, equity and inclusion (DEI). Simple exposure to adiverse environment in the classroom does not fully prepare students to succeed in a similar real-world environment.In order to best prepare students for post-graduation roles, we must incorporate DEI into ourcurriculum. Education in these issues promotes their awareness of the topic and allows them toexplore their own implicit bias in a safe environment. Practicing our teaching with similarthought, we must assess the student outcomes in a manner which is reflective of our ownunderstanding of these issues and aims to minimize performance gaps due to disparities betweenstudents.Systems Engineering is an ideal platform to promote student awareness of global inequities inthe world as well as explore
both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University,she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis.From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement ofTeaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designingfor the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSFinnovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences forhigh school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:”Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and
Paper ID #18394Peer-based Gamification Products Critiquing: Two Case studies in Engineer-ing EducationJingwen(Jess) Li, PSU Jingwen Li is a current PhD candidate in Human Factors at IE department, Penn State University. She graduated from Beihang University, Beijing, with her thesis working on upper limb dynamic modeling applied in extravehicular activities considering spacesuit effects. Her research focus now includes model- ing cognitive aspects of human in a dynamic information system, maintaining vigilance through physical activity in during monitoring task, and applying gamification to enhance engineering education.Mr
socialsupport to my students, as well as enrichment and research or practical experienceopportunities. I have been the PI and Co-PI for grants received from NSF, NASA and theDepartment of Education amounting to over $5 million to develop the engineeringprogram and award CSEMS/S- STEM (Science, Technology Engineering and Math)scholarships to students at San Antonio College. An NSF discretionary grant from EngineeringEducation I obtained in 2003 allowed me to initiate the EDGE (Early Development ofGeneral Engineering) 13 a summer program, designed to attract and retain high schoolstudents into the engineering field. The program continued through 2015 with help fromDepartment of Education MSEIP funding. A majority of my mentees have participated in
and Social Inquiry, Sociology of Education, and Gender and Society) on topics including the legal profession, intellectual property, and constitutional law.Dr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Dr. Rincon joined the Society of Women Engineers in February 2016 as the Manager of Research, where she oversees the organization’s research activities around female engineers from elementary through col- lege and into the workforce. With over 15 years of experience in higher education administration, includ- ing as a Senior Research and Policy Analyst for The University of Texas System, her focus has been on understanding the factors that impact student success and influencing the policies that support students
Paper ID #28509Student Construction Sustainability Evaluations: A LEED Lab Case StudyDr. Jeyoung Woo P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Jeyoung Woo is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona). He is a registered Professional Engineer (Civil - Construction) in Texas. He has worked in the industry for nine years as a project manager, a corporate quality manager, a field engineer, and a designer. Also, he conducted several research projects about construction labor productivity, construction safety, engineering
Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationspecialized case studies. These cases use the norm of best engineering practice to encourage theengineer to generalize and discriminate his or her behavior and to act on this knowledge. Thefocus of this paper is on how you teach ethical behavior, given a reasonable standard of whatethical behavior is. With the renewed interest in ethics shown by ABET and the assumption thatethical engineers are what ABET wants, the responsible professor, chairman, and dean isobligated to develop sound strategies based on theory to teach it.2. Developing ethical engineersDesigning a strategy to produce more ethical engineers is no different from designing a bridge.The engineering method applies to both. A
based on one of the term projects of a mezzanine levelmechanical engineering (ME) elective course on Lightweighting and Joining of Structures. The11-week duration class (including the final exam week) at Kettering University consisted of bothsenior undergraduate and graduate ME students. The prerequisites for the course includemechanics, CAE, design, material science and finite element analysis (FEA). For the analysiscarried in this paper, the currently used all-steel railcar truck stand has been redesigned andmodeled as a simplified 3D space frame using standard tubular (pipe section) members.Although the simplified model does not represent in any way the actual stand used in the railcarindustry, it is anticipated to serve the same purpose as
College Collaborative. Supporting Engineering programsacross multiple rural colleges, sharing resources, faculty, perhaps including a mobile lab anddeveloping an Introduction to Engineering Project between colleges could potentially lead tonew ways of delivering Engineering education in rural Arizona. Using remote access labs,sharing key faculty/lab resources, and employing on-line web delivery of programs are examplesof this model.Sharing of Ideas and Best PracticesThe colleges’ sharing of ideas, resources, and even faculty through the Network has strengthenedthe community and yielded collective impact as follows: • Shared experiences and best practices led to an appreciation for high quality work being accomplished on each campus
thetraditional content of a culture and assimilates its knowledge, practices, and values(KPV). Under such definition, ABET outcomes were transferred to a set of culturalconstructs based on the content of the first-year engineering program. A depiction of suchcultural constructs or traits is portrayed in Figure 1.Figure 1. Schematic of outcomes from the course organization for the first-yearengineering course. II. Research Design, Analysis and ResultsA. The open-ended analysisThe primary purpose of the open-ended study was to analyze student perspectives on howthe process of engineering enculturation is occurring according to what is taught in afirst-year engineering course. The three open-ended questions from a pre-survey thatwere
, withthe relevant issues for the present study. Concepts on PBL and B. Design of ExperimentsExperiment Project are elaborated. In section 3, the classroom As [15] claim, the consistency of the conclusions drawn from an experiment depends on how the experiment wasconducted. Therefore, the statistical planning of the complemented with a lecture class given by the professor ofexperiment supports the use of valuable sources in an efficient the discipline at the end of the practice moment.way, assuring the economy and the efficiency of the The crafting of the airplanes is
, Mississippi State University Michelle Garraway rejoined the Mississippi State family as the Center for Community-Engaged Learn- ing’s (CCEL) Program Coordinator in August 2013. After graduating from MSU with a bachelor’s degree in Secondary Education in 2003, Michelle spent some time teaching in Alabama before moving to Hat- tiesburg, MS. There she served over 20 different area nonprofit agencies in her position as Community Impact Coordinator with the United Way of Southeast Mississippi. In 2010, Michelle and her husband David moved back to Starkville where she worked in the Starkville-Oktibbeha Consolidated School Dis- trict before coming on board with CCEL. Michelle enjoys connecting faculty with community partners
second semester the student completesthe design, again with the direction and approval of faculty. The entire process is mirrored afterindustry practice, where the student must accomplish such tasks as write a project proposal, setand meet time-related deliverables, and write and present a final report.3. Description of Our EnvironmentThe Department of Electrical Engineering enrolls over 450 under-graduates and over 100 fulland part-time graduate students. Active research and course work include topics in computerarchitecture, microprocessor systems, fault-tolerance, interconnection networks, parallel anddistributed systems, expert systems, fuzzy logic, software engineering, algorithms, andprogrammable logic. We are part of The College of
, undergraduate research, study abroad programs, servicelearning, student design teams, leadership positions, and involvement in technical andprofessional student organizations, this paper aims to underscore the importance of theseapproaches in shaping well-rounded and industry-ready civil engineers.KeywordsExperiential Learning, Civil Engineering, Professional Preparation, Student Development,Leadership, Senior DesignIntroductionExperiential learning involves active engagement with real-world situations to develop criticalthinking, problem-solving skills, and practical expertise. In the context of civil engineeringeducation, this approach is invaluable for preparing students to thrive in a rapidly evolvingprofessional landscape and providing a bridge
students.Three years ago an idea was hatched to start a multi-disciplinary design studio involvingarchitecture and architectural engineering students from two different campuses. One waslocated on the west coast and the other in the Midwest. The premise was to collaborate on adesign competition and form teams of structural and architectural design majors. Thepartnership for the lead instructors was formed years earlier as each worked together on abuilding project when one practiced architecture and the other structures. As both individualsmoved into academia there was an impetus to create a class that emulated the real world designprocess. To help transition this relationship into academia, the two instructors would sit ondesign review juries together
are in Table 2. Relationship code shown in Table 5 was substituted for calculations with numbers: = 9 = strong, = 3 = medium, ∆ = 1 = weak, empty cell = 0 = negligible.Not surprisingly, learning outcome ‘Reduction and compilation of information’ came on top asthe best fulfilled by the learning activities evaluated. The learning process is about informationcompilation and reduction even if little self preparation of students is required a lot of spoonfeeding is practiced to enhance amount of material covered. Page 12.1528.9Interdisciplinary thinking, analysis of ill-defined problems, conveying technical ideas using
social justice education from Iowa State University; and a Ph.D. from the University of Utah where she studied Educational Leadership and Policy and also earned a graduate certificate in gender studies from the School of Social Transformation. Whether related to research, practice, or teaching, Dr. valerie guerrero williamson has prioritized strate- gic, research-informed efforts to actualize equity for students, staff, and faculty. Broadly, her research focuses on higher education at the organizational level, including change models and their implementa- tion, campus climates and cultures, cultivating critical praxis, and faculty development and socialization. Dr. v has also developed and led hundreds of educational
Paper ID #20248Lean Six Sigma Case Study within a Public School DistrictMs. Emily M Salmon, Mississippi State University Emily Salmon is a recent graduate of Mississippi State University (MSU) with a bachelor’s in Industrial and Systems Engineering. She is a Research Engineer for MSU’s Institute for Systems Engineering Research (ISER) located in Vicksburg, MS. Her current research involves lean six sigma practices and applications, manufacturability, and modeling and simulations. She received her Six Sigma Black Belt from MSU’s CAVS Extension Center in June 2016 and is currently pursuing her Masters of Engineering at MSU
University’s Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence and Educational Innovation, where he consults with faculty, graduate students, and post-docs to design, implement, and assess research projects that relate to teaching and learning in their classrooms. He also contributes to a variety of program-level assessment projects on the CMU campus. Mike’s training includes an M.A. and Ph.D. in Social Psychology from the University of New Hampshire, as well as an M.Ed. in sport and performance psychology from Springfield College. His interests include the science of learning, research methodology, and data analysis. Prior to joining the Eberly Center in 2017, Mike worked as the Teaching and Learning Research Coordinator at the Center
completea remote controlled robot project. The goal of the project is to program a robot that is outfittedwith the PLP system to navigate an obstacle course manually and autonomously (see appendixfor project description).The research phase lasts for approximately two weeks and teams learn in great detail the aspectsof their part of the overall design. Teams are asked to research information relevant to their partof the design, create block diagrams, fully define signals and protocols that impact the otherteam, and document all of their work on the course Wiki. At the end of the research phase, teamsdeliver formal presentations of their findings. Other students, as well as an assessment boardmade up of the course instructor, other knowledgeable
in engineering dynamics with applications to wearable technology for analysis of human motion in a variety of contexts ranging from warfighters to astronauts. In addition to her engineering work, she also has an interest in engineering education research, which most recently has focused on incorporating authentic engineering educational experiences through engineering history education and open-ended modeling problems designed to initiate the productive beginnings of engineering judgement and engineering identity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Incorporating History Lessons into a Second Year Mechanical Engineering SeminarIntroduction Unlike the other major
institution, lab facilities, and personnel.Each course was designed so that both upper-level undergraduates and graduate students couldparticipate. The intent of this decision was to provide the education and training for the graduatestudents but also to attract interested undergraduates into the microsystems field with the hopethat they would continue on to graduate school with a microsystems research emphasis. The University of Utah is on the semester system and the College of Engineeringtraditionally offers courses at the graduate level that contain three semester credit hours ofcontent. Thus, all of the new courses were designed to be delivered on a semester calendar andto contain material that is consistent with three semester credit
practicesdescribed in Tables A and B based on: review of course materials; classroom observation; and, discussionwith the instructor. The practices in Table A have been shown to have a particularly large and robust impacton learning in undergraduate STEM courses (see, e.g., Wieman and Gilbert, 2014). The literature onteaching indicates that practices in Table B promote learning also, but with less impact than those in TableA. Hence, evaluators should pay particular attention to the practices in Table A that the instructor choosesto implement in their course.Not all practices described in Tables A and B are appropriate for every course. Wieman and Gilbert identifiedthese as best practices for undergraduate non-laboratory courses. However, laboratory and
education with digital technology to overcome inequalities: a scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1474.2. Anderson, J. and Kyte, M. (2012). Using visual simulation tools and learning outcomes- based curriculum to help transportation engineering students and practitioners to better understand and design traffic control signal systems. National Institute for Advanced Transportation Technology, University of Idaho.3. Aravinthan, V. and Worden, J. (2010). Animations as a tool for enhancing teaching and learning outcomes in civil engineering courses. Proceedings of the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.4. Bobek, E. and Tversky, B. (2016). Creating visual explanations improves learning. Cognitive Research
; instead, civil engineering faculty have an additional mandate to help studentsparticipate in the multiple roles in which they will participate as practicing engineers. Globallearning, in this sense, extends beyond a simple definition of the term to denote a preoccupationwith internationalism, but instead connotes a whole host of ideas, which Kevin Hovland argues,better prepares students to apply their technical expertise, and thus open “the door for democraticpractice and social responsibility at the experiential level.”11The project introduced herein is seeking to improve the ability of Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering graduates from the University of Utah to have an impact in a global society byapplying their knowledge, skills, and aptitudes
helped champion the cooperative education learning outcomes initiative. She also authored international conference presentations on best practices in cooperative education and has co-created a vocational rehabilitation-training program for professionals in the United Kingdom. She is currently the Executive Director of AUTO21, a Network of Centres of Excellence for automotive-related research.Derek Northwood, University of Windsor Professor Northwood has over thirty years experience in the field of Engineering Education. He occupies the posts of Research Leadership Chair and Professor of Engineering Materials. He was Deputy Chairman of the International Liaison Group-Engineering
engineering projects and solving contemporary andfuture engineering problems. The complexity of modern technology and the sophistication ofcurrent knowledge and procedures makes it impossible for any single individual to know and doeverything; assistance from others is essential in virtually every engineering endeavor. Page 7.909.1It is vital that engineering graduates both understand the nature of, and be able to function in,team situations. As a result, engineering education must include a significant number ofexperiences that impact students in ways that build awareness and skills in teaming. There aremany formats in which this can be done. Teams
experience in areas of Automotive and Systems Engineering.Dr. Lisa Elanna Burris, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Lisa Burris is an assistant professor of Civil Engineering at the Ohio State University. Dr. Burris’ exper- tise lies in the areas of cement and concrete optimization, durability of construction materials, forensic evaluation of structural and material deficiencies, and infrastructure construction and repair best practices. Dr. Burris holds a B.S. in Architectural Engineering and M.S. in Civil Engineering from Kansas State University, a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, and has over a decade of experience in construction materials research
theories,methods, and promising practices across institutions and disciplines. Harassment, threats, andintimidation cannot be tolerated if we are to engage this call to the best of our abilities. It iscrucial that all our students are able to realize their potential, and that our profession welcomesand cultivates talent to more fully enhance and protect the welfare of people and the planet.Each of us is a potential ally to another STEM diversity researcher. We offer [35] a shortacronym to help scholars remember how to respond in such an attack: RSR, for Report, Support,and Recommit. When a scholar is attacked, they (or a supportive colleague) should Report theattack to multiple bodies: the unit, college, and university levels; to law enforcement
;P decision; and viii) provision of formal recognition, acknowledgment,and awards for mentoring17. Louisiana Tech University has incorporated each of these aspectsinto its formal mentoring program. Formal program management is provided by the Office forWomen in Science and Engineering, which is run out of the office of the Associate Dean forAdministration and Strategic Initiatives for the college. Training for mentors and mentees isprovided through three one-hour workshops prior to their joining the program, dissemination oftraining materials, and a monthly e-newsletter. Training materials (also posted on the programwebsite) include brochures (which summarize research-based best practices, such as qualities ofa good mentor, goals for mentors