order to demonstrate synthesisof topics covered throughout the entire course. The career plan also required students to performself-assessment and independent research, as well as short-term and long-term goal setting.While designing the course content and activities, I also devised a teaching plan for each lessonunit. Each plan outlined the following: objectives of the unit; specific teaching practices that Iwould employ to meet these objectives; and a breakdown of classroom time for all discussionsand activities determined for the unit. Guided by these teaching plans in the classroom, I wasable to rely heavily on the active and cooperative learning practices and minimize the amount oflecturing. For example, I would begin a class by asking
Paper ID #37743The Multiplicity of Care in Engineering Education andProgram BuildingMarie Stettler Kleine (Teaching Assistant Professor ) Marie Stettler Kleine is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering, Design, & Society. She conducts research on engineering practice and pedagogy, exploring its origins, purposes, and potential futures. Marie is especially interested in the roles of values in engineers’ pursuit to “do good.” Marie received her B.S. in mechanical engineering and international studies from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and M.S. and PhD in science and technology
Technology Department at UNC Charlotte. She was the first woman PhD graduate from the Lee College of Engineering, with a research emphasis in microelectronic devices and solid state materials. She has served in numerous mentoring and educational roles for undergraduates, high school and middle school students. Page 11.1070.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Recruiting Underrepresented Minorities to Engineering and Engineering TechnologyAbstractAn essential component of any modern economy is a well-educated and versatile workforce ableto design and produce
sciencestudents. The project had a strong focus on supporting women and underrepresented minoritystudents in STEM. The curricular and the support strategies were built on high impact edu-cation practices that had shown to enhance the learning and the engagement of women andunderrepresented minority students in STEM. Research shows active-learning pedagogy suchas hands-on collaborative student-centered learning enhances the success of underrepresentedminority students in STEM [1, 4]. In this paper, we describe the work done to address the three critical areas. In particular: 1. We describe the design and the adoption of the college algebra with a corequisite model to shorten the time on algebra sequence. 2. We describe the curriculum redesign
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2008 American Society for Engineering EducationOur second question on graduate vs. undergraduate student learning style preferences indicatedthere isn’t a big dichotomy between these students. In contrast, some research suggests thatfaculty and student learning styles are often different and graduate students look more likefaculty populations. In our study, we did not disaggregate the master’s level and doctoral levelstudents. It is possible that some variations between master’s and doctoral students could impactthis analysis.Our final question looked at whether learning styles impact student use of instructionaltechnologies. Within a tool like BlackBoard
), as well as an in-classexercise in analyzing a short research paper.ConclusionIn this segment of “Introduction to Literature Review and Proposal Writing,” we definecreativity as the application of critical thinking skills (analysis, synthesis and evaluation).Developing these skills is a life-long practice that must be deliberately pursued. During t hecourse, graduate students practice two methods to enhance their creativity: brainstorming andcritical reading. These activities are designed to help them begin generating research ideas anddeveloping their research proposal for their graduate studies.1. Boice, R. (2000). Advice for New Faculty Members: Nihil Nimus. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.2. Kent School District (2001). Teaching Using Bloom’s
researcher, biomedical and mechanical engineer, and national leader in transforming undergraduate engineering education. She has served as founding faculty of two brand new engineering programs (the first at James Madison University) and served on several national roles across ASEE, ABET, AAAS, NSF, KEEN, etc. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Educating the Whole Engineer: Leveraging Communication Skills to Cultivate Ethical Leadership CharacterABSTRACT - Effective communication skills are fundamental to the practice of engineeringand thus essential to engineering education. In this paper, we highlight how effectivecommunication skills can also become a vehicle to
AC 2011-42: INTRODUCING YOUNG CHILDREN TO ENGINEERINGTHROUGH EARLY STEM LITERACYEmily M. Hunt, West Texas A&M UniversityMichelle L Pantoya, Texas Tech University Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Texas Tech University. PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Davis. Specialty in Combustion of Energetic Materials.Aaron S. Hunt, Canyon Independent School District I am in my ninth year in public education. Three years teaching high school Spanish, two teaching 8th grade history, one as a graduate student and researcher, and three years as an assistant principal in middle school. I love working with students and know the value of the education business. I also am in my last year of
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Demographic Leadership –A First of its Kind Diversity Leadership Online Course in a Tier-1 University Doctorate Degree ProgramAbstractThis first course in a professional doctorate degree program called the Doctorate of Technology(DTECH) on demographic leadership at a tier 1 university was premised on years of research,practice, and scholarship. The scholarship was conducted by asking the question “Why don’tyou like me?”“Why don’t you like me?” as a research question, is not about the author(s) individually, butabout each of us as individuals. It is about all of us. The question is really “why don’t
path, and regarding when would be the best moment to take thataction.Meeting personnel at the plant includes two main engineers (Level 4): Alex Stadopoulus, whodeals with the documents, and John Berger, who is in charge of operation of the facility. Thestudent can ask the first one for plans and documents about the design and construction of thetank, as shown in Figure 2. The choice of one of the documents leads to plans such as thatillustrated in figure 3 (Level 5). In another screen, the student may also ask for the company thatdesigned the tank, when was it designed and fabricated, and if it was a special design or if thosetanks are a standard structural model
outcome for the civil engineer of the future to enter the professional practice of civil engineering. There was much give and take in these deliberations. Because over 50 experienced civil engineers participated in these deliberations, consensus was achieved without ever having to resort to a vote of the participants. 2. After this “professional practice” line was set, the committee then determined what level of achievement was proper at the time of graduation from an undergraduate civil engineering program. Again, consensus was reached without having to vote, largely as a result of the preparatory work done by the committee in developing the explanations and
for improvingretention include several best-practice components, namely: 1) exposure to engineering practice through two new courses employing multidisciplinary projects6, presentations by practicing engineers, presentations by students involved in co- op education, and presentations by senior capstone design project students; 2) the development of the faculty mentoring program for first-year students; 3) the development of a peer advisor mentoring program for first-year students; 4) the development of an industrial mentoring program for first-year students.We are implementing all four initiatives, and this paper focuses on initiative #4, industrialmentoring.1.3 Other Industrial Mentor ProgramsFreshman
, take initiative, and strive for excellence much more than the typical college graduate.” Graduates from universities with a formalized commitment to leadership are often able toquickly contribute in industrial settings due to their ability to communicate to solve problems andlead teams2. Hiring graduates who have participated in engineering leadership programs mayalso help organizations cut costs associated with sending employees through their company’sinternal leadership development programs. The purpose of this survey was to collect data from various institutions to examine thetypes of programs utilized and highlight innovative practices. This paper will provide insight intovarious types of leadership development programs that
understanding and a disposition that a student builds across thecurriculum and co-curriculum, from making simple connections among ideas and experiences tosynthesizing and transferring learning to new, complex situations within and beyond thecampus”10, 11. The Integrative Knowledge Portfolio Survey was designed “in order to create apedagogy and technology to help students know and articulate what they have learned”9, 11especially valuing how they learn and implementing this in their career choices11. Pizzolato’sSAS is the first tool of its kind to assess self-authorship quantitatively. The capacity to assessself-authorship quantitatively can help institutions create and implement new practices by havinga tool that could be used for assessment. Prior to
anddeveloping countries, and effective management of academic and engineeringinstitutions. 2Critical thinking and problem solving are important skills that need to be developed forstudents in an undergraduate program. Critical thinking is one of the several ABETprogram outcomes that are difficult to achieve using traditional approaches toengineering education. For example, engineering graduates need to have the broadeducation necessary to understand the impact of civil engineering solutions in a globaland societal context. There is much to be gained from broader application of thephilosophies and techniques to the education of engineers.3 Problem solving in specificcannot be simply a series of stand-alone assignments or projects. It must thus
wholeindividual, and not viewed with a deficit lens. In this study, we leveraged the overarching modeland its six forms of capital to better understand mentors’ approaches with their minoritizedmentees.MethodsThere were two main sources of data collected for this pilot study: individual contextualbackdrop summaries and individual interviews. The following sections detail the recruitment ofparticipants before discussing the methods for collecting and analyzing these sources of data.Recruitment of ParticipantsAfter receiving Exempt approval from the Institutional Review Board, the research teamidentified 5 individuals to pilot the interview protocol. These mentors needed to: (1) be a STEMprofessional practicing for five years or more and (2) have
(t ) (1) dtIn practice, the inflow hydrograph I(t) is either known or predicted from an appropriate surfacewater hydrologic model (e.g., those incorporated in the Army Corps of Engineers HEC 1program). In practice, outflow from the reservoir, Q(t) is regulated by a spillway; these arehydraulic structures that can be designed in many different configurations. Common spillwaytypes include straight drop (weir), overflow (ogee), open channel, drop inlet, culvert and siphonconfigurations. Orifice flow is often and appropriate model for drop inlet, culvert, and siphonspillways under submerged inlet conditions. An orifice is easily fabricated from glass tubing,therefore, such a
higher-order thinking skills, amongmany other outcomes, are enhanced by experiences during their college years. The “collegeimpacts” framework by Terenzini and Reason 12; 13 brings coherence to that research andconceptually combines factors forming the “Undergraduate Experience” in an effort to explainstudent learning outcomes and persistence. Several research studies in higher education (e.g.30-32 ), including ones grounded within an engineering context (e.g.,33), empirically support theframework.Figure 1. Organizing college impacts framework for the “Engineering of 2020” learningoutcomes, which includes leadership skills (revised from Terenzini & Reason12; 13).Our study used a revised version of the framework, which was modified in light
contributions of team members but in the interactions of team members and the rolesthat these members assume throughout the process1. High performing industry teams alsodemand both task and team orientations to insure successful outcomes2. But the literaturediverges once these components are dissected. For instance, individual ability has long beenthought to be key to successful outcomes. However, Bass 3 reported that the relationship betweenproductivity and individual contributions was weak at best. It also appears that the impact ofindividual abilities declines as the interactive nature of the task increases 1,4,5. The same is truefor gender composition on teams. There is a virtually unlimited amount of research concerningthe differences that women
the continuousimprovement of the program. To manage effective assessment and continuous improvement,programs should thoroughly research best practices. Guidance articles by Gloria Rodgers [4, 5]can provide numerous ideas to promote compliance. In addition, educators at differentinstitutions may be a source for successful continuous improvement activities [6]. Lastly, someprograms use exit exams as a tool to gather data. While this approach may feature somelimitations, a review of the use of a comprehensive test as an assessment tool may be fruitful [7].The second greatest number of the 2018 findings before due process were associated with theProgram Educational Objectives (PEOs), Criterion 2, with almost all shortcomings reduced ormitigated
following: formal procedures for providingmentorship or a formal mentoring program linking university and departmental resources(human and material); the roles and/or responsibilities of the department chair, the mentor and Page 12.1058.5the new faculty member; established Best Practices for mentoring or established Qualities of aGood Mentor; mentorship short and long term goals; mentorship training; and a continuousimprovement feedback process.11 The Faculty Manual is clear on the roles and responsibilities of the Unit Administrator,the Department Chair, in some smaller units this may be the Dean or Associate Dean, thereforewe recognize
just and safe space for all and uses writing, speaking, and research to address each of these important aspects of her academic career. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploratory Literature Review of Education Theories Guiding Engineering and Physics OutreachAbstractDue to the increasing demand for a diverse, STEM-competent workforce, many universities areparticipating in engineering and physics outreach activities for K-12 students. Despite theproliferation of these outreach programs, the fundamental learning and social theories that guidedevelopment of high-impact outreach experiences can be unclear, hindering their transferability.The purpose of this
essential skill for international communication and a potential asset in the global job market. • Financial Aid and Scholarships: While studying in the U.S. can be expensive, many universities offer financial aid, scholarships, and assistantship programs to help alleviate some of the financial burden for international students. • Networking and Alumni Connections: U.S. universities have extensive alumni networks that provide students with valuable connections and networking opportunities during and after graduation. • Opportunities for Internships and Practical Training: The U.S. offers extensive internships and practical training opportunities, allowing students to gain hands-on experience
is something that should be instilled in engineering students. Some studentshave never had the opportunity to be instructed in matters like this.. The need for students to gain confidence in their ability to solve problems. This may be one of the mostimportant character traits that can be developed in a student as he/she advances toward graduation. Thedifference between an entry-level engineer with average problem-solving skills and one with better problem-solving skills is many times reflected merely by the amount of confidence that the person displays. One ofthe best ways to nurture this maturation process is to have students begin a laboratory course performingsimple experiments, then continue through the semester performing experiments
, although specific expectations for majors willoften exceed expectations for non-majors. A graduate of an engineering technology orengineering degree program would have knowledge and capabilities required for practice in theirfield that would go far beyond expectations for a non-major. These aspects are directly related tothe curriculum in any degree program. Aspects related to broader questions and concerns, suchas the impact of technology on society, are not closely linked to the traditional elements of thecurriculum. These aspects of technological literacy are, however, at least as important to ourgraduates as they mature and move into positions of leadership as they are to non-majors.Accreditation Criteria – Program OutcomesThe need to prepare
component that takes the theory of the classroom into “real” life. Not evenwell-crafted case studies can bring such reality-based complexities for student (andinstructor) consideration.UW’s General EPICS Program EPICS at the UW provides engineering and design deliverables in acommunity/client-based atmosphere. Based in the College of Engineering, EPICS placesteams of undergraduate and graduate engineering students, as well as students fromacross campus, into a partnership with local community service agencies. Through thisinteraction, teams design and develop long-term engineering projects that meet identifiedagency needs. EPICS has proven to be an asset beyond the classroom or design project level(more on that later). At the college
Engineering department.Dr. Matthew K Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He obtained his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech and worked at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center on bridge research. He is currently The Jackson-Hope Professor of Civil Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). He teaches engineering mechanics and structural engineering courses and enjoys working with the students on bridge related research projects and the ASCE student chapter. ©American Society for
Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Ms. Katherine SchmotzerAna Paula Valenca, Purdue EPICS Page 26.996.1 c American Society for
. Phillips, Oklahoma State University JOHN PHILLIPS, a registered engineer and Professor of Architectural Engineering, practiced as a structural engineer for nine years before returning to his alma mater to teach. He teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in building structures and architectural design. He is currently acting as the Interim Head of the School of Architecture for Oklahoma State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Benchmarking Architectural Engineering Capstones Part 3: Exploring Technical Studies and IntegrationAbstract Architectural Engineering (AE) programs are poised to be leaders in educating future engineers
alsoprovides students with a free Online Writing Lab (OWL). OWL’s easily accessible andorganized content went live on the College’s website in December 2011 and is expected to be aninvaluable resource for students needing assistance with anything from basic grammar tocomplex research projects. Excelsior College Library is another free resource designed to helpstudents with research and study needs. Besides having access to the Library’s collections,students have dedicated librarians to help them identify, use, and evaluate information resources. Although not a free resource, Excelsior College offers Practice Exams as a useful tool forthose students that intend to “test-out” of certain degree requirements instead of taking a course.Preparing