledge of how students learn expands, so does the use of more active learningexercises in our classrooms, because as Nie and Lau [1] state, “learning is not passivelyreceiving knowledge, but an active process of constructing meaningful representations ofknowledge.” We must address students’ misconceptions [2], tap into their existing knowledge,and motivate them to actively engage in their learning. We recognize different learning modes[3] and the importance of learning flexibility [4] [5]. A
organizations, yet the mechanisms ofits influence are less clear, as are the types and extent of involvement that lead to such benefits.Thus, the objective of this review is to further investigate how involvement has been measuredand conceptualized in research studies, with a focus on the differential effects of involvementamongst different student populations.This paper investigates the following research questions: (1) How have forms of involvement beenmeasured and conceptualized in studying the impact of undergraduate students’ out-of-classexperiences on their professional development; (2) what mechanisms have been proposed toexplain the impact of experiential learning in student organizations on students’ professionaldevelopment; and, (3) how do
is simply doing more with less [1] [2] [3]. Monetarily, outputis sales revenue while input consists of operating expenses both fixed and variable. Further still,operating efficiency can be measured by the amount of output – number of units for a specifiedtime period associated with the cost of producing these units. A more inclusive definitioninvolves multifactor measures the output generated by a combination of inputs, multifactor ortotal factor productivity [4]. Total factor productivity consists of capital, labor, energy, rawmaterials, and business services. The evolution of the Internet of Things (IoT) provides acomprehensive platform where students can assimilate and differentiate operating efficiency vs.productivity
the course structure. This paperdescribes the details of the course design and document some of the outcomes.IntroductionWe have embarked on an effort to change the educational outcomes of engineering students bychanging how we teach the foundational engineering courses. We call the effort The MechanicsProject because, at least initially, the focus has been on the engineering mechanics courses(Statics, Dynamics, and Deformable Solids). The Mechanics Project was created at a large R1university in the southwest, and although it was certainly not the first effort in higher educationto redesign the fundamental mechanics courses [1] – [6], it has created long term impacts on bothstudent learning and subsequent course content.The decision to focus
The Missing Third: The Vital Role of Two-Year Colleges in Shrinking Engineering Education DesertsIntroduction and BackgroundTwo-year colleges have been shown to provide educational, economic, and health benefits totheir surrounding communities. These colleges serve a critical role in post-secondary educationby providing transferable starting access to many four-year degree disciplines along with two-year degrees and certificates. Just under half of four-year degree graduates have transferred incourses from at least one two-year college [1], and one of the key factors for making thattransition successful is the connections students make with the faculty at their two-yearinstitutions [2]. In addition
and institutional data set. It is our goal tounderstand the social and organizational processes that determine how changes in engineeringeducation occur, and understand this well enough to present policy recommendations on how topursue effective, meaningful, and enduring changes in engineering education at differentinstitutional scales.Our first major work-in-progress report was presented last year at ASEE 2019 in Tampa, Floridaand was on the development and implementation of ABET EC 2000 [1]. While ABET is a majorpart of what drives change in engineering education, we do not address accreditation directly inthis paper. Instead, this year we focus on the broader social and organizational processesassociated with “higher education governance
and Marshall College. Hye Rin’s research interests are self-reflection, academic interventions, online learning in education, mea- surement, temporal motivation, and resilience in students with disabilities. Specifically, her research focuses on (1) creating an effective intervention that helps URMs persist and continue on in STEM ma- jors via the social media platform, YouTube; (2) examining the nuances related to various measures of academic self-related motivational beliefs; (3) resilient students who achieve high levels of academic per- formance despite their disability; and (4) combining aspects of cognitive and positive psychology to study individual differences in motivation, particularly in exploring
different thanpresented in class. This exercise is termed a “napkin sketch” to articulate to students the benefitsof simple sketches to communicate ideas – as is often done by engineers in practice. The purposeof the study was to investigate how this napkin sketch activity addresses three concerns ofengineering educators: creativity, visualization and communication, and knowledge retention.Specific objectives of the study were to generate conclusions regarding the activity’s ability to(1) provide an outlet for, and a means of encouraging creativity, (2) provide an opportunity forstudents to visualize and communicate what they have learned through drawings rather thanequations or writing, and (3) encourage knowledge retention by providing a