are space systems, robust fault tolerant control, nonlinear control, adaptive control, small spacecraft design, high performance spacecraft components, mechatronics, real-time health monitoring, and diagnostic methodology.Dr. Michael A. Swartwout, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng. Dr. Swartwout is co-director of the Space Systems Research Laboratory. His research and teaching interests focus on systems engineering and design. Page 26.1454.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Systems Engineering Entrepreneurship Modules across Aerospace
Paper ID #30254Employment of Active Learning Pedagogy Throughout a Makerspace-Based,First-Year Introduction to Engineering CourseMr. Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville Nicholas Hawkins is a Graduate Teaching Assistance in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at the University of Louisville. A PhD student in Electrical and Computer Engineering, he received both his B.S. and M. Eng. from the University of Louisville in the same field. His research interests include power electronics and controls, as well as engineering education for first-year students.Dr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis
EPICS.Mrs. Pamela Dexter, Purdue University, West Lafayette Pamela Dexter graduated from Purdue University with a bachelor’s of arts degree in education and worked as the Gifted & Talented Program Coordinator and teacher for a local school corporation. Dexter was also the Director of Marketing and Resource Development for Lafayette Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc., before joining Purdue University’s EPICS (Engineering Projects in Community Service) program. Dexter has been the EPICS High School Program Coordinator since inception of the program in 2006. Dexter is dedicated to the national dissemination of engineering service-learning design education in schools across the U.S. and abroad. These efforts blend the
assessment; evidence- based teaching practices and curricular innovations applied to misconceptions; and engineering education policy. His research explores the nature of global competency development by assessing how interna- tional experiences improve the global perspectives of engineering students. His dissertation investigates how best to design and operationalize effective global programming strategies within engineering curric- ula.Dr. Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California Gisele Ragusa is a Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Southern California. She conducts research on college transitions and retention of underrepresented students in engineering and also research about
howcommuters use the financial assistance that they receive and its impact on the progress they maketowards completing their degrees; (c) identifying the support practices and interventions thatenhance the academic success of commuter students from among the many that are provided byuniversities and colleges; and (d) identifying the challenges that commuters face with jugglingresponsibilities and obligations from home, work, and school.Rationale and Approach of the ProjectThe objectives of this project are to (a) increase graduation rates of the STEM cohorts; (b) buildthe foundation for a sustainable institutional structure and support STEM scholars and otherstudents; (c) carry out research designed to advance understanding of the factors, practices
medicalnanotechnology device for disease detection and complete a microfluidics lab on a chipexperiment. Students read journal articles and used newfound knowledge from these articles toinform their designs throughout the project. Much like the robot design/build project, thestakeholder needs and tasks for the alternative were well-defined. The research-based project forthe 2022-2023 academic year was redesigned to be more open ended and to expand the themesof the course. Specifically, it asked students to identify an opportunity and problem within thethemes of either medical nanotechnology or sustainability. The course still focused on researchand reading journal articles but also expanded assignments to consider value creation, needs, andthe impact of their
characteristics of effective PD identified in the literature include:(i) sufficient duration; (ii) focus on subject matter; (iii) hands-on activities; (iv) attention toproblems of practice; and (v) institutional support for implementation. It is further suggested thatteacher learning is best promoted by a set of complementary approaches, such as summer PD andonline discussions as follow up [24].Traditionally, the focus of teacher PD programs has been on preparing teachers to follow, ratherthan to create or adapt, innovative, research-based curriculum materials [25]. However, whenteachers do not understand the underlying model of the expert-designed curricula provided tothem, they tend to pick and choose elements of the new curriculum to fit their
will bring new excitement toeducation by introducing reconfigurable electronics with a new world of possibilities for studentprojects, such as robot competitions, video game design, embedded systems and more. Finally,the project will develop industry, K-12 and university partnerships to facilitate pathways tocareers in the exciting field of reconfigurable electronics for first-generation, minority and otherunder-served populations, including veterans. In summary, this project will provide the trainingand educational resources and promote best practices for community college, university, andhigh school instructors to enable them to teach new hardware technologies to a broad range ofstudents, including those who have not previously had access to
diverse, interdisciplinary teams [26]–[29] and as part of theleader-mentor-learner triad [30]–[32]. As with all EF training, these leadership skills will bepresented using a variety of role-playing and discussion exercises to allow participants toimmediately practice new skills in the context of engineering research and practice.In addition to the materials being developed by Tau Beta Pi and Michigan State Universitythrough the NSF-funded project, the EF facilitators are lending their professional expertise to thedevelopment of additional curriculum modules. For example, a module on Design Thinking isbeing developed based on work done at The Pennsylvania State University. The development ofthis module responds to the recent growth in popularity
Course, University of Dayton, Fall2016.Swart, A.J., “Does it matter which comes first in a curriculum for engineering students—Theoryor practice?,” Int. J. Elect. Eng. Educ., vol. 47, pp. 189–199, 2010.Swart, A.J., “Theory versus practical in a curriculum for engineering students—A case study,”presented at the AFRICON, Nairobi, Kenya, 2009.The VARK modalities. http://vark-learn.com/introduction-to-vark/the-vark-modalities, 2017.The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF), 26. Business Scenarios,http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/ 2011.Yin, R.K., Case study Research—Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2009.
begin to paint a morecomprehensive picture of obstacles to retention. Do these same factors vary byinstitutional type?To more fully understand the institutional context for discouraging and encouraging Page 14.23.2factors for SME retention, Seymour and Hewitt designed a multi-institutionalethnographic study of three private and four public universities in four differentgeographical areas.10 Institutions were selected on the basis of their private or publicfunding, their mission, the level of prestige accorded their research activities, and the sizeand composition of their graduate and undergraduate populations with a concentration oninstitutions
happen. Individual departments in science, mathematics, and social science will retain ownership of their respective courses, as it is most important for students to hear and work with professors from these diverse fields. Problems of the 21st-century will best be solved by multidisciplinary teams with different points of view and approaches, all contributing to the optimal solution. • A set of modules of instruction, in electronic, interactive form, for both self-study and in- class use, will be developed in key skill areas essential for the practice of engineering: problem solving and design, technical communication, professional development, measurement systems, and computing, all with a balance between theory and
basic premisebehind this project area is that students will quickly forget long tedious lists of boring lab safetyrules, however anyone who has ever experienced a real laboratory accident will remember thatexperience ( and hopefully learn from it ) for a much longer time. Simulated accidents areobviously not as memorable as true experiences, however they should still be more memorableand have a more long-lasting impact than simple written rules.Part of the research goal for this project area was to experiment with different developmentplatforms, in order to determine how to best implement educational virtual reality. It was alsodesired to address lab safety issues that were common across a broad spectrum of laboratoryenvironments, and not
interest inengineering. Not only do makerspaces offer chances for young students to engage in engineeringendeavors in creative ways, but makerspaces have shown great potential in addressing broadergoals of education, such as the augmentation of first-year engineering student retention. Much ofthe research on makerspace impacts and practices have focused on K-12 and informal education.Little is known about how a well-designed, makerspace-based engineering course can addressbarriers to first-year students’ persistence in engineering, such as the interest in engineering barrierfocused on in this paper.Research also suggest that the makerspace movement provides a beneficial opportunity forstudent development of interests and identity. The structure of
usingengineering courses to address the soft skills lifelong learning, communication, professional andethical obligations, and the global impact of engineering. Page 22.259.2Lifelong Learning OutcomeThe fast pace of advancement in science and technology makes it vital for all professionals tostay up-to-date with contemporary advances and innovations in various fields of technology. Themultidisciplinary nature of engineering practice puts engineers at the forefront of meeting thispressing demand. At some point in their practice, engineers will need to solve a problem ordesign a component that requires research, learning new software, knowledge of
Civil EngineeringDr. Jennifer Harper Ogle, Clemson University Dr. Jennifer Ogle is a Professor in the Glenn Department of Civil Engineering at Clemson University, and a 2005 graduate of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Georgia Tech. Her research portfolio focuses on transportation infrastructure design, safety, accessibility, and management. She is currently the facilitator for the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Depart- ments (RED) grant at Clemson, and is leading three transformation efforts related to culture, curriculum, and community to achieve adaptability, innovation, and shared vision. Alongside her research, Dr. Ogle has been active in the development of engaged
readiness levels of students in learningenvironments by integrating best practices that can address these issues in the context of SEcourse work.We create a clear case for change within the SE education pedagogy, and a research method toachieve the objective is outlined. The SE course curricula, current standards, and intendedlearning outcomes are examined which enables us to outline the changes required.Recommendations and suggested methods to help close the gaps are outlined.IntroductionMany industrial and academic oriented studies have examined software developmentperformance over the last 30 years. Theoretic and practice oriented experts recognize that severalreasons exist for the sub-optimal performance. While much of the failure can be
within the schema of practical procedural problems as knowledgeencapsulation. The application in a capstone class is to provide the student with repeatedpractical problems to encourage expertise development in the realm of practical engineeringproblems. It should be pointed out that the relationship between PBL and knowledgeencapsulation is an untested hypothesis based on previous research, but remains encouraging.Table 1. ABET 2004-2005 Program Outcomes6 identified by the department as primary outcomes of the capstone classes. ABET Description of Criteria: Designation The 21st century civil engineer must demonstrate: an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science
successful teaching strategy.It can be used in a virtual environment or regular college classroom settings. Active learningteaching approaches have been found to improve student learning, raise retention rates, and closethe achievement gap between various student populations in college science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses [4]. Beyond the subject of electrical engineering,active learning pedagogies have been applied extensively in industrial engineering [5-7].For STEM students, in particular, who learn best in courses with hands-on laboratories, aneffective online instructional practice uses a variety of active learning pedagogies as shown inFigure 1. There is a considerable level of discontent with online engineering
design. In American Societyfor Engineering Education, vol. 26, p1.9. Galaleldin, M., Bouchard, F., Anis, H. and Lague, C. 2016. The impact of makerspaces onengineering education. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association(CEEA).10. Local Tools. Start sharing: The easy way to manage a lending library. Accessed January 24,2019. http://localtools.org/ 11. U.S. News & World Report. 2018. Best engineering schools. Accessed January 24, 2019.https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/eng-rankings?_mode=table)12. University of Florida, George A Smathers Libraries. Technology @ Marston ScienceLibrary: Tool Library. Accessed January 24, 2019. http
with end-to-endinstruction on the analysis and design steps generally followed in the development of an electricdrive system. An electric drive system includes generation, power electronic drive or powerprocessing unit (PPU), motor, and load components. By end-to-end instruction we mean teachthe student to design an electric drive system, with appropriate understanding of the role thatgeneration and end-use (motor plus load) affects the design of the PPU.This objective correlates well with Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET), Accrediting Engineering Programs, criterion 3 (Program Outcomes and Assessment),item (c), which states “Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have anability to design a system
-tutoring, have been identified as high impact activities that improve studentretention and success. This paper describes a successful internship program that has been inplace for several years at Penn State Harrisburg. Survey results show that the program is helpingstudents increase their abilities to succeed after graduation.I. IntroductionScience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education is crucial to innovation,progress, and national competitiveness. A major concern, however, is that success rates in U.S.colleges and universities are still low. The National first- to second-year retention rate in 4-yearpublic institutions averages 65.6% and the mean for the National 5-year graduation rate of 4-yearpublic institutions is 37.9
Undergraduate Teaching Fellowsor through Terrascope-administered research projects.In this paper, we describe the structure and evolution of the program over the past four years,outcomes for students, and lessons we have learned in designing and implementing the program.IntroductionThe MIT Earth System Initiative (ESI) is a multidepartmental organization that encourages andfacilitates research and education within MIT on environmental and Earth-system science and Page 11.1245.2engineering (see http://web.mit.edu/esi for details). It is directed jointly by representatives of theDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Department of
SJ concerns [3], we work with more technocratically oriented STEM majors. For thisreason, we decided to start our research by inquiring into perceptions that students have aboutcontextualized and decontextualized problems (Con/Decon), and what resources they would useto try to write contexts, in order to understand how we might successfully coach them to come upwith context on their own.Evidence suggests that the invisibility of SJ concerns in engineering curricula factors into a“culture of disengagement” [2], [5], [7]. This scholarship posits that the divide between technicalknowledge and social concerns in engineering curricula impacts undergraduate engineeringmajor retention -- since students who are more driven by social/humanitarian
funding organizations are also moving toward a greaterconsideration of the future impact of research activity forcing those in the academy to promotetheir work in a broader and more application driven light. The careers of engineers often grow toincorporate managerial and strategic responsibilities which are almost impossible without anability to consider business and legal issues and to communicate effectively to many differentaudiences. 1, 2, 3, 4 And, as Meier et al., suggest even those who remain squarely within atechnical arena, “are being asked to take responsibility for the overall system.”5 One subject thatneatly encompasses the concepts of innovation (implying new markets and new products),opportunities, creating networks, management
differences in such factors as climate, natural resources, and economic conditions. Thus, technology use varies from region to region and over time (MS-ETS1-1). ● New technologies can have deep impacts on society and the environment, including some that were not anticipated. Analysis of costs and benefits is a critical aspect of decisions about technology (HS-ETS1-1 and 1-3).Yet, helping youth understand the complexities of sociotechnical issues in engineering is nosmall feat, and teachers and researchers alike struggle to support students’ understanding of themultiple and multi-faceted factors involved in implementing engineered solutions to address ahuman need or desire. Nonetheless, failing to do so at best limits students
funded projects led by five differentprofessors. I had learned how to do qualitative research by practicing it and by being exposed tomany different professors who did this work. While the tools for experimental research tend tobe external to the individual researcher, qualitative research depends on the researcher as analystto make decisions based on decades of reading and experience. I was unsure how to condenseseveral years of situated learning into a digestible nugget. This problem was compounded by mydiscomfort performing “sage on the stage” knowledge-transfer type teaching.I tried my best and ended up leading a seminar on paradigms, focusing on positivism, socialconstructivism, and critical theory [25]. I created a chart to help my
learning works best for them. Whenpresented with a problem, they are equipped to quickly identify which style of learning andtechnique(s) best apply to the situation enabling them to address problems in a timelier manner.While metacognition and SDL skills sets can be applied to familiar problems, they also providevalue in approaching unfamiliar problems. IRE alumni consistently reported earning confidencefrom peers and supervisors through a versatile ability of routinely solving unfamiliar problemsmaking the alumni valuable workplace assets.Future Directions and SignificanceWe have identified three areas of research we intend to pursue. First, we will continue totriangulate the think-aloud data with students’ self-report interview data but on an
casesand problems by integrating heterogeneous knowledge bases and knowledge making practices”[2]. These heterogeneous knowledge bases and practices may include both different engineeringand science disciplines as well as non-technical disciplines that illuminate the economic, social,and cultural dimensions of a given problem. Such a well-rounded perspective has long been highon the list of desirable attributes sought in future engineering graduates [3]. For example,ABET’s accreditation requirement that students be able to solve complex engineering problemsincludes solving problems with “many components or sub-problems, involving multipledisciplines, or having significant consequences in a range of contexts” [4].In this work-in-progress paper, we
Engineering and Management from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Her educational research interests are focused on improving construction management education.Dr. Ross A. Perkins, Boise State University Dr. Perkins is an associate professor in the Department of Educational Technology at Boise State Uni- versity, where he also serves as the coordinator of the department’s Ed.D. program. His research inter- ests include the diffusion and adoption of technologies and innovations for education, mobile learning, instructional design for distance education in STEM and other disciplines, and ICT integration in devel- oping nations. He is the Co-PI on two grants funded by the National Science Foundation