agricultural and biological engineering at MSU. James is also the Adjunct Director for training and instruction in the professional services department at ABET. In this role, Warnock oversees the development, planning, production and implementation of the ABET Program Assessment Workshops, IDEAL and the assessment webinar series. He also directs activities related to the workshop facilitator training and professional development. Page 26.1274.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Promoting Engineering Identity through a Pre-Semester
,implement, and communicate solutions to their problems. This synthesis of skills is a criticallearning outcome of the capstone course, as it provides students with an understanding of thework they will be doing when they graduate.There are a variety resources that describe the topics covered and desired outcomes of capstonedesign courses. Surveys of capstone instructors 1-3 show that instructors teach a wide range ofsubjects, including oral communications, teamwork, project planning, and ethics, among manyother aspects of engineering design. Moreover, the Engineering Profile 4, developed using datafrom both industry practitioners and design faculty, highlights the importance of bothprofessional and technical skills, describing engineering roles
engineering or technology. A National Association for Researchand Teaching article provides an overview of engineering education to date, and the stepsnecessary for successful integration of engineering in the new NGSS. 2 They suggest a need formore training and new instructional resources to provide opportunities to engage students inSTEM learning; however they caution that “effective, equitable, and accessible teaching andlearning” require “careful planning and implementation”.There have been several nation-wide engineering curriculum program (Engineering isElementary (EiE), Project Lead the Way (PLTW), Lego Engineering, etc.) as well as university-led initiatives in local schools3,4,5 which have brought engineering to K-12 students
? a. What science content do they integrate into engineering units? b. What adaptations do they make to the engineering curricula? c. What factors influence teachers’ choices for making these adaptations? Methods This exploratory case study examined the ways in which teachers implementedan engineering curriculum in their classroom. The study occurred in a large, urbanschool district in the beginning stages of a STEM initiative with future plans to open amiddle-level STEAM Academy (STEM + Art). The initial step in this vision was theadoption and piloting of new science (Science and Technology Concepts [STC] and FullOption Science System [FOSS]) and engineering
opportunities. 2. Organize, plan, and manage a long term engineering project within a team environment. 3. Identify and communicate the value of a design in terms of economic, professional, personal, and societal value. 4. Translate customer feedback into design specifications. 5. Utilize a systematic design process in order to bring a project to fruition. 6. Identify and utilize technical tools and skills needed to create a viable design solution. 7. Account for cost, value, and market implications at all stages of development. 8. Communicate design status and results to all stakeholders in verbal, written, and public presentation formats at appropriate points in the development timeline.Once these learning objectives were
in engineering. She has developed and taught a wide variety of engineering courses in First Year Engineering and Mechanical En- gineering at Ohio State. She has received four teaching awards in the last three years at both the College and the Departmental level at OSU.Suzanne Grassel Shoger, The Ohio State University Suzanne Shoger, M.A., is a Ph.D. student in Higher Education and Student Affairs at The Ohio State University. Her areas of expertise include strategic planning, gender equity and women’s leadership development, and social justice education. Her research focus is centered on gender equity among under- graduate and graduate engineering students, specifically related to ways men as a majority population
which was established at the University of Oregon. The program is designed to help communities advance long- term community development goals by leveraging university scholarship and community collaboration towards sustainable, equitable, research-based planning solutions. In 2014 UT adopted the SCI as the feature program for their new Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP), Experience Learning. The Office of Service-Learning is now preparing for expansion as the QEP moves into implementation. Mrs. Ellenburg is also the founder and chair of the University’s Service-Learning Steering Committee, composed of des- ignated faculty from each academic college working to build the profile and capacity of service-learning across
Excellence in STEM at The University ofTexas Pan-AM as part of a grant funded by the US department of Defense. The 2-day workshopaimed at presenting hands-on experience on designing effective instruction. The first part of theworkshop emphasized the 5-stage/task backwards design (modified framework from Wiggins &McTighe, Understanding by Design,1999) used to guide the content modules for the courses thatwill use the CBI modules [6] . The model is shown in Figure 1. We were asked to keep in mindthe following general objectives to emulate as we went through the 5-tasks planning stage: Promote conducting fundamental research on learning and instruction research issues and opportunities related to designing learning environments that
Technology. Besides her responsibilities in developing strategic partnerships that support the mission of the School of Engineering and Computing Sciences, Panero serves as a resource to faculty and students on economics and market plans, including student design projects and special topics courses; developing strategic partnerships with industry and promoting partnerships for applied research c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15313 and joint industry and academic projects. Panero received her Ph.D. in economics from the New School for Social Research with a concentration in
education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sustainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. She is currently engaged in course development and instruction for the junior design sequence (ENGR 331 and 332) and the freshman design experience, along with coordinating junior capstone at JMU. In addition to the Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University.Dr. Justin J. Henriques, James Madison UniversityDr. Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University Dr. Kyle Gipson is an Assistant Professor at James Madison University (United States) in
Engineering Education, 2016 Comparison of Two Project-Based Learning Experiences in Panama City, PanamaAbstractIn 1970, Worcester Polytechnic Institute adopted The WPI Plan, a project-based educationalphilosophy that requires students to complete three research projects during their undergraduatecareers, each the equivalent of a full term’s worth of work. Almost immediately, this curriculumevolved to incorporate off-campus project opportunities, with the first off-campus Project Centerestablished in 1974. This paper compares two groups of undergraduates that recently carried outNSF-funded research at the Panama City, Panama, Project Center in order to fulfill one of theirproject requirements. The first group was
removing unknowns through research, I was able to move down to a direct and effective question.”3.2 Course Outcomes: Student Preparation for the Summer Research ExperienceDuring the first week of the summer research program, the five recipients participated in a groupinterview with an external evaluator. The purpose was to discuss their perceptions of theresearch course and their proposed work plans for the summer. This section summarizes thestudent responses.In describing the course, the first item mentioned was a process of defining the meaning ofresearch, and, over several weeks, refining their definition. One student said, As a class, we decided on what a 20-word definition of what research was the first day, and then at two
probabilities given that all the concepts are known to ensure logicalrelationships. Future work is planned to further constrain the parameter optimization.Numerical Results from Pilot StudyThe data collected from 37 students over three sequential quizzes has been used to inform thedevelopment of Bayesian networks for knowledge tracking. Each student will have his/her ownindividual model. At the beginning of the class, prior to any testing the probabilities will besimilar across models. However, once the testing begins these probabilities will be quitedissimilar from student to student, which in essence will provide a knowledge profile for eachindividual student. Three quizzes have been given during this study. The first quiz contains twoquestions
direction based on the number of pixels ineither the x or the y direction. Figure 8: Aircraft-Target Position VectorD. UAV Collision and Obstacle Avoidance SystemIn order to utilize the full potential of UAVs, they must be integrated into the National AirspaceSystem (NAS). This requires that the UAVs must be capable of sensing and avoiding obstaclesor other aircraft in their flight path12,13.The collision avoidance system must be able to detect obstacles or other aircraft well ahead ofcollision, perform collision avoidance maneuver, and plan an alternate path for the continuationof the mission. For obstacle detection, sensors such as ADS-B transponders, laser scanners,camera, and sonars are being used3,4,5. The students
utilitarian goals supportingcareer development and professionalism to more holistic goals of citizenship and broadliberal education. The goal of this work is to support ongoing conversations in highereducation about integrative and interdisciplinary education efforts by providing a sharedlanguage and classification system for understanding these efforts.Higher education wrestles with the balance of what Kwame Appiah has called its“utopian” and the “utilitarian” instincts: the “utopian” motivation to educate citizensbroadly, regardless of their future plans; and the “utilitarian” goal of burnishing theircredentials for the job market. Stewart-Gambino and Rossmann (2015), surveyingevidence of the effectiveness of integration efforts both historically
manufacturing equipment to safeguard the machine operator from moving robotic equipment traveling at above‐head level. The company provided the project specs. The students set to design and simulate cages design using SolidWorks CAD/CAM software. Students, the faculty advisor, and the graduate student visited the company during the project execution and had regular contact with the company advisor, during the semester, to seek feedback and test their designs. By the end of the project, the students were able to successfully design new cages to meet the company requirements. This paper describes the project in more detail, how team members worked together, the company’s feedback, guidance to students, and the company’s plans to implement the final
checks; helps toschedule and staff the build sessions; and plans and runs the capstone events. Makers receive anhonorarium, project materials, a capstone event budget, and a small travel stipend. Theseexpenses are partially funded by a small grant from the Parents Council and other donors.The first MIR was an amateur astronomer who led students in the fabrication of a telescope.Using this telescope, more than 500 students and community members have been able to viewthe moon, planets and stars during the capstone event as well as other events both off campusand at the planetarium on campus. The second MIR was a local engineering professional who ledworkshops in the fabrication of Arduino-based musical circuits. Students played their
positions. Project teams that moved forward were presented Figure 1. Our interdisciplinary approach with the opportunity to participate in a semester- long course designed to support them as theyworked through the iterations necessary to create a plan for market readiness and a full proposalapplication for funding consideration. Although participation in the course was not required inorder to submit a full proposal application, it was “strongly recommended,” and 95% of applicantschose to participate in the course. Applicant teams were given the option of having existingstudents working on their
multi-disciplinary teamsME graduates: 1. Participates fully in team, respects team members' opinions, resolves conflicts (if any) 2. Demonstrate team leadership by taking responsibility for various tasks, motivating others to reach project goals 3. Communicate ideas in ways that teammates can understandThe teamwork outcome was recently revised by ABET to be Outcome 5: “an ability to functioneffectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative andinclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.” This change will requiresome minor revisions to the performance criteria and rubrics, but the general conclusions aboutthe assessment improvement process remain the same.The peer
withclear specialization statements on students’ transcripts too. The backbone of the curriculumupdate was the replacement of the Electrical Systems Technology concentration area with fournew concentration areas, which are specific to the specialization fields: CommunicationsSystems Technology concentration area, Embedded Systems Technology concentration area,Mechatronics Engineering Technology concentration area, and Power Systems Technologyconcentration area. To support the five concentration areas in the new curriculum, a couple of theexisting courses are revised, and a few new courses are introduced. For each concentration area,4 years study plans were developed to clearly outline the course pathways. While the largemajority of courses are
froman asychronistic reading and writing assignment to an interactive, experiential-learning activity.The challenges related to collaborating across departments and associated with measuringstudent learning will be discussed as well as planned future work in this collaboration.Introduction Two faculty from different departments, science and humanities, realized that throughoutboth of their very different courses, was the common theme of the societal impacts of newtechnologies. The courses were both engineering electives, one a science fiction course and theother a course on nanotechnology. Initial discussions uncovered another area of commonality.The nanotechnology course required students to read a science fiction novel on
and technology and that try to foster the interest of the younger generation in STEM fields.Ms. Jennifer Arreola, University of Texas, El Paso Jennifer Arreola is pursuing a Bachelors in Engineering Leadership with a concentration in Environmental Engineering. She plans on working for the protection of human health and ecosystem. She believes that as an engineer the ability to understand not only the problem but other issues such as political, business and social are necessary to approach this new generation.Ms. Andrea Annette Duenez Andrea A. Duenez is a senior at the University of Texas at El Paso majoring in Engineering Leadership with a focus in Electrical Engineering. Andrea plans to graduate in December of
Peer Project Management for Capstone Design TeamsAbstractThe mechanical and mechatronic engineering programs at California State University Chicoconclude with a robust, externally funded, two-semester capstone design experience. Students inboth majors work in interdisciplinary teams on year-long design projects sponsored by industrialpartners. Project teams are assigned a faculty advisor whose role [1] is multi-faceted, but doesnot include day-to-day project management or responsibility for project success.Design projects in industry typically have an assigned project manager (PM) with responsibilityfor overall project success as well as a lead role in initiating, planning, executing, monitoring,and controlling the project
also be used for the purpose. We plan organizing narration of life stories ofsuccessful and not successful entrepreneurs, which could be through in-person interactions, overvideo calls, or through audio visual recordings. This could also take care of the motivation ofprospective student entrepreneurs.Facilitating idea selection Once students develop proper understanding of entrepreneurship and commit to followthat path, we need to help them select proper ideas. We need to make them aware of thenecessity of first choosing a challenge domain and then developing a technological solution for aproblem in that domain, and not the other way around. Towards that, we need to organizebrainstorming sessions on challenges in different domains to
experience was as expected, impacted their career plans, and impactedtheir ability to further their educational goals. Over sixty percent presented their research results.Students self image and employment plans are presented in Figure 6. Half of the students indicated thatthe experience changed how they envisioned themselves as scientists. Seventy-five percent indicatedplans to seek employment in industry prior to the summer experience, while only twenty-five percentremained with those plans after the summer experience. Responses moved to going to graduate school,other plans, and unsure. Figure 7 shows fifty percent of respondents indicated a 5 out of 5 overall ratingof the experience with nearly 40 percent of respondents indicating a 4 out of 5
1993/94 academic year saw the creation of seven outcomes specific to the academic missionof USAFA and an initial plan for assessment of these outcomes. Over the next several years asthe institution wrestled with the proper assessment of these seven outcomes two concerns arose.First, the academic arm of the institution did not create, or maintain an integrated assessmentplan with centralized control and avenues for full-circle feedback. Second, no position at theinstitution was wholly responsible for creation and coordination of assessment efforts.The assessment issues identified above led to the creation of a Director of Academic Assessmentposition in the summer 2000 and eventually to the development of a 10-year plan titled “Plan toAssess the
at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Kyle’s primary teaching duties include courses in geotechnical engineering and construction materials. His research interests include behavior and monitoring of in-place foundations and retaining structures. In addition to his teaching and research duties, Kyle is involved in geotechnical consulting and Engineers Without Borders.Dr. Matthew D. Lovell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Matthew Lovell is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and he currently serves as the Interim Senior Director of Institutional Research, Plan- ning, and Assessment office. He is also serving as the director of the Making Academic
. Jacob has focus on autonomous robotics spending time researching and competing in robotics. He plans on graduating in 2020 Jacob is currently the chair of the Autonomous Robotics Club (ARC). ARC annually compete in au- tonomous robotics competitions in the US. ARC also has focuses on educational robotics and volunteers or host events geared towards teaching robotics to grade schoolers. Please email janovosa@gmail.com to contact me.Mr. Huan Phan-Van, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Huan Phan-Van received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, in 2013. He is currently a graduate student in Me- chanical Engineering
. Pereira et al. [6] integrated UAVs and photogrammetry into a buildinginformation modeling (BIM) course, part of a construction engineering program, where studentspiloted UAVs and used photos to create three dimensional models of objects located indoors.Autodesk software was used in that project: Recap was used to generate the point cloud that wasthen imported into Revit [6]. Sharma and Hulsey [7] used a UAV for aerial photogrammetry asan exploratory task to investigate its potential in the university setting although it did not appearthat they were integrating UAVs into teaching. Other faculty reported plans to use UAVs formapping in a Construction Surveying course as part of a Civil and Construction EngineeringTechnology program [8]. Opfer and
analysis of the initial design and all subsequent designswith the manufacturing processes planned to create them.Problem Statement of the projectStudents were expected to develop a problem statement of their challenge to solve, and below is theproblem statement developed by our students for PSBIS.Based on recent studies, , a company is expected to spend about $1.4 million, on average, if an employeedies on the job [1], on top of the lowered morale, inefficiencies created by an inexperienced replacement orthe emotions experienced by the family all of which vary from case to case and are extremely difficult toprepare for. In 2016, 5,190 workers were killed on the job, of that 9.4% where struck by objects and 7.3%were caught in/between objects [2